Title Sustainability in small company of UAE

Course code
Course title
Student name
Student ID
Date of submission
Contents
Title........................................................................................................................................................3
Abstract:................................................................................................................................................3
Keywords...............................................................................................................................................3
Introduction...........................................................................................................................................3
Literature...............................................................................................................................................5
Analysis..................................................................................................................................................7
Discussion..............................................................................................................................................9
Conclusion...........................................................................................................................................11
Recommendations...............................................................................................................................11
Appendices..........................................................................................................................................13
Bibliography.........................................................................................................................................13
Title
Sustainability in small company of UAE

Abstract:
This has a look at provides a longitudinal, two cases observe the analysis of sustainable

enterprise models and their development. We pick out five traits of sustainable business

fashions (organic development, collective effort, price-primarily based movements, the

interplay of sustainability dimensions and distinct groups of target clients) along with

associated possibilities and demanding situations precise to sustainable commercial enterprise

fashions. We compare and compare our findings with prior commercial enterprise version

concepts in both conventional, for-income and sustainability-orientated contexts. Different

from previous contributions, our findings emphasize the joint consideration all gain

dimensions (social, ecologic, monetary) in a single value equation. Also, we emphasize the

fee capacity inside the sustainability community and within the collaboration of its actors. We

perceive unconsidered complexity at the interface of customers and companies pursuing a

sustainability-oriented commercial enterprise model approach.[ CITATION Ger03 \l 1033 ]

Keywords: Sustainability, Business Models, Case Study Research.

Introduction
Economic success has been the dominating aim of business agencies for a long time.

However, imparting answers to fundamental questions concerning the world’s sustainable

development is a vital challenge not handiest for society, however also for plenty of

commercial enterprise corporations [ CITATION Gra11 \l 1033 ]. Sustainability, in terms of

“simultaneous pursuit of financial, environmental, and social” objectives, has complemented

and changed the traditional earnings-attention of many groups [ CITATION Sch111 \l 1033 ].

Firms pursuing sustainable strategies face additional and one of a kind challenges than

traditional, income-centered companies, mainly close to the multiplicity and interdependence

of their objectives and stakeholders [ CITATION Fig05 \l 1033 ] and their tough transformation

adventure in the direction of sustainability [ CITATION Bau101 \l 1033 ]. Due to the disruptive

individual of sustainable solutions, making use of a business model attitude has been

identified to be beneficial in this context [ CITATION Bal11 \l 1033 ]. However, the commercial

enterprise version concept has originally been developed within the context of conventional,

profit-centered firms without listening to the specific needs of sustainability-oriented

companies. In light of the growing necessity to reduce economy’s poor effect on society and

the herbal surroundings, commercial enterprise version and business version innovation

principles practical to this context are urgently required [ CITATION Sus205 \l 1033 ] . Business

fashions have emerged as a powerful device for management to explain how the cost is

created and how it's miles captured, thereby serving because the automobile to enact financial

opportunities [ CITATION Rei15 \l 1033 ] . Despite common know-how and agreementon the

idea’s overall scope, an extensive variety of definitions and frameworks has been mounted to

guide managers and researchers in describing, growing and innovating business models.

Within studies on sustainability, the enterprise version concept has come to be a primary unit

of evaluation in current years. The key undertaking of sustainable commercial enterprise

version designs “is characterized by way of growing monetary achievement thru (and now

not simply together with) a positive environmental or social hobby” [ CITATION Mud101 \l

1033 ]. There are special labels used for sustainability-orientated enterprise fashions, e.g.

Business fashions for sustainability or sustainability-helping business models. In their midst,

they all comprise sustainability as in crucial detail of a firm’s fee introduction and capture

good judgment [ CITATION Ind201 \l 1033 ] . The greater widespread business version
frameworks have been criticized for now not sufficiently embracing the sustainability

measurement. This is due to the fact they do no longer thoroughly incorporate the

sustainability business case, they remember an inadequate machine scope and making plans

horizon or they count on a too low systematic stakeholder engagement competence [ CITATION

Con20 \l 1033 ]

Several sustainability-oriented business version ideas had been introduced [ CITATION Ecc12 \l

1033 ] at the same time as other pupils argue that there may be no sizable difference in the

business version concept among “traditional” and “sustainable” enterprise to valid a need for

incorporating sustainability factors in the frameworks [ CITATION Lin10 \l 1033 ]. Whether and

to what degree these models reflect the organizational reality and are therefore helpful for the

improvement of sustainability supporting business fashions stays largely unexplored. In

reaction to this, this observe goals at imparting a solution to the research query “how do

commercial enterprise version ideas seize the particularities of sustainable business models?”.

