Professional Documents
Culture Documents
practise-samp-PS13643-FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT-30.7.2019
practise-samp-PS13643-FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT-30.7.2019
£000
2018
Gross profit
margin(Gross
Profit/Sales) 18760/38550=
49%
Operating Profit
margin(Operating
Profit/sales 7485/38550=
19%
Asset Utilization =
Revenue / Average
Total Assets 38550/42995=
90%
P/E[Price per
share/Earning per
share] 1/1.48069905895909
68%
Current ratio(Current
16040/29950= asset /current liability) 18760/38550=
54% 49%
Quick ratio((Current
asset-inventories ) (18760-
10105/29950= /current liability)) 6225)/38550=
34% 33%
Quick asset 12,535
10,105 -26% Current asset 18,760
29,950 Current Liability 38,550
inventory 6,225
gearing ratio=(Long-
term debt + Short-term
debt + Bank overdrafts) (4575+0+2180)/2
29950/33065= ÷ Shareholders' equity 9940=
91% 90% 23%
tential ratios
£000
2017
(1*29950)/24330=
0.81
1
29,950 29%
24,330
1/1.23099054665023=
81%
24,330 7%
29,950
1.23099054665023 20%
dity ratios
£000
2017
16040/29950=
54% 51%
16,040 17%
29,950 29%
(16040-3875)/29950=
41% 37%
12,165 3%
16,040 30,870 24,130
29,950 12,125 8,935
3,875 61% 42,995 33,065
ing ratio
£000
2017
(1250+0+0)/29940=
5%
1,250 266%
0 #DIV/0!
25,440
res the proportion of a company's borrowed funds to its equity. The ratio indicates the financial risk to which
nancial risk to which a business is subjected, since excessive debt can lead to financial difficulties. A high gea
difficulties. A high gearing ratio represents a high proportion of debt to equity, while a low gearing ratio repre
ow gearing ratio represents a low proportion of debt to equity
Profitability ratios
£000
2018
Gross profit
margin(Gross
Profit/Sales) 18760/38550=
49%
Operating Profit
margin(Operating
Profit/sales 7485/38550=
19%
Asset Utilization =
Revenue / Average
Total Assets 38550/42995=
90%
P/E[Price per
share/Earning per
share] 1/1.48069905895909
68%
Current ratio(Current
16040/29950= asset /current liability) 18760/38550=
54% 49%
Quick ratio((Current
asset-inventories ) (18760-
10105/29950= /current liability)) 6225)/38550=
34% 33%
Quick asset 12,535
10,105 -26% Current asset 18,760
29,950 Current Liability 38,550
inventory 6,225
gearing ratio=(Long-
term debt + Short-term
debt + Bank overdrafts) (4575+0+2180)/2
29950/33065= ÷ Shareholders' equity 9940=
91% 90% 23%
tential ratios
£000
2017
(1*29950)/24330=
0.81
1
29,950 29%
24,330
1/1.23099054665023=
81%
24,330 7%
29,950
1.23099054665023 20%
dity ratios
£000
2017
16040/29950=
54% 51%
16,040 17%
29,950 29%
(16040-3875)/29950=
41% 37%
12,165 3%
16,040 30,870 24,130
29,950 12,125 8,935
3,875 61% 42,995 33,065
ing ratio
£000
2017
(1250+0+0)/29940=
5%
1,250 266%
0 #DIV/0!
