Central University of South Bihar

TABLE OF CONTENT

S.No Contents Page

No.

1. TABLE OF CONTENTS 2
2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3
3. INTRODUCTION 4
4. THE INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMISSION 5-6
5. OTHER BODIES 7
6. A BRIEF SUMMARY OF CODIFICATION OF 7-8
INTERNATIONAL LAW

7. CONCLUSION 8
8. BIBLIOGRAPHY 9
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I hereby take the opportunity thank Ms. Kumari Nitu for her consent and the inspiration that she
radiates. Her jovial behaviour and ease making attitude eased my tension and the initial doubts
that I had about my potentialities. I also want to thank my friends who helped me a lot in
preparing this project. I have also taken help from several books and websites for doing this.
Ultimately, I once again thank Nitu Mam, who made indelible impact on me which shall go
beyond the pages of this project and reflect in all my endeavours of life.

Hoping Acceptance and Appreciation from you, I hereby submit this project.

--Kumar Pritam

2|Page
gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

3|Page
4|Page
 INTRODUCTION
Codification of International Law has already evolved over a long journey, of over a century,
pari passu with the progressive development of the discipline. 1There are those who identify the
two Hague Peace Conferences (of 1899 and 1907) as ' the first modern codification conferences'.
Today the International Law Commission has a mandate from the U.N. General Assembly to
1
Trindade,Antônio Augusto Cançado,International Law for Humankind: Towards a New Jus Gentium, Second
Revised Edition

5|Page
codify and progressively develop international law. For most of the ILC’s history, the lion’s
share of its work took the form of draft articles adopted by the General Assembly as the basis for
multilateral conventions. But if we go back in time we will see that the actual process of some
sort of codification of Public International Law started around 23 BC or nearly 4300 years ago.

Codification is the process through which rules of law are committed to written form. It is
usually mentioned in one breath with progressive development.The process of codification tends
to change the law, because transforming unwritten rules into written rules requires precision,
systematization, and definition of the relevant terms and rules. The term codification ordinarily
implies the process of reducing the generally existing principles of a branch of law into a Code
capable of enactment and reference. Therefore it connotes a systematic arrangement of the
hitherto existing diverse rules spread over a plethora of judicial decisions and juristic opinions.
Thus codification does not give birth to rules or principles of a branch of law but only assists to
consolidate, compile or give shape to the existing rules of a particular branch of law or in
general.2

Oppenhiem holds that codification in respect to international law implies a two fold
process.3

(a) process of translating into statutes or conventions, customary law and rules arising from
judicial decisions,

(b) process of securing, by means of a general convention, agreement among states upon certain
topics of international law.

such international conventions as those on the Law of the Sea in 1958, Diplomatic Relations in
1961, Consular Relations in 1963, Special Missions in 1969 and the Law of Treaties in 1969. Of
course, this smooth operation does

is notable, moreover, because of the breadth and depth of the importance given in it to the work
product of the International Law Commission. The Court’s Judgment not only draws on treaties
concluded pursuant to the Commission’s proceedings: those on the law of treaties, of State
succession in respect of treaties, and the law of international watercourses. It gives great weight

2
Brownlie, Ian,Principles of Public International Law, p28, (Oxford, London, 6th edition, 2003)
3
Oppenheim, International Law, p97, (Robert Jennings & Arthur Watts , Universal, New Delhi, 9th edition, 1996

6|Page
 to some of the Commission’s Draft Articles on State Responsibility, as did both Hungary and
Slovakia. This is not wholly exceptional; it rather illustrates the fact that just as the judgments
and opinions of the Court have influenced the work of the International Law Commission, so the
work of the Commission may influence that of the Court.4

Thus, one can see that the International Law Commission is involved in at least two of the major
sources of law. Its drafts may form the bases of international treaties which bind those states
which have signed and ratified them and which may continue to form part of general
international law, and its work is part of the whole range of state practice which can lead to new
rules of customary law. Its drafts, indeed, may constitute evidence of custom, contribute to the
corpus of usages which may create new law and evidence the opinio juris. In addition, it is not to
be overlooked that the International Law Commission is a body composed of eminently qualified
publicists, including many governmental legal advisers, whose reports and studies may be used
as a method of determining what the law actually is, in much the same way as books.

