Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Permanganate Value
Arranged by
Environmental Engineering Class 2017
Jababeka Education Park, Ki Hajar Dewantara Street, Kota Jababeka, West Cikarang, Bekasi
17550 – Indonesia
Phone (021) 8910 9762-6, Fax (021) 8910 9768
Email: enrollment@president.ac.id, http://www.president.ac.id
i
SULPHATE
A. Objective
- To find the concentration of Sulphate in waste water
B. Introduction
The SO4 2- ion is one of the major anions occurring in natural waters. It is of importance in public
water supplies because ot its cathartic effect upon humans when it is present n excessive amounts. For
this reason the U.S. EPA’s secondary standard for SO 4 2- is 250 mg/L in waters intended for human
consumption. Sulphate is important in both public and industrial water supplies because of the
tendency of waters containing appreciable amounts to form hard scales in boiler and heat exchangers.
Sulphate is of considerable concern because it is indirectly responsible for two serious problems often
associated with the handling and treatment of wastewaters. These are odor and sewer-corrosion
problems resulting from the reduction of sulfate to hydrogen sulfide under anaerobic conditions, as
shown in the following equations:
High SO4 2- concentration as well as low pH conditions can result in streams that are fed by drainage
from abandoned coal mines and other exploited mineral-bearing deposits. The sulfide minerals
present are oxidized through a combination of bacterial and chemical action to produce H2SO4,
Not only does the SO4 2- content increase in streams to which mine drainage discharges, but the
lowered pH and high iron content produce added harm to water quality. For these reasons, care is
exercised today to replace the cover or to seal mines to prevent the introduction of O 2 and water that
lead to that reaction.
Principle
The sulfate ion (SO42-) in acidic condition reacts with barium chloride (BaCl 2) to form a barium
sulphate crystal (BaSO4) which is all the same. The beam absorbed by the barium sulfate suspension
were measured by the spectrofotometer and the sulfate content was calculated by comparison of the
reading with the calibration curve.
2
C. Method
1. Calibration
Tools Materials
Pipette SO4
Bulb BaCl
Volumetric flask Buffer A
Cuvette
Spatula
Spectrophotometer
1.2 Procedure
No Steps Pictures
.
1. Prepare a measuring flask that has been
labeled with solution standard 0, 5, 10, 15,
20, 25 ppm
3
4. Add liquid buffer A 5 ml in each
measuring flask, make it homogenous
4
9. Use the highest ABS for each solution
standard and creat a curve , R must more
than 90% , and get the the formula for
analysis SO4
2. Sample Analysis
Tools Materials
Spectrophotometer Tap Water
Erlenmeyer River Water
Beaker Glass BaCl2
Pipette Aquadest
Pipette Bulb
Spatula
Gloves
2.2 Procedure
5
1. Prepare the apparatus that we want to use.
6
D. Experimental Result
1. Calibration
N1 = 100 ppm
N2 =25 ppm
N1 N2
V1 (ml) (ppm) (ppm) V2 (ml)
0 25 100 0
5 25 100 1.25
10 25 100 2.5
15 25 100 3.75
20 25 100 5
25 25 100 6.25
Wavelength = 304.5 nm
sample : 1 2 3 4 5 6
volume (ml) : 0 5 10 15 20 25
highest
number of 0 0.053 0.127 0.236 0.252 0.309
absorbent :
0.35
0.2
0.15 Linear ()
Linear ()
0.1
0.05
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Because R is more than 90% which R2 = 0.9721 so that curve and the formula that
we get is valid , the formula for analysis SO4 that we use is y= 0.0129x + 0.002.
2. Sample Analysis
Wavelength = 304.5 nm
7
Sample Time Absorbance Concentration (x)
(y) y= 0.0129x + 0.002
8
our experiment the challenges is in the requirement that we have to be quick after adding the
BaCl2.
F. Conclusion
To get valid data of calibration for sulphate analysis, this result should be R > 90%.
Following the requirement, we got R from our result more than 90%. It can be said that our
experiment follows as calibration of sulphate. Because R is more than 90% which R2 =
0.9721 so that curve and the formula that we get is valid , the formula for analysis SO 4 that
we use is y= 0.0129x + 0.002 . For the sample analysis for sulphate we were able to get a
clear result and we were able to find the concentration from the equation that is found from
the calibration. In conclusion this experiment is important for analyzing the quality of water
especially considering that sulphate has many negative impacts.
