You are on page 1of 4

PHYSICA L R EVIEW LET T ERS week ending

VOLUME 91, N UMBER 3 18 JULY 2003

Chaotic Dynamics of the Fractional Lorenz System


Ilia Grigorenko1 and Elena Grigorenko2
1
Institut für Theoretische Physik der Freien Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 14, 14195 Berlin, Germany
2
Irkutsk State Academy of Economics, Lenin street 11, 664015, Irkutsk, Russia
(Received 8 April 2003; published 17 July 2003)
In this Letter we introduce a generalization of the Lorenz dynamical system using fractional
derivatives. Thus, the system can have an effective noninteger dimension  defined as a sum of the
orders of all involved derivatives. We found that the system with  < 3 can exhibit chaotic behavior. A
striking finding is that there is a critical value of the effective dimension cr , under which the system
undergoes a transition from chaotic dynamics to regular one.

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.034101 PACS numbers: 05.45.Ac, 02.90.+p

Although fractional derivatives have a long mathemati- the work of Hartley et al. where the authors studied
cal history, for many years they were not used in physics. chaotic motion of the Chua-Hartley system of a fractional
One possible explanation of such unpopularity could be order [9]. In this Letter we investigate dynamics of the
that there are multiple nonequivalent definitions of frac- fractional Lorenz system and we find that can be chaotic
tional derivatives [1]. Another difficulty is that fractional with  < 3. We estimate the largest Lyapunov exponent in
derivatives have no evident geometrical interpretation this case. Moreover, we determine a critical value cr ,
because of their nonlocal character [2]. However, during under which  < cr the dynamics of the considered
the last ten years fractional calculus starts to attract much system becomes regular.
more attention of physicists. It was found that various, Few definitions of fractional derivatives are known [1].
especially interdisciplinary applications can be elegantly Probably the best known is the Riemann-Liouville for-
described with the help of the fractional derivatives. As an mulation. The Riemann-Liouville derivative of order 
example, one can mention studies on viscoelastic bodies, and with the lower limit a is defined as
polymer physics, phase transitions of fractional order,
@ 1 dn Z t f 
anomalous diffusion, and a description of the fractional ft  d ; (1)
kinetics of chaotic systems (for a review, see [1]). The @t n   dtn a t  n1
usefulness of fractional derivatives in quantitative finance where  is the gamma function and n is an integer number
[3] and quantum evolution of complex systems [4] was chosen in such way that n  1 <  < n. An alternative
recently demonstrated. One should also mention recent definition was introduced by Caputo [10]. Caputo’s de-
attempts to introduce a local formulation of fractional rivative of order  and with the lower limit 0 is a sort of
derivatives [5] and to give some geometrical interpreta- regularization of the Riemann-Liouville derivative and it
tions [2]. However, most of the studies mentioned above is defined through
were performed on the basis of linear differential equa-
tions containing fractional derivatives. The main conse- @ 1 Z t fn  
quence of this limitation is that the dynamics of such ft  d : (2)
@t n   0 t  n1
systems cannot be chaotic. According to the Poincaré-
Bendixson theorem (see, for example, [6]), chaos cannot The main advantage of the definition Eq. (2) is that
occur in two-dimensional systems of autonomous ordi- Caputo derivative of a constant is equal to zero, that is
nary differential equations. One would have to stress that not the case for the Riemann-Liouville derivative.
this theorem is applicable to continuous-time dynamical Substantially, the Caputo fractional derivative is a formal
systems and not to discrete maps. The discrete-time dy- generalization of the integer derivative under the Laplace
namical systems can exhibit chaotic behavior even in one transformation [3].
dimension (see, for example, the well-known logistic Now let us introduce a fractional generalization of the
map [7]). A famous example of a continuous-time Lorenz system:
three-dimensional system which exhibits chaos is the @ @
Lorenz model [8]. The dimension  of such system can x  y  x; y  x  y  xzr ;
@t @t (3)
be defined as a sum of the orders of all involved deriva-
@
tives. Therefore, by using fractional derivatives of orders z  xy  bz:
0 < ; ;  < 1 it is possible to obtain a system with an @t
effective noninteger dimension  < 3. A natural question Here we assume 0 < ; ;   1; r  1 and the time de-
arises whether such a system can exhibit chaotic behavior. rivatives are in the Caputo sense. The effective dimension
In connection with this question one should also mention  of the system Eq. (3) we define as a sum of the orders

