Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Conversation, Criticism, Taste
Conversation, Criticism, Taste
“…talking too much; talking of oneself; being clever at all costs; dictating and presiding; pedantry (‘too
frequent and unseasonable obtruding our own knowledge in common discourse, and placing too great a value
upon it’); bad raillery; interrupting others impatiently; not bearing to be interrupted; rude familiarity; re-telling
the same story too often…”
“Therefore it seemeth to me that the truest way to understand conversation is to know the faults and errors to
which it is subject, and from thence every man to form maxims to himself whereby it may be regulated,
because it requireth few talents to which most men are not born, or at least may not acquire without any great
genius or study.”
“Reading, methinks, is but collecting the rough materials, amongst which a great deal must be laid aside as useless.
Meditation is, as it were, choosing and fitting the materials, framing the timber, squaring and laying the stones, and
raising the building. And discourse with a friend (for wrangling in a dispute is of little use) is, as it were, surveying the
structure, walking in the rooms, and observing the symmetry and agreement of the parts, taking notice of the solidity or
defects of the work, and the best way to find out and correct what is amiss.”
Central issues:
► The qualifications of a critic = (moral) portrait over rigid rules; or: the critical persona
► The education of taste
TASTE