Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Although fractional derivatives have a long mathemati- the work of Hartley et al. where the authors studied
cal history, for many years they were not used in physics. chaotic motion of the Chua-Hartley system of a fractional
One possible explanation of such unpopularity could be order [9]. In this Letter we investigate dynamics of the
that there are multiple nonequivalent definitions of frac- fractional Lorenz system and we find that can be chaotic
tional derivatives [1]. Another difficulty is that fractional with < 3. We estimate the largest Lyapunov exponent in
derivatives have no evident geometrical interpretation this case. Moreover, we determine a critical value cr ,
because of their nonlocal character [2]. However, during under which < cr the dynamics of the considered
the last ten years fractional calculus starts to attract much system becomes regular.
more attention of physicists. It was found that various, Few definitions of fractional derivatives are known [1].
especially interdisciplinary applications can be elegantly Probably the best known is the Riemann-Liouville for-
described with the help of the fractional derivatives. As an mulation. The Riemann-Liouville derivative of order
example, one can mention studies on viscoelastic bodies, and with the lower limit a is defined as
polymer physics, phase transitions of fractional order,
@ 1 dn Z t f
anomalous diffusion, and a description of the fractional ft d; (1)
kinetics of chaotic systems (for a review, see [1]). The @t n dtn a t n1
usefulness of fractional derivatives in quantitative finance where is the gamma function and n is an integer number
[3] and quantum evolution of complex systems [4] was chosen in such way that n 1 < < n. An alternative
recently demonstrated. One should also mention recent definition was introduced by Caputo [10]. Caputo’s de-
attempts to introduce a local formulation of fractional rivative of order and with the lower limit 0 is a sort of
derivatives [5] and to give some geometrical interpreta- regularization of the Riemann-Liouville derivative and it
tions [2]. However, most of the studies mentioned above is defined through
were performed on the basis of linear differential equa-
tions containing fractional derivatives. The main conse- @ 1 Z t fn
quence of this limitation is that the dynamics of such ft d: (2)
@t n 0 t n1
systems cannot be chaotic. According to the Poincaré-
Bendixson theorem (see, for example, [6]), chaos cannot The main advantage of the definition Eq. (2) is that
occur in two-dimensional systems of autonomous ordi- Caputo derivative of a constant is equal to zero, that is
nary differential equations. One would have to stress that not the case for the Riemann-Liouville derivative.
this theorem is applicable to continuous-time dynamical Substantially, the Caputo fractional derivative is a formal
systems and not to discrete maps. The discrete-time dy- generalization of the integer derivative under the Laplace
namical systems can exhibit chaotic behavior even in one transformation [3].
dimension (see, for example, the well-known logistic Now let us introduce a fractional generalization of the
map [7]). A famous example of a continuous-time Lorenz system:
three-dimensional system which exhibits chaos is the @ @
Lorenz model [8]. The dimension of such system can x y x; y x y xzr ;
@t @t (3)
be defined as a sum of the orders of all involved deriva-
@
tives. Therefore, by using fractional derivatives of orders z xy bz:
0 < ; ; < 1 it is possible to obtain a system with an @t
effective noninteger dimension < 3. A natural question Here we assume 0 < ; ; 1; r 1 and the time de-
arises whether such a system can exhibit chaotic behavior. rivatives are in the Caputo sense. The effective dimension
In connection with this question one should also mention of the system Eq. (3) we define as a sum of the orders
034101-2 034101-2
PHYSICA L R EVIEW LET T ERS week ending
VOLUME 91, N UMBER 3 18 JULY 2003
50
periodic orbits. In Fig. 4 we show an example of such
40 quasiperiodic dynamics of the variable xt using pa-
rameters values r 1, 1, and 0:98, that
30 corresponds to the effective dimension 2:98. We
z
20 used the same initial conditions as for Figs. 1–3. Note
that after some time of transient behavior the system
10 30 evolves quasiperiodically. For different initial conditions
20
0 10 the dynamics of the system shows different limiting
-20 0
-15 -10
-5 -10 y cycles having the same two symmetric centers (fixed
0 5 -20 points) given by Eq. (7).
x 10 15 20 -30 One can understand the obtained results shown in
Figs. 1– 4 in the following way. Any chaotic system is
FIG. 2. Dynamical portrait of the fractional Lorenz system
characterized by a strong sensitivity to its initial condi-
using parameters 0:97 and with the effective
dimension 2:91. Note, that the strange attractor does not tions, and the ‘‘memory’’ time of the system can be
exist estimated as tmem 1 , where is the largest posi-
p and
p the system ispattracted
p by one of two focuses:
(3 8; 3 8; 26) and ( 3 8; 3 8; 26). tive Lyapunov exponent. On the other hand, the introduc-
tion of fractional derivatives leads to a nonlocality in
time domain [see definition Eq. (2)], which can be inter-
Note that the stationarity condition Eq. (8) has the usual preted as the presence of long memory. The competition
form because we use the Caputo’s fractional derivatives, between these two tendencies was the subject of presented
and it is not applicable, if one uses the Riemann-Liouville investigations.
formulation Eq. (1). Now we discuss the question of whether the introduc-
However, the obtained critical value cr 2:91 is not tion of fractional derivatives should always lead to stabi-
the ‘‘universal threshold’’ for any continuous-time cha- lization and damping of the chaos in the dynamical
otic system of fractional dimension. We found that it is a system. Let us consider Eqs. (4) and (5) in more detail.
value that characterizes a particular dynamical system. In In the case of A < 0 and in the limit t ! 1, E At /
order to illustrate this we repeat the simulations shown in t [3]. Therefore, one obtains only a power law conver-
the Fig. 2 with the same initial conditions, but with the gence of two close trajectories instead of the exponential
changed parameter r 3. In Fig. 3 we show the dynam- one for 1. Thus, even small changes of the orders of
ics of the variable xt. The system Eq. (3) in this case derivatives could lead to dramatic changers of the
exhibits a ‘‘stronger’’ nonlinearity, which probably com- Lyapunov spectrum and of the whole dynamics. One
pensates the damping effect described above, and one can imagine a situation, when a small decreasing of the
again obtains chaotic behavior. order of the derivative could lead to a stronger sensi-
We also found that under certain conditions the system tivity of the whole nonlinear system to initial conditions.
Eq. (3) can exhibit quasiperiodic oscillations with stable If A > 0, in the limit t ! 1, E At / expA1= t, and
20
20
10
10
x(t)
0
x(t)
-10
-10
-20
0 2 4 6 8 10 -20
t 0 2 4 6 8 10
t
FIG. 3. Evolution of the variable xt of the fractional Lorenz
system. We use parameters 0:97, r 3. The FIG. 4. A quasiperiodic evolution of the variable xt of the
effective dimension 2:91. Note, that unlike in Fig. 2, fractional Lorenz system. We use parameters 1,
the dynamics of the system is chaotic. 0:98, r 1.
034101-3 034101-3
PHYSICA L R EVIEW LET T ERS week ending
VOLUME 91, N UMBER 3 18 JULY 2003
034101-4 034101-4