snenoia ‘SAP Controling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Sié HANA | SAP Blogs Proc Industries Support ining Commi eveloper Aska Question Write a Blog Post Kesharika Goonawardena August 10,2018 8 minute read SAP Controlling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to S/4 HANA Hh RSS teed 12Likes 13,257 Views 4 Comments Let's learn on new changes in SAP Controlling module, from ECC to S/4 HANA. General 1 In ECC, any CO-related postings were updated in both the line item table (COEP) and total tables (COSP for primary/COSS for secondary). Ingo htpssblogssap.com2018/0/10/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsom-from-occo-s4-hanal 18sro2re019 ‘SAP Controling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Si4 HANA]| SAP Blogs (COSP: Display of Entries Found are Evie 1) sea m0 [soan SEceeceeece EEScGeeeees SEceeceeece C058: Display of Entries Found are es —S— -— w arial Sea. fl (ro Be obec Yer vo cote. cOntiy an ow et De eat wae Tac ee eee TC aon CCOEP: Display of Entries Found are ie : —— a SPREE ees] e oso 1 coe fs nt ig oe Ry Ee eu Tny Feead Wc o With SAP S/4HANA Finance and Controlling, the totals tables are no longer required because data can be aggregated from the line item table, which is also used for reporting. This avoids data redundancy. All actuals data continue to be stored in the line item table COEP. ‘Two new tables—COSP_BAK and COSS_BAK—have been created to store planned data related to primary and secondary costs, respectively. InS/4 HANA hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal 206sro2re019 ‘SAP Controling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Si4 HANA|| SAP Blogs (COSP_BAK: Display of Entries Found are ae = a SMI (Bee (aro Bi cmenree wet Gta ai | OA a Wa na nt a (COSS_BAK: Display of Entries Found are : a al SERRE Feo co Bis oc ‘sere cata nny in| one wr ware siecet 2. Actual data of COEP (WRTTP ='04') is now stored in ACDOCA. Actual statistical data of COEP (WRTTP = ‘11))is stored in ACDOCA using additional columns for the statistical account assignments and in COEP for compatibility access. Actual data needed for long-term orders/projects from COSP_BAK, COSS_BAK is stored in table ACDOCA. This ensures for primary postings that there is a single source of truth, such that all general ledger items with an assignment to cost centers, orders, WBS elements, business processes, or CO-PA characteristics are treated as one data record which is enriched with the relevant profit center, functional area, segment, and so on. For secondary postings this ensures that all sender-receiver relationships that are triggered by allocations, settlement, and so on are captured in the universal journal along with the partner profit centers, functional areas, and so on that are affected by the allocation, ‘ACDOCA: Display of Entries Found are OSPR gems ole Bu cca Yar em Uo ecco mim BRST ta Mm nn ane aed fae CO-CEA ( Cost Element Accounting hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal 326snanore ‘SAP Gontroling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Si4 HANA | SAP Blogs 1. Cost elements are no longer required in SAP S/4HANA Finance because they are created as G/L accounts using Transaction FS0O now they are part of the chart of accounts. A new field for the cost element category has been introduced in the G/L master record. Cost elements can no longer be maintained in a time- dependent manner. InECC %:_.