Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CSTP Element Initial Rating Rating Description (Identify both teacher and student rating for CSTP 1 and 2.)
Adapting instructional plans and I will have given students a pre-chapter test to assess their
4.5 curricular materials to meet the assessed 2 - Exploring knowledge of the subject. I will use this to help determine which
learning needs of all students groups to put students into.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 1 of 4
Section 2: Pre-Observation Conference
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
The lesson will close with everyone coming back into I think closing the lesson by bringing
Closure the whole group. I will give students an exit ticket in everyone back in to discuss what was
• How will you close your lesson?
• How will you assess student learning and prepare
which they must answer two questions about learned helps students to retain more
them for the next lesson? volume. I will use that to determine who was able to information. I also think an exit ticket is a
understand the lesson. good way to gauge learning.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 2 of 4
Section 3: Observation of Lesson Delivery
Part 3A: ME Observation of Lesson Delivery Part 3B: NT Reflection on
Teacher Actions Student Actions Lesson Delivery
Student groups answered worksheet questions that included all Students completed the worksheets and were able to ask
EXAMPLE When teacher reviewed worksheet, she asked additional questions of
levels of Bloom’s (“Identify 6 problem-solving strategies; pick questions. Most groups needed revisions for their questions;
CSTP 1: Engaging All Students analysis and evaluation (“which problem-solving strategy do you prefer?
two strategies and identify at least one similarity and one comparison/contrast was the most common analysis
• In what ways were students How could you create a math problem that could be solved with this
difference between them”). Groups then selected a strategy question. I need to give them a Bloom’s question stems
engaged? strategy?”)
and created two math problems to exchange tomorrow. handout next time.
Specific Feedback
• What information can you
provide the NT regarding
requested special
feedback?
CSTP 2: Effective
Learning Environment
• How did students and
teacher contribute to an
effective learning
environment?
CSTP 3: Organizing
Subject Matter
• What actions of the NT
contributed to student
assimilation of subject
matter?
• How did students
construct knowledge of
subject matter?
• What misconceptions did
students have and how
were they addressed by
the teacher?
CSTP 4: Learning
Experiences
• How were students
supported through
differentiated
instruction?
• How did students
participate?
• How did the NT contribute
to student learning?
CSTP 5: Assessing
Student Learning
• How did students
demonstrate
achievement of lesson
objectives?
• In what ways did
students struggle or
demonstrate limited
understanding?
• What teacher actions
contributed to student
achievement?
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 3 of 4
Section 4: Post Observation Conference
To what degree did students
achieve lesson objectives?
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
To what degree did focus
students achieve lesson
objectives?
Other Comments/Notes
All parts of this form should be transcribed (typed; not hand-written) into a single document and submitted to course instructor.
Information from this POP Cycle should be summarized on the NT ILP as appropriate.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 4 of 4