To offer answers to this query, we comply with a longitudinal, a couple of cases examine the

technique of sustainable business models to pick out their particularities before contrasting

those findings with current business model standards. This study contributes to each literature

on sustainable innovation and business fashions. The findings assist to better understand the

particularities in phrases of traits, opportunities, and challenges of sustainable business

fashions. Furthermore, the contrast with present business version ideas displays that relevant

price mechanisms of sustainable commercial enterprise models are not yet captured.

Literature
Business fashions had been famous in academic and corporate exercise ever for the reason

that

the emergence of the net and associated e-enterprise activities [ CITATION Coe13 \l 1033 ].

Business models seize how firms are doing commercial enterprise, in particular how they
invent and capture fee [ CITATION Ort09 \l 1033 ] . The commercial enterprise version thereby

describes how a company makes a profit [ CITATION Nid13 \l 1033 ]. In reaction to externally

and internally initiative change and trends, business fashions themselves have often come to

be a problem to exchange and innovation [ CITATION Lie10 \l 1033 ].

Sustainability-orientated firms are characterized to observe a sustainability task as an

indispensable part and riding force of their employer [ CITATION The201 \l 1033 ]. They

function as profit-oriented and self-sustaining business endeavors, that recognize earnings as

a means to generate sustainable consequences [ CITATION Dew13 \l 1033 ]. Sustainable effects

thereby reflect contributions to both environmental and societal demanding situations

[ CITATION Who20 \l 1033 ] . This illustrates the wider definition of the price that is considered

with the aid of sustainability-oriented firms in contrast to conventional earnings-oriented

corporations [ CITATION Sin09 \l 1033 ]. At the same, it displays the simultaneous assignment

confronted via sustainability-orientated companies to create financial income in another way,

particularly through environmental or social sports [ CITATION Mil10 \l 1033 ]. In consequence,

as opposed to focusing at the firm’s shareholders, a plurality of stakeholders and their

predicted blessings want to be taken into consideration [ CITATION Bae11 \l 1033 ]. The

motivation to interact in sustainability-oriented business sports is alternatively personal and

value-based than marketplace pushed [ CITATION Hut09 \l 1033 ]. In outcome, fitting networks

comprising companions with shared dreams and values has been diagnosed to be critical to

provoking sustainability innovations [ CITATION Sus206 \l 1033 ]. Among the early works of the

current wave of interest in commercial enterprise fashions and their innovation, [ CITATION

PEW12 \l 1033 ] emphasized the relevance of business models in a social commercial

enterprise context. Arguing that simple replication of for-earnings commercial enterprise

fashions does no longer meet the needs of social companies, the authors cautioned a

framework comprising four inter-related business model additives (cost proposition, fee
constellation, monetary earnings equation, social earnings equation). Recently, [ CITATION

Dow20 \l 1033 ] cautioned to amend this framework by using at the same time considering the

financial and social profit equations and via paying more interest to the man or woman

stakeholders and their particular benefit expectations. Both the authentic and the amended

framework respond to social the business challenge of concurrently aiming for non-profit and

for-earnings effects [ CITATION Cha02 \l 1033 ] by using deliberating the fee generated by using

the firm for society and people.

Whereas [ CITATION SVi10 \l 1033 ] explicitly addressed commercial enterprise fashions that

emphasize the social size of sustainability, most studies at the intersection of enterprise

fashions and sustainability emphasizes a broader sustainability knowledge, which includes

environmental as well as social cost in addition to financial income. For example, [ CITATION

Poj07 \l 1033 ]described a sustainable business model as “a commercial enterprise model that

creates competitive benefit via advanced customer cost and contributes to the sustainable

improvement of the business enterprise and society”. Similarly, [ CITATION Sca12 \l 1033 ]

defined the fee generated by using a business version for sustainability as the “cost for

various stakeholders and the natural surroundings”. They also emphasized the mutual

interdependencies and reinforcement of those value components.

