Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4806 – 52 Street
Bentley, Alberta
Prepared For:
BENTLEY GARAGE HOLDINGS INC.
Box 527
Bentley, Alberta
T0C 0J0
FIGURES
Figure 1 Key Map
APPENDICES
Appendix I Opta Response
Appendix IV Photographs
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
PHH ARC Environmental Ltd. (PHH ARC) was retained on September 25, 2013 through
an Authorization to Proceed signed by Mr. Ray Williams, of Bentley Garage Holdings
Inc. (Client) to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the property
located at 4806 – 52 Street, Bentley, Alberta (hereafter referred to as the “Site”).
The Site was developed with one, two-storey industrial building (the Site Building)
occupied by Bentley Garage.
PHH ARC was advised by the Client that the purpose of the Phase I ESA was to assess
potential issues of environmental concern in relation to the sale of the Site.
1.2 Scope of Work
The Phase I ESA was completed in general accordance with the Canadian Standards
Association (CSA) document entitled Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, CSA
Standard Z768-01 dated November 2001, including a review of readily available
historical records, a review of readily accessible regulatory records, a Site visit,
interviews, an evaluation of information and reporting, subject to the limitations outlined
in Section 8.0 of this report.
The Client indicated that the person most knowledgeable of the Site conditions is
Mr. Ray Williams, Owner/Operations Manager since 2004, hereafter referred to as the
Site Representative.
Topic Findings
Site Area 0.38 ha (0.95 acres).
Topic Findings
Topography of Site and The Site and surrounding areas to the south, north and west are
Surrounding Area generally flat. A slight upward incline is directly east of the Site.
The Site is at similar grade to the adjoining properties to the south,
Site Grade Relative to the
west and north. The Site is lower in elevation than the adjoining
Adjoining Properties
property to the east.
Glacoilacustrine Deposits which consist primarily of well-stratified
Subsurface Soils
course grained, silt and clay (Atlas of Canada, 2007).
The Site appears to have been cultivated agricultural land from at least 1949 until 1992.
In 1998, the Site appears to be undeveloped vacant land and the current Site Building
was visible in 2004.
The surrounding areas to the south and west appear to have been cultivated agricultural
land and/or vacant undeveloped land until a surface water pond was developed to the
southwest. Commercial and/or industrial development is visible to the east in 1998 and
continues through to 2007. The surrounding areas to the north remained rural
homesteads with associated buildings and cultivated agricultural lands.
A main railway line is visible approximately 275 m east of the Site in the years 1949 to
2013. Creosote or copper chromium arsenic (CCA) used to treat railway ties has the
potential to impact soils in the vicinity of railway lines. These impacts are typically minor,
localized, and near the surface. Based on the distance from the Site, it is PHH ARC’s
opinion that this railway line is unlikely to give rise to potential subsurface impacts in
connection with the Site.
Based on PHH ARC’s review of the above-noted aerial photographs, nothing was
observed that is likely to give rise to potential subsurface impacts in connection with the
Site.
3.3 Opta Information Intelligence
PHH ARC contacted Opta Information Intelligence (Opta) to obtain Fire Insurance Plans
(FIPs) related to the Site and surrounding area, as well as Property Underwriters’
Reports (PURs) and Site Plans for the Site. A response from Opta indicated no FIPs,
Site Plans or PURs were available for the Site (see Appendix I).
3.4 City Directories
City directories have not been complied for the Town of Bentley and therefore were not
available for PHH ARC’s review.
3.5 Land Titles
A copy of the current land title was obtained by PHH ARC from the Spin 2 online
registry. Based on information listed within the title document, the Site is described as
“Lot 3; Block 1; Plan 9620070”. The land title indicated that “Bentley Garage Holdings
Inc.” was listed as the registered owner of the Site at the time of this assessment. No
liens or other encumbrances indicating potential environmental concern were noted
within the current title.
A copy of the current land title is included in Appendix II.
3.6 Previous Environmental Reports
No previous reports (i.e., Phase I ESAs, geological, or geotechnical reports) were
provided for PHH ARC’s review and, according to the Site Representative, none are
available.
