Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mock Iep
Mock Iep
Demographic Information
For Students with SLD only, the following area(s) of eligibility was/were previously determined: Math and
reading
Level of Services: (A)
Type of Meeting:
Initial
Date Meeting Notice Sent to the Date Procedural Safeguards given to the
Parent(s): 02/21/2020 Parent(s): 02/21/2020
This page will not need to be completed because it is a signature page.
Special Education Department
Individualized Education Program (IEP)
Student (Pseudo) Name: Student Data/Cover Sheet (Form A-2) IEP Meeting Date:
The following persons participated in the conference and/or the development of the IEP. Additionally, parents have
been given a copy of their rights regarding the student’s placement in special education and understand that they
have the right to request a review of their child’s IEP at any time.
If during the IEP year the student turns 16, if the student is not present at the IEP meeting, the service coordinator
must review the IEP with the student and obtain the student’s signature and the date of this review.
Special Education Department
Individualized Education Program (IEP)
Student (Pseudo) Name: Student Data/Cover Sheet (Form B) IEP Meeting Date:
Mary Smith 03/09/2020
Summarize special education services the student is receiving: This is an initial IEP meeting.
The student is not receiving any services at this time.
Areas of Eligibility:
A. Cognitive (academic performance in content areas, e.g., ELA/Reading/Writing, Math, Science, Social
Studies, Technology and Fine Arts, as applicable):
Math: Mary struggles to correctly complete grade level math work. She is attentive during lessons;
however, she rarely turns in homework and often does not complete work in class.
Reading: Mary currently reads at a first-grade level. She struggles with fluency and with
comprehension after reading. Mary’s reading logs show that she does not read at home.
B. Physical (gross motor, fine motor, vision, and hearing): Mary exhibits no problems with physical
abilities at her grade level. There is no concern about this area.
C. Oral Language and Communication: Mary exhibits good oral language and communication habits for
her grade level. There is no concern about this area.
D. Social and Emotional Behavior: Mary exhibits good social and emotional behavior habits for her
grade level. There is no concern about this area.
E. Adaptive: Mary exhibits good adaptive behaviors for her grade level. There is no concern about this
area.
Current Classroom-Based Data: Mary does not perform at grade level with the rest of her peers in
assignment and assessments in math and reading. She is struggling with these subjects as shown in the
assessments she took in preparation for this IEP.
Family’s Input on Student’s Current Performance: Family agrees that Mary struggles in math and reading.
They notice that she becomes stubborn when being asked to complete homework and she will not
complete it. They do not ask her to complete her homework when she gets like this.
Summary of Work Habits: Mary struggles in class. While she is attentive during lessons, she rarely
completes homework. When doing work in class, Mary shuts down and refuses to work when she comes
to problems she does not know.
Considered
Not Needed Included
Rationale:
The assessments given were ones that showed Mary’s ability level in math and reading at current 2 nd
grade levels. These were prime indicators to Mary’s difficulties within these subjects. The interventions
that are given are based on the assessments results as well as teacher and family observations about
Mary’s difficulties.
State Assessments
Standard Accommodation(s): Math and Reading: When Mary takes state tests next year (3rd grade;
2020-21), she will not be timed on the tests. She will be able to have questions and possible answers read
to her unlimited times.
District Assessments
Standard Accommodation(s): Math: When Mary takes district tests, she will not be timed on the tests.
She will be able to have questions and possible answers read to her unlimited times. Reading: When
Mary takes district tests, she will be able to look back in the book to help her answer comprehension
questions. She will not be timed.
Mary will be receiving special education services for 2 forty-minute blocks in an 8 block school
day including lunch. This means that for 25% of her instruction will be in a resource room with
other students who are learning at a more individualized pace and will spend the other 75% of
her time in her general education classroom.
Consider any potential harmful effects of this placement for the child or on the quality of
services that he or she needs §300.552 (a-b):
There are no anticipated harmful effects that this placement could have on Mary. The majority of
her time will be spent with her peers and she will receive services with other students for the
other 25% of her time.
Mary will be receiving services at school for math and reading support. This in done in a
resource room where students are given more individualized attention and are working at a pace
that is beneficial to them.
