Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Yui Tobimatsu, Noriko Inada, Jun Shoji & Satoru Yamagami (2018) Clinical
Characteristics of 17 Patients with Moraxella Keratitis, Seminars in Ophthalmology, 33:5, 726-732,
DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2017.1417454
Article views: 75
1
Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo,
Japan and 2Department of Ophthalmology, Diabetes Centre, Tokyo Women’s Medical University School of
Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To retrospectively investigate the clinical characteristics of Moraxella keratitis. Patients and methods: We
reviewed the medical records of 17 patients with Moraxella keratitis. Onset age, sex, predisposing factors, initial
clinical presentations, culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and management and outcome of medical
treatment were investigated.
Result: Moraxella keratitis was more common in patients older than 40 years of age, and its representative initial
presentation was a round-shaped ulcer with endothelial plaque (70.6%) and hypopyon (58.8%). Local predis-
posing factors were significantly more frequent than systemic predisposing factors (P < 0.005). Isolated strains of
Moraxella (M. catarrhalis, M. osloensis, and other Moraxella spp.) were sensitive to all antibiotics tested except
ampicillin. The common disease contraction period was <2 weeks.
Conclusion: Moraxella keratitis (including the first report of M. osloensis keratitis) had local predisposing factors,
high sensitivity to antibiotics, and a tendency to recover within 2 weeks.
Keywords: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, clinical form, corneal ulcer, endothelial plaque, hypopyon
Received 9 May 2017; accepted 25 November 2017; published online 9 January 2018
Correspondence: Satoru Yamagami, Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1
Oyaguchi-Kamichou, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan. E-mail: yamagami.satoru@nihon-u.ac.jp
Color versions of one or more of the figures in the article can be found online at www.tandfonline.com/ISIO.
726
Clinical Characteristics of Moraxella Keratitis 727
TABLE 1. Predisposing factors of Moraxella keratitis. shaped ulcer, and speckled forms showed speckled
or ring shaped white opacity. Therefore, initial clin-
Predisposing factors No. of patients (cases) ical presentations of Moraxella keratitis comprised
Contact lens wearers* 3 nine eyes of round-shaped ulcers with diffuse
Non-contact lens wearers 14 form opacity, five eyes of round-shaped ulcers
Local predisposing factors with speckled form opacity, and three eyes of irre-
Corneal edema 3 gular pattern ulcers (Figure 3). There was no asso-
Trauma (plant) 3
Others 2
ciation between the shape of the corneal ulcer and
Systemic predisposing factors Moraxella spp. strains isolated from corneal ulcers.
Atopic dermatitis 2 Regarding the clinical findings complicated with a
Diabetes 1 corneal ulcer, endothelial plaque was observed in 12
No possible risk factor 4 eyes (70.6%) and hypopyon in 10 eyes (58.8%). Ratios
*Contact lens wearer with no systemic or local disposing of complicated endothelial plaque and hypopyon in
factors except contact lens wear. each form of corneal opacity are shown in Figure 3.
Seminars in Ophthalmology
Clinical Characteristics of Moraxella Keratitis 729
corneal ulcers. Medical treatment details for the 17 cefmetazole intravenous feeding, cefmenoxime ophthal-
patients are shown in Table 4. The combination of med- mic solution, or tetracycline ophthalmic ointment were
icaments most commonly administered for the treatment administered in some patients.