| Display Cost Element: Basic Screen a @ eS, 18 Jame WR isons [ont cr asian [ory] Name other Description Other CElem category 2 Internal atv allocation Areibute mi S/4 HANA % | Display G/L Account Centrally a > F dn financal saameneverson Giuaccoune 990038000) wy Reus Anais a Contr Chart Accounts 2000 Heys Operating Cart cours Desc Shortest (wr) Reson Ana Giaccone was Anat Control in Chart of Accounts G/L Account Type "S Secondary Costs ‘Account Group 'N Nonoperating Expense or income P. Primary Costs or Revenue 5 Secondary Costs Description X alance Sheet Account Short Text \WiP/ Results Analyst, htpssblogs.sap.com2018/08/10/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparson-from-ecco-s4-hanal 426snenoia ‘SAP Controling (CO) Sub modules com "i Display G/L Account Centrally ano <> etn nats ison from ECC to Si4 HANA | SAP Blogs “beeen eto —| Rewarsison |< > ena ana ameun Cob sc ng ey pom dn conga ce + New reports such as the trial balance will display all postings (primary and secondary) by account G/L Account Balances 2, The default account assignment is maintained using Transaction OKBS and not in the traditional cost element master data. InECC hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanalsnanore ‘SAP Containg (CO} Sub modules comparison ftom ECC to Sié HANA SAP Blogs %t_.] Display Cost Element: Default Account Assignment a & Cost Element Controlling Area Valid From 31.12.9999 Basie Data | Indicators History Default Account Assignment Cost Center Order In S/4 HANA Only allow the option of OKB9 assignment. Display View "Default account assignment”: Overview B&B See Co. Costelem. |B. Costctr Order rf. Profit. Acct Assignmt Detail WW Default account assignment 60 v a [Bs etal per business are et v [Bn etal per profit center 0% v 0 0 an on 3 Profit center is mandato 010112016 an an an an an Valuation area is manda. Valuation area is manda. Valuation area is manda. Valuation area is manda. 3. G/Laccount mapping of CO real-time integration with the new G/L is now obsolete, Secondary cost elements are now created as G/L accounts and are part of the chart of accounts, On the configuration side, document types that you want to use for posting in CO need to be defined and require the indicator G/L to be set. These document types need to be linked to the CO business transaction via a variant. The fiscal year variants of all controlling areas used by an organization and their assigned company codes must be the same. InEcc hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal 626sro2re019 ‘SAP Controling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Si4 HANA|| SAP Blogs > Pate Aecounting B® ‘sor BB @ ore tes for Seecing CO tine toms BB @ _oefine ld transers for Res-Tme tortion ¥befine Account Determination for Res-Tese tegration B® - betineiercompany Cling Accounts B® etic Account Determination for Res-Tie tegration B® Transfer Co Documents Retrospective Change View "Variants for Real-Time Integration CO->FI": Overview So @ wos BoB KB \ariants for Real-Time integration CO->Fi B VarR-Tin | R-TintAct Key DateA... Acct Deter Type Ledg... UseCheck.. UseBAd! Usii) ‘oven vi ° ° « y jaan i: ae Change View “Assignment of Variants for Real-Time Integration for CoCo 2 mime BO RR B Assignment Varn for el Tere tegration or CaCodes Company Code |Variant for Real-Time in. Text aie ‘Standard Variant fr Real-Time integration CO->FI_ InS/4 HANA Y Ledgers > Fields > Ledger > Fiscal Year and Posting Periods > Parallel Valuation Approaches > Parallel Accounting ¥ Integration of Controling with Financial Accounting BB @__ Define Document Type Mapping Variants for CO Business Transactions B® checkand bene Deaut atue or Postings in Conon BB @ _ Define Ledger for CO version > Define Account Determination Bi @ __ execute Consistency Check of General Ledger Settings. hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal 7126snenoia ‘SAP Controling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Sié HANA | SAP Blogs Display View "Variant for Mapping CO Transact. to Doc. Types": Overvie ROR or sow = CO kn Tomato t| anon Jntwe Display View "Mapping of CO Bus. Transactions to Document Types": Over SERRE Manin etOma.aneeM TE ng cota Tana Beonaimen rams eam gt Ca ong Decne m0 santas « Display View "Default Values for Postings in Controlling": Overview BR BR Company Code vaidriom Deu LedserGrous | Doctive Mooring ar. | fl coor 1900 a- or 1800 Display View "Ledger From Which CO Reads Actual Data’: Overview RRR Ledger omen CO Reds Acs Ota B come eson Ledger Conon oman ar