Analysis
The research query of this takes a look at concentrates on how business version concepts

seize

the particularities of sustainable enterprise fashions. To provide an answer to this query, we

selected a qualitative study design to discover in detail the know-how of sustainable business

fashions [ CITATION Cla20 \l 1033 ]This desire is based at the complex nature of the

phenomenon, the designated know-how we aspired to reap about it and the relevance of the

contexts and settings of the sustainable business fashions [ CITATION The202 \l 1033 ]. As no
current idea has the potential to reply comprehensively our studies query, our objectives are

to construct idea from instances [ CITATION Cla20 \l 1033 ]To broaden concept, we build on

more than one instance to set up styles based totally on longitudinal facts this is capable of

analyzing development over time. Aim of this inductive take a look at is to theorize around

our information so that you can increase a proposition-primarily based theoretical frame

[ CITATION The202 \l 1033 ] As a unit of analysis, we focussed on the character commercial

enterprise version of each case organization. In the case of more than one commercial

enterprise fashions, we centered the evaluation at the firm’s middle commercial enterprise

version in support of its sustainable assignment ensuing in a holistic case look at layout

[ CITATION The202 \l 1033 ] . We purposefully selected to do not to forget a couple of case

studies to obtain the desired breadth to examine the results [ CITATION Wha201 \l 1033 ]. In

terms of geographic consciousness, we simplest covered corporations with headquarters in

speaking countries of the UAE to make sure comparable felony and political framework

parameters.

A useful sampling strategy was applied to select statistics-rich cases [ CITATION Ecc14 \l 1033 ].

To achieve this, we applied a combination of an ordinary and criterion-based sampling with a

snowball sampling approach [ CITATION Wil20 \l 1033 ]. We started to identify capacity cases

by way of searching for firms that explicitly address a sustainable task. To create a

homogenous sample, we only taken into consideration companies that had been based over

the past 5 years. In addition to our personal search, we requested specialists in the

community, usually involved in start-up finance with an emphasis on sustainable

entrepreneurship, for similarly pointers. As our motive turned into to become aware of styles

throughout the individual organizations, we decided to cognizance on a larger pattern size

[ CITATION Met20 \l 1033 ] that during total contains seven case businesses.

Data Analysis
Detailed case descriptions of each man or woman case were written ( [ CITATION Nai08 \l 1033 ]

earlier than a move-case evaluation to examine and contrast the in my view emerging styles

became carried out [ CITATION Sti12 \l 1033 ]. This method that each case became understood

as a distinct experiment via itself and that theory building is a result of go-case replication

[ CITATION Sre12 \l 1033 ] . Central to the information the analysis becomes to recognize styles

of relationships most of the constructs identified and their underlying good judgment both

inside each of the individual instances and across all instances [ CITATION Def201 \l 1033 ]. To

identify regularities and styles in the data, we carried out a comprehensive coding procedure

(Creswell, 2013; Stake, 1995; Yin, 2014). In guide of our inductive method and to make

certain for and open-minded and context-touchy analysis, the first preliminary coding of the

uncooked statistics became based totally on open, in-vivo codes (Corbin and Strauss, 2007;

Glaser and Strauss, 1967; Miles et al., 2014). In a second spherical of coding the identical

records, a set of a priori codes based on prior paintings on this area and the secondary

interview cloth turned into used to supplement the inductive technique of the first found

(Eisenhardt, 1989). This turned into followed using the process of axial coding to

interconnect the categories diagnosed in the preliminary coding stages (Corbin and Strauss,

2007). To assist our information analysis, in precise to code the statistics and to visualize

these records, we used the MAXQDA software program.

Discussion
The consequences of this have a look at providing some of the characteristics of

sustainability-orientated companies and their underlying commercial enterprise models. They

can widely be divided into three categories: (1) The community and community of the actors

pursuing the identical sustainable assignment, (2) the multitude of interrelated blessings

provided, and (three) the multitude of recipients of the blessings supplied. This segment gives
a discussion of ways those precise characteristics are considered using existing enterprise

version principles, each within the conventional for-earnings and sustainability contexts.