034101-1 0031-9007=03=91(3)=034101(4)$20.00  2003 The American Physical Society 034101-1


PHYSICA L R EVIEW LET T ERS week ending
VOLUME 91, N UMBER 3 18 JULY 2003

      . Throughout this Letter we use the 50


following values of the parameters:   10,   28, b  40
8=3, so that in the case       r  1 the system
Eq. (3) reduces to the common Lorenz dynamical system 30
z
exhibiting chaotic behavior. Generalization of dynamical 20
equations using fractional derivatives could be useful in
phenomenological description of viscoelastic liquids such 10 30
20
as, for example, human blood [1,11]. The system Eq. (3) is 0 10
in fact a system of coupled nonlinear integro-differential -20 -15 -10 0
equations with a weakly singular kernel. This is a com-
-5 0
-10 y
5 -20
putationally expensive problem since for numerical inte- x 10 15 20 -30
gration it requires On2  operation counts, where n is the
number of sampling points [12]. FIG. 1. Dynamical portrait of the fractional Lorenz system
using parameters       0:99 and with the effective
Let us start from the analytical solution of a linear
dimension   2:97. Note formation of the attractor, similar
fractional differential equation: to the Lorenz strange attractor.
@
x  Ax  ft; x0  x0 : (4)
@t time-series data. With the help of the freeware package
With the help of the Laplace transformation [13] one can TISEAN [16] we estimated the largest Lyapunov exponent
easily obtain the solution of Eq. (4) in the form:  for the case shown in Fig. 1. We found  0:85 that
Zt corresponds to the chaotic regime. Note, that for the
xt  x0 E At   t  1 E At   f d ; common Lorenz system  0:906 [17]. We conclude
0 that decreasing of the effective dimension  induces
(5) some effective damping in the system. By decreasing
the parameters ; ;  one obtains a further decreasing
where E is the one-parameter Mittag-Leffler function
of the largest Lyapunov exponent. At a certain critical
[14] defined by
dimension cr the dynamics of the system undergoes
X
1
xk qualitative changes and becomes regular for any initial
E x  ;  > 0: (6) condition. This is a new interesting result which, to our
k0
k  1
knowledge, was not described before. We obtain the low-
For   1, E reduces to the usual exponent function. est value of the system’s effective dimension cr 2:91,
The numerical scheme we implemented in our calcula- for which chaotic regime is still possible. This corre-
tions is based on the linearization of the system Eq. (3) on sponds to the case  0:91;     1. The obtained
each step of integration and iterative application of Eq. (5). critical values of the parameters ; ;  reflect the fact
We have checked our numerical scheme by comparison that the first, the linear differential equation in the system
results for Eq. (3), obtained using Eq. (5), and by the Eq. (3) seems to be less ‘‘sensitive’’ to the damping,
standard fourth-order Runge-Kutta method for the case introduced by a fractional derivative, than other two,
      r  1. nonlinear equations.
We integrated Eq. (3) for different values of the pa- If we restrict ourselves for the case of equal derivative
rameters ; ; ; r and different initial conditions. The orders     , the effective critical dimension for
first finding is that the fractional Lorenz system can this symmetric case is even higher: sim cr 2:94. In Fig. 2
exhibit chaotic behavior with the effective dimension we show the dynamical portrait of the system setting
 < 3. In Fig. 1 we show the dynamical portrait of the parameters r  1,       0:97, with the corre-
system fxt; yt; ztg using parameters r  1,     sponding effective dimension   2:91 < sim cr . We use
  0:99. Thus, the effective dimension of the system is the same initial conditions as for the previous examples.
  2:97 < 3. We set initial conditions at t  0 as Note, that in this case the system exhibits a strong damp-
fx0 ; y0 ; z0 g  f10; 0; 10g. Note that the system exhibits ing of the oscillations. Dependent on initial conditions,
chaotic dynamics similar to the case of the common the trajectory of the system is attracted by one of two
Lorenz system. Moreover, one probably can also define centers given by
the set of points which could be characterized as a strange p p
attractor. However, this set is slightly deformed compared x; y; z   br  1; br  1; r  1: (7)
to the ‘‘classical’’ Lorenz attractor [15]. We have to stress These points can be easily defined from the stationarity
that it is rather time consuming to define Lyapunov ex- condition
ponents for the nonlocal system, such as Eq. (3). In order
to resolve this difficulty we define the largest Lyapunov @ @ @
x  y  z  0: (8)
exponent  using an implicit procedure developed for the @t @t @t

