BIBLIOGRAPHY

 Abraham S. Goldstein and Martin Marcus, ―The Myth of Judicial

Supervision in Three ―Inquisitorial‖ Systems: France, Italy and
Germany‖, 87 Yale 240 (1977).

 Alfred Hill, ―The Bill of Rights And the supervisory Power‖, 69

Col.L.R.181 (1969)

 Andrew sanders and Richard Young, ―Police powers‖ in Tim

Newburn (edtd.) Hand Book of Policing, Willan Publishing Ltd.,
Devon, U.K.,2003 p.233.

 Andrew Sanders and Richard Young, ―The Rule of Law, Due

Process and Pre- trial Criminal Justice‖, Current Legal Problems,
47 (2):131.

 Andrew Sanders, ―Rights, Remedies, and the Police And Criminal

Evidence Act‖, [1988] Crim.L.R 802.

 Anton A.E, ―L‘Instruction Criminelle‖, 1960 Am.J.Comp.L, 441.

 Ashworth A J, ―Concept of Criminal Justice‖, [1979] Crim.L.R.

412.

 Bakshi P.M., ―Continental System of Criminal Justice‖, 36

J.I.L.I.419

 Bhagawati P.N., ―Human Rights and Criminal Justice System‖,

Indian Bar Review, vol.III, 1985

 Brenda A. Dixon, ―The Adversary system: A Brief Philosophical

Analysis‖, http://mywebpages.comcast.net/badixon1/ adversary. htm.

 Brennen, ―Judicial Supervision of Criminal Law Administration‖,

9 Crime &Delinquency, 227 (1963)

xxxvi
 Burt Neuborne, ―An Overview of the Bill of rights‖, in Alan B.
Morrison (Gen.editor) Fundamentals of American Law, Oxford
University Press, New York, 1996, p.105

 Charles D. Breital, ―Controls in Criminal Law Enforcement‖,

1960 Uni.Chi.L.R., 427.

 Cherif Bassiouni M., ―Survey of Major Criminal Systems in the

world‖ in Daniel Glaser (edtd.) Hand Book of Criminology, Rand
McNally College Publishing Co., Chicago, 1974 at p.549.

 Colin Munro, ―The Accountability of the Police‖, [1985]

Crim.L.R 581 at p. 582.

 Dallin H. Oaks, ―Studying the Exclusionary Rule in Search and

Seizure‖, 37 Uni. Chi. L. R. 665, (1969-70).

 David Alan Sklanski, ―Police and Democracy‖ 103

Mich.L.R.1699.

 David Telling, ―Arrest and Detention – The Conceptual Maze,‖

[1978] Crim.L.R 320.

 Editorial Note, ―An Historical Argument for the Right to Counsel

During Police Interrogation‖, 73 Yale.L.J.1000 (1963-64).

 Editorial note, ―Judicial Control of Illegal Search and Seizure‖,

60 Yale.L.J. p.144

 Editorial Note, ―Preliminary Investigation of Criminal Offences-

The Report of the Committee Appointed by Justice‖. [1960]
Crim.L.R. 793.

 Editorial Note, ―The Judges‘ Rules and the police‖, [1964]

Crim.L.R. 173

 Edward L. Barrett, Jr., ―Police Practices and the Law- From Arrest
to Release or Charge, 50 Calif.L.R 11

xxxvii
 Frank .J.Vandall; ―Police Training for the Tough Calls;
Discretionary Situations‖; 25 Emory Law Journal, 393, [1976]

 Frank J. McGarr, ―The Exclusionary Rule: An Ill Conceived and

Ineffective Remedy‖, 52 J. Crim. L., C. & P.S. 266 (1961)

 Fred E. Inbau, ―More About Public Saftey v. Individual

Liberties‖, 53 J. Crim. L., C. & P.S. 329 (1962).

 Fred E.Inbau, ―Democratic Restraints Upon the Police‖, 57

J.Cri.L, C&P.S 265 (1966)

 Fred E.Inbau, ―Self-Incrimination – What can an accused Person

be Compelled to Do‖, 89 J.Crim.L.,C & P.S.1329 (1998-99).

 George P. Fletcher, ―Two Kinds of Legal Rules: A Comparative

Study of Burden of Persuasion – Practices in Criminal Cases‖;
Yale. L.J. vol.77, 1968.

 Gerald.L.Kock, ―Criminal Proceedings in France‖: 1960 Am.

J.Comp.L. 253, vol 9

 Glanville Williams, ―Questioning by the Police: Some Practical

Considerations‖, [1960] Crim. L.R. 331

 Glanville Williams, ―Requisites of a Valid Arrest‖ [1954]

Crim.L.R 6

 Glanville Williams, ―The Authentication of Statements to Police‖,

[1979] Crim.L.R.6.

 Grossman B.A, ―Police Command: Decisions and Discretion‖

(1975), pp. 59-60 quoted in 53 ALJ, p. 633

 Hansaria B.L, Writ Jurisdiction Under the Constitution, 2nd edtn.