3.7 Historical Summary
Based on the results of the historical review, nothing was identified that is likely to result
in potential subsurface impacts at the Site.
no spills, complaints, or current or historic oil and gas wells were present in the vicinity of
the Site, with exception of:
The following pipeline:
Pipeline licence number 1973 – 3 approximately 170 m north of the Site. The
pipeline is reportedly constructed of steel and contains natural gas. No spills are
associated with this pipeline. Based on the distance of the pipeline from the Site,
it is PHH ARC’s opinion that it is unlikely to result in subsurface impacts at the
Site.
A copy of the map of the area has been included in Appendix II.
4.5 Alberta Environmental Law Centre
The Alberta Environmental Law Centre search results on Bentley Garage Holdings Inc.,
the current owner of the Site according to the most recent land title indicated that no
known enforcement actions have been issued against this party.
The full response from the Environmental Law Centre has been included in Appendix II.
4.6 Petroleum Tank Management Association of Alberta
A Petroleum Tank Management Association of Alberta (PTMAA) database search
indicated that there were no records of underground (USTs) or aboveground storage
tanks (ASTs) for the Site or any other adjacent properties searched.
The PTMAA database only includes information reported through registration or a survey
of abandoned sites completed in 1992. A copy of PTMAA’s correspondence is
presented in Appendix II of this report.
4.7 EcoLog ERIS
PHH ARC submitted a request to EcoLog Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd.
(ERIS) for a review of the following databases, as they pertain to the Site and
surrounding properties:
PTMAA Fuel Storage Tanks dated 1985 to January 2012;
PTMAA Retail Fuel Storage Tanks dated 2001 to June 2010;
Environment Canada National Pollutant Release Inventory dated 1993 to 2010;
Environment Canada Federal Convictions dated 1988 to June 2007;
ESRD’s Help End Landfill Pollution (HELP) Program Database dated June 1988;
Alberta Waste Receivers Summary dated 1993 to April 2012;
Alberta Waste Generator Summary dated 1993 to April 2012; and
Alberta Waste Management Facilities – Certificates of Approval dated 1993 to
2010.
A copy of the EcoLog ERIS report is provided in Appendix III. Information obtained from
the above-noted sources indicated the following:
No records were found for the Site or surrounding area.
Based on PHH ARC’s review of the above-noted information sources, nothing was
identified that is likely to result in potential subsurface impacts at the Site.
4.8 Regulatory Information Summary
Based on the regulatory information reviewed, nothing was identified that is likely to
result in potential subsurface impacts at the Site.
Topic Findings
Oils, antifreeze, sealants, greases, lubricants, and selected additives were
observed in manufacturer-supplied containers, 20 L jugs or smaller for
Chemicals immediate use and for retail sales within the Site.
Various jerry cans were observed in the service bay of Site Building.
Waste oil filters generated by the shop are stored in one 250 L metal drum
located on the exterior of the Site Building.
Used batteries generated by the shop are stored within the interior of the
Site.
Used oil stored in one, 2,000 L metal AST was observed on the exterior of
Hazardous Waste
the Site Building.
Used antifreeze stored in one, 250 L metal AST was observed within the
Boy of the Site Building.
The above-mentioned hazardous wastes are picked up and hauled away for
off-Site disposal by Trennary Services, on an as-needed basis.
No spills or evidence of historic spills (i.e., staining) were observed in the chemical
storage areas noted above. The interior floor slab was observed to be in good condition
(i.e., no cracking or pitting), the chemicals appeared to be stored in an orderly fashion,
and the exterior sealed ground surfaces were also in good condition.
PHH ARC recommends that secondary containment systems be implemented on-Site to
minimize the potential environmental risks of future spills or releases in the chemical
storage areas.
Minor hydrocarbon staining (approximately 0.5 m2) was observed in various locations on
the concrete floor within the interior of the Site Building. No staining was observed on the
bare ground surface in the vicinity of the used oil AST. As such, the observed staining
is considered unlikely to give rise to subsurface impacts in connection with the Site.
However, consideration should be given to adding secondary containment systems to
minimize the potential environmental risks of future spills or releases on to the concrete
floor in the interior and exterior storage areas.