25,440
res the proportion of a company's borrowed funds to its equity. The ratio indicates the financial risk to which
nancial risk to which a business is subjected, since excessive debt can lead to financial difficulties. A high gea
difficulties. A high gearing ratio represents a high proportion of debt to equity, while a low gearing ratio repre
ow gearing ratio represents a low proportion of debt to equity
2018 2017
receivable days(accounts
receivables/average
sales)*365 days 56 55 1
Payable days(trade
payable/cost of sales)*365
days 94 128 -34.1203
Working capital
cycle(Inventory
days+receveible days-
payable days ) 77 28 48.27275
170.6743 156.5218 14.15244
WCC
2017- Break even analy
Breakeven Analysis-2017
14000000
13500000
13000000
12500000
cost, sales 12000000
11500000
11000000
40000 41000 42000 43440 44000
selling units
45000 300
nalysis-2017
Total cost
sales value
nits
Number of
units
manufactu
cost per unit, red and calculated
£ sold cost,£
Direct material 125 45000 5625000
Variable manufacturing
overhead 20 45000 900000
45000 360
0 00 0 00 0
30 33 34
18
37
units
Variable cost calculation
Number of
units
manufactu
cost per unit, red and calculated
£ sold cost,£
Direct material 125 45000 5625000
Variable manufacturing
overhead 20 45000 900000
12100 13310
10 10
121000 133100
114950 126445
112651 123916.1
8349 9183.9
10% 10%
Hofstede, G.H., 2012. The game of budget control. Routledge
Libby, T. and Lindsay, R.M., 2010. Beyond budgeting or budg
Frow, N., Marginson, D. and Ogden, S., 2010. “Continuous” b
Ross, S.A., Westerfield, R. and Jaffe, J.F., 2013. Corporate fin
Arnold, G., 2012. Corporate financial management. Pearson E
Shinoda, T., 2010. Capital budgeting management practices i
Rocheteau, G., Wright, R. and Zhang, C., 2018. Corporate fin
Brief, R.P. and Peasnell, K.V. eds., 2013. Clean surplus: A lin
Qian, M. and Yeung, B.Y., 2015. Bank financing and corporat
De Fiore, F. and Uhlig, H., 2015. Corporate debt structure and
Attari, M.A. and Raza, K., 2012. The optimal relationship of ca
Nobanee, H., Abdullatif, M. and AlHajjar, M., 2011. Cash conv
Talonpoika, A.M., Monto, S., Pirttilä, M. and Kärri, T., 2014. M
Quayyum, S.T., 2011. Effects of working capital management
Owolabi, S.A., Obiakor, R.T. and Okwu, A.T., 2011. Investiga
Maditinos, D., Chatzoudes, D., Tsairidis, C. and Theriou, G., 2
Borio, C., 2014. The financial cycle and macroeconomics: Wh
Vogel, H.L., 2014. Entertainment industry economics: A guide
Palepu, K.G. and Healy, P.M., 2013. Business analysis and v
Fridson, M.S. and Alvarez, F., 2011. Financial statement anal
Williams, E.E. and Dobelman, J.A., 2017. Financial statement
Gertler, M. and Kiyotaki, N., 2010. Financial intermediation an
Madrid-Guijarro, A., García-Pérez-de-Lema, D. and Van Auke
e of budget control. Routledge.
10. Beyond budgeting or budgeting reconsidered? A survey of North-American budgeting practice. Management accounting research, 21(1
gden, S., 2010. “Continuous” budgeting: Reconciling budget flexibility with budgetary control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4),
Jaffe, J.F., 2013. Corporate finance (pp. 353-54). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
ancial management. Pearson Education.
eting management practices in Japan: a focus on the use of capital budgeting methods. Economic Journal of Hokkaido University, 39, pp.3
Zhang, C., 2018. Corporate finance and monetary policy. American Economic Review, 108(4-5), pp.1147-86.
ds., 2013. Clean surplus: A link between accounting and finance. Routledge.
5. Bank financing and corporate governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, pp.258-270.
5. Corporate debt structure and the financial crisis. Journal of Money, credit and Banking, 47(8), pp.1571-1598.
The optimal relationship of cash conversion cycle with firm size and profitability. International Journal of Academic Research in Business a
AlHajjar, M., 2011. Cash conversion cycle and firm's performance of Japanese firms. Asian Review of Accounting, 19(2), pp.147-156.
rttilä, M. and Kärri, T., 2014. Modifying the cash conversion cycle: revealing concealed advance payments. International Journal of Product
f working capital management and liquidity: evidence from the cement Industry of Bangladesh. Journal of Business and Technology (Dhaka
d Okwu, A.T., 2011. Investigating liquidity-profitability relationship in business organizations: A study of selected quoted companies in Nige
Tsairidis, C. and Theriou, G., 2011. The impact of intellectual capital on firms' market value and financial performance. Journal of intellectua
ycle and macroeconomics: What have we learnt?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 45, pp.182-198.
nt industry economics: A guide for financial analysis. Cambridge University Press.
2013. Business analysis and valuation: Using financial statements, text and cases.
011. Financial statement analysis: a practitioner's guide (Vol. 597). John Wiley & Sons.
.A., 2017. Financial statement analysis. World Scientific Book Chapters, pp.109-169.
10. Financial intermediation and credit policy in business cycle analysis. In Handbook of monetary economics (Vol. 3, pp. 547-599). Elsevie
ez-de-Lema, D. and Van Auken, H., 2011. An analysis of non-financial factors associated with financial distress. Entrepreneurship and Reg
ent accounting research, 21(1), pp.56-75.
anizations and Society, 35(4), pp.444-461.