OR, if the above LRE information does not apply to this student, explain why:
Standard 3: Individualized Education Plan - Part 2
Annual Goal: Mary currently is able to correctly identify the place values (ones, tens, hundreds)
by sorting one, two, and three digit numbers 0 out of 5 times. By this time next year, Mary will
be able to correctly identify and sort one, two, and three digit numbers 3 out of 5 times.
Annual Goal: Mary currently is able to correctly solve two-step addition and/or subtraction
problems 0 out of 5 times. By this time next year, Mary will be able to solve 3 out of 5 two-step
addition and/or subtraction problems correctly.
Annual Goal: Mary currently reads with a fluency of 75/100 words correctly which is a 75%.
By this time next year, Mary will be able to read 90/100 words correctly which is a 90%.
Baseline Level of Mastery: 75 out of 100 words correctly
Service Provider(s) for this goal: Resource Room Special Education Teacher: Taylor Munoz
Annual Goal: Mary currently is able to answer 2 out of 5 comprehension questions correctly after
reading a literature or informational text. By this time next year, Mary will be able to answer 4 out of 5
questions correctly after reading a literature or informational text.
Date Given to General Education Teacher: 03/09/2020 Service Coordinator: Taylor Munoz
Family Communication
How will the family be informed of their child’s academic progress and the extent to which that progress
is sufficient to enable the child to achieve annual goals by the end of the year?
The family will be updated with the students progress three times throughout the school year towards the
end of each trimester. The special education teacher will meet with the family during both of the parent
teacher conferences throughout the school year and during the yearly review of the IEP. The special
education teacher will be available for additional meetings if the family would like to talk about the
student’s progress outside of the specified times.
Clarification: Mary will be receiving intervention support in both reading and math each for 40 minutes
out of each school day.
Special Instructional
Education Setting/ Start Date Frequency Provider Duration/ End
Services Location Date
Clarification: There are no relevant related services that Mary is in need of.
Clarification: There are no supplementary aids/assistive technology and services that Mary is in need
of.
Special Instructional
Education Setting/ Start Date Frequency Provider Duration/ End
Services Location Date
Clarification: There are no school personnel supports that are needed for Mary’s services.
IEP Meeting Planning
Required Participants/Roles: List the participants of an IEP meeting and their roles, including
whether or not the student is expected to participate.
Mary Smith (student): Not expected to participate
Teresa and Gregory Smith (parents): One or both parents are expected to come to the initial
IEP meeting. They will listen to Mary’s goals and voice any concerns or questions they may
have.
Taylor Munoz (special education teacher): Will discuss Mary’s IEP including assessment
results, goals and other important details.
Kris Moore (principal): Will observe and take notes of important information discussed during
the IEP.
Danielle Toop (general education teacher): Will listen to Mary’s IEP and offer and support she
finds necessary to discuss.
Lara Schab (student teacher): Observe the meeting and offer support if needed.
Required Agenda Outline: In 500-750 words, create an agenda for the IEP meeting. Discuss the
required topics you must address (i.e., introduction of team members, whether or not this is an initial or
review or an annual IEP, discussion of test results, present levels, goals, services, Least Restrictive
Environment (LRE) statement, Extended School Year (ESY) services, procedural safeguards, and prior
written notice.
Plan for Conflicts: Provide a description of ways you can involve parents in the development of
the IEP. Discuss whether you anticipate issues or conflicts that may arise during the meeting and your
plan on addressing those concerns.
I will be sure to involve parents in every part of the discussion. When we begin talking about
Mary’s current scores and progress, I will be sure to ask them what they think. This will give
them an opportunity to discuss if they have seen similar traits at home or if this is new to them.
I will also be sure to check with them after each goal is described to be sure that any questions
and comments are addressed. I will also mention how we all have Mary’s best interest in mind
and these services are being put in place to help her move forward and succeed in the future. If
I find that a conflict may arise, I will be sure to slow down and talk through the conflict to be
sure there is no miscommunication present. If conflicts are not resolved through discussion,
other members may need to be involved to help find a resolution.