G. References
AMONIUM
A. INTRODUCTION
B. METHODS
Tools and Materials
Tools Materials
Pipette Phenol
9
Bulb Na (nitroprusside)
Volumetric flask Oxidizing solution
Cuvette Aquadest
Spatula NH310 ppm
Spectrophotometer - River water
C. PROCEDURE
The steps of procedure on calibration curve for ammonia analysis are shown below:
No Procedure Picture
2.
10
Add 1mL phenol solution to each volumetric flask
3.
with through mixing.
11
Pour each solution to the spectrophotometer cuvvete
8.
and wipe the surface with tissue.
12
Make a calibration curve based on the ppm and
12.
absorbance value.
Sample Analysis
No Step Picture
13
2. Add with throughout mixing after each addition of
1 mL phenol solution, 1 mL sodium nitroprusside
solution and 2.5 mL oxidizing solution
14
3. Cover samples with alumunium wrap
15
4. Let color develop at room temperature (22 - 27 0C)
in subdued light for at least 1 h
5. Measure absorbance
D. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
0 ppm
Work solution needed = 0 mL
1 ppm
V 1 N 1=V 2 N 2
(25 mL)(1 ppm)=V 2 (10 ppm)
V 2=2.5 mL
2 ppm
V 1 N 1=V 2 N 2
( 25 mL )( 2 ppm )=V 2 (10 ppm)V 2=5 mL
16
3 ppm
V 1 N 1=V 2 N 2
( 25 mL )( 3 ppm ) =V 2 (10 ppm)V 2=7.5 mL
4 ppm
V 1 N 1=V 2 N 2
( 25 mL )( 4 ppm )=V 2(10 ppm)V 2=10 mL
5 ppm
V 1 N 1=V 2 N 2
( 25 mL )( 5 ppm )=V 2(10 ppm)V 2=12.5 mL
Result of Spectophotometry
λ max=657.5 nm
Normality Blank 1 2 3 4 5
(ppm)
ABS -0.000 0.486 0.798 1.320 1.541 2.721
3
2.5
f(x) = 0.49 x − 0.58
R² = 0.94
2
1.5 ABS
Linear (ABS)
0.5
0
0 ppm 1 ppm 2 ppm 3 ppm 4 ppm 5 ppm
Result Analysis
Blanko=0
17
river water = 0.074
Drinking water = 0.043
y = 0.4945x – 0.5829
River water
Y=0.074
Y = 0.4945x – 0.5829
0.074=0.4945x-0.5829
0.4945x=0.074 + 0.5829
0.4945x=0.6569
X=0.6569/0.4945
X=1.328
Drinking water
Y = 0.043
Y = 0.4945x – 0.5829
0.043=0.4945x-0.5829
0.4945x = 0.043+ 0.5829
0.4945x = 0.6259
X=0.6259/0.4945
X=1.265
Result
E. DISCUSSION
In this experiment, a calibration curve was created by plotting absorbance vs. concentration (ppm)
in Excel. The calibration curve was constructed by measuring the absorbance rate of ammonia in six
standards solutions. From the experiment, we found that there are various reading of absorbance of
the ammonia after being detected by spectrophotometer. The highest readings that have recorded was
2.721 this was due to high concentration of ammonia in that water sample (5ppm). The graph from
Figure 1 shows that the high concentration of the ammonia the higher the absorbance. In order to
quantify how much ammonia is in our extract we measure the absorbance at a particular wavelength.
In the example, our measurements were at a maximum wavelength of 657.5 nm to coincide with the
ammonia peak and if it was at a lower wavelength then it would minimize interference from the
N H 3 peak. Our samples had concentration of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 ppm. We put each of these in the
spectrophotometer in order to determine their absorbance.
F. CONCLUSION
18
In order to figure out the relationship between concentration and color development standard curved
needs to be constructed from a series of samples of known concentration. The range of the concentrations
should be from zero to the maximum concentration detectable by the method. Series of solutions with
different colors only depend on the amount of concentrations within the samples.
To get valid data of calibration for ammonia analysis, this result should be R > 90%.
Following the requirement, we got R from our result more than 90%. It can be said that our
experiment follows as calibration of ammonia. Because R is more than 90% which R2 = 0.942 so
that curve and the formula that we get is valid , the formula for analysis ammonia that we use is
y = 0,4945x - 0,5829 . For the sample analysis for ammonia we were able to get a clear result
and we were able to find the concentration from the equation that is found from the calibration.
In conclusion this experiment is important for analyzing the quality of water especially
considering that ammonia has many negative impacts.
19