of Moraxella keratitis was ceftazidime intravenous feed- We investigated the disease contraction period in
ing, levofloxacin or aminoglycoside ophthalmic solution, each patient. The healing of a corneal ulcer was deter-
and ofloxacin ophthalmic ointment. In addition, mined when the epithelial defect of the corneal ulcer
Seminars in Ophthalmology
Clinical Characteristics of Moraxella Keratitis 731
highlighted that some patients with Moraxella keratitis generation cefem antimicrobial agent, but are sensitive
developed an amoeba-like or an irregularly shaped to other antimicrobial agents including third generation
corneal ulcer.7 The authors reported atypical corneal cefem, macrolides, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, fluor-
ulcers thought to be similar to those reported in the oquinolones, and carbapenem-based antimicrobial
present non-representative Moraxella keratitis patients agents, which are recommended for the medical treat-
who were classified with an irregular ulcer. We recog- ment of Moraxella keratitis. All 13 strains isolated in the
nize that round-shaped ulcers with severe stromal present study were resistant to the penicillin antimicro-
infiltration, corneal endothelial plaque, and hypopyon bial agent, ABPC, and 12 of the isolated strains showed
are a common feature in typical Moraxella keratitis. susceptibility to ampicillin/sulbactam, a β-lactamase
However, bacteriological examination is vital for diag- inhibitor combination penicillin. Fluoroquinolone-based
nosis because typical clinical observation is not specific and aminoglycoside-based antimicrobial ophthalmic
to Moraxella keratitis. solution and fluoroquinolone-based antimicrobial
The isolated causative Moraxella spp. in the present ophthalmic ointment were administered in many
study included 12 cases of Moraxella spp., four cases of patients with Moraxella keratitis as a first-line treatment
M. catarrhalis, and one case of M. osloensis. In our culture at the initial visit. Based on the results of the antimicro-
results, M. lacunata, which is thought to be the most bial susceptibility testing, these ophthalmic solutions
frequent causative species of Moraxella keratitis, may and ointments appeared to be useful in treatment of
have been one of the strains recorded as Moraxella spp. Moraxella keratitis. Frequent administration of ceftazi-
Furthermore, M. osloensis, which is a rarely isolated cau- dime intravenous feeding is sensitive to gram-negative
sative bacterium in ocular infections, was detected in a rods (including Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and M. catarrha-
female 18-year-old soft contact lens wearer without sys- lis, which was isolated from four patients with Moraxella
temic predisposing factors. Moraxella osloensis is a resi- keratitis in the present study. Therefore, empirical ther-
dent bacterium of the upper respiratory tract and oral apy, which assumed infectious keratitis by gram-nega-
cavity, and is sometimes reported as the causative agent tive rods according to the clinical observation at initial
of sepsis and meningitis.21,22 In ocular infections, there presentation, was thought to be useful as a first-line
have been some reports of endophthalmitis caused by M. treatment for Moraxella keratitis at the initial visit.
osloensis, but there are no reports of M. osloensis keratitis. In our study, 11 eyes (64.7%) with Moraxella keratitis
These results show that due to the wide variety of strains healed within 2 weeks. This result indicates that corneal
isolated from Moraxella keratitis, antimicrobial suscept- scraping combined with effective antibiotic treatment
ibility to isolated Moraxella spp. warrants specific due to appropriate selection based on initial presentation,
attention. bacterial culture, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Moraxella spp. are characterized by a β-lactamase pro- is an effective treatment approach for Moraxella keratitis.
duction, and it is reported that approximately 80% of M. In conclusion, Moraxella keratitis, including the first
catarrhalis produce β-lactamase.23 Therefore, Moraxella report of M. osloensis keratitis, had local predisposing
spp. usually show resistance to penicillin and first- factors, high sensitivity to antibiotics, and a tendency to
recover within 2 weeks. These findings will help us devise 10. Willcox MD. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and
a treatment protocol for Moraxella keratitis based on past inflammation during contact lens wear: a review. Optom
Vis Sci. 2007;84:273–278.
therapeutic experience. A prospective clinical trial is 11. Ormerod LD, Smith RE. Contact lens-associated microbial
warranted. keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104:79–83.
12. Catlin BW. Branhamella catarrhalis: an organism
gaining respect as a pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST 1990;3:293–320.
13. Vaneechoutte M, Verschraegen G, Claeys G, Weise B, Van
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Den Abeele AM. Respiratory tract carrier rates of Moraxella
(Branhamella) catarrhalis in adults and children and inter-
pretation of the isolation of M. catarrhalis from sputum. J
Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:2674–2680.
