Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Synthesis and Antimicrobial Activity of Novel 1,4,5-Triphenyl-1H-Imidazol - (1,2,3) - Triazole Derivatives
Synthesis and Antimicrobial Activity of Novel 1,4,5-Triphenyl-1H-Imidazol - (1,2,3) - Triazole Derivatives
, 2017.
Abstract—Novel 1-phenyl-4-((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole
derivatives were synthesized by click chemistry reaction and screened for antimicrobial activity against gram-
positive and gram-negative bacterial and fungal species. All the compounds were characterized by 1H and
13
C NMR, IR, and mass spectral data. The results of antibacterial study indicated that 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-4-
((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole, 1-(4-(4-((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-
1H-imidazol-2-yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)phenyl)ethanone, 1-(2,6-dichloro-4-nitrophe-
nyl)-4-((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole, and 1-(2-methoxy-4-
nitrophenyl)-4-((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole showed appre-
ciable antibacterial activity while 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)phe-
noxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole, 1-(2,6-dichloro-4-nitrophenyl)-4-((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-
yl)phenoxy)methyl)- 1H-1,2,3-triazole, and 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-
yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole emerged as the most potential antifungal agents.
589
590 KUMAR et al.
for 2 h to obtain intermediate 1,4,5-triphenyl-2-(4- istry reaction conditions in presence of copper iodide
(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)phenyl)-1H-imidazole (II); inter- and dry THF at room temperature for 10–12 h to
mediate (II) was common to all derivatives being syn- result in novel 4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-
thesized. In the final step, intermediate (II) was con- yl)phenoltriazole derivatives (IIIa–j) in quantitative
densed with various aromatic azides under click chem- yields.
NH2 CHO Ph N
Ph O OH
NH4OAc, I 2 (10 mol % )
+ + Ph N
EtOH, 75°C
Ph O
OH
I
Ph N Ph N
OH K2CO3, DM F O
Ph N + Br Ph N
2 h, Reflux
I II
Ph N3 N
N N
Ph N
O Dry THF, CuI N
N + O R
Ph RT, 10–12 h
Ph N
R
II
(IIIa)–(IIIj)
(IIIa) R = H (IIIf) R = 4-Br
(IIIb) R = 4-NO 2 (IIIg) R = 4-NO 2, 2,6-Cl
(IIIc) R = 4-Ac (IIIh) R = 4-NO 2, 2-OCH3
(IIId) R = 4-F (IIIi) R = 4-CH 3
(IIIe) R = 4-Cl (IIIj) R = 4-OCH 3
All the derivatives were characterized by 1H and13C 1H NMR spectra, the presence of singlet resonances
NMR, IR, and ESI-MS spectra. Compounds (IIIa–j) at 5.27–5.11 and 9.17–8.91 ppm were attributed to the
showed IR absorption bands ranging from 3144 to methylene protons attached to oxygen atom and pro-
3013 cm–1 for aromatic C–H stretching. There were ton of 1,2,3-triazole ring, respectively, whereas the cor-
also absorptions due to C=C and C=N stretchings at responding carbon resonances in the 13C NMR spectra
1685–1643 and 1250–1234 cm–1, respectively. In were observed at 59.8–60.9 and 123.3–123.0 ppm,
Cl N
Cl
Cl O
O N
O N
N HN
N N
O
N N
Imidazole based anti fungal drug Imidazole based anti bacterial agent Imidazole based anti fungal drug
HN HO O
O O
N O
O O Cl NH2 S
N S N H2 N N
O N
N N
OH
S N N O
N
H Cl Cl N O
HO
H2 N
1,2,3-Triazole based drug as an antibiotic used 1,2,3-Triazole based drug as an angiogenesis 1,2,3-Triazole based drug
in the treatment of bacterial infections inhibitor useful in cancer therapy as -lactamase inhibitor
respectively. All the rest of the protons and carbons C. albicans, and the rest of the compounds showed
resonated at expected regions. moderate activity.
using 25% ethylacetate in hexane as eluent to yield dichloromethane. The combined organic layers were
compound (I) [30]. Pale yellow solid, yield 88%, mp dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated to get
175–177°C. 1H NMR: 9.07 (s, 1H, OH), 7.57 (d, J = the final product (IIIa–j). The crude products were
7.2 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.36 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.23– purified by column chromatography with 30% of ethyl
7.18 (m, 9H, Ph), 7.12 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.04 (d, acetate in hexane.
J = 6.0 Hz, 2H, Ph), 6.82 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ph).