5.2.2 Underground Storage Tanks
No evidence of USTs (i.e. fill/vent pipes) was observed on-Site and none were reported
by the Site Representative.
5.3 Water and Wastewater
Topic Findings
Water Supply Communal Well. Groundwater is not used as a source of potable water at
Source the Site.
Water Use Water is primarily used for domestic-related activities.
Sanitary/Process
Municipal sanitary sewer system. No process wastewater is generated at
Wastewater
the Site. Wastewater is limited to sanitary effluent.
Receptor
Topic Findings
One dual chambered sump was located in the service bay within Site
Building. According to the Site Representative, oily water rarely enters the
sump located in the service bay. The oil is skimmed off the water using oil
absorbent pads on a regular basis and the remaining water within the sump
drains to the municipal sewer system. The oil absorbent pads are stored in
metal drums and hauled away for off-Site disposal by Little Dipper, as
needed. The sump is reportedly cleaned out on an as-needed basis by
utilizing a vac trailer. The condition of the sump was not observed at the
Pits, Sumps, or time of the Site visit, as a heavy piece of equipment was located in the
Lagoons sump area. The sump in the third bay is not utilized at this time. No fluids
were observed within this sump and the sump appeared to be in good
condition at the time of the Site visit.
Given the practices detailed above and the age of Site Building, the sumps
are considered unlikely to give rise to subsurface impacts in connection with
the Site.
No pits or lagoons were observed and none were reported by the Site
Representative.
Grease Traps None observed and none reported by the Site Representative.
Oil/Water
None observed and none reported by the Site Representative.
Separators
Storm Water Flow Storm water would likely run overland to percolate naturally through the soil
and Receptor or discharge into the municipal storm sewers.
Wells None observed and none reported by the Site Representative.
Watercourses,
Ditches, or None observed and none reported by the Site Representative.
Standing Water
PHH ARC did not conduct a compliance assessment of waste water management as
part of this Phase I ESA, disposal practices should be reviewed to ensure they are
allowed under municipal by-laws.
Consideration should be given to periodic inspections of the sumps’ integrity to verify
that oil from equipment being serviced cannot migrate to the subsurface underneath the
Site Building. If cracks or other deficiencies are observed during an inspection, the
sump should be repaired, and an assessment of surrounding soils should be conducted.
5.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls
The use of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as dielectric fluids in electrical equipment
such as transformers, fluorescent lamp ballasts, and capacitors was common up to
about 1980. The Federal PCB Regulations, SOR/2008-273, regulate the manufacture,
import, export, sale, use and processing of PCBs. In addition, these regulations aim to
eliminate the use of high level PCBs (>500 mg/kg), as well as low level PCBs
(50-500 mg/kg) on or within 100 m of a “Sensitive Site” (e.g., drinking water treatment
facility, feed/food processing plant, child care facility, schools, hospitals, etc.), by
December 31, 2009. Light ballasts, pole top transformers, and other electrical
equipment with low level PCBs (50-500 mg/kg) in non-sensitive sites are aimed to be
eliminated by December 31, 2025.
Pole-mounted dry transformers were observed on the east portion of the Site.
Given the year of construction of the Site Building (circa 2004), it is unlikely that PCBs
are present in on-Site electrical or hydraulic equipment.
5.5 Asbestos-Containing Materials
Asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) are commonly found in building construction
materials (particularly in buildings constructed prior to 1986). Friable asbestos (friable
as defined as a material that can be crumbled, powdered or pulverized by hand
pressure) was widely used in spraying fireproofing until 1973, and in decorative or
finishing plasters, and thermal systems insulation until the early 1980s. Non-friable or
manufactured asbestos products were widely used in building construction including in
vinyl floor tiles, sheet flooring, ceiling tiles, pipe gaskets, roofing materials, asbestos
cement boards, and numerous other products until the mid-1980s. A very limited
number of non-friable asbestos products in limited quantities are still in use currently in
building construction.
Given the year of construction of the Site Building (circa 2004), it is unlikely that ACMs
are present.
PHH ARC did not conduct an asbestos survey as part of this Phase I ESA, nor was any
destructive or intrusive sampling or inspection conducted as part of this Phase I ESA.