1992, N.M.Tripathi Pvt. Ltd., Bombay. 217

 Harold Joseph Berman, Talks on American Law 39 (1960)

xxxviii
 Herbert L.Packer, ―Two Models Of Criminal Process‖, 113
Uni.Pa.L.R. 1

 Herman Goldstein; ―Administrative Problems in controlling the

Exercise of Police Authority‖, 58 J.Crim.L,C & P.S.160(1967)

 Hogan & Snee, ―The McNabb- Mallory Rule: Its Rise, Rationale
and Rescue‖, 47 Geo.L.J,23 (1958) Edward L. Barrett, Jr. , ―Police
Practices and the Law – From Arrest to Release or Charge‖, 50
Calif. L.R., 11, 19 (1962).

 Hooda R.K., ―The Constitutional and Legal position of the Police

in India‖, A.I.R. 1968 Journal 127

 Hydervali, ―Law and Custodial Torture in India‖, 1999 Cri.L.J. 36.

 Ian Oliver, ―Police Accountability In 1996‖, [1996] Crim.L.R.611.

 Jack B. Weinstein, ―Some Difficulties in Devising Rules for

Determining Truth in Judicial Trials‖, 66 Col.L.R. 223 (1966)

 Jagadish Narain Sarkar, ―Police in the Mediaeval India – In

Theory and Practice‖, The Indian Police Journal (centenary issue
1861-1961), SVP Police Academy, Hyderabad.

 John H.Langbein and Lloyd L.weinreb, ―Continental Criminal

Procedure: ―Myth‖ and Reality‖, 1978 Yale L.J 1549

 John L.Lambert, Police Powers and Accountability,

 K.W.Lidstone, ―A Maze in Law!‖ [1978]Crim.L.R 332.

 K.W.Lidstone, ―Investigative Powers and the Rights of the

Citizen‖, [1981] Crim.L.R 454

 Kirby M.D., ―Controls Over Investigation of Offences and Pre-

Trial Treatment of Suspects – Criminal Investigation and the Rule
of Law‖, 53 ALJ 626 at p. 631 (1979)

xxxix
 LaFave and Remington, ―Controlling the Police: The Judge‘s Role
in Making and Reviewing law Enforcement Decisions‖, 63 Mich.
L.R.987 (1965).

 Lyman J.L., ―The Metropolitan Police Act, 1829; An Analysis of

Certain Events Influencing the Passage and Character of the
Metropolitan Police Act in England‖, Journal of Criminal Law &
Criminology, vol.55, 1964,p.141.

 Mackenna, J., ―Police Interrogation‖, 120 New.L.J. 665 (1970).

 Madhava Menon N.R., ―Police Reform: Imperative for Efficiency

in Criminal Justice‖, in P.J.Alexander, (edtd.) Policing India in the
New Millennium, Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd, New
Delhi,2002,p.259.

 Manfred Pieck, ―The Accused‘s Privilage Against Self-

Incrimination in the Civil Law‖, 1962 (2) Ame.J.Comp.L.,585.

 Manoje Nath, ―Human Rights and the Police‖, in P.J.Alexander

(edtd.) Policing India In the New Millennium, Allied Publishers
Pvt.Ltd.,New Delhi, 2002. p.475.

 Mark A. Gelowitz, ―Section 78 of the Police and Criminal

Evidence Act 1984: Middle Ground or No Man‘s Land?‖ 106
LQR 327,342 (1990)

 Marvin E. Frankel, ―The Search for Truth: An Umpireal View‖,

123 Uni. Pa. L. R. 1031, 1032(1975)

 Mirjan Damaska, ‗Adversary system‘ in S.Kadish(gen. ed.),

Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice,: New York : The Free
Press,1983,at 29, quoted in Salvatore Zappala, Human Rights in
International Criminal Proceedings, Oxford University Press,
2003 at. 14.

xl
 Mirjan Damaska, ―Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two
Models of Criminal Procedure : A Comparative study‖, 121
Uni.Pa.L.R. 506 (1973)

 Mirjan Damaska; Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two

Models of Criminal Procedure; A Comparative Study; 121
Uni.Pa.L.R 555 [1973].

 Monard G. Paulsen, ―The Exclusionary Rule and Misconduct by

the Police‖, 52 J. Crim. L., C. & P.S. 255. (1961).

 Morris Ploscowe , ‗The Investigating Magistrate (Juge d‘

Instruction) in European Criminal Procedure‖, 33 H.L.R.1010
(1934-35)

 Murray Gleeson, ―Role of a Judge In Criminal Trial‖,

 Pandey B.B., ―Human Rights and Criminal Justice Administration

in India‖,in K.I.Vibhute, Criminal Justice, Eastern Book Co.,
Luknow,2004.

