Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6.7 Strategy Workshops
6.7 Strategy Workshops
7: Strategy workshops
This publication forms part of the Open University course BB835 The dynamics
of strategy. Details of this and other Open University courses can be obtained from
the Student Registration and Enquiry Service, The Open University, PO Box 197,
Milton Keynes MK7 6BJ, United Kingdom (tel. +44 (0)845 300 60 90; email general-
enquiries@open.ac.uk).
Alternatively, you may visit the Open University website at www.open.ac.uk where
you can learn more about the wide range of courses and packs offered at all levels by
The Open University.
In using electronic course materials and their contents you agree that your use will be
solely for the purposes of following an Open University course of study or otherwise
as licensed by The Open University or its assigns.
Open University course materials may also be made available in electronic formats
for use by students of the University. All rights, including copyright and related rights
and database rights, in electronic course materials and their contents are owned by or
licensed to The Open University, or otherwise used by The Open University as
permitted by applicable law.
In using electronic course materials and their contents you agree that your use will be
solely for the purposes of following an Open University course of study or otherwise
as licensed by The Open University or its assigns.
The paper used in this publication is procured from forests independently certified to
the level of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) principles and criteria. Chain of
custody certification allows the tracing of this paper back to specific forest-
management units (see www.fsc.org).
WEB046599
2.1
Contents
Introduction
Research on strategy workshops
Research method
Workshop process and activities
Workshop outcomes
Summary and conclusions of the research
Activity 7.1
Summary
Conclusion
Glossary
References
Introduction
Previous: 6.6: Strategists.
This section is perhaps the most micro of all the perspectives through which we
investigate how strategy happens in organisations, as we now consider the preparation
that goes into strategy workshops, who leads them, their duration and what tools are
used. We take a look inside strategy workshops at who is involved, what happens and
how they are accomplished. You should remember that, although strategy workshops
are micro in nature, they are linked to the broader, macro structural configurations
discussed earlier in the unit. For example, it seems reasonable to speculate that the
type and use of strategy workshops will be influenced by the kind of organisation
configuration we looked at in the beginning of this unit. As organisations realise that
strategy knowledge and capability is not only restricted to senior managers,
workshops are likely to become more utilised, more important and more relevant for
our study.
The authors of the AIM report are the academics Gerard P. Hodgkinson, Gerry
Johnson, Richard Whittington and Mirela Schwartz (Hodgkinson et al., 2005). They
are also the authors of the academic paper in LRP (Hodgkinson et al., 2006) In fact,
the research that the report is based on is also used as the source of the academic
Research method
The authors, in conjunction with AIM, used a survey method to send a questionnaire
to 8,000 AIM members in the UK, drawn from all management levels, sectors and
sizes of organisation:
Key findings
The researchers wanted to know how frequently workshops were held:
44.8 per cent reported that workshops were held in their organisations
at least once a year.
15.4 per cent said that workshops occurred once every two years.
14.7 per cent reported occasional use of workshops (once every three
to four years).
22.7 per cent stated that strategy workshops never occurred in their
organisations.
Purposes of workshops
The purposes that participants identified for holding strategy workshops were many
and varied. Approximately two-thirds of the sample indicated that workshops are part
of their organisation’s regular strategy development processes. Other reasons given
included team building and changes to organisational structure. The authors noted that
very few workshops seem to be crisis driven, the overwhelming majority being
triggered by developmental needs.
The majority of the workshops (61.1 per cent) were led by senior directors (including
the chairperson or CEO). Relatively few were led by other internal members of staff
or external consultants.