ORCID 14. Bharathi MJ, Ramakrishnan R, Shivakumar C, Meenakshi R,
Lionalraj D. Etiology and antibacterial susceptibility pattern
Yui Tobimatsu http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9311- of community-acquired bacterial ocular infections in a ter-
9008 tiary eye care hospital in south India. Indian J Ophthalmol.
2010;58:497–507.
Noriko Inada http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0486-1230 15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance
Jun Shoji http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8957-3312 Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: 26th
Satoru Yamagami http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1330- Informational Supplement. Wayne, PA: Clinical &
5386 Laboratory Standards Institute; 2016. CLSI document
M100-S26.
16. Baum J, Fedukowicz HB, Jordan A. A survey of Moraxella
corneal ulcers in a derelict population. Am J Ophthalmol.
REFERENCES 1980;90:476–480.
17. Marioneaux SJ, Cohen EJ, Arentsen JJ, Laibson PR.
1. Green M, Apel A, Stapleton F. Risk factors and causative Moraxella keratitis. Cornea. 1991;10:21–24.
organisms in microbial keratitis. Cornea. 2008;27:22–27. 18. Das S, Constantinou M, Daniell M, Taylor HR. Moraxella
2. Ibrahim YW, Boase DL, Cree IA. Epidemiological character- keratitis: predisposing factors and clinical review of 95
istics, predisposing factors and microbiological profiles of cases. Br J Opthalmol. 2006;90:1236–1238.
infectious corneal ulcers: the Portsmouth corneal ulcer 19. Inoue H, Suzuki T, Inoue T, et al. Clinical characteristics
study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1319–1324. and bacteriological profile of Moraxella keratitis. Cornea.
3. Varaprasathan G, Miller K, Lietman T, et al. Trends in the 2015;34:1105–1109.
etiology of infectious corneal ulcers at the F. I. Proctor 20. Garg P, Mathur U, Athmanathan S, Rao GN.
Foundation. Cornea. 2004;23:360–364. Treatment outcome of Moraxella keratitis: our experi-
4. Laspina F, Samudio M, Cibils D, et al. Epidemiological ence with 18 cases-a retrospective review. Cornea.
characteristics of microbiological results on patients with 1999;18:176–181.
infectious corneal ulcer: a 13-year survey in Paraguay. 21. Fox-Lewis A, Coltart G, Rice S, Gourtsoyannis Y, Hyare H,
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:204–209. Gupta RK. Extensive subclinical sinusitis leading to
5. Schaefer F, Bruttin O, Guex-Crosier Y. Bacterial keratitis: a Moraxella osloensis meningitis. ID Cases. 2016;6:
prospective clinical and microbiological study. Br J 39–42.
Ophthalmol. 2011;85:842–847. 22. Lee WS, Hsueh PR, Yu FL, Chen FL, Hsieh TC, Ou TY.
6. Chen JJ, Applebaum DS, Sun GS, Pflugfelder SC. Atopic kera- Moraxella osloensis bacteremia complicating with severe
toconjunctivitis: A review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70:569–575. pneumonia in a patient with lung cancer. J
7. Inoue Y. Ocular infections in patients with atopic dermati- Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.
tis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2002;42:55–69. jmii.2015.03.005.
8. Kunimoto DY, Sharma S, Garg P, Gopinathan U, Miller D, 23. Sheikh SO, Fasih N, Irfan S, Zafar A. β-Lactamase production
Rao GN. Corneal ulceration in the elderly in Hyderabad, and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Moraxella catarrhalis
south India. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:54–59. isolates: report from Pakistan. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2014.
9. Parmar P, Salman A, Kalavathy CM, Jesudasan CA, doi:10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60237-6.
Thomas PA. Pneumococcal keratitis: a clinical profile. Clin
Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;31:44–47.
Seminars in Ophthalmology