Process Engineering | Better design is no pipe dream | Chemical Processing Page 1 of 6

Navigate

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2006/094.html?page=print 11/6/2007
Process Engineering | Better design is no pipe dream | Chemical Processing Page 2 of 6

Navigate

Better design is no pipe dream

By Mike Spear, editor at large

ChemicalProcessing.com
The benefits of using pipeline simulation tools at the piping and instrumentation diagram (P&ID)
level, rather than running simulations just on the process flow diagram, can often be overlooked.

“Fluid flow is the forgotten science in the chemical industry,” says Todd Willman, director of
development and engineering with engineering software company EPCON International, Houston,
Texas. By not understanding what is going on in a plant’s piping systems, engineers are in danger of
“forgetting half the possibility of where you can make your process better,” he warns.

As Willman has highlighted before, the benefits of using pipeline simulation tools at the piping and
instrumentation diagram (P&ID) level, rather than running simulations just on the process flow
diagram, can often be overlooked. The problem, he says, is that chemical engineers “typically have
significantly less ‘schooling’in fluid mechanics principles” than their mechanical engineering
counterparts, who tend to take charge of fluid flow analyses in other industries.

Leigh Gillard, Asia channels manager with Flowmaster International, Towcester, U.K. and Skokie,
Ill., makes a similar point. Speaking of an application of his company’s pipe modeling software at
BP’s complex at Hull, U.K., he says BP’s view was that many chemical engineers are “classically
trained in production,” and so tend to ignore the mechanical effects of simply getting fluid from
point A to point B — events such as valve slamming or pressure surges, for instance. “You can’t just
specify a pipe and hope you get a flow down it. You have to take into account many other factors,”
he notes.

That BP application involved a complete redesign of the utility services at the site, where steam,
water, air and nitrogen pipe networks serve a variety of process plants producing a number of basic
chemicals from acetic acid to oxygenated solvents. With Flowmaster in use there since 1993 (initially
for transient surge analysis of incompressible fluids), BP’s engineers were well versed in how to build
accurate design models of all the networks, models which are now continually in use to analyze the
impact of prospective changes in the service requirements of each plant.

Flowmaster Version 6.5 was released in October 2005 with several enhancements to the basic one-
dimensional package that was originally designed to analyze the fluid dynamic effects of fast-acting
pressure transients (such as pressure surge and water hammer) in complex pipe networks. The
main drivers behind its use in the chemical industry, according to Gillard, are basically asset
management — “knowing which pipes are going where” — and simulation of flare and pressure-relief
systems.

Tailored to chemical engineers

EPCON’s SiNET 7 software, which is part of the company’s Engineer’s Aide Toolbox suite, recently
celebrated its 25th anniversary with a new edition that, says Willman, “fully completes the
metamorphosis of taking a traditional mechanical engineering task to the ‘mainstream’for chemical
engineers in the chemical process industries (CPI).”

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2006/094.html?page=print 11/6/2007
Process Engineering | Better design is no pipe dream | Chemical Processing Page 3 of 6

Navigate

“If you use this technology right,” Willman notes, “you can find out all sorts of problems. We’re not
trying to force a hydraulic, mechanical engineering view onto chemical engineers. We’re basically
helping them to do the right calculations from their point of view.”

With options including access to AIChE’s DIPPR physical properties database of more than 2,000
components and EPCON’s own two-phase flash models, SiNET is said to be good for general-purpose
pipeline network analysis and process equipment sizing and troubleshooting.

For its fluid-flow modeling modules, Applied Flow Technology, Woodland Park, Colo., offers the 700-
component-strong Chempak database licensed from Madison Technical Software of Westwood, Mass.
The basic module is AFT Fathom for incompressible-flow pipe network analysis and system
modeling, complemented by AFT Arrow for studies of compressible fluids, AFT Mercury and Titan for
incompressible- and compressible-flow system optimizations, respectively, and AFT Impulse for
water-hammer/surge-transients analysis.

Noting that the software is used in just about every industry that has piping or ducting systems,
Tom Glassen, AFT’s vice president, operations, finds it somewhat surprising that application of pipe
flow network analysis in the chemical industry is “still at a relatively early stage, not nearly as
extensive as, say, the use of pipe stress analysis tools.” Many engineers, he believes, are still using
“relatively crude tools based on spreadsheets,” although he is now seeing steady growth in the
adoption of piping flow analysis software. “Companies that take it up,” he says, “soon appreciate the
benefits of better design and fewer problems later on in operation… ”

This gradual uptake is also recognized by Michael Blondin, sales and marketing manager of
Engineered Software, Lacey, Wash. Its flagship product is Pipe-Flo, which started out life more than
20 years ago as a tool primarily for engineering design firms. Blondin says the current customer split
has now swung around to being nearer 40% operators and 60% design firms. “We’ve seen a shift in
probably the past 10 years,” he notes, “as we’ve moved to sophisticated Windows-based solutions
and graphical interfaces, P&IDs and so on, trying to make the program as easy to use as possible. In
many cases we work both with the design firm and then also with the end user, so that the Pipe-Flo
model will apply throughout the life of the system.”