1-Phenyl-4-((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-
1,4,5-Triphenyl-2-(4-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)phenyl)- yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole (IIIa). Yellow
1H-imidazole (II). Compound (I) (1.0 mol) along with solid, yield 82%, mp 180–183°C. IR: 3074, 1643,
1.5 mol of potassium carbonate was dissolved in 1234, 1033. 1H NMR: 8.93 (s, 1H, =CH triazole ring),
dimethylformamide (DMF) and solution of propargyl 8.10 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ph), 8.02 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H,
bromide (1.5 mol) in DMF was added. Reaction mix- Ph), 7.48 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.38–7.33 (m, 5H,
ture was stirred and refluxed to afford crude 1,4,5- Ph), 7.30–7.26 (m, 4H, Ph), 7.26–7.16 (m, 7H, Ph),
triphenyl-2-(4-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)phenyl)-1H-imid- 7.00 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, Ph), 5.11 (s, 2H, CH2).
azole. This crude residue was purified by column 13C NMR: 157.5, 144.3, 144.1, 143.5, 139.3, 136.6,
chromatography over silica gel (100–200 mesh) in 136.4, 136.3, 134.3, 131.1, 129.8, 129.2, 128.6, 128.5,
15% ethyl acetate in hexane to get compound (II) in 128.3, 1282, 128.1, 126.2, 123.2, 119.7, 119.2, 119.1,
pure state. Pale yellow solid, yield 88%, mp 149– 114.1, 59.8. ESI-MS, m/z: 546 (M + 1) observed for
151°C.1H NMR: 7.59 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.37 (d, C36H27N5O.
J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.28–7.21 (m, 7H, Ph), 7.19 (s,
2H, Ph), 7.13–7.10 (m, 2H, Ph), 7.06–7.01 (m, 2H, 1-(4-Nitrophenyl)-4-((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H-
Ph), 6.84 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ph), 4.66 (s, 2H, CH2), imidazol-2-yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole (IIIb).
2.51 (s, 1H, ≡CH). 13C NMR: 157.5, 146.6, 138.5, Yellow solid, yield 91%, mp 185–187°C. IR: 3132,
134.6, 131.1, 130.7, 130.6, 130.2, 129.9, 129.0, 128.6, 1660, 1485, 1250. 1H NMR: 9.16 (s, 1H, =CH triazole
128.5, 128.3, 128.2, 127.9, 127.3, 126.5, 124.1, 114.5, ring), 8.47 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ph), 8.24 (d, J = 9.1 Hz,
78.3, 75.6, 55.7. ESI-MS, m/z: 427 (M + 1) observed 2H, Ph), 7.48 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.38–7.31 (m,
for C30H22N2O. 5H, Ph), 7.31–7.28 (m, 3H, Ph), 7.27–7.12 (m, 7H,
Ph), 7.00 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ph), 5.25 (s, 2H, CH2).
4-(1,4,5-Triphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)phenoltri- 13C NMR: 160.1, 146.7, 144.1, 143.6, 139.3, 136.7,
azole derivatives (IIIa–j). Compound (II) (1.0 mmol) 136.5, 136.4, 131.2, 130.1, 129.7, 129.2, 128.7, 128.5,
was dissolved in dry THF (10 mL) and catalytic 128.4, 128.3, 128.2, 126.3, 123.2, 123.3, 119.8, 119.3,
amount of copper iodide was added. To this, substi- 119.1, 114.2, 60.0. ESI-MS, m/z: 591 (M + 1) observed
tuted aromatic azides (1.0 mmol) in dry THF were for C36H26N6O3.
added slowly while stirring at room temperature under
nitrogen atmosphere for 12 h. Later, the solvent was 1-(4-(4-((4-(1,4,5-Triphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-
removed under reduced pressure and the residue was phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)phenyl)eth-
diluted with distilled water and extracted thrice with anone (IIIc). Yellow solid, yield 87%, mp 179–180°C.
IR: 3111, 2970, 1677, 1597, 1250. 1H NMR: 9.08 (s, 1-(2-Methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-4-((4-(1,4,5-triph-
1H, =CH triazole ring), 8.17 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ph), enyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-tri-
8.09 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.50 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, azole (IIIh). Yellow solid, yield 88%, mp 155–157°C.
Ph), 7.39–7.33 (m, 5H, Ph), 7.31–7.28 (m, 3H, Ph), IR: 3144, 2970, 1666, 1342, 1250. 1H NMR: 8.91(s,
7.26–7.16 (m, 7H, Ph), 7.01 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, Ph), 1H, =CH triazole ring), 8.15 – 8.05 (m, 3H, Ph), 7.50
5.24 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.64 (s, 3H, CH3).13C NMR: 198.9, (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.34 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 5H, Ph),
157.9, 144.5, 144.1, 143.8, 139.5, 136.8, 136.5, 136.4, 7.30–7.17 (m, 10H, Ph), 7.01 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, Ph),
131.1, 131.0, 129.6, 129.1, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.3, 5.24 (s, 2H, CH2), 3.61 (s, 3H, CH3). ESI-MS, m/z:
128.1, 126.3, 123.2, 123.0, 119.8, 119.3, 119.1, 114.3, 621 (M + 1) observed for C37H28N6O4.