The Site Representative advised PHH ARC that no asbestos surveys have been
previously conducted at the Site, and that an Asbestos Management Program has not
been developed for or implemented at the Site.
5.6 Lead-Based Paints
Although paints containing lead were banned from uses on exterior or interior surfaces
of buildings, furniture or household items produced in the 1970s, various commercial
paints (e.g. road paint) are still known to contain lead.
Given the year of construction of the Site Building (circa 2004), it is unlikely that paints
containing lead are present on Site Building interior surfaces.
5.7 Ozone-Depleting Substances
The bulk storage of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) was not observed. The Site
Representative reported that the bulk storage of ODSs has not been carried out at the
Site.
The Site Building possesses residential refrigeration units. These units may include
refrigerants, such as R22 or R12, that are noted within the phase-out schedules for
elimination in both Provincial and Federal regulations. No other sources of ODSs were
observed at the time of the Site visit.
5.8 Radon
Radon is a radioactive gas formed by naturally occurring radioactive breakdown of
uranium in soil, rock and water. Radon escapes from the ground and mixes with outdoor
air forming concentrations that are too low to be of concern; however, if radon enters a
building it can accumulate to higher levels. Health Canada has developed guidelines for
acceptable levels of radon in buildings; however, there are currently no regulations
governing acceptable levels of radon within buildings, and no requirements for testing or
mitigation if levels are found to exceed the current Health Canada guidelines. Testing
for radon in the Site Building was beyond the scope of this Phase I ESA. The Site
Representative reported that no radon surveys have been carried out at the Site.
5.9 Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation
Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation (UFFI) is composed of a mixture of
urea-formaldehyde resin, a foaming agent, and compressed air. It was used by injecting
the foam in exterior wood frame and masonry walls in order to insulate difficult to reach
cavities. It was primarily in use in residential construction from 1975 to 1978, though it
was in-use in commercial and industrial developments to a lesser degree. During the
mixing and curing of the insulation, as well as during its eventual deterioration, quantities
of formaldehyde gas would be released into the air causing accumulation within the
building. UFFI was banned in Canada in December 1980 as a precautionary measure to
evaluate health concerns due to the off-gassing of the formaldehyde gas.
Recent studies performed in structures containing UFFI reported non-significant levels of
interior formaldehyde gas. Given these findings, and the timeframe since the ban of
UFFI in Canada, structures still containing UFFI would most likely have low levels of
formaldehyde and would be considered a low risk for health concerns to the occupants
of these structures.
5.10 Mould or Microbial Contamination
The presence of mould or other microbiological contamination in buildings has become a
concern to building tenants and owners due to potential health effects on occupants and
users. Provincial Ministries of Labour have recently issued guidelines on enforced
regulations to protect the health of construction workers who are exposed to mould in
the course of building renovations. The presence of water leaks or high humidity can
cause the growth or amplification of mould within building environments.
A comprehensive inspection for mould, which would require intrusive testing, was not
performed as part of this Phase I ESA. Visible mould or water damaged areas were not
observed at the time of the Site visit. The Site Representative was not aware of the
presence of mould in the Site Building.
Topic Findings
Washroom Vents Washroom vent exhausts are discharged through roof stacks.
Kitchen Vents None observed and none reported by the Site Representative.
Electricity Back-up
None observed and none reported by the Site Representative.
Generator On-Site
Site Building is heated via natural gas-fired heating. The
Heating/Cooling warehouse/workshop areas of all the bays within the Site Building are
System(s) heated via natural gas-fired suspended unit heaters and/or ceiling radiant
heaters. No cooling is provided to the remainder of the Site Building.
A ceiling fan was observed. The ceiling fan is used to exhaust fugitive
Process Vents
vehicle emissions to the Site exterior.
Odours No strong, pungent or noxious odours were identified.
The Site Representative indicated that (Bentley Garage Holdings Inc.)
Permits/Approvals does not hold any permits/approvals for the Site, as related to air
emissions or discharges.
An air emission inventory was not conducted as part of the scope of work and, therefore,
compliance with applicable acts, regulations, laws and/or statutes was not evaluated.