OTHER BODIES

Although the International Law Commission is by far the most important of the organs for the
study and development of the law, there do exist certain other bodies which are involved in the
same mission. The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and
the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), for example, are
actively increasing the range of international law in the fields of economic, financial and
development activities, while temporary organs such as the Committee on the Principles of
International Law have been engaged in producing various declarations and statements. Nor can
one overlook the tremendous work of the many specialised agencies like the International
Labour Organisation and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation
(UNESCO), which are constantly developing international law in their respective spheres. There
are also some independent bodies which are actively involved in the field. The International Law
Association and the Institut de Droit International are the best known of such organisations
which study and stimulate the law of the world community, while the various Harvard Research
drafts produced before the Second World War are still of value today.5
4
See www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/ipresscom/SPEECHES/Ga1997e.htm.
5
See Virally, ‘Sources’, pp. 154–6; Brownlie, Principles, pp. 612–15; W. Fiedler, ‘Unilateral Acts in International
Law’ in Encyclopedia of Public International Law (ed. R. Bernhardt), Amsterdam, 2000, vol. IV, p. 1018; G.

7|Page
 A BRIEF SUMMARY OF CODIFICATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW

The codification process can be briefly summarised as under6 :

(i) The history of codification of international law dates back to the end of 18th century when
the idea of codification of international law was conceived by Bentham.Before him an
unsuccessful attempt was made by the French Convention to draw up a declaration of the Rights
of Nations in 1792.

(ii) The actual beginning of the codification process can be traced back to 1873 when the
Institute of International Law was founded at Ghent in Belgium with one of the aims to codify
the existing principles of international law.

(iii) The First Hague Conference convened by Russian Emperor Nicholas II in 1899, which
resulted into two conventions in the form of code, namely:

(a) Convention on the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes

(b) Convention on the Laws of Customs of War on Land

(iv) The Second Hague Convention of 1907, which resulted into thirteen conventions were one
of the major codification exercises undertaken at that time.

(v) Thereon a lot of codification work was undertaken under the aegis of the League of Nations.
In fact Oppenhiem has noted that “it was left to the League of Nations to approach in a
systematic manner the problem of codification properly called.” The League Council appointed a
Committee of sixteen jurists in 1924 to report to the Council, subjects which were ripe for
codification. Thereon the Committee reported seven subjects for codification and further in 1928
reported two more subjects for codification.

Venturini, ‘La Portee et les Effets Juridiques des ´ Attitudes et des Actes Unilateraux des ´ Etats’, 112 HR, 1964, p.
363; J. Charpentier, ‘En- ´ gagements Unilateraux et Engagements Conventionnels’ in ´ Theory of International Law
at the Threshold of the 21st Century, p. 367; A. P. Rubin, ‘The International Legal Effects of Unilateral
Declarations’, 71 AJIL, 1977, p. 1; K. Zemanek, ‘Unilateral Legal Acts Revisited’ in Wellens, International Law, p.
209; E. Suy, Les Actes Unilateraux en Droit International Public, Paris, 1962, and J. Garner, ‘The International
Binding Force of Unilateral Oral Declarations’, 27 AJIL, 1933, p. 493. The International Law Commission has been
studying the question of the Unilateral Acts of States since 1996, see A/51/10, pp. 230 and 328–9. See also the Fifth
Report, A/CN.4/525, 2002.
6
Jain, Tarun,CODIFICATION AND PROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL
LAW,http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1120849 accessed on 17 November 2015

8|Page
 CONCLUSION

Codification is the process through which rules of law are committed to written form. It is
usually mentioned in one breath with progressive development. Within the broader topic of the
sources of international law, codification holds a peculiar place. The process of codification
tends to change the law, because transforming unwritten rules into written rules requires
precision, systematization, and definition of the relevant terms and rules. These changes can be
minor or substantial. As all authors agree, “pure” codification does not exist; it always involves
some measure of change. When this change is substantial, it is often is called “progressive
development” or “legislation.”

Codification is often seen as beneficial, increasing certainty through the rule of law and the
development, coherence, and sophistication of international law. Yet, it is also criticized for
decreasing flexibility, creating discord, and creating uncertainty through the vagueness and
generality of provisions in codification treaties due to the requirement of consensus.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS :-

 International Law, Malcolm N. Shaw(6th Edition)

 Brownlie’s Principle of Public International Law, James Crawford
 Starkes’s International Law, I.A. Shearer(11th Edition)
 The Sources of International Law, Hugh Thirlway

WEBSITES :-
 https://legal.un.org/cod/
 https://www.foreignaffairs.com/
 https://legal.un.org/ilc/
 https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/
 https://Cambridge.org/

9|Page
 JOURNALS :-

 AJIL (American Journal of International Law), 1939

 AJIL (American Journal of International Law), 1941

10 | P a g e