60.9, 26.7. ESI-MS, m/z: 588 (M + 1) observed for 1-(p-Tolyl)-4-((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H-imidazol-
C36H26N5O2. 2-yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole (IIIi). Yellow
1-(4-Fluorophenyl)-4-((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H- solid, yield 82%, mp 171–173°C. IR: 3016, 2970, 1685,
imidazol-2-yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole (IIId). 1248. 1H NMR: 9.06 (s, 1H, =CH triazole ring), 8.17
Yellow solid, yield 83%, mp 169–171°C. IR: 3111, (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ph), 8.09 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ph),
2919, 1669, 1527, 1285. 1H NMR: 9.17 (s, 1H, =CH 7.50 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.39–7.33 (m, 5H, Ph),
triazole ring), 8.49 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ph), 8.24 (d, 7.31–7.28 (m, 3H, Ph), 7.26–7.16 (m, 7H, Ph), 7.00
J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.5 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.38– (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, Ph), 5.23 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.30 (s,
7.31 (m, 5H, Ph), 7.31–7.28 (m, 3H, Ph), 7.28–7.13 3H, CH3).13C NMR: 157.8, 144.5, 144.0, 143.8, 139.4,
(m, 7H, Ph), 7.07 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ph), 5.27 (s, 2H, 136.7, 136.5, 136.4, 134.4, 131.1, 130.0, 129.1, 128.7,
CH2).13C NMR: 157.9, 144.6, 144.1, 143.7, 139.5, 128.6, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 126.3, 123.0, 119.8, 119.2,
136.7, 136.5, 136.4, 134.4, 131.1, 130.0, 129.1, 128.7, 119.6, 114.3, 60.8, 21.1. ESI-MS, m/z: 560 (M + 1)
128.6, 128.4, 128.3, 128.2, 126.2, 123.1, 119.7, 119.2, observed for C37H29N5O.
119.1, 114.4, 60.6. ESI-MS m/z: 564 (M + 1) observed 1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-4-((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H-
for C36H26FN5O. imidazol-2-yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole (IIIj).
1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-4-((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H- Yellow solid, yield 85%, mp 180–182°C. IR: 3013,
imidazol-2-yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole (IIIe). 2853, 1675, 1249, 1115. 1H NMR: 9.08 (s, 1H, =CH
Paleyellow solid, yield 85%, mp 175–177°C. IR: 3132, triazole ring), 8.17 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ph), 8.09 (d,
2971, 1679, 1364, 1245. 1H NMR: 9.11 (s, 1H, =CH J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.50 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ph),
triazole ring), 8.45 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ph), 8.24 (d, 7.38–7.33 (m, 5H, Ph), 7.30–7.14 (m, 10H, Ph), 7.01
J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.47 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ph), (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, Ph), 5.24 (s, 2H, CH2), 3.32 (s,
7.37–7.31 (m, 5H, Ph), 7.31–7.28 (m, 3H, Ph), 7.27– 3H, CH3). 13C NMR: 157.8, 144.3, 144.2, 143.7, 139.5,
7.12 (m, 7H, Ph), 7.00 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ph), 5.25 (s, 136.8, 136.5, 136.4, 131.2, 129.9, 129.6, 129.1, 128.7,
2H, CH2). ESI-MS, m/z: 580 (M + 1) observed for 128.6, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 126.3, 123.3, 123.1, 119.9,
C36H26ClN5O. 119.3, 119.1, 114.2, 60.7, 26.3. ESI-MS, m/z: 576
(M + 1) observed for C37H29N5O2.
1-(4-Bromophenyl)-4-((4-(1,4,5-triphenyl-1H-
imidazol-2-yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole (IIIf).
Yellow solid, yield 86%, mp 167–169°C. IR spectrum: Biological Assay
3016, 2970, 2223, 1685, 1523, 1248. 1H NMR: 9.14 (s,
1H, =CH triazole ring), 8.47 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ph), Antibacterial assay. All the synthesized compounds
8.24 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.47 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, were evaluated for their in vitro antibacterial activity
Ph), 7.37–7.31 (m, 5H, Ph), 7.31–7.28 (m, 3H, Ph), against gram-positive bacteria S. aureus and B. subtilis
7.27–7.12 (m, 7H, Ph), 7.01 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ph), and gram-negative bacteria E. coli and K. pneumonia.