Topic Findings
Domestic refuse is deposited into a polyethylene bin on the Site interior.
Non-hazardous
The contents of the bin are emptied and hauled for off-Site disposal an
Wastes
as needed basis by the Client.
Recyclables None observed and none reported.
9.0 CLOSURE
The conclusions and recommendations represent the best judgment of the assessor
based on the Site conditions observed on October 10, 2013 and current environmental
standards.
This report has been issued without having received responses to requests for
information from ESRD and the Town of Bentley. Our conclusions and
recommendations may be amended based on information from these regulatory
agencies. We trust that the information provided in this report meets your current
requirements. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact
the undersigned.
Yours truly,
PHH ARC ENVIRONMENTAL LTD.
Report Prepared By: Report Reviewed By:
LW/GR
10.0 REFERENCES
The following documents, persons, or organizations provided information used in this
Report:
1. Abacus Datagraphics website: http://www.abacusdatagraphics.com.
2. Alberta Energy and Utilities (EUB), Alberta Geological Survey, Geological Map of
Alberta, February, 1999.
3. Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development (AESRD) – Corporate
Services, Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Office.
4. Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Environmental Site
Assessment Repository (AESRD): http://www.environment.alberta.ca/2948.HTML.
5. Alberta Human Resources and Employment. (2006). Alberta Asbestos Abatement
Manual. Edmonton, AB.
6. Atlas of Canada website:
http://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca/site/english/maps/environment/land/surficialmaterials).
7. Canadian Centre for Occupational Health & Safety:
http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/phys_agents/phys_agents/radon.html.
8. Town of Bentley.
9. Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Standard. CSA Z768-01, Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment, Canadian Standards Association International,
November 2001.
10. EcoLog ERIS report entitled, “Phase I ESA, 4806 – 52 Street, Bentley, AB, dated
October 1, 2013 (ERIS Project # 20130926023).
11. Environmental Law Centre website: http://www.elc.ab.ca/home/index.cfm.
12. Government of Alberta – Sustainable Resources: Air Photo Library (Edmonton,
Alberta).
13. McGregor, R.G., Vasudev, P., Letourneau, E.G., McCullough, R.S., Pranti, F.A., and
Taniguchi, H. Background Concentrations of Radon and Radon Daughters in
Canadian Homes. Department of National Health and Welfare Canada, November
1979.
14. Opta Information Intelligence – Historical Environmental Reporting System (HEIRS).
15. Petroleum Tank Management Association Of Alberta: http://www.ptmaa.ab.ca.
CLIENT NAME:
BENTLEY GARAGE HOLDINGS INC.
PROJECT NAME:
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
LOCATION:
4806-52 STREET, BENTLEY, ALBERTA
TITLE:
KEY MAP
DATE: PROJECT #: IMAGE SOURCE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: FIGURE #:
OCTOBER 2013 3384A OPENSTREETMAP JVALDERRAMA LWYNNYCHUK 1
Highway 12
Ra
49A Ave
il
wa
49 Ave
y Av
51
e
S
MTC
tre
Commercial
et
52 Street
50 Street
AST
Canadian
Bentley Storage Compression AST's
System
Crop Production
Retention Pond
LEGEND
Site Building
Buildings
Above Ground
AST Storage Tank
APPROXIMATE SCALE
0 80 Mult-Tenant
(m) MTC
Commercial
CLIENT NAME: DATE: FIGURE:
BENTLEY GARAGE HOLDINGS INC.
OCTOBER 2013
PROJECT NAME:
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO: 2
3384A
LOCATION:
4806-52 STREET, BENTLEY, ALBERTA DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:
TITLE:
J.VALDERRAMA LWYNNYCHUK
Site Address:
4806 – 52 Street,
Bentley, AB
Project No:
3384A
An SCM Company
Opta Order ID:
150 Commerce Valley Drive W 20198
8th Floor
Markham, Ontario L3T 7Z3 Requested by:
T: 905-882-6300
Eduardo Jimenez
www.optaintel.ca
PHH ARC Environmental Ltd
Report Completed By:
Devon Mallay Date Completed:
October 7, 2013
Opta Environmental Services
Historical Environmental Information Reporting System (HEIRSTM)
October 7, 2013
Eduardo Jimenez
PHH ARC Environmental Ltd
#200, 9707 – 110 Street,
Edmonton, AB
T5K 2L9
Dear Eduardo,
Re: Your Site Address: “4806 – 52 Street, Bentley, AB”
Your Project No.: 3384A
As requested, we have searched our records regarding the above site and the following information was
found:
Information Date(s) Comment Cost
Research Fee per street $50.00 flat fee per street address. $50.00
address
Fire Insurance Plans No Records Found $125.00 for each Fire Insurance Plan.