(1) The evaluation discovered a robust emphasis of sustainable corporations on taking part

with

companions that proportion their pursuits, specifically in the case of influential partners

which includes buyers. This finding is consistent with [ CITATION Def201 \l 1033 ] who

recently emphasized the crucial position of a hard and fast of shared goals and values for

innovation in the sustainability context. Whereas conventional in addition to sustainability-

oriented enterprise version standards don't forget the value advent techniques and actors, they

do not seize the underlying price constellations. As our evaluation discovered, these

constellations are critical to apprehend emerging price drivers together with the

collaboration-based efficiency potentials recognized. Furthermore, the threats inclusive of

faster actions via competition or self-regulation regarding enterprise engagements are not

captured by the business version concept.

(2) The evaluation, also, underlined the multitude of strongly interrelated blessings supplied

by sustainable business fashions. This locating is in line with the mutual interdependence and

reinforcement of the benefits of sustainable business fashions diagnosed [ CITATION Poj09 \l

1033 ]. However, the robust interrelatedness of the benefits display the impracticability of a

strict separation of the monetary and the closing sustainable results in a business version

angle as recommended with the aid of Yunus (2010) or through Joyce and Paquin (2016) of

their 3-dimensional sustainable business version canvas. Sabatier et al. (2017) counseled to

jointly keep in mind income and social price equation inside the context of social enterprise

fashions. Our analysis confirms this locating. Furthermore, the findings endorse to also

including the ecological fee equation in the context of sustainable business fashions. (3) In

phrases of the multitude of recipients of the benefits supplied, our analysis reveals the
awesome motivations of clients to buy from sustainability-oriented corporations and the way

companies address those. None of the prior modifications of conventional enterprise model

standards has yet considered this issue.

Conclusion
The objective of this has a look at became to shed mild at the particular characteristics,

possibilities and demanding situations of sustainable firms and to recognize how these

particularities are considered in present enterprise model ideas. Based on a longitudinal, more

than one case take a look at the method, we diagnosed 5 traits of sustainable business models:

Organic improvement, collective effort, value-based actions, the interplay of sustainability

dimensions and awesome corporations of goal clients. Opportunities and demanding

situations

attributable to every one of these characteristics have been recognized and mentioned. Based

on those consequences, we mentioned how current enterprise model ideas cater to those

particularities of sustainable companies.[ CITATION Stu07 \l 1033 ]

Recommendations
Theoretical implications. The literature on sustainable business models and business model

innovation has developed as a specialized circulation within each, sustainability and

enterprise version literature. Few contributions (e.G., Joyce and Paquin, 2016; Sabatier et al.,

2017; Yunus et al., 2010) have emphasized the particularities of sustainable enterprise model

factors and dimensions. This has ended in parts in opposing suggestions, consisting of taking

a separate view on each price dimension or together with all fee dimensions into one single

equation (Joyce and Paquin, 2016; Sabatier et al., 2017). Our findings assist the blessings of

an included cost angle. Furthermore, we screen applicable areas that are not sufficiently
addressed in current business models for sustainable companies: the multitude of customer

motivations to engage with sustainable corporations and the value drivers at the back of the

collaboration inside the sustainability community.

Managerial implications. Whether undertaking small sustainability-oriented projects or

therefore following a sustainable orientation, the subject has grown to apply to firms in any

industry, in any regional context. Solving the ecological and social challenges present and

emerging is predicted to grow to be even greater relevance. Our findings offer practitioners

engaged in or interested in undertaking sustainable sports with an overview of the unique

characteristics, challenges, and possibilities associated with this kind of commercial

enterprise. This is mainly applicable as our evaluation further indicates that some of these

components are not captured through current equipment and methods. Limitations and

destiny studies. We are not aware of another longitudinal, multicase observe strategies

focussing on the development and innovation of sustainable business models over the years.

These insights have allowed us to contribute to the traits of firms working on this context and

the associated possibilities and

challenges. However, this observe comes with some of the barriers. This includes the regional

restriction of the facts, capacity sampling biases no matter the useful sampling method and

the tremendously quick observation period of years. Future research ought to similarly

explore sustainable commercial enterprise model development over longer durations.