5.26 (s, 2H, CH2). ESI-MS, m/z: 624 (M + 1) The bacterialcultures were grown in nutrient agar
observed for C36H26BrN5O. media and sub cultured for the better growth (log-
phase cultures) in a liquid nutrient broth medium and
1-(2,6-Dichloro-4-nitrophenyl)-4-((4-(1,4,5- further inoculation onto the Petri plates for the exper-
triphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)phenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3- iments. The broth cultures were diluted with sterilized
triazole (IIIg). Yellow solid, yield 90%, mp 170– saline to bring the final size of inoculums approxi-
172°C. IR: 3111, 2970, 1677, 1597, 1246. 1H NMR: mately to 105–106 CFU/mL. The compounds were
9.01 (s, 1H, =CH triazole ring), 8.23 (s, 2H, Ph), 7.46 diluted in DMSO for biological assays. The bacterial
(d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.39–7.30 (m, 5H, Ph), 7.29– culture inoculums were placed on the media and incu-
7.25 (m, 3H, Ph), 7.21–7.11 (m, 7H, Ph), 7.03 (d, J = bated at 37°C for 24–48 h along with the chemical
8.8 Hz, 2H, Ph), 5.23 (s, 2H, CH2).13C NMR: 157.9, disks dipped and placed over the media. The zones of
146.5, 144.1, 143.8, 139.4, 136.7, 136.5, 136.4, 131.2, bacterial growth inhibition were measured, using the
130.0, 129.6, 129.1, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, diameter of the zone (mm) as a unit to measure the
126.3, 123.4, 123.3, 120.1, 119.4, 119.1, 114.3, 58.9. antibacterial activity. All the experiments were carried
ESI-MS, m/z: 659 (M + 1) observed for C36H24Cl2N6O3. out in triplicates. The results were compared with the
activity of the standard antibiotic ampicillin 7. Achar, K.C.S., Hosamani, K.M., and Seethara-
(100 µg/mL). For disk diffusion method, the test mareddy, H.R., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2010, vol. 45,
compound was introduced onto the disk and then pp. 2048–2054.
allowed to dry. Once the disk was completely saturated 8. Amir, M., Ahsan, I., Akhtar, W., Khan, S.A., and Ali, I.,
Indian J. Chem., 2011, vol. 50B, pp. 207–213.
with the test compound, it was introduced onto the
9. Mader, M., Dios, A., Shih, C., Bonjouklian, R., and
upper layer of the medium containing the bacterial Tiechao, L., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2008, vol. 18,
inoculum. The Petri dishes were incubated overnight pp. 179–183.
at 37°C for 24 h. 10. Puratchikody, A. and Mukesh, D., Bioorg. Med. Chem.,
Antifungal assay. The antifungal activity of synthe- 2007, vol. 17, pp. 1083–1090.
sized compounds was tested against two pathogenic 11. Harsha, T., Krishnanand, S.T., Laxmi, A., and Chan-
fungi, A. flavus and C. albicans, by the poison plate drashekar., Res. J. Pharm., Biol. Chem. Sci., 2010,
technique. Test compounds were dissolved in DMSO vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 23–30.
(10 mL) before mixing with potato dextrose agar 12. Sharma, D., Narasimhan, B., Kumar, P., Judge, V.,
Narang, R., De Clercq, E., and Balzarini, J., Eur. J.
medium (PDA, 90 mL). The final concentration of Med. Chem., 2009, vol. 44, pp. 2347–2353.
compounds in the medium was maintained to be 13. Shingalapur, R.V., Hosamani, K.M., and Keri, R.S.,
100 µg/mL. Above-mentioned speciesof fungi were Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2009, vol. 44, pp. 4244–4248.
incubated in PDA at 25 ± 1°C for 3–4 days to get good 14. Pinzam., Farinaz., and Cerri A., J. Med. Chem., 1993,
mycelium growth for antifungal assay; then, a mycelia vol. 36, pp. 4214–4220.
disk approximately 0.45 cm in diameter cut from the 15. Hadizadeh, F., Hosseinzadeh, H., Sadat Motamed-
culture medium was picked up with a sterilized inocu- Shariaty, V., Seifi, M., and Kazemi, S., Iranian J.
lation needle and inoculated in the center of a PDA Pharm. Res., 2008, vol. 7, pp. 29–33.
plate. The inoculated plates were incubated at 25 ± 16. Whiting, M.J., Tripp, C., Lin, Y.C., Lindstrom, W.,
1°C for 5 days. DMSO in sterilized distilled water was Olson, A.J., Elder, J.H., Sharpless, K.B., and Fokin, V.V.,
used as control, while clotrimazole was used as stan- J. Med. Chem., 2006, vol. 49, pp. 7697–7710.
dard for all the treatments; three replicates were per- 17. Dorota, G.P., Jan, B., and Iwona, E.G., Eur. J. Med.