ame versn scrpon vat endl . * Paria vesion o ten vauaton = CO-CCA / CO-OM (Cost center Accounting / Internal Order Management ) 1. CO-OM planning, P&L planning, and profit center planning are now covered by SAP BPC for S/4HANA Finance (known as Integrated Business Planning) (SAP Note 2081400). If the business does not want to use SAP BPC for S/4HANA but need to use classic FI-GL and CO-OM planning functions instead, can continue to use the classic planning transactions. + FI-GL Planning - SAP Note 2253067 describes how to reactivate + Profit Center Planning (classic) ~ SAP Note 2345118 and 2313341 describe how to reactivate + Cost Center Planning by Cost Element ~ no longer in the menu but can be used in - KPO6 + Order Planning by Cost Element - no longer in the menu but can be used in SAP S/4 HANA, hitpssblogssap.com2018/0810/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparson-from-ecco-st-hanal 826snanore ‘SAP Gontroling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Si4 HANA | SAP Blogs + Project Planning by Cost Element — no longer in the menu but can be used in SAP S/4 HANA + Project Planning Overall - no longer in the menu but can be used in SAP S/4 HANA + Note that it is also possible to run the two solutions in parallel. SAP Note 2061419 describes how to retract data from SAP BPC for S/4HANA Finance + Transaction KEPM (Profitability Planning) supports both account-based CO-PA within the universal journal and costing-based CO-PA and is still on the menu In ECC planning G/L Planning: GPI2N / GPI2NA Plan data Change Charact. BOB [reer [ram my Project Overall Planning: CJ40 / CJ42 Change Cost Planning: Initial Screen Cost Planning “at Projet ef Currency Cost Center Planning: KP06/KPO7 hitpssblogssap.com2018/0810/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparson-from-ecco-st-hanalsnenora Change Cost Element/Activity Input Planning: Initial Screen 2ea Project planning: CJR2/CJR3 Planning Cost Elements/Activity Inputs Change: Initial screen 2aB layout 1-701 Cost Element Panning my Order Planning: KPF6/KPF7 hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal ‘SAP Controling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Sié HANA | SAP Blogs 1026snenoia ‘SAP Contoling (CO) Sub modules com ison fom ECC to Si4 HANA | SAP Blogs Planning Cost Elements/Activity Inputs Change: Initial screen a2 Fé Bb Layout cer [costélemene Panning Variables From Perio ToFeriod Fecal Year order or group (Cost Element or group ney ores Form Based Profit centre Planning: 7KEP/ 7KEI-6 hitpssblogssap.com2018/0810/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparson-from-ecco-st-hanal 126sie2nora SAP Contoting (C0) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Si4 HANA SAP Blogs Change Plan Costs/Revenues: Characteristics af [Z)tayou) [7] rote Layout (LSAT _Promeconer ran stn ore Form bsed Profitability Planning: KEPM gone ea Change Sales and Profit Plan: Aggregated values CO-PCC ( Product Costing Controlling.) 1. In ECC used base planning objects to store cost estimates that can be included in cost estimates for projects, sales orders and so on as items of type B (base planning object). The creation of cost estimates with reference to base planning objects is no longer supported in SAP S/4HANA. hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal 1206snenoia ‘SAP Controling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Sié HANA | SAP Blogs Instead, itis recommended to use transaction CKECP to prepare ad-hoc cost estimates and CKUC to prepare multilevel material. KKEL Change Base Planning Object: Master Data a & Campa ote tas oor ning Set wey een “ q tong er opeags TF 1% XQ RRR ERB InS/4 HANA CKECP, hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal 1926snenoia ‘SAP Controling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Sié HANA | SAP Blogs %) Ad Hoc Cost Estimate cron oem | ren tn ES ‘Costing Variant ‘ola ‘rgantaon Uns rot center ‘auton Date (oat vues 2. Activation of Material Ledger is a mandatory requirement with SAP S/4HANA. And activation of Actual costing is optional in $/4 HANA. ‘SPRO -> Controlling -> Product cost controlling -> Actual Costing / Material Ledger & Activate Material ledger for valuation area. Display View "Activation of Material Ledger": B mR B B_ Valuation Area | Company Code Ma. status MLACt. 