Reports: No Records Found $55.00 for each Inspection/Survey report
All Risk/Multi-Risk:
Inspection:
COPE:
Other:
Site Plan(s) No Records Found $70.00 for each Site plan
$50.00
Subtotal
Minimum order fee of $155.00 N/A
2 (two)/4 (four) Day Rush Service N/A
Total $50.00
NRF: No Records Found. NO: Not Ordered.
The total cost for this report is $50.00 plus courier charges (if applicable) and HST. Please see the Terms
and Conditions for our search on page two of this report.
Thank you for employing the services of Opta Information Intelligence.
Devon Mallay
Opta Environmental Services
Opta Environmental Services
Historical Environmental Information Reporting System (HEIRSTM)
Terms and Conditions
Report
The documents (hereinafter referred to as the "Documents") to be released as part of the report (hereinafter
referred to as the "Report") to be delivered to the purchaser as set out above are documents in Opta’s records
relating to the described property (hereinafter referred to as the "Property"). Opta makes no representations or
warranties respecting the Documents whatsoever, including, without limitation, with respect to the completeness,
accuracy or usefulness of the Documents, and does not represent or warrant that these are the only plans and
reports prepared in association with the Property. The Documents are current as of the date(s) indicated on
them. Interpretation of the Documents, if any, is by inference based upon the information which is apparent and
obvious on the face of the Documents only. Opta does not represent, warrant or guarantee that interpretations
other than those referred to do not exist from other sources. The Report will be prepared for use by the purchaser
of the services as shown above hereof only.
Disclaimer
Opta disclaims responsibility for any losses or damages of any kind whatsoever, whether consequential or other,
however caused, incurred or suffered, arising directly or indirectly as a result of the services (which services
include, but are not limited to, the preparation of the Report provided hereunder), including but not limited to,
any losses or damages arising directly or indirectly from any breach of contract, fundamental or otherwise, from
reliance on Opta Reports or from any tortious acts or omissions of Opta's agents, employees or representatives.
Entire Agreement
The parties hereto acknowledge and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions hereof. The request form
constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all
prior and contemporaneous agreements, negotiations and discussions, whether oral or written, and there are no
representations or warranties, or other agreements between the parties in connection with the subject matter
hereof except as specifically set forth herein. No supplement, modification, waiver, or termination of the request
shall be binding, unless confirmed in writing by the parties hereto.
Governing Document
In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between the provisions hereof and the Reports, the rights and
obligations of the parties shall be deemed to be governed by the request form, which shall be the paramount
document.
Law
This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the
laws of Canada applicable therein.
Page 2 of 2
APPENDIX II
CORRESPONDENCE WITH REGULATORY AGENCIES
LAND TITLE CERTIFICATE
S
LINC SHORT LEGAL TITLE NUMBER
0026 620 443 9620070;1;3 062 023 512
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PLAN 9620070
BLOCK 1
LOT 3
EXCEPTING THEREOUT ALL MINES AND MINERALS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGISTERED OWNER(S)
REGISTRATION DATE(DMY) DOCUMENT TYPE VALUE CONSIDERATION
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OWNERS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENCUMBRANCES, LIENS & INTERESTS
REGISTRATION
NUMBER DATE (D/M/Y) PARTICULARS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
( CONTINUED )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENCUMBRANCES, LIENS & INTERESTS
PAGE 2
REGISTRATION # 062 023 512
NUMBER DATE (D/M/Y) PARTICULARS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
*END OF CERTIFICATE*
Yours truly,
Elizabeth Smart
Chief Administrative Officer
4806 - 52 Street, Bentley, Alberta
040-01 W5
2 1
3
TOWN OF BENTLEY
15 16
14
NE-22
040-01 W5
AER High Pressure Pipelines and Wells current to August 30, 2013 *** Low Pressure Pipelines current to November 1, 2005
N
Petroleum Tank Management
Association of Alberta
Suite 980, 10303 Jasper Avenue
Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N6
PH: (780)425-8265 or 1-866-222-8265
FAX: (780)425-4722
Eduardo Jimenez
PHH Environmental Ltd.
