Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CSTP Element(s) Focus for POP Cycle (In semesters 2, 3, 4, copy pertinent elements from ILP for POP Cycle focus.)
1 - Emerging 2 - Exploring 3 - Applying 4 - Integrating 5 – Innovating
NT pedagogical skills are newly formed and just Skills are developing as NT investigates Skills are applied as NT makes Skills are refined as NT combines Skills are polished as NT expands ability
coming into prominence and examines pedagogical practices increased relevant and suitable use of elements into a cohesive and unified to add new methods and strategies into
pedagogical choices pedagogical repertoire pedagogical repertoire
CSTP Element Initial Rating Rating Description (Identify both teacher and student rating for CSTP 1 and 2.)
Selects and adapts a variety of instructional strategies to ensure
Utilizing instructional strategies that are
3.4 Exploring student understanding of academic language appropriate to subject
appropriate to the subject matter
matter and that addresses students’ diverse learning needs.
Incorporates differentiated instructional strategies into ongoing
planning that addresses culturally responsive pedagogy, students’
Planning instruction that incorporates diverse language, and learning needs and styles.
4.4 appropriate strategies to meet the Exploring
learning needs of all students Uses assessments of students’ learning and language needs to inform
planning differentiated instruction.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 2 of 6
● Clear expectations for materials before lesson
starts
● Students will self-assess how well they
understand and are able to apply this
strategy
o **Unable to view students’ ● How will students self-assess? Be
Closure self assessments due to sure to give clear expectations for
● How will you close your lesson?
● How will you assess student learning and prepare them for remote learning how to do this, either with a
the next lesson? ● Students will also turn and talk to a partner number on their fingers or an exit
about how this strategy is related to the one ticket
from previous days
o **Unable to do turn and talks
due to remote learning
Section 3: Observation of Lesson Delivery
Part 3A: ME Observation of Lesson Delivery Part 3B: NT Reflection on
Teacher Actions Student Actions Lesson Delivery
Student groups answered worksheet questions that included all Students completed the worksheets and were able to ask
EXAMPLE When teacher reviewed worksheet, she asked additional questions of
levels of Bloom’s (“Identify 6 problem-solving strategies; pick questions. Most groups needed revisions for their questions;
CSTP 1: Engaging All Students analysis and evaluation (“which problem-solving strategy do you
two strategies and identify at least one similarity and one comparison/contrast was the most common analysis question.
● In what ways were students prefer? How could you create a math problem that could be solved with
difference between them”). Groups then selected a strategy I need to give them a Bloom’s question stems handout next
engaged? this strategy?”)
and created two math problems to exchange tomorrow. time.
● Direct correlation to
previous lesson and
previous strategies
CSTP 3: Organizing Subject Teacher repeated the steps of
Matter taught
underlining the important parts of the
● What actions of the NT ● Students were given a
contributed to student problem and modeled it initially with
assimilation of subject chance to try the
matter? manipulatives. Then the teacher
● How did students construct N/A problem and strategies
demonstrated multiple times, the
knowledge of subject matter? first, before teacher
● What misconceptions did more abstract strategy and provided
students have and how were explained and
they addressed by the apple opportunities for students to use
demonstrated
teacher? the strategy .
● Students were given
multiple ways to show
and explain their thinking
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 3 of 6
During the actual lesson, I think the
use of number sets could have been
helpful for your learners- those who
may have needed work with smaller
numbers before diving into ● Differentiation: multiple
double-digit numbers as well as those ways to show strategy
CSTP 4: Learning Experiences who could have been pushed further that students could
● How were students supported
through differentiated with more challenging numbers. choose from & different
instruction? N/A number sets to choose
● How did students participate?
● How did the NT contribute to The teacher allowed for students to from in problems
student learning? review a previously taught strategy, ● Students given
and connect it with the more abstract opportunities to explain
visual strategy that was the focus of their thinking
the lesson. The terminology used, as
well as the demonstration were
consistent with each new problem that
was posed.
● Independent work-
showed if they were able
to effectively use today’s
strategies
CSTP 5: Assessing Student ● Asked to self-assess their
Learning Teacher provided lots of visuals, both
● How did students understanding with
demonstrate achievement of concrete and visual. The teacher
numbers 1-4
lesson objectives? provided problems with similar
● In what ways did students N/A ● Used scaffolding in each
struggle or demonstrate structure that students could then
limited understanding? problem to help students
● What teacher actions
apply the strategies that were taught
solve and show strategies
contributed to student on each new problem with ease.
achievement? ● For students whose work
I was able to view, most
were able to effectively
use the strategy taught
and got correct answers
Section 4: Post Observation Conference
*I was unable to collect all assigned work due to COVID-19 school closures and my school not requiring 1st
graders to ‘turn in’ any work electronically. I was able to collect a few work samples from families who agreed
to send them to me, so analysis is based on the sample size of work that I received*
To what degree did students
achieve lesson objectives?
From what I was able to analyze, most students achieved the lesson objective and were able to use the
strategy that was taught. Some students were still using the previously taught strategy of direct modeling to
solve the given problems, but the majority successfully used the representational strategy.
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
JE- student successfully used the
representational strategy for 1/2
HS- student was still using the
given problems. In the second
To what degree did focus students AL-student successfully used the previously taught, direct
achieve lesson objectives? problem, the student seemed to
representational strategy to solve modeling strategy and did not
miscount and therefore got the
both problems given. yet show mastery of the
answer incorrect, but still
representational strategy
attempted to use the new
strategy
As my mentor suggested, I would use a choice of number sets for at least one of the problems that we worked
What would you do differently next on all together. To differentiate even more, I think I also could have checked in more to have students
time? self-assess their understanding after the first 2 problems. Students could then choose to begin working
independently right away, or stay to watch the rest of the video with me for further review.
I think my learning objective was clear- students understood that today we were learning a new
representational strategy to solve problems using place value.
What were three top Lesson
Strengths? I also think I made a clear connection between the previously taught strategy and the new strategy. This
helped students who are typically more comfortable with concrete strategies see the connection and be able
to further understand this new strategy.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 4 of 6
Last, I think I gave students enough opportunities to practice together, with scaffolding. The process of solving
each problem was consistent throughout the whole lesson, but I gradually gave students more independence
as we moved along.
More differentiation- as described above, I could have had more opportunities to differentiate through the
numbers students used, and the amount of independence they chose.
What were three top areas for I could have also provided more opportunities for students to self-assess their understanding throughout the
improvement? whole lesson, rather than just at the end.
Last, I could have added another visual with the steps to solve each problem, to further support my English
learners.
For students who are ready for even more abstract strategies, I plan on teaching new strategies that allow
What are next steps?
them to mentally and visually manipulate numbers without drawings. For students who need more support
with this representational strategy, I plan to review it with them using both physically base ten blocks and
drawings.
Other Comments/Notes
While I had planned to provide my focus students with small group instruction, following my whole-group lesson, I was unable to do so
due to current school closures. My school is currently not doing any live instruction yet, only pre-recorded video lessons, which is how I
presented this lesson. I plan to begin live small group instruction very soon.
All parts of this form should be transcribed (typed; not hand-written) into a single document and submitted to course instructor.
Information from this POP Cycle should be summarized on the NT ILP as appropriate.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 5 of 6
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 6 of 6