One end user can thank Pipe-Flo for a $40,000/year saving in energy costs. Bill Kane, manufacturing
technologist at the Monsanto plant in Luling, La., used the software to optimize the plant’s
compressed air system. “You wouldn’t have time or the expertise to do this type of analysis without
Pipe-Flo,” he says. “These types of projects get more complicated as you get more people involved,
so using the working model in Pipe-Flo made communication easier.”

Engineered Software has arranged with around 80 pump manufacturers to incorporate their pump
curve data into a web-based pump selection module for Pipe-Flo. The company also is in the process
of linking its software into other process applications such as distributed control systems (DCSs).

Multiphase flow
At the moment, Pipe-Flo is only applicable to single-phase flows, but that’s under review, says
Blondin, given “a strong customer base in the CPI interested in multiphase flow.” AFT also is
considering multiphase. “It’s an area for which, on the one hand, there is a regular demand, but, on

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2006/094.html?page=print 11/6/2007
Process Engineering | Better design is no pipe dream | Chemical Processing Page 5 of 6

Navigate

Invensys SimSci-Esscor offers Inplant, a rigorous steady-state simulator for designing, rating and
analyzing plant piping systems — from process pipes to steam and utility distribution systems to
flare relief networks. “A nice thing about Inplant is that it can do rigorous three-phase flow,
everything from simple bulk properties to rigorous thermodynamics,” says Jim Browne, upstream
technology director for the Inplant business and the related Pipephase program for upstream
applications.

Tie-in with CFD

He says many customers use a package like Inplant or Pipephase to set up a model and then run
through a series of “case studies” or scenarios to identify areas where they’re pushing constraint
limits. “They can then examine those areas in more detail using CFD (computational fluid dynamics)
tools — almost using Inplant as a screening tool.”

For the moment, Inplant doesn’t have an interface with any of the proprietary CFD packages,
although Browne says “one of the companies we have been looking at is Fluent.” Now a comment
like that from one of the major control vendors is usually enough to send rumors of mergers and
acquisitions spreading around the industry like wildfire. But as Fluent, Lebanon, N.H., was acquired
in May by ANSYS, Canonsburg, Pa., SimSci-Esscor’s interest is clearly co-operational.

Inplant wouldn’t be the first pipe-network-analysis software to link into Fluent, however.
Flowmaster, for instance, has interfaces with both Fluent and Star-CD, the CFD code from CD-
adapco, Melville, N.Y. and London, U.K.

Fluent’s business development manager for oil and gas and chemicals, Daniel Burton, says CFD can

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2006/094.html?page=print 11/6/2007
Process Engineering | Better design is no pipe dream | Chemical Processing Page 6 of 6

Navigate

corrosion studies within pipelines in refineries, for example.”

Although Fluent 6.3 was released in beta version in December 2005, Burton says the main changes
recently have been not so much in software development but rather in working on “more
customizable versions of the software, where we can work with clients to design an interface for
them so they can move CFD from the specialists and out to process engineers, for instance. The
Fluent code then interfaces with their existing CAE (computer aided engineering) tools, with CFD
very much going on in the background.”

In a similar vein, CD-adapco has “for the past few years been concentrating on ways of providing
very easy front ends to our software,” says technical marketing manager Stephen Ferguson. One of
these is STAR-Design, which, he notes, is “like a simple solid-modeling CAD package that anybody
can pick up. It’s not like ten years ago when you probably needed a Ph.D. to run CFD programs. The
idea behind this sort of simple analysis is that you can do it from a PC without having to understand
Navier-Stokes equations.”

Of course, what can be done on a PC today would have stretched the imagination of any engineer 10
years ago. And the pace of change shows no sign of slackening. For instance, Comsol, Burlington,
Mass. and Stockholm, Sweden, released in March the latest 64-bit version of its Multiphysics
simulation tools, based on the rapid solving of partial differential equations — including, of course,
Navier-Stokes. With support for the forthcoming 64-bit Windows platform, users of Multiphysics 3.2a
reportedly will be able to increase the size of simulation models on their PCs by “orders of
magnitude.”

Whether such power is needed for pipe network analysis is debatable, of course. EPCON’s Willman
still says “you can solve a whole lot of problems — especially in the energy and utilities areas — by
doing the simple analyses. We don’t want to get away from just giving the engineers out there tools
that are simple to use.” No doubt in their own way, the likes of Comsol, Fluent, CD-adapco,
AspenTech and SimSci would all agree with that sentiment.

Site Highlight
Process Puzzler
Readers offer suggestions to possible chemical processing scenarios. Test your skills and offer
suggestions here. http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/voices/process_puzzler.html

Copyright © 2004 - 2007 Chemical Processing All rights reserved.

P: 630-467-1300 | 555 West Pierce Rd., Suite 301, Itasca, IL 60143
Contact Us | Advertise | Advertiser Preview | Legal Terms | Site Map

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2006/094.html?page=print 11/6/2007