200 9707 110 Street
Edmonton, AB
T5K 2L9
As per your request, the PTMAA has checked the registration of active tank sites and inventory of
abandoned tank sites and there are no records for the property with the legal land description:
Please note that both databases are not complete. The main limitation of these databases is that
they only include information reported through registration or a survey of abandoned sites
completed in 1992 and should not be considered as a comprehensive inventory of all past or
present storage tank sites. The PTMAA cannot guarantee that tanks do not or have not existed at
this location. Information in the databases is based on information supplied by the owner and the
PTMAA cannot guarantee its accuracy. Information on storage tanks or on past or present
contaminant investigations may be filed with the local Fire Department or Alberta Environment.
Yours truly,
Connie Jacobsen
PTMAA
APPENDIX III
ECOLOG ERIS
Project Property: PHASE I ESA
4806 - 52 Street
Bentley AB
Report Type: Standard Select Report
Order #: 20130926023
Date: October 1, 2013
Table of Contents
Table of Contents...........................................................................................1
Executive Summary........................................................................................2
Executive Summary: Report Summary................................................................................................3
Executive Summary: Site Report Summary – Project Property...........................................................5
Executive Summary: Site Report Summary – Surrounding Properties................................................6
Map.................................................................................................................7
Aerial...............................................................................................................8
Detail Report...................................................................................................9
Unplottable Report........................................................................................10
Appendix: Database Descriptions.................................................................11
Definitions.....................................................................................................19
Reliance on information in Report: This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment but is solely
intended to be used to focus further investigation.
Licence for use of information in Report: No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project
property identifier. The information in Report(s) may not be modified or re-sold.
Your Liability for misuse: Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach
of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties, and gives ERIS
the right to terminate your account, rescind your licence to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service.
No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by EcoLog Environmental
Risk Information Services Ltd ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and Provincial
government departments. The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any
alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be
and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor
medical advice. Although ERIS has endeavoured to present you with information that is accurate, EcoLog ERIS disclaims, any and all
liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or
otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of EcoLog ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for
this report.
Trademark and Copyright: You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This
Service and Report(s) are protected by copyright owned by EcoLog ERIS Ltd. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s) (the
"Data") is owned by EcoLog ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s) and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in
any substantial part without prior written consent of EcoLog ERIS.
Property Information:
Coordinates:
Latitude: 52.463953
Longitude: -114.056067
UTM Northing: 5,816,718.10
UTM Easting: 699,983.96
UTM Zone: UTM Zone 11U
Elevation: 2,940 FT
896.17 M
Order Information:
Additional Products:
Total: 0 0 0
MCPHERSON AVE
50 AVE
49A AVE
EL
EV
TOA
53 STREET CLOSE
R
RD
52 ST
_
^
48 AVE
m 1:2900
80 40 0 80
52°28'N
_
^
m 1:10000
250 125 0 250
No records found in the selected databases for the project property or surrounding properties.
No unplottable records were found that may be relevant for the search criteria.
Ecolog Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd can search the following databases. The extent of Historical
information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicity available to Ecolog ERIS
at the time of update. Note: Databases denoted with " * " indicates that the database will no longer be updated. See the
individual database description for more information.
Alberta Environment's H.E.L.P. (Help End Landfill June 1988* Provincial HELP
Pollution) Program Database:
The H.E.L.P. Data Tracking and Management Control System was created to provide tracking and management
capabilities of industrial landfills in Alberta for the Department of Environment. Detailed information including company
name, location, type of landfill, priority, score, status, use and much more is included in this database.
