Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Untitled 22

    Uploaded by

    Amyatena Leonie Sembiring
    19 views4 pages
    This document analyzes data on uterine fibroids (miomas) and patient characteristics. It contains frequency tables and chi-square tests comparing rates of miomas to age groups (21-30, 31-40, 41-50, >50 years old) and parity (nulliparous, multiparous, primiparous). The results found no significant association between age and mioma occurrence but a significant association with parity, with higher rates of miomas in nulliparous women. Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests found no significant difference in age distribution between women with and without miomas.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    untitled 22

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document analyzes data on uterine fibroids (miomas) and patient characteristics. It contains frequency tables and chi-square tests comparing rates of miomas to age groups (21-30, 31-40, 41-50, >50 years old) and parity (nulliparous, multiparous, primiparous). The results found no significant association between age and mioma occurrence but a significant association with parity, with higher rates of miomas in nulliparous women. Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests found no significant difference in age distribution between women with and without miomas.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    19 views4 pages

    Untitled 22

    Uploaded by

    Amyatena Leonie Sembiring
    This document analyzes data on uterine fibroids (miomas) and patient characteristics. It contains frequency tables and chi-square tests comparing rates of miomas to age groups (21-30, 31-40, 41-50, >50 years old) and parity (nulliparous, multiparous, primiparous). The results found no significant association between age and mioma occurrence but a significant association with parity, with higher rates of miomas in nulliparous women. Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests found no significant difference in age distribution between women with and without miomas.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4

    Usia, Kolmogorov Smirnov (CI=90%)

    Case Processing Summary


    usia2 * Kejadian Mioma Crosstabulation
    Cases
    Valid Kejadian
    Missing Mioma Total
    Total
    N Percent Mioma
    N Non Mioma
    Percent N Percent
    usia2 * Kejadian Mioma Count 94 100.0% 06 0.0% 11 94 17 100.0%
    >50 Expected Count 8.5 8.5 17.0
    % within Kejadian Mioma 12.8% 23.4% 18.1%
    Count 3 3 6
    21-30 Expected Count 3.0 3.0 6.0
    % within Kejadian Mioma 6.4% 6.4% 6.4%
    usia2
    Count 16 11 27
    31-40 Expected Count 13.5 13.5 27.0
    % within Kejadian Mioma 34.0% 23.4% 28.7%
    Count 22 22 44
    41-50 Expected Count 22.0 22.0 44.0
    % within Kejadian Mioma 46.8% 46.8% 46.8%
    Count 47 47 94
    Total Expected Count 47.0 47.0 94.0
    % within Kejadian Mioma 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

    Chi-Square Tests
    Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Monte Carlo Sig. (2-sided)
    sided) Sig. 90% Confidence Interval
    Lower Bound Upper Bound
    Pearson Chi-Square 2.397a 3 .494 .521 b
    .437 .606
    b
    Likelihood Ratio 2.424 3 .489 .521 .437 .606
    b
    Fisher's Exact Test 2.440 .521 .437 .606
    N of Valid Cases 94
    a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.00.
    b. Based on 94 sampled tables with starting seed 2000000.

    Frequencies
    mioma1 N
    mioma 47
    usia3 non mioma 47
    Total 94
    Test Statisticsa
    usia3
    Absolute .106
    Most Extreme Differences Positive .106
    Negative .000
    Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .516
    Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .953
    Sig. .617b
    Monte Carlo Sig. (2-tailed) Lower Bound .535
    90% Confidence Interval
    Upper Bound .699
    a. Grouping Variable: mioma1
    b. Based on 94 sampled tables with starting seed 299883525.

    PARITAS (CI=90%)

    Case Processing Summary


    Cases
    Valid Missing Total
    N Percent N Percent N Percent
    Paritas * Kejadian Mioma 94 100.0% 0 0.0% 94 100.0%

    Paritas * Kejadian Mioma Crosstabulation


    Kejadian Mioma Total
    Mioma Non Mioma
    Count 15 31 46
    Multipara Expected Count 23.0 23.0 46.0
    % within Kejadian Mioma 31.9% 66.0% 48.9%
    Count 25 8 33
    Paritas Nullipara Expected Count 16.5 16.5 33.0
    % within Kejadian Mioma 53.2% 17.0% 35.1%
    Count 7 8 15
    Primipara Expected Count 7.5 7.5 15.0
    % within Kejadian Mioma 14.9% 17.0% 16.0%
    Count 47 47 94
    Total Expected Count 47.0 47.0 94.0
    % within Kejadian Mioma 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

    Chi-Square Tests
    Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Monte Carlo Sig. (2-sided)
    sided) Sig. 90% Confidence Interval
    Lower Bound Upper Bound
    Pearson Chi-Square 14.389a 2 .001 .000 b
    .000 .024
    b
    Likelihood Ratio 14.943 2 .001 .000 .000 .024
    b
    Fisher's Exact Test 14.565 .000 .000 .024
    N of Valid Cases 94
    a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.50.
    b. Based on 94 sampled tables with starting seed 926214481.

    Kolmogorov Smirnov (CI=95%)

    Frequencies
    mioma1 N
    mioma 47
    usia3 non mioma 47
    Total 94

    Test Statisticsa
    usia3
    Absolute .106
    Most Extreme Differences Positive .106
    Negative .000
    Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .516
    Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .953
    a. Grouping Variable: mioma1

    You might also like