034101-2 034101-2
PHYSICA L R EVIEW LET T ERS week ending
VOLUME 91, N UMBER 3 18 JULY 2003

50
periodic orbits. In Fig. 4 we show an example of such
40 quasiperiodic dynamics of the variable xt using pa-
rameters values r  1,     1, and   0:98, that
30 corresponds to the effective dimension   2:98. We
z
20 used the same initial conditions as for Figs. 1–3. Note
that after some time of transient behavior the system
10 30 evolves quasiperiodically. For different initial conditions
20
0 10 the dynamics of the system shows different limiting
-20 0
-15 -10
-5 -10 y cycles having the same two symmetric centers (fixed
0 5 -20 points) given by Eq. (7).
x 10 15 20 -30 One can understand the obtained results shown in
Figs. 1– 4 in the following way. Any chaotic system is
FIG. 2. Dynamical portrait of the fractional Lorenz system
characterized by a strong sensitivity to its initial condi-
using parameters       0:97 and with the effective
dimension   2:91. Note, that the strange attractor does not tions, and the ‘‘memory’’ time of the system can be
exist estimated as tmem 1 , where  is the largest posi-
p and
p the system ispattracted
p by one of two focuses:
(3 8; 3 8; 26) and (  3 8; 3 8; 26). tive Lyapunov exponent. On the other hand, the introduc-
tion of fractional derivatives leads to a nonlocality in
time domain [see definition Eq. (2)], which can be inter-
Note that the stationarity condition Eq. (8) has the usual preted as the presence of long memory. The competition
form because we use the Caputo’s fractional derivatives, between these two tendencies was the subject of presented
and it is not applicable, if one uses the Riemann-Liouville investigations.
formulation Eq. (1). Now we discuss the question of whether the introduc-
However, the obtained critical value cr 2:91 is not tion of fractional derivatives should always lead to stabi-
the ‘‘universal threshold’’ for any continuous-time cha- lization and damping of the chaos in the dynamical
otic system of fractional dimension. We found that it is a system. Let us consider Eqs. (4) and (5) in more detail.
value that characterizes a particular dynamical system. In In the case of A < 0 and in the limit t ! 1, E At  /
order to illustrate this we repeat the simulations shown in t [3]. Therefore, one obtains only a power law conver-
the Fig. 2 with the same initial conditions, but with the gence of two close trajectories instead of the exponential
changed parameter r  3. In Fig. 3 we show the dynam- one for   1. Thus, even small changes of the orders of
ics of the variable xt. The system Eq. (3) in this case derivatives could lead to dramatic changers of the
exhibits a ‘‘stronger’’ nonlinearity, which probably com- Lyapunov spectrum and of the whole dynamics. One
pensates the damping effect described above, and one can imagine a situation, when a small decreasing of the
again obtains chaotic behavior. order of the derivative  could lead to a stronger sensi-
We also found that under certain conditions the system tivity of the whole nonlinear system to initial conditions.
Eq. (3) can exhibit quasiperiodic oscillations with stable If A > 0, in the limit t ! 1, E At  / expA1= t, and

20
20

10
10
x(t)

0
x(t)

-10
-10

-20
0 2 4 6 8 10 -20
t 0 2 4 6 8 10
t
FIG. 3. Evolution of the variable xt of the fractional Lorenz
system. We use parameters       0:97, r  3. The FIG. 4. A quasiperiodic evolution of the variable xt of the
effective dimension   2:91. Note, that unlike in Fig. 2, fractional Lorenz system. We use parameters     1,  
the dynamics of the system is chaotic. 0:98, r  1.