While horizontal well drilling has been around for decades, recent improvements in the technology have made it possible
to combine horizontal drilling with hydraulic fracturing to help coax oil and natural gas out of tight rock. Today, more than
half of western Canada¿s wells are being drilled horizontally.
This data includes include: well locations (LE,LS,SE,TWP,RG,M,E), licence numbers, well names, Business Associate
(BA) codes, licensee abbreviations, spud dates, final drilling dates, total depth, true vertical depth, and last updated dates.
Indian & Northern Affairs Fuel Tanks: 1950-Aug 2003* Federal IAFT
The Department of Indian & Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) maintains an inventory of all aboveground & underground
fuel storage tanks located on both federal and crown land. Our inventory provides information on the reserve name,
location, facility type, site/facility name, tank type, material & ID number, tank contents & capacity, and date of tank
installation.
Identification and Verification of Active and Inactive Oct 1982* Provincial LDS
Land Disposal Sites:
In late 1981, Environment Canada and Alberta Environment initiated a project to identify and verify land disposal sites in
the province of Alberta. A point scoring system was used to classify the sites into potential priority 1, priority 2 or priority 3
groups on the basis of the type of waste received at the sites and the site environment. Sites that, according to available
information, may pose a hazard to public health and safety or the environment are classified as potential priority 1 sites.
National Defence & Canadian Forces Fuel Tanks: Up to May 2001* Federal NDFT
The Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces maintains an inventory of all aboveground & underground
fuel storage tanks located on DND lands. Our inventory provides information on the base name, location, tank type &
capacity, tank contents, tank class, date of tank installation, date tank last used, and status of tank as of May 2001. This
database will no longer be updated due to the new National Security protocols which have prohibited any release of this
database.
National Defence & Canadian Forces Spills: Mar 1999-Aug 2010 Federal NDSP
The Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces maintains an inventory of spills to land and water. All spill
sites have been classified under the "Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act - 1992". Our inventory provides information
on the facility name, location, spill ID #, spill date, type of spill, as well as the quantity of substance spilled & recovered.
National Defence & Canadian Forces Waste Disposal 2001-Apr 2007* Federal NDWD
Sites:
The Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces maintains an inventory of waste disposal sites located on
DND lands. Where available, our inventory provides information on the base name, location, type of waste received, area
of site, depth of site, year site opened/closed and status.
Canadian Pulp and Paper: 1999, 2002, 2004, 2005, Private PAP
2009
This information is part of the Pulp and Paper Canada Directory. The Directory provides a comprehensive listing of the
locations of pulp and paper mills and the products that they produce.
Database Descriptions: This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including: source, information
available, time coverage, and acronyms used. They are listed in alphabetic order.
Detail Report: This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record. Records are
summarized by location, starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity.
Distance: The distance value is the distance between plotted points, not necessarily the distance between the sites'
boundaries". All values are an approximation.
Elevation: The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted.
All values are an approximation. Source: Google Elevation API.
'Report Summary'- Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property, within
the report search radius, and the surrounding area outside the search radius.
'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'- This section lists all the records which fall on the project
property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section.
'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'- This section summarizes all records on adjacent
properties, listing them in order of proximity from the project property. For more details, see the
'Detail Report' section.
Map Key: The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property. Map Key numbers
always start at #1. The project property will always have a map key of '1' if records are available. If there is a number in
brackets beside the main number, this will indicate the number of records on that specific property. If there is no number
in brackets, there is only one record for that property.
The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation': the red upside down triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower
Elevation', the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation' and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites
with Same Elevation.'
Unplottables: These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons, including limited geographic
information. These records may or may not be in your study area, and were included as reference.
Photo 4 – View of south elevation of Site Building and the used oil AST.
Photo 6 – View of the vacant undeveloped land, 49A Avenue and Highway 12 located north of the Site
Building.
Photo 7 – View of 52 Street and the ASTs located east and southeast of the Site Building.
Photo 8 – View of the treed area located west of the Site Building.
Photo 13 – View of the well located southeast portion of the Site exterior.
Photo 14 – View of the pole transformer located adjacent to the exterior southeast corner of Site Building.