Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COBIT FOCUS
Can COBIT 5 principles and enablers be applied to support strategic planning exercises?
Two years ago in Mexico City, work was underway at an organization that offers managed print services and
document solutions. This organization decided to start an effort to reinforce its governance and
management model, starting with strategic planning. For this organization, planning and strategic
alignment, among their many different aspects, were something relatively new and out of practice, but
necessary in order to continue organizational growth (which was greater than 10-12 percent annually during
the preceding 5 years).
Even when the organization started this effort, with the support of a specialized consulting rm, the
executive group and the organizational culture were not yet ready to adopt and adapt to these new
concepts. Prior to this engagement, the organization’s strategic planning was basically a document de ned
by the owner and president of the company.
Given this scenario and the organization’s desire to run a new, practical, short, participative and renewed
exercise, the decision was made, with the help of a consultant, to create a whole new approach to review
and adjust the strategic plan.
The initial idea was to choose an alternative way to run the exercise; learning from previous mistakes,
revising the original approach and strategies, and combining different techniques and methods, applied in
an integrated and simple way, to generate the company’s updated strategic planning. But this time, the
exercise would add a particular variant: concepts from COBIT 5, speci cally, 2 of the 5 principles and the 7
enablers, in order to reinforce important concepts among the executive group and other organizational
areas. The organization would adopt from COBIT 5 its:
Holistic approach
End-to-end vision
Relevant enablers (from the 7) that apply to the executive strategies and tactics for the company and
employees
The documented strategy to undertake the strategic planning exercise was integrated using methods and
techniques including:
SWOT matrix to generate strategies and tactics among the executive group
Balanced scorecard (BSC) methodology to classify the indicators and strike a balance between hard
and soft aspects
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) matrix to analyze the organization’s current situation in the market,
according to its product and service portfolio
Governance and management based in COBIT 5 to de ne speci c principles for the executive group to
orient, increase and clarify the vision to create and align strategies with tactics
Indicator system to de ne the 4 basic elements that at least all key performance indicators (KPIs)
must integrate in the scorecard (purpose, formula, source of data and frequency)
Information Mapping to set some speci c principles for the executive group in order to limit or restrict
the number of strategies and tactics generated
3. General planning information:
Strategic cascading—Part of the Hoshin Kanri method and consisting of splitting from the vision down to
the objectives and business goals. Both aspects are de ned by the president of the organization and
then from the objectives and goals, continuing down to the strategies and KPIs.
SWOT crossing—Part of the SWOT analysis and the Hoshin Kanri method. It consists of generating
strategies and KPIs, then tactics and indicators (cascading), both based on the SWOT matrix and other
data/information elaborated on or gathered by the executive group.
Principle 2: Implementation of a holistic thought process considering all areas and their
interrelationships. The executive group was tasked with taking into consideration the organizational
aspects of the customer (the 7 enablers) in order to de ne good, complete and integrated strategies and
tactics. COBIT 5’s 7 enablers are:
2. Processes
3. Organizational Structures
5. Information
Now, when this exercise is repeated with the same formula, the planning sessions with executives are
shorter; the executive group is more proactive and more focused on business goals—armed with a clear
understanding of a holistic and end-to-end approach. Another bene t to the organization is an
understanding of what elements to consider while thinking or generating strategies and tactics. Over and
above these bene ts, the organization saw great results in 2014, indicating that almost 90 percent of its
areas achieved nearly 80 percent of their objectives and goals set forth in the strategic plan. As a result, the
expectations for 2015 are high.
One nal lesson learned from this case is the fact that now the organization has a clear idea of the
responsibilities of the president and the board, as well as the responsibilities of the management body. This
simple change improves the organization with regard to governance and management.
QUICK LINKS
Resources
@ ISACA
COBIT Focus
ISACA Now Blog
ISACA Podcasts
Glossary
Navigating COVID-19 | Website Feedback | Contact Us | Terms | Privacy | California Privacy Policy
| ©2020 ISACA. All rights reserved.