Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lead Article
Vitamin E is essential for human health and may play a role in the prevention of
some degenerative diseases. Its bioavailability, however, is wide ranging and is
affected by numerous factors. Recent findings showing that the intestinal
absorption of vitamin E involves proteins have raised new relevant questions about
factors that can affect bioavailability. It is, therefore, opportune to present a current
overview of this topic. This review begins by exploring what is known, as well as what
is unknown, about the metabolization of vitamin E in the human upper
gastrointestinal tract and then presents a methodical evaluation of factors assumed
to affect vitamin E bioavailability. Three main conclusions can be drawn. First, the
proteins ABCA1, NPC1L1, and SR-BI are implicated in the absorption of vitamin E.
Second, the efficiency of vitamin E absorption is widely variable, though not
accurately known (i.e., between 10% and 79%), and is affected by several dietary
factors (e.g., food matrix, fat, and fat-soluble micronutrients). Finally, numerous
unanswered questions remain about the metabolization of vitamin E in the
intestinal lumen and about the factors affecting the efficiency of vitamin E
absorption.
© 2013 International Life Sciences Institute
Affiliations: P Borel and C Desmarchelier are with the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unité Mixte de
Recherche (UMR) 1062, Nutrition, Obesity and Risk of Thrombosis, Marseilles, France, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
(INRA), UMR1260, Marseilles, France, and the Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine, Marseilles, France. D Preveraud is with INSERM,
UMR1062, Nutrition, Obesity and Risk of Thrombosis, Marseilles, France, INRA, UMR1260, Marseilles, France, the Aix-Marseille Université,
Faculté de Médecine, Marseilles, France, and Adisseo France S.A.S., Centre of Expertise and Research in Nutrition, Commentry, France.
Correspondence: P Borel, UMR NORT 1260 INRA/1062 INSERM/Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine, 27 Boulevard Jean-Moulin,
13385 Marseilles Cedex 5, France. E-mail: Patrick.Borel@univ-amu.fr, Phone: +33-4-91-29-41-11, Fax: +33-4-91-78-21-01.
Key words: a-tocopherol, absorption, enterocyte, intestine, micelle
doi:10.1111/nure.12026
Nutrition Reviews® Vol. 71(6):319–331 319
and polyunsaturated fatty acids will increase the recom- lipase activity is not optimal (e.g., in neonates and in
mended dietary allowance of vitamin E and thus increase patients with pancreatic insufficiencies).
vitamin E deficiency.7 In the duodenum, digestive enzymes, i.e., proteases,
The potential benefit of vitamin E in several diseases amylases, and lipases, continue to release vitamin E from
has been studied extensively.8–14 Yet, surprisingly, neither food matrices. It is hypothesized that vitamin E not natu-
the fundamental mechanisms that govern the absorption rally incorporated in vegetable oils is transferred from
Foods
?
?
?
Enterocyte Micelles
Vesicles
?
Figure 1 Distribution and transfer of vitamin E between the different vehicles assumed to transport vitamin E in the
human intestinal lumen.
ferent lipid structures in the intestinal lumen during tion, with the highest concentrations in the ileum being
digestion. It can also be suggested that absorption mecha- those of NPC1L1 and ABCA1.34 Another significant vari-
nisms are affected by the structure with which vitamin E able that can modulate vitamin E absorption is the repar-
is associated: micelles may interact with proteins located tition of vitamin E transporters between the basolateral
in membranes, while vesicles might have a different trans- and apical membranes of the intestinal cell. This reparti-
port pathway. Thus, knowledge of the distribution of tion is different along the gut: SR-BI, which is involved in
vitamin E between the different vehicles allowing its solu- vitamin E absorption, is present mainly on the apical
bilization in the intestinal lumen is required to better membrane of the proximal intestine, but mainly on the
understand the mechanisms governing its absorption. basolateral surface of the distal intestine.35 Better knowl-
The main site of vitamin E absorption is assumed to edge of the localization of transporters implicated in
be in the mid-GI tract, although its precise localization in absorption of vitamin E, both along the gut and within
humans is still unknown. Indeed, the only data available the intestinal cell, would likely increase the current
were obtained using everted small bowel sacs in rats and knowledge of vitamin E absorption. Another hypothesis
mice. Hollander et al.31 found that the highest efficiency of explaining why the efficiency of vitamin E absorption is
vitamin E absorption in the rat took place in the medial not similar along the intestine is that the major sites of
portion of the small bowel, assumed to be the jejunum. absorption might be those where the bioaccessibility
This is in agreement with a recent study in mice showing of vitamin E is the highest, i.e., where the concentration of
that the main site of absorption of vitamin E is the distal vitamin E in micelles, and possibly vesicles, is the highest.