034101-3 034101-3
PHYSICA L R EVIEW LET T ERS week ending
VOLUME 91, N UMBER 3 18 JULY 2003

one obtains, as in the case of   1, the exponential [2] I. Podlubny, math/0110241.


divergence of two close trajectories. [3] E. Scalas, R. Gorenflo, and F. Mainardi, Physica
In this work we introduced a fractional generalization (Amsterdam) 284A, 376 (2000); F. Mainardi,
of the Lorenz model which could be useful in phemeno- M. Raberto, R. Gorenflo, and E. Scalas, Physica
(Amsterdam) 287A, 468 (2000); N. Laskin, Physica
logical description of viscoelastic liquids [15]. We study
(Amsterdam) 287A, 482 (2000).
how the dynamics of the system depends on the effective [4] D. Kusnezov, A. Bulgac, and G. D. Dang, Phys. Rev. Lett.
dimension , which now can be a noninteger value. We 82, 1136 (1999).
found that the fractional Lorenz system exhibits rich [5] K. M. Kolwankar and A. D. Gangal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80,
dynamical properties and can be chaotic with effective 214 (1998).
dimension  less than 3. We also estimated the largest [6] M.W. Hirsch and S. Smale, Differential Equations,
Lyapunov exponent in a particular case. We obtained that Dynamical Systems and Linear Algebra (Academic
the dynamics of the system is strongly sensitive to the Press, New York 1965).
values of the orders of the involved derivatives ; ;  and [7] E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems (Cambridge
as the result, to the effective dimension . In general, University Press, Cambridge, 1994).
decreasing of the parameters ; ;  leads to a damping [8] E. N. Lorenz, J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130 (1963).
[9] T. T. Hartley, C. F. Lorenzo, and H. K. Qammer, IEEE
in the system. We discovered that under the certain criti-
Trans. Circuits Syst. I 42, 485 (1995).
cal dimensionality cr  2:91 chaotic motion of the sys- [10] M. Caputo, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 13, 529 (1967).
tem is not possible. There are some interesting questions [11] G. B. Thurston, Biophys. J. 12, 1205 (1972).
which are still open. Does the lowest universal bound un cr [12] K. Diethelm, Elect. Trans. Num. Anal. 5, 1 (1997).
exist, under which any nonlinear system cannot be cha- [13] I. Podlubny, funct-an/9710005; Fractional Calculus and
otic? And how far could it be from the value predicted by Its Applications (Academic Press, San Diego, 1999).
the Poincare-Bendixson theorem (un cr  2)? Another [14] A. Edérlyi, Higher Transcendental Functions (McGraw-
interesting question is whether the introduction of frac- Hill, New York, 1955).
tional derivatives of the distributed order [18] in non- [15] I. Grigorenko (to be published).
linear systems could help in the description of ‘‘edge of [16] For the overview of the TISEAN package, see, for ex-
chaos,’’ which is characterized by a power law divergence ample, chao-dyn/9810005.
[17] C. Sparrow, The Lorenz Equations: Bifurcations, Chaos,
of close trajectories.
and Strange Attractors (Springer-Verlag, New York,
1982).
[18] A.V. Chechkin, R. Gorenflo, and I. M. Sokolov, Phys.
[1] Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics, edited by Rev. E 66, 046129 (2002).
R. Hilfer (World Scientific, River Edge, New Jersey,
2000).

034101-4 034101-4

You might also like