10 1 soo, |v n we 200, mv 2 we 200, mv 2 1 500 my u 1e 500 mv 8 18 so00 a 16 me 000 a Execute OMX3 hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal Price Deter Price Det. Bindi 1426san0%8 ‘SAP Conlin (CO) Su modules comparison from ECC to Sié HANA| SAP logs Display View "Assignment of Material Ledger Types to Valuation Areas": B&B BR HB Valuation area | Mat. ledger type Status, 010 “ oi 012 013, ont eis, Then to production start-up, execute Transaction code: CKMSTART Production Startup of Mat. Ledger @ seeciononons (EL achange Rac Tp2 Iesatly After Parod Choe Processing Onions WM ackaround Processing vestnun Paral Processing Package Sine 1,000) fo hintary Purchasing Document cy a) + Separate currency customizing of Material Ledger (transactions OMX2 / OMX3) Is required, Material Ledger is acting on a subset of the currencies defined for Financials. There is no default Material Ledger Type ‘0000" anymore, hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal 1626snenoia ‘SAP Controling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Si4 HANA | SAP Blogs Display View "Define material ledger type": Overview RR & Dialog Struct ee | ML Type | CT fromFl CO CrcyTyp Manual YA Define material ledger tye "gp |B Define individual chars Descripton Yi Crey Type/Val. 10 Display View "Define individual characteristics": Overview - R Dios Seucure D] seitecce Tee = ¥ im etre material eager 1W etre neta B Creytype Short Descript. e ‘ompany code currency * 20 oun curency 2 foup currency profit center valuation It is not allowed to use an ML Type that references to currency settings defined in Flor CO (flags ‘Currency Types from FI resp. ‘Currency Types from CO’). Instead, the user has to define explicitly the currency and valuation types that are relevant for Material Ledger. Material Price Analysis (Transaction CKM3): Plan/Actual Comparison is removed in new CKM3 InSi4 HANA Material Price Analysis am @ [Sas Order Stock roe Stock sia Year 22 [2007| (4) Perseus (1) Pered Opened Cureton 10 Company ce cureney . vue {i Prices and ventory Values @ SiFial[Y |(z | 26/5] |) & ‘usiness Tansacton Objector fusibess Tanscton Unt Changein Quinny alveChange| Movement Mice Per | Tol stock, Toul Vale ceed Period opening htpssblogssap.com2018/0/10/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsom-from-ecco-s4-hanal 1626snanore ‘SAP Gontroling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Si4 HANA | SAP Blogs 1. Cost of goods sold (COGS) postings is captured at the time of the goods issue from the warehouse. New functions are available to split the COGS posting to multiple accounts in accordance with the relative weight of the assigned cost components, Functions to support the matching principle between revenues and COGS are planned. InECC At PGI posting Fl Posting based on the accounts defined in OBYC setting as per Valuation Class of the Material. i 4] Display Document: Data Entry View SW] WE ovepycarency comrade View ‘oocument Date "22.11.2017" Posting Date 22.11,2017 Period 6 tence eano00ne18 cross-compso REY 1 sees) o ecount_.Descrpton cur, |. mocener|D/c | Laccurtamountsp.G/LAssgnment _|/L Account € 2M 5212900810 costoFsales= ux s0012000 s 000 21290690 In S/4 HANA Financial Accounting (New) -> General Ledger Accounting (New) -> Periodic Processing > Integration -> Materials Management -> Define Accounts for Splitting the Cost of Goods Sold Display View "Cost Splitting Profile": Overview BR BR Spining oF Cost oF C008 STE | c.g spining moe \ Costsoitnarrafie | fa cosspitngrrofie | cores | chwsAccs —cosiceme sts [bp owalescosAccour, if oh 2000 10 . BS Company Code Settings (Document Type Mapping