part of the jejunum.32 A first hypothesis explaining why Data on the efficiency of vitamin E absorption are
the efficiency of vitamin E absorption is not similar along scant and have been obtained with widely different models
the intestine is that the proteins involved in vitamin E (laboratory animals, healthy volunteers, subjects with
absorption; i.e., scavenger receptor class B type 1 (SR-BI), intestinal malabsorption, ileostomy subjects). They have
Niemann-Pick C1-like protein 1 (NPC1L1), and ATP- also been obtained with wide-ranging doses of vitamin E,
binding cassette, subfamily A (ABCA1),33 are not distrib- which were embedded into different matrices and ingested
uted evenly. It is likely that the efficiency of vitamin E in very different test meals or diet. The wide variability in
absorption is maximal where the intestinal transporters published data is unsurprising because 1) absorption of
of vitamin E are most highly expressed. The intestinal vitamin E is modulated by numerous factors,2) absorption
distribution of transporters involved in cholesterol is likely mediated by gut proteins at dietary doses but is
absorption – transporters also involved in vitamin E likely passive at pharmacological doses,33 and 3) there is an
absorption – was recently measured in intestinal samples important interindividual variability with regard to the
from 11 subjects. Results showed a bell-shaped distribu- efficiency of vitamin E absorption.36
a-TTP
RRR-a-tocopherol
Bile VLDL
intestine RRR-a-tocopherol
RRR-b,g,d -tocopherols
RRR-a-tocopherol LDL
RRR-a,b,g,d -tocotrienols
all-rac-a-tocopherols except
RRR-a-tocopherol HDL ?
Target tissues
RRR-a-tocopherol
Figure 2 Metabolization of vitamin E in the human body, showing the key role of a-TTP (a-tocopherol transfer
protein).
mixed micelles
Apical side
NPC1L1
NPC1/2 ?
L-FABP ?
hTAP 1,2,3
Basolateral side
ABCA1
Chylomicron
HDL HDL
Figure 3 Proteins involved in vitamin E uptake by human intestinal cell. From Reboul & Borel33 and Takada & Suzuki.45
Abbreviations: ABCA1, ATP-binding cassette A1; hTAP 1,2,3, sec14p-like proteins 1,2,3; L-FABP, liver fatty-acid-binding protein;
NPC1/2, Niemann-Pick type C1/C2; NPC1L1, Niemann-Pick C1-like 1; SR-BI, scavenger receptor class B type 1.
other than a-TTP are involved in the intracellular trans- isomer of a-tocopherol, unlike a-TTP. Lastly, it has
port of vitamin E in other tissues.56 A protein that binds recently been found that Niemann-Pick type C1/C2
vitamin E, called “supernatant protein factor” (SPF) or (NPC1/2) proteins are involved in the intracellular trans-
“tocopherol-associated protein” (TAP), has been found in port of tocopherol in fibroblasts and hepatocytes.62
bovine57 and human58 tissues. This protein belongs to a However, it is not known whether these proteins are
family of proteins that bind hydrophobic ligands and that expressed in enterocytes or whether they are involved in
share a homologous substrate-binding pocket, commonly vitamin E absorption.
referred to as the “sec14 domain.” It was shown by North- Finally, it is important to state that the two absorp-
ern blot that SPF/TAP mRNA is expressed ubiquitously. tion mechanisms, i.e., protein-mediated absorption and
Therefore, this protein was suggested to be involved in the passive absorption, may be complementary, with protein-
intracellular transport of vitamin E in various tissues, mediated absorption occurring at dietary doses (Figure 3)
although its expression in enterocytes has not been evalu- and passive diffusion taking over at pharmacological
ated.57 Nevertheless, a systematic review of the substrate doses.
specificity of this protein has shown it has a weak, nonse-
lective affinity toward tocopherols,59,60 suggesting it is not a POSSIBLE FACTORS AFFECTING ABSORPTION
good candidate for intracellular transport of vitamin E.