 Parmanand Singh, ―Protection of Human Rights Through Public

Interest Litigation in India‖, in K.I.Vibhute (edtd.) Criminal
Justice, Eastern Book Co., Lucknow, 2004.

 Patrik Devlin, ―Police Powers and Responsibilities: Common

Law, Statutory and Discretionary‖, Part I, Australian Police
Journal (1967), vol.2, p.122

 Peter Allsop, ―Report of the Royal Commission on the Police-

Editorial Comments‖, [1962] Crim.L.R.516.

 Pillai K.N.C. ―Adversarial System, The Bar and Legal Education‖

2001 CULR 40.

 Plumb, ―Illegal Enforcement of the Law‖, 24 Conell L.Q 337

(1939)

xli
 Police and Criminal Evidence Act, 1984 (PACE)

 R.Deb, ―Police Investigations: A Review‖ in P.J.Alexander,

(edtd.) Policing India in the New Millennium, Allied Publishers
Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, 2002, p.111.

 Remington, ―The law Relating to ‗On Street‘ Detention,

Questioning and Frisking of Suspected Persons and Police Arrest
Privileges in General‖, 51 J.Crim.L., C. & P.S. 386

 Richard May, ―Fair Play at Trial: an Interim Assessment of section

78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, 1984, [1988]
Crim.L.R. 722.

 Riech, ―Police Questioning of Law Abiding Citizens‖, 75

Yale.L.J. 1161 (1966)

 Robert M.Pitler, ―The Fruits of the Poisonous Tree Revisited and

Shepardised, 56 Calif. L.R. 579

 Robert Vouin, ―The Exclusionary Rule Under Foreign Law –

France, 52 J.Crim.L.,C & P.S, p.275 (1961)

 Saini R.S., ―Custodial Torture in Law and Practice with Reference

to India‖, 36(2) JILI 166 (1994) at p.177.

 Shah Commission Report, 1977, quoted in N.K.Singh, ―police

Reforms‖, in P.J.Alexander (edtd.), Policing India in the New
Millennium, Allied Publishers Pvt.Ltd., New Delhi, 2002, p.284

 Smith J.C., ―The New Judges‘ Rules- a Lawyer‘s View‖, [1964]

Crim.L.R.176

 T.E.ST.Johnston, ―The Judges‘ Rules and Police Interrogation in

England Today‖, 57 J.Crim.L.,C & P.S. 85 (1966).

xlii
 Thampi B.J.K., ―Training a New Police in the Century‖, in
P.J.Alexander (edtd.) Policing in India in the New Millennium,
Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi,2002, 689 at p. 704.

 Transactions, SVP Police Academy, Hyderabad, vol.38, 1983.

 Upendra Baxi, Vasudha Dhagamwar, Reghunath Kelkar and

Lotika Sarkar, ―An Open Letter to the Chief Justice of India‖,
(1979) 4 SCC 17 (jou.).

 Vincent L.Broderick, ―The Supreme Court and the Police: A

Police Viewpoint‖, 57 J.Crim.L, C & P.S, 271 (1966).

 Vouin, ―Protection of the Accused in French Criminal Procedure‖,

5 Intl. Comp. L.Q, 1 (1956)

 W.Zeidler, ―Evaluation of the Adversary System: As Comparison,

Some Remarks on the Investigatory System of Procedure‖, 55
A.L.J.390, (1981)

 Waite, ―Judge and the Crime Burden‖, 54 Mich. L. R. 169 (1955)

 Wayne R La Fave & Frank J Remington, ―Controlling the Police:

The Judges Role in Making and Reviewing the Law Enforcement
Decisions‖, 63 Mich.L.R 987 (1965).

 Wayne W. Bennett & Karen M.Hess, Criminal Investigation,

Wadsworth, Belmont, USA, Sixth edn.

 Willis C, ―The Use, Effectiveness, and Impact of Police Search

Powers‖. Research and Planning Unit Paper 15. London: Home
Office, 1983.

 Yale Kamisar, ―Public Saftey v. Individual liberties: Some ―Facts‖

and ―Theories‖, 53 J. Crim. L., C. & P.S. 171 (1962)

 Zukerman A.A.S, ―Miscarriage of Justice – A Root Treatment‖,

[1992]Crim. L. R. 323.

xliii
 Zukerman A.A.S, Miscarriage of Justice and Judicial
Responsibility, [1991]Crim.L.R 492.
Websites
 http://mywebpages.comcast .net/badixon1/adversary.htm.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/due_process

 http://www.bprd.gov.in/writereddata/linkimages/22.

 Http://www.realpolice.net/police-history.shtml dtd.02-10-08

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Convention_Agains_
Torture. dtd.02-11-2008

 www.hcourt.gov.au/speeches/cj/cj_6june07.pdf dtd.16-08-2008.

 www.pucl.org/Topics/Religion-communalism/2002/gujarat-nhrc-
submission dtd. 02-11-2--8

 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombay_Riots dtd. 02-11-2008

xliv