Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Title: Quantitative Method in Production & Logistics Course Code: SCM601W1-5521
Faculty: Waqas Mahmood Section:
Day / Date: Saturday/ 18th April, 2020 Timings: 2:00pm – 3:30pm
Student’s Name: Muhammad Hamza Ijaz Total Marks: 15
Student ID: 20202-27041
Note: Attempt all questions. All questions
By calculating the possible safety stock level and associated total inventory costs the degree of risks for
each policy could be determined.
Numerical assumptions include data distributions of demand and lead time for the random cases.
1) Demand and lead time are presented in weeks.
2) The blood donors come to donate when they receive the blood shortage advertisement.
3) Both continuous review policy and periodic review policy are developed under service levels of 90%,
which means that in 90% cases there is no shortage based on the adopted policy.
4) Inventory monitoring investment, including purchasing software or hiring labor, does not include the
inventory setup cost or inventory holding cost, and it is an independent cost type within the total cost.
5) The total inventory cost is calculated by the modified equation: Total annual inventory cost = annual
setup cost + annual holding cost + annual safety stock holding cost +annual monitor cost.
The setup cost is used to pay the advertisement of blood shortage cost. The holding cost is used to pay
all the blood plasma holding related cost. The annual safety stock holding cost is used to consider the
safety stock. The monitoring cost, which is regarded as an independent cost, is used to pay for the labor
or purchasing monitoring software and related facilities.
Structural assumptions:
1. Consider demand per week and lead time by week.
2. Sufficient blood donor supply when facing shortage
3. Inventory monitor investment includes purchasing monitoring software and hiring the required
labor
4. Total inventory annual cost = annual setup cost + annual holding cost + annual safety stock holding
cost +annual monitoring cost
Numerical Assumptions:
1. 20 minutes of thawing from frozen conditions
2. 90% service level
Q2. Outline the various pieces of the case study that you are focusing on. Evaluate these pieces by
discussing what is working and what is not working. (4 Marks)
Answer: In general, continuous review policy is better than periodic review policy. If the budget is over the
total cost of the continuous review policy, we will select it. If the budget is lower, lower than the
total cost of continuous review policy but over the periodic review policy, we will select lower cost
one.
Q4. A) Provide specific and realistic solution(s) or changes needed. Explain why this solution was chosen.
(2 Marks)
Answer: The paper presents a scientific stochastic model for transitory open-dating nourishments
including deficiency and outdating costs. The interest changes have been considered demonstrating
them through a typical conveyance, and their effect on the capacity time has been contemplated
thinking about the stochastic idea of such a parameter thus. The evaluation of died items has been
additionally tended to, deciding the likelihood for a result of staying in stock past the finish of its Shelf
Life. Based on such premises, the ideal arrangement of parameters that limit the absolute unit cost has
been resolved. A numerical application and a sensitivity analysis show the practical applicability of the
proposed model in the context of warehouse management, underlining managerial insights
B) Determine and discuss specific strategies for accomplishing the proposed solution. (2 Marks)