Other candidates for intracellular transport of vitamin E In order to be absorbed, vitamin E has to be released from
within the enterocyte could be the sec14p-like proteins the matrix in which it is incorporated and presented to
(encoded by TAP1, 2, and 3 in humans). Indeed, these the brush border in a state allowing its absorption by
proteins are detected in several tissues and have been enterocytes. Absorption efficiency depends on an array of
shown in vitro to improve the transport of a-tocopherol to numerous variables that include the following: 1) food
mitochondria with the same efficiency as a-TTP.61 Since matrix, 2) nature and amount of macronutrients, 3) activ-
a- and g-tocopherol are absorbed with similar effi- ity of digestive enzymes, and 4) transport efficiency across
ciency,46,52 and with no firm evidence that the other forms the intestinal cell. The mnemonic “SLAMENGHI,” listing
of vitamin E (b- and d-tocopherol and tocotrienols) are the factors assumed to govern carotenoid absorption,63 is
absorbed with different efficiencies, it can be hypothesized used here to review the factors suspected to affect vitamin
that, if a vitamin E-binding protein is involved in the E absorption. Each letter stands for one factor: Species of
transport of vitamin E within the intestinal cell, it is prob- vitamin E (i.e., the form of vitamin E, e.g., a-tocopherol,
ably a transporter that has no specificity for the RRR g-tocopherol, or a-tocotrienol), molecular Linkage (e.g.,
Milk and milk-derived products. Dairy products are gen- Genetic factors
erally assumed to be a significant source of vitamin E.
When the contribution of these products to the Recom- The involvement of intestinal proteins in vitamin E
mended Dietary Intake (RDI) of vitamin E was evalu- absorption has prompted the hypothesis that genetic vari-
ated,114 however, it was calculated that the consumption ants (most common genetic variants being single-
of three standard portions/day of dairy products could nucleotide polymorphisms) in these proteins can
provide about 3% of the RDI for vitamin E (15 mg/day). modulate the efficiency of vitamin E absorption. This is
The same consumption, but using fortified/supplemented supported by several studies. Concerning NPC1L1, it has
milk and yogurt, may increase the contribution to up to been shown, in Caco-2 cells transiently transfected
24% of the RDI for elderly subjects. Thus, the inclusion of with expression vectors containing different variants,
fortified dairy products in the diet may offer a sensible that NPC1L1 nonsynonymous variants transport less
approach to improving vitamin E intake and status. a-tocopherol than the wild-type NPC1L1.49 Concerning
Several clinical studies did not report any inhibitory SR-BI, it was shown in a cohort of 128 volunteers that
effect of milk on vitamin E absorption.81–83,115 In addition, single-nucleotide polymorphisms in SCARB1, the gene
an in vitro study showed that a-tocopherol bioaccessibil- coding for SR-BI, were related to the plasma status of a-
ity from fruit juices was increased in the presence of milk, and g-tocopherols,122 suggesting an effect of these variants
and that consumption of fruit juices with milk did not on a-tocopherol distribution in the body. Another scav-
significantly modify serum tocopherol increase in enger receptor, CD36 (cluster of differentiation 36),
response to fruit juices. The authors concluded that the which has been found to be involved in cellular uptake
presence of milk did not markedly influence the bioavail- of carotenoids,123,124 but not yet in cellular uptake of
ability of a-tocopherol from fruit juices.116 a-tocopherol, has been associated with blood levels of
Bovine milk fat globule membranes were purified vitamin E in humans.125 Because CD36 recognizes a
and used to stabilize oil-in-water emulsions containing broad variety of lipid ligands, including fatty acids, oxi-
a-tocopherol. Interestingly, the bioaccessibility of dized low-density lipoproteins, apoptotic cells, and caro-
vitamin E in these vehicles was double that in emulsions tenoids, recognition of vitamin E by CD36 is plausible, as
stabilized by milk proteins (whey proteins and – like SR-BI – CD36 may function as a docking port and
caseinate).117 thus facilitate the transfer of lipid molecules (including
In conclusion, milk does not seem to significantly tocopherols) from mixed micelles to the apical mem-
affect vitamin E absorption for the general population. brane of the enterocyte.