The stakeholder groups involved in the strategy workshops were identified as follows:
%
Se 76.3
ni
or
m
an
ag
e
m
en
t
Ex 50.8
ec
uti
ve
dir
ect
or
s
Mi 44.4
dd
le
m
an
ag
e
m
en
t
%
S 62.0
W
O
T
an
al
ysi
s
St 30.0
ak
eh
ol
de
r
an
al
ysi
s
Sc 28.5
en
ari
o
pl
an
ni
ng
M 22.6
ar
ke
t
se
g
m
en
tat
io
n
Co 21.5
m
pe
te
nc
Workshop outcomes
A majority of respondents agree (60.4 per cent) or strongly agree (10.2 per cent) that
the strategy workshop they last attended achieved its objectives. However, a
significant number disagree (8.5 per cent) or strongly disagree (1.5 per cent). In terms
of impact on the organisation their findings indicate that:
Reading the academic paper drawn from the research, you may get a different
perspective on the findings, because one of its intended audiences – academics – will
be expecting a more critically informed analysis. This is the subject of the next
activity.
Activity 7.1
Timing: Allow 1 hour for this activity.
Purpose: To understand what the strategy research says about strategy workshops.
Summary
In this session we have looked at strategy workshops. The data and information we
have drawn on relate to a study of strategy workshops in the UK, so it may be that in
other countries strategy workshops are accomplished differently, with different
aspects emphasised. The impression left from the report and academic paper is that
workshops, although reasonably common, are ill prepared for and under utilised. In
particular, it appears that an opportunity is being missed in that strategy analysis tools
do not seem to be widely used. A deeper level of strategic understanding is possible
through the use of the kind of tools you have been introduced to in this module. Based
on the evidence presented here, strategy workshops appear to be an under-used
strategy mechanism.
Conclusion
In this unit we have examined how organisations are able to make strategy happen.
This can involve implementing a pre-existing strategy, creating strategy in an
emergent way, or a combination of the two. We first examined how strategy and
structure are related, and identified the two dominant perspectives: that structure
follows strategy (Chandler’s view), or that strategy follows structure. We also looked
at the different structural forms, or configurations, that organisations adopt and their
associated advantages and disadvantages.
We maintained our macro perspective and next discussed how strategic control
systems may be used to influence how people and groups in organisations behave.
This is done so that strategies can be effectively implemented.
The notion of strategic drift was advanced as one means by which organisations
realise that change is necessary.
We then looked at strategists – who they are and what they do. The strategic activities
of senior and middle managers were analysed, and we identified how the traditional
roles assigned to them in the strategy literature are being updated. Drawing on a major
new conceptual paper, we then examined how senior managers and middle managers
may effectively interact to improve not only strategic decision quality but also
implementation quality.
Lastly, we adopted our most micro perspective to consider how strategy workshops
are used: who leads them, who attends them and what strategy tools are used.
By looking at how strategy is made to happen in this way, we have developed your
awareness of both the macro structures and the micro activities of strategists to form
an integrated and dynamic understanding of strategy and strategists in action.
We hope you have enjoyed studying Unit 6. When you are ready, please move on to
Unit 7: Thinking and acting strategically.
Glossary
Triangulate
Combining of more than one source; usually applied to data when interviews
and observation are combined, for example.
References
Hodgkinson, G.P., Whittington, R., Johnson, G. and Schwarz, M. (2006) ‘The role of
strategy workshops in strategy development processes: formality, communication, co-
ordination and inclusion’, Long Range Planning, vol.39, no. 5, pp. 479–96.
Raes, A.M., Heijltjes, M.G., Glunk, U. and Roe, R.A. (2011) ‘The interface of the top
management team and middle managers: a process model’, Academy of
Management Review, vol.36, no. 1, pp. 102–26.
It seems that, according to Hodgkinson et al.’s data (2006) , middle managers and
senior managers seldom interact when undertaking strategy development processes.
Middle manager involvement is restricted to implementation planning. The authors
advocate greater involvement of middle managers. This, of course, links in with the
section in Session 6.6 that looked at a model for senior and middle manager
interaction (Raes, et al., 2011). In a sense, Hodgkinson et al. (2006) call for this
involvement and Raes et al. (2011) provide a model for how it might be achieved; but,
as yet, there are few studies that actually examine how it has been done in the messy
worlds that strategists inhabit.
Back