hitpssblogssap.com2018/0810/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparson-from-ecco-st-hanal 726snenoia ‘SAP Controling (CO) Sub modules com Display View “Detailed COGS Accounts": Overview mR son ftom ECC to Sié HANA | SAP Blogs Fetsing atest of ood S18 | conspinng rosie Bt Sling Protie |) conoting rea 1000 Chart Accounts 2000 IB Company Code Stings | cost comp. Sr 0 [Bs Documen Type Mapring nated COGS Accounts BCocsacct Comp [Name ofCost Component TargerAce___ShortText__ beaut 50300000 301 rect Mater sosone0c [2ics rect tenis ‘50300000 103 ‘Thr Party 50302000 COGS Thed Party oO ‘sosoocco 0s Matera Overhead ——_Sos0s000 cogs MateralOvehd Sosoco00 201 Peseneltme 0304000 COGS Paronnel Tra | 0300000 202 ‘Mache te Soseso00coGsmacine Tme 0300000 203 SetUp tre esc6c00 COGS Setup Tme o 51300000 209 production Ovefead 50507000 COGS Productn Ovehd__C ‘59083000 201 Dect Materal 50901000 COGS Dect Materal a Display View "Company Code Settings": Overview o B&R EG Spliting of Cost of Goods Sold | Company Code Settings {BE Cost Spliting Profle | E3 Company Code Valuation View | ValidFrom | CostSpliting Profite [ll Bs Detailed COGS Accour) Legal Valuation v 01.04.2017 2 ~ ° ‘Wl Company Codesenings | 0 0 tegalValuation v 01.04.2017 22 Be Document Type Mapping 0 0 Legal Valuation v 01.04.2017 © 21. ° 0 tegal valuation v 01.04.2017 zt ° 0 Legal Valuation v 01.04.2017 22 no 0 tegal Valuation v 01.04.2017 22 Be 0 tegalValuation v 01.04.2017 22 150 0 Legal Valuation v 01.04.2017 22 v0 0 tegal valuation v 01.04.2017 22 woed.om7 74 ie [creck || pox] {08 Devky 5 [ROR Waters Docume) (eo00000952] [2017] [DLN Ll 5 Te oftoamensn Acconing eteeey [| Created On zeae) ——~—~—~S«| Documents in Accounting ‘Transacton Code [Change Outbound DeWvary | "4900000055 Accounting document | /Acoe0oRWOO Contiolng Document | "A00000RV00_Controlna Dacument ‘AODBDDAVOD Nate iedger hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal 1826sro2re019 ‘SAP Controling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Si4 HANA]| SAP Blogs (Ale (SL ==] 2 Trmfex]s] 4, Production order variances can be split to multiple accounts to separate scrap, price variances, quantity variances, and so on Display View "Price Differences Splitting Profile": Overview AR HR iting of Price Diferences | price pierences Spitting Profile ‘rice Differences Spliting price Acets Price Diff. Splitting Profile Name [il hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal 19261122/2018 ‘SAP Controlling (CO) Sub modules comparison fom ECC to Si4 HANA | SAP Blogs Display View "Detailed Price Difference Accounts": Overview > 8 5K B [Setring ofrriceiferences | price ot sphingProfie ~ Ib Price DferencesSletin| Controting Area WE Detaled Price eren| Chur of Accouns [Bs Company Code Settings etme a Si “Gio weet Garey vee, erssrano oO ‘0 Rue ie Varnes pr saranee ao ie heron Ht vce fara a 10 pe rx Vee vr sree Oo {380 cP Voce ferret Io Display View "Company Code Settings": Overview 3 & KR BR Sing of rice DHE | Company Code Seings BB Price Differences Splitting) & Company Code Valid From Price Diff. Profile Be Detailed Price Differen ne 1 a ‘WW Company Code Settings 230 at 50 z v0 z 90 1 ue 1 30 1 Document Number {200000017 ‘Company Code ] Fiscal Year Document Date [29.02.2017] Posting Date 29.09.2017, Period 4] Reference ‘cross-comp.No. ] Currency | 7 Texts Bxst Oo ‘Ledger Group 5/50) 52076000 Price Diferenc 700.00- vo CO-COPA ( Profitability Analysis) 1. In ECC it was advised to use costing-based CO-PA rather than, account-based CO-PA. The main reason for this was: hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal 20126snanore ‘SAP Gontroling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Si4 HANA | SAP Blogs + Togenerate the contribution-margin report with a breakdown of their cost-of-sales down to the cost components level for each cost bucket + Toget a production variance report by variance categories + To get the breakdown of the individual cost buckets beyond the total value that was posted