Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CAPACITY
MANAGEMENT
Chapter Five
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Learning Objectives
LO5–1: Explain what capacity management is and
why it is strategically important.
LO5–2: Exemplify how to plan capacity.
LO5–3: Evaluate capacity alternatives using
decision trees.
LO5–4: Compare capacity planning in services to
capacity planning in manufacturing
5-2
Economies of Scale Made of Steel
5-3
Capacity Management in Operations
5-4
Capacity Planning Time Durations
Long range
Intermediate range
Short range
5-5
Strategic Capacity Planning
Determining the overall level of capacity-intensive
resources that best supports the company’s long-
range competitive strategy
Facilities
Equipment
5-6
Capacity Planning Concepts
Capacity utilization rate – a measure of how close
the firm is to its best possible operating level
5-7
Capacity Planning Concepts
Capacity focus – the idea that a production facility
works best when it is concentrated on a limited set
of production objectives
Focused factory or plant within a plant (PWP) concept
Capacity flexibility – the ability to rapidly increase
or decrease product levels or the ability to shift
rapidly from one product or service to another
Comes from the plant, processes, and workers or from
strategies that use the capacity of other organizations
5-8
Capacity Flexibility
5-9
Considerations in Changing Capacity
Maintaining System Balance
• Outsourcing
• Sharing capacity
Decreasing Capacity
• Temporary reductions
• Permanent reductions
5-10
Frequent versus Infrequent Capacity
Expansions
5-11
Determining Capacity Requirements
5-12
Example 5.1—Determining Capacity
Requirements
Stewart Company produces two flavors of salad
dressing.
Paul’s and Newman’s
Each is available in bottles and single-serving bags.
What are the capacity and labor requirements for
the next five years?
5-13
Determining Capacity Requirements
Step 1: Use forecasting to predict Year
sales for individual products 1 2 3 4 5
Bottles (000s) 60 100 150 200 250
Paul’s
Plastic bags (000s) 100 200 300 400 500
Bottles (000s) 75 85 95 97 98
Newman’s
Plastic bags (000s) 200 400 600 650 680
5-14
Determining Capacity Requirements
Step 2: Calculate equipment and Year
labor requirements 1 2 3 4 5
Bottles (000s) 135 185 245 297 348
Plastic bags (000s) 300 600 900 1050 1180
Bottling Operation Bagging Operation
5-15
Determining Capacity Requirements
Step 3: Project equipment and Year
labor availabilities 1 2 3 4 5
Percentage capacity 24 48 72 84 94
Plastic Bag utilized
Operation Machine requirement 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.2 4.7
Labor requirement 3.6 7.2 10.8 12.6 14.1
Percentage capacity 30 41 54 66 77
Bottle utilized
Operation Machine requirement 0.9 1.23 1.62 1.98 2.31
Labor requirement 1.8 2.46 3.24 3.96 4.62
Excel: Capacity
Requirements 5-16
Decision Trees for Capacity Analysis
5-17
Example 5.2: Decision Trees
The owner of Hackers Computer Store is evaluating three
options – expand at current site, expand to a new site, do
nothing.
The decision process includes the following assumptions and
conditions.
Strong growth has a 55% probability
New site cost is $210,000
Payoffs: strong growth = $195,000; weak growth = $115,000
Expanding current site cost is $87,000 (in either year 1 or 2)
Payoffs: strong growth = $190,000; weak growth = $100,000
Do nothing
Payoffs: strong growth = $170,000; weak growth = $105,000
5-18
Example 5.2: Decision Trees
Calculate the value of each alternative
5-19
Example 5.2: Decision Trees
Diagram the problem chronologically
Events
Decision
Decision
5-20
Example 5.2: Decision Trees
Calculate value of each branch
$765,000
$365,000
$863,000
$413,000
$843,000
$850,000
$525,000
5-21
Example 5.2
Work backwards to calculate the value of each decision/event
$765,000
$365,000
Do nothing has higher
value than expand, so
$660,500 $863,000
choose to do nothing
$413,000
Do nothing = $703,750
$843,000
Do nothing has higher Do nothing = $850,000
$703,750
value than expand or $850,000
move, so choose to do
nothing $525,000
5-22
Example 5.2: Decision Trees
Decision tree analysis with net present value
calculations
Excel: Decision
Trees
5-23
Planning Service Capacity
5-24
Capacity Utilization and Service
Quality
The relationship between service capacity utilization
and service quality is critical.
Utilization is measured by the portion of time servers
are busy.
Optimal levels of utilization are context specific.
Low rates are appropriate when the degree of
uncertainty (in demand) is high and/or the stakes are
high (e.g., emergency rooms, fire departments).
Higher rates are possible for predictable services or
those without extensive customer contact (e.g., commuter
trains, postal sorting).
5-25
Service Quality
Rate of service utilization and service quality are
directly linked. Service quality declines –
disruptions or high arrival
Arrivals exceed services – levels lead to long wait
many customers are never times
served
Sufficient capacity to
provide quality service
5-26