Chem., 2012, vol. 47, pp. 501–509.
formed. The radial growth of the fungal colonies was 18. Turan-Zitouni, G., Kaplancikli, Z.A., Yildiz, M.T.,
measured on the fourth day, and the data were statisti- Chevallet, P., and Kaya, D., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2005,
cally analyzed. The in vitro inhibition effects of the test vol. 40, pp. 607–613.
compounds on the fungi were calculated by the given for- 19. Ross, S.A., Gulve, E.A., and Wang, M., Chem. Rev.,
mula: CV = A – B/A, where A represents the diameter of 2004, vol. 104, pp. 1255–1282.
fungi growth on untreated PDA, B, the diameter of fungi 20. Moreno-Manas, M., Arredondo, Y., Pleixats, R., Teix-
on treated PDA, and CV, the rate of inhibition. ido, M., Haga, M.M., Palacin, C., Castello, J.M., and
Oritiz, J.A., J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1992, vol. 29,
pp. 1557–1560.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 21. Shukla, D.K. and Sribastava, S.D., Indian J. Chem.,
2008, vol. 47B, pp. 463–469.
We thank DST-FIST Program of India 22. Agalave, S.G., Maujan, S.R., and Pore, V.S., Chem.
(SR/FST/CSI-213/2010) for infrastructural facilities. Asian J., 2011, vol. 6, pp. 2696–2718.
B.S. Kumar would like to acknowledge UGC-New 23. Walczak, K., Gondela, A., and Suwinski, J., Eur. J.
Delhi, India, for Junior Research Fellowship. We also Med. Chem., 2004, vol. 39, pp. 849–853.
thank Director of CFRD, Osmania University, 24. Shafi, S., MahboobAlam, M., Mulakayala, N.,
Hyderabad, for providing spectral analysis facilities. Mulakayala, C., Vanaja, G., Kalle, A.M., Pallu, R.,
and Alam, M.S., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2012, vol. 49,
pp. 324–333.
REFERENCES 25. Mossman, T., J. Immunol. Methods, 1983, vol. 65,
1. Ramachandran, R., Rani, M., Senthan, S., and Kabi- pp. 55–63.
lan, S., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2011, vol. 46, pp. 1926– 26. Giffin, M.J., Heaslet, H., Brik, A., Lin, Y.C., Cauvi, G.,
1934. Wong, C.H., McRee, D.E., Elder, J.H., Stout, C.D.,
and Torbett, B.E., J. Med. Chem., 2008, vol. 51,
2. Nagarapu, L., Satyender, A., Rajashaker, B., Srinivas, K., pp. 6266–6270.
Rani, P.R., Radhika, K., and Subhashini, G., Bioorg. 27. Bektas, H., Karaali, N., Sahin, D., Demirbas, A.,
Med. Chem. Lett., 2008, vol. 18, pp. 1167–1171. Karaoglu, S.A., and Demirbas, N., Molecules, 2010,
3. Padmavathi, V., Prema kumara, C., Venkatesh, B.C., vol. 15, pp. 2427–2438.
and Padmaja, A., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2011, vol. 46, 28. Boddy, I.K., Briggs, G.G., Harrison, R.P., Jones, T.H.,
pp. 5317–5326. O’Mahony, M.J., Marlow, I.D., Roberts, B.G., Willis, R.J.,
4. Hussain, T., Siddiqui, H.L., Rehman, M.Z., Bardsley, R., and Reid, J., Pest Manage. Sci., 1996,
Yasinzai, M.M., and Parvez, M., Eur. J. Med. Chem., vol. 48, pp. 189–196.
2009, vol. 44, pp. 4654–4660. 29. Aher, N.G., Pore, V.S., Mishra, N.N., Kumar, A.,
5. Congiu, C.,Cocco, M.T., and Onnis, V., Bioorg. Med. Shukla, P.K., Sharma, A., and Bhat, M.K., Bioorg.
Chem. Lett., 2008, vol. 18, pp. 989–993. Med. Chem. Lett., 2009, vol. 19, pp. 759–763.
6. Refaat, H.M., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2010, vol. 45, 30. Kidwai, M. and Mothsra, P., Tetrahedron Lett., 2006,
pp. 2949–2956. vol. 47, pp. 5029–5031.