Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEFINE
Scope and plan the project
MEASURE
Define customer needs
ANALYSE
Develop functional specification
ANALYSE
Develop high-level designs
AND DESIGN REVIEWS
In DFSS a great emphasis is placed on
The DEFINE phase is about organ- The MEASURE phase focuses The ANALYSE phase starts the pro- Taking the most promising reviews. There are tollgate reviews at the end
ising and planning the journey for on planning and conducting the cess of moving from WHAT the concepts, you can then start to of each of the 5 phases and following the
your project. It is important to research necessary to understand customer wants to HOW we might identify requirements for a more pilot to help determine whether it is appro-
understand the purpose, ration- the customer needs and require- achieve it. This means mapping detailed design. This usually priate to move on to the next phase, and
ale and business case, as well as ments associated with the product CTQs onto internal functions and involves creating several high-level you’ll see there are questions to address at
knowing who you might need to or service. These are translated starting to look at alternative con- designs, assessing the capability the end of each of the steps before moving
help you, and how you will go into measurable characteristics cepts. of each, and then selecting the on to the next one.
about managing things. The main (CTQs) that become the overall best fit.
There are also a number of design reviews;
aim (like DMAIC) is to scope requirements for the product or Key tools
these take place within the phases rather
and plan the project – so here it service. The phase ends by set- L Functional Analysis Key tools
than at the end and are particularly relevant
is important to understand the ting targets and specification limits VË0ÁjjË?~Á? L Quality Function to Analyse, Design, and Verify.
boundaries of the project, includ- for the CTQs. The aim is to fully VË.+#
Deployment (QFD House 3)
ing the processes, market(s) and understand the customer require- VË0Á?ÄwjÁËÖWÍÄ L Design Elements There should be a minimum of four design
customers involved. ments and define the measures. L CATALYST L Process Maps reviews, one in Analyse, one at the end of
L Quality Function Deployment the detailed design in step 6, a post-pilot
L Capability Evaluation
Key tools Key tools (QFD House 2) review in step 7, and finally a post imple-
VËË+ÁWjÄÄË aj~Ë?aË
L Affinity and Interrelationship L Customer Segmentation L Benchmarking mentation review in step 8.
Simulation
Diagrams L Customer Research Methods L Pugh Matrix/Priority Based VËjÄ~Ë.WÁjW?ÁaÄ There is also a pilot readiness review at the
L Thought Map L Data Collection and Sampling Matrix L Pugh Matrix/Priority Based end of the Design phase but this usually
L Improvement Charter L Quality Function Deployment Matrix forms part of the tollgate review at the end
L In Frame Out of Frame (QFD House 1) L Design Review of Design.
L Customer Segmentation L CTQ Analysis and Prioritisation L FMEA
L Multi-Generation Plan VËwxÍßË?~Á? L Design of Experiments DESIGN REVIEWS
L SIPOC VË0ÁjjË?~Á? WHY: To evaluate the capability of
L Elevator Speech L Kano Model the design as far as possible,
L Stakeholder Analysis L Performance Benchmarking highlighting any iterative design
L FMEA L Design Scorecards work required before the tollgate
is reached
L PDPC
WHEN: In Analyse, Design and Verify
WHAT: The actual design of the process
according to some specified
STEP 5 STEP 6 STEP 7 STEP 8 criteria
WHO: Design Team, Champion,
DESIGN
Create detailed design
DESIGN
Plan and test design
VERIFY
Implement and standardise
VERIFY
Assess achievements
Stakeholders, Customers, Experts
HOW: Format of reviews differ depending
on the phase that the project is in
the solution and lessons
The DESIGN phase takes the By this stage there should be
In the VERIFY phase the design is The results of the implementation TOLLGATE REVIEWS
“HOW” thinking into more detail enough detail to test and evaluate
by adding more detail onto each the capability of the design by piloted and assessed. All the facets are verified against the original WHY: To assess the deliverables of the
element of the high-level design. preparing a pilot. of project, process and change CTQs, specifications and targets. particular phase and give sign-off
The emphasis remains on develop- management then come together The project cannot be closed until for progression to the next phase
ing designs that satisfy the require- Key tools for a full-scale implementation and the solution has been standardised WHEN: At the end of Design, Measure,
ments of the process outputs. L FMEA/EMEA deployment of the new service/ and transitioned to Operations and Analyse, Design, and Verify. And
process. Process Management. following the pilot
L Simulation Software
Key tools L Design Scorecards WHAT: The quality and content of
L Design Elements Key tools Key tools the deliverables, appropriate
L Capability Evaluation
L Process Maps L Process Management L Multi-Generation Plan application of tools, Change
L Control/Verification Plan
L Architecture and Structure L Control Charts L Process Stapling Management thinking and Project
L Pilot/Test Plans
Diagrams L Standards/Procedures L Control Charts Management thinking
L Design of Experiments
L Detailed Design Documents L Control/Response Plans L Data Displays WHO: The Project Leader, Champion,
L Process Benchmarking Stakeholders
L Quality Function Deployment HOW: The basis of the reviews is set
(QFD House 4) out in the step by step guide that
L Design of Experiments follows