Furthermore, we endorse constructing our findings to further discover the cost drivers at the

back of sustainable communities and networks. Also, we advocate to further discover the

patron-enterprise interface within the context of sustainable business fashions.

Appendices

Bibliography
Bae, H., & Smardon, R. S. (2011). Indicators of Sustainable Business Practices. Retrieved 3 30, 2020,
from https://intechopen.com/books/environmental-management-in-practice/indicators-of-
sustainable-business-practices

Balkau, F., & Sonnemann, G. (2011). Addressing Sustainability Issues Through Enhanced Supply-Chain
Management. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from https://intechopen.com/books/supply-chain-
management-new-perspectives/addressing-sustainability-issues-through-enhanced-supply-
chain-management

Baumgartner, R. J., & Ebner, D. (2010). Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and
maturity levels. Sustainable Development, 18(2), 76-89. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sd.447

Charter, M., Peattie, K. J., Ottman, J., & Polonsky, M. J. (2002). Marketing and Sustainability.
Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from http://cfsd.org.uk/smart-know-net/smart-know-net.pdf

Clancy, H. (n.d.). The 2014 Dow Jones Sustainability Index: Abbott to Woolworths. Retrieved 3 30,
2020, from http://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2014/09/11/bmw-bayer-intel-sap-and-unilever-
prevail-dow-jones-sustainability-list

Coelho, D. A., & Fernandes, S. A. (2013). Toy Design Methods: A Sustainability Perspective. Retrieved
3 30, 2020, from https://intechopen.com/books/advances-in-industrial-design-
engineering/toy-design-methods-a-sustainability-perspective
Confino, J. (n.d.). Best practices in sustainability: Ford, Starbucks and more. Retrieved 3 30, 2020,
from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/blog/best-practices-sustainability-
us-corporations-ceres

Definition of SUSTAINABLE. (n.d.). Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from https://www.merriam-

webster.com/dictionary/sustainable

Dewulf, K. (2013). Sustainable Product Innovation: The Importance of the Front- End Stage in the
Innovation Process. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from https://intechopen.com/books/advances-in-
industrial-design-engineering/sustainable-product-innovation-the-importance-of-the-front-
end-stage-in-the-innovation-process

Dow Jones Sustainability Indices in collaboration with RobecoSAM. (n.d.). Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
http://www.sustainability-indices.com/sustainability-assessment/corporate-sustainability-
assessment.jsp

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on
Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from http://hbs.edu/faculty/publication files/ssrn-
id1964011_6791edac-7daa-4603-a220-4a0c6c7a3f7a.pdf

Eccles, R. G., Serafeim, G., & Li, X. (2012). Dow Chemical: Innovating for Sustainability. Retrieved 3
30, 2020, from https://hbs.edu/faculty/pages/item.aspx?num=41386

Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2005). The Cost of Sustainability Capital and the Creation of Sustainable Value
by Companies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 47-58. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1162/108819805775247936

Foods, W. (n.d.). Sustainability and Our Future. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
http://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/mission-values/core-values/sustainability-and-our-
future#actions

Gerbens-Leenes, P., Moll, H., & Uiterkamp, A. S. (2003). Design and development of a measuring
method for environmental sustainability in food production systems. Ecological Economics,
46(2), 231-248. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s092180090300140x

Grayson, D. (2011). Embedding corporate responsibility and sustainability: Marks & Spencer. Journal
of Management Development, 30(10), 1017-1026. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
https://emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02621711111182510/full/html

Hahn, P. W., Seaman, S. L., & Bikel, R. (2012). Making Decisions with Multiple Attributes: A Case in
Sustainability Planning. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
https://gbr.pepperdine.edu/2012/08/making-decisions-with-multiple-attributes-a-case-in-
sustainability-planning

Hutchison, P. M. (2009). Environmental Sustainability in China: A Historical Perspective. Inquiries

Journal, 1(11). Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
http://inquiriesjournal.com/articles/68/environmental-sustainability-in-china-a-historical-
perspective

Independent think tank and strategy consultancy. (n.d.). Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from SustainAbility:
http://www.sustainability.com
Liebowitz, J. (2010). The Role of HR in Achieving a Sustainability Culture. Journal of Sustainable
Development, 3(4), 50. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
http://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/8542