to the general ledger. + This functionality was not available in COPA account base before and therefore companies used Cost Base COPA. The biggest issue with Cost based was the reconciliation effort because cost base COPA did not use a direct alignment to the general ledger accounts. With SAP HANA primary database it aligns COPA structure with the general ledger. Due to this, itis now advised companies to use account-based CO-PA and not costing-based CO-PA. In ECC Maintain Operating Concern C) BBacions ooasrucure = = 8) “Type of Proftabily Analysis Micosiino-based Daa structure [> aciware sans om Me] tied block a hitpssblogssap.com2018/0810/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparson-from-ecco-st-hanal 28snanore ‘SAP Contaling (CO} Sub modules comparison ftom ECC to Sié HANA] SAP Blogs Maintain Operating Concern Do Bit Bower pesingcances JETT] tare peretg concen eee eee a sed Poa Anas In $/4 HANA Maintain Operating Concern CS Bipctons JPomastrucure i Operating concern HS88]] operating Concern staus Description ‘Operating Concern “Type of Proftabilty Analysis MiAccount-based Data structure [> Depay) saws oon (WS) hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal 2228sre2nota SAP Contoting (CO) Sub modules comparison fom ECC to SIA HANA] SAP Blogs Maintain Operating Concern DG BBrcons Posastucture operaing concern [vou Operating Concern status ‘oom [baa Structure Environment ey ‘operating concern currency UW) siLantan Rupee Fiscal year variant 13) Ape Mare, speci periods ‘Company Code Curreney % Opcencern creyPeCtr valuation Comp.Code creyPrctrvaluaton 2d period type - weeks CO-ABC (Account Based Costing) ‘ABC using delta versions is not supported in SAP S/4HANA (for more details see note 2270408 - Activity- Based Costing), Reference: Simplification List for SAP S/4HANA 1709 Initial Shipment Stack, Document Version: 1.01 - 2017-09-19 Other Related Blogs : https: //blogs.sap.com/2018/06/25/sap-finance-sub-module-comparison-from-ecc-to-s4-hana/ : SAP Finance Sub modules comparison from ECC to S/4 HANA hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal 228snenoia ‘SAP Controling (CO) Sub modules com ison ftom ECC to Si4 HANA | SAP Blogs Like Alert Moderator Assigned tags SAP S/4HANAFinance | FIN (Finance) | FIN ontroling | FINCost Object Controlling | FIN Product Cost Planning | View more, Related Blogs ‘SAP Finance Sub modules comparison from ECC to $/4 HANA, By Kesharika Goonawardena , Jun 25, 2018 hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal 2028snenoia ‘SAP Gontroling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Si4 HANA | SAP Blogs SAP S/4 Finance blog series-4-Changes in Controlling & how to use them By Former Member , Nov 02, 2015 New GL & New asset accounting for $/4 HANA Finance By Former Member , Oct 11, 2016 Related Questions Sales planning issues through SAP HANA ACCOUNTING BASED method. By KWANGJIN KIM , Jan 07, 2019 S/4 customizing migration to sand box By Former Member , Nov 18, 2016 S/AHANA on-premise - Extensibility of Financial apps (embedded 8W apps) By Former Member , Jul19, 2017 4.Comments You must be Logged on to comment or reply to a post. e& Shinas Hamsa September 20, 2018 at 12:11 pm ‘Simple, and Fruitful. Thanks for sharing. Like (2) @ vesruian October 17,2018 at 5:37 pm ‘Thank you very much for sharing this ,Extremely very helpful Like (a) @ verammad usman November 22, 2018 at 7:06 pm You Beautifully and simply designed the changes. I really appreciate it. Keep it up. hitpssblogssap.com2018/0/0/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparsor-from-ecco-st-hanal 25128snenoia ‘SAP Controling (CO) Sub modules comparison from ECC to Sié HANA | SAP Blogs Thank you. e@ Jorge Calderon December 21, 2018 at 3:49 pm Excellent material, very didactic. Thank you Privacy Legal Disclosure Trademark sitemap Share & Follow Terms of Use Copyright Cookie Preferences Newsletter hitpssblogssap.com2018/0810/sap-contaling-co-sub-modules-comparson-from-ecco-st-hanal 2628