Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shitanshu - Yadav - Task 6
Shitanshu - Yadav - Task 6
5G reserve price is just too high for telecom companies, say experts (17 June 2019)
India is ready for its ambitious 5G spectrum auctions, but the industry thinks that it’s priced
exorbitantly high, and the analysts think that the return on the investment by telecom
companies will be low(7 per cent).
The Digital Communications Commission (DCC) sought a review on the reserve price to avoid
having unsold spectrum. But it seems as if the debt-ridden telecoms are much interested;
Bharti Airtel finds the price to be too high, whereas, Vodafone Idea wans the auctions to
take place next year. Laying 5G’s fibers (fiberisation) is expensive and on top of that, the sky-
high spectrum costs.
%G’s fiberisation is likely to cost ₹1 trillion for just one player over the next two to three
years. Penetration of Airtel, Vodafone Idea in 4G is just about 25-30%, and, since, 5G is in
nascent stage, its usage are also limited. These reasons don’t justify the cost, so, it should be
lower if the government wants better participation in the auctions.
2. MCA moves NCLT for 5-yr ban on IFIN’s auditors (16 June 2019)
The ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has asked National Company Law Tribunal to bar
auditors of IL&FS Financial Services (IFIN) – Deloitte Haskins & Sells and BSR & Associates –
from business for 5 years after an alleged collusion with IFIN management was found along
with a failure to report it.
The application was files against Deloitte, BSR and individuals; this was after an investigation
by Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), which found out that the auditors concealed
information about wrongdoings of the management despite knowing of the sorry state by
conniving with the IFIN’s former director. Other than this, financial statements were
falsified, auditing standards were not followed, bank finances were not identified,
engineering loans were allowed to defaulting borrowers.
The application to bar IFIN was moved under Section 140(%) of Companies Act, which says
that if the tribunal is satisfied of the fraudulent act committed by an auditor of a company, it
can ask for a change in the auditor of that company.