Linnenluecke, M. K., & Griffiths, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and organizational culture.
Journal of World Business, 45(4), 357-366. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s1090951609000431

Metro Sustainability. (n.d.). Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from

https://www.metro.net/projects/sustainability/

Miller, J. L. (2010). Sustainability: Is It a Good Choice for Small Companies? Inquiries Journal, 2(10).
Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from http://inquiriesjournal.com/articles/295/sustainability-is-it-a-
good-choice-for-small-companies

Mudd, G. M., & Mudd, G. M. (2010). The Environmental sustainability of mining in Australia: key
mega-trends and looming constraints. Resources Policy, 35(2), 98-115. Retrieved 3 30, 2020,
from https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s0301420709000531

Naik, T. R. (2008). Sustainability of Concrete Construction. Practice Periodical on Structural Design

and Construction, 13(2), 98-103. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
http://courses.washington.edu/cee380/naikconcrete-sust.pdf

Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2013). Why sustainability is now the key driver
of innovation. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 41(2), 30-37. Retrieved 3 30, 2020,
from
http://faculty.wwu.edu/dunnc3/rprnts.hbr.whysustainabilityisnowthekeydriverofinnovation.
pdf

Ortiz, O., Castells, F., & Sonnemann, G. (2009). Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of
recent developments based on LCA. Construction and Building Materials, 23(1), 28-39.
Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s0950061807003005

Pojasek, R. B. (2007). A framework for business sustainability. Environmental Quality Management,

17(2), 81-88. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic541380.files/business sustainability.pdf

Pojasek, R. B. (2009). Using leading indicators to drive sustainability performance. Environmental

Quality Management, 18(4), 87-93. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tqem.20228

Reimsbach, D., & Hahn, R. (2015). The Effects of Negative Incidents in Sustainability Reporting on
Investors’ Judgments - An Experimental Study of Third-Party versus Self-Disclosure in the
Realm of Sustainable Development. Business Strategy and The Environment, 24(4), 217-235.
Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.1816

S, V., & Jm, B. (2010). Sustainability reporting in the mining sector: identifying critical issues.
Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from http://scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=s0041-
47512010000100005

Scanlon, B. R., Faunt, C. C., Longuevergne, L., Reedy, R. C., Alley, W. M., McGuire, V. L., & McMahon,
P. B. (2012). Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and
 Central Valley. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, 109(24), 9320-9325. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
https://pnas.org/content/109/24/9320

Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation:
categories and interactions. Business Strategy and The Environment, 20(4), 222-237.
Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bse.682

Singh, R. K., Murty, H., Gupta, S., & Dikshit, A. K. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment
methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2), 189-212. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s1470160x11000240

Sreenivasan, J., Govindan, M., Chinnasami, M., & Kadiresu, I. (2012). Solid Waste Management in
Malaysia – A Move Towards Sustainability. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
https://intechopen.com/books/waste-management-an-integrated-vision/solid-waste-
management-in-malaysia-a-move-towards-sustainability

Stirman, S. W., Stirman, S. W., Kimberly, J. R., Cook, N., Calloway, A., Calloway, A., . . . Charns, M. P.
(2012). The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical
literature and recommendations for future research. Implementation Science, 7(1), 17-17.
Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-7-17

Stuart, N., & Adams, J. (2007). The Sustainability of Canada's Healthcare System: A Framework for
Advancing the Debate. Healthcare quarterly, 10(2), 96-103. Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from
https://longwoods.com/content/18839

Sustainability Indices Homepage. (n.d.). Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from http://www.sustainability-

index.com/

Sustainability Reporting. (n.d.). Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from Globalreporting.org:

https://www.globalreporting.org/information/sustainability-reporting/Pages/default.aspx

The business logic of sustainability. (n.d.). Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from

http://www.ted.com/talks/ray_anderson_on_the_business_logic_of_sustainability.html

The sustainability in Eni. (n.d.). Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from

http://www.eni.com/en_IT/sustainability/sustainability.shtml

What is sustainability. (n.d.). Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from

http://www.globalfootprints.org/sustainability

Wild-caught seafood sustainability ratings. (n.d.). Retrieved 3 30, 2020, from Whole Foods Market:
http://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/mission-values/seafood-sustainability/wild-caught-
seafood-sustainability-ratings