Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lauren Dula
ENC 1102
Professor Mooney
April 5, 2020
2
My topic is the dance discourse community and how the people within the community
use spatial rhetoric and how it effects their communication and productivity. I will be explaining
the three themes of the research which are rhetoric, communication and dance. For the
researched article it is essential to know and understand what rhetor is. According to Downs,
rhetoric is “a set of principles the explain and predict how people make meaning and interact”
(460). Every time a person is communicating or interacting with someone, they are using
rhetoric whether they realize it or not (Downs, 460). Thus, in the discourse community of dance
verbal and nonverbal ways of communicating are crucial to making the community run
smoothly. For dance an instructor must use specific lexis to explain a dance move for the dancer
to do. Another example of how rhetoric is significant in the dance community is even the space
of where dancers practice is important to how each person in the community interact.
the community. I have been dancing most of my life, so I never really thought how we
communicate and why we do it. Furthermore, it made me question just how important space is.
This assignment has made me think and question how dancers use language to communicate and
how the specific space we are dancing in affects our productivity and communication.
At first, my research question was how does the dance community use rhetoric to
communicate and how does it affect their productivity? However, since the dance world is too
broad, and I do not have enough time or even the tools to be able to research that in depth I
decided to just focus my research on Knights and Damsels Dance Company. I chose to focus my
research on this UCF dance club because it is still within the discourse community of dance and
will make my research more attainable. Thus, I have changed my research question to how does
the Knights and Damsels Dance Company use spatial rhetoric to communicate and how does it
3
affect their productivity? This UCF dance club will allow me to conduct primary research
without it being too much and it will also enable me to finish the research and analysis in a
timely manner.
The research in the article are two case studies that find the importance of space in the
discourse community. For the case study I observed two KDDC practices, one being at UPAC
which is a smaller room and a different practice at PAC which is a much larger space. I also
interviewed the artistic director of KDDC because she is the main choreographer for KDDC and
can give insight as both a choreographer but also a dancer. The questions I asked focused on the
space of the two different rooms and how that can affect the communication but also
communicate and share common goals. One of the main themes is rhetoric, which Downs
(2019) states that rhetoric can be anything and it can have specific requirements depending on
the situation. The rhetorical situation that is commonly used is spatial rhetoric and space is a
theme that affects dancers and choreographer. According to Bannerman (2014) it can influence
observations, a choreographer needs a certain amount of space to be able to create a piece. Thus,
if the dance room is quite small and there are many dancers it will be difficult for the instructor
to see their vision clearly and Bannerman (2014) thinks that it affects the communication process
as well. Furthermore, Duffy et al (2019), explains the significance of artistic roles and the
importance of the space. They surveyed dance educator participants to see if space and a
dancers and dance instructors’ productivity. Both authors, Friesen and Vincs & McCormick
4
found that space has a great effect on the dancer mobility. This can inhibit productivity because
of a dancer cannot move to their best ability than not much can be completed.
Another theme that is important is how the dancers and choreographers in this discourse
community communicate and collaborate and whether space has an impact on it. According to
Haroutounian (2019), language is important to communicate artistic ideas to the people who
participate within the discourse community. The people in the discourse community use verbal
and nonverbal language to communicate. Gehm et al (2011) believes that discourse community
of dance uses choreography to communicate a message to not only the people actively in the
discourse community but also the people not in it as well. The community also uses verbal
language and has a specific lexis. A person outside of the discourse community would have a
much more difficult time understanding what the people within the community are talking about.
Furthermore, Mumford explains that space can affect a choreographer’s creativity. For example,
a larger stage will enable the choreographer to in vision and experiment different artistic paths
with dancers, while a small stage would make it much more difficult.
currently a member of it. Furthermore, because I am in the community and have practiced at
many different places and venues such as a parking lot, dance studio and auditorium each of
these places had an impact on our practices. Thus, I decided to find research and eventually
conduct research of my own. Most of the secondary sources used case studies as their
methodology. This is most likely because the authors can observe and interview the dance
instructors and students on why the practice goes better with specific things such as a mirror,
dance floor and stereo. The reason why I chose to conduct case studies as my methodology is so
5
that I can observe and interview dancers in different dance practice setting to see how different
This researched article shows a continuation of similar results and findings from my
secondary sources research. These continued results show that space is an important aspect to
the dance discourse community, especially for making rehearsal productive. Furthermore, it also
showcases other important aspects, such as space having an influence on collaboration author
Duffy (2019) found that space can have an affect the dancers and choreographer’s way of
communicating. It can be assumed that the affect of communication due to space can also have
Methods
For my research methodology I have chosen to conduct two case studies. The first case
study I observed a practice at UPAC and wrote down things I observed. I wrote down specific
things in the room that I pointed out, such as a mirror, stereo and what type of dance floor
(marley or wood). While observing, I focused on looking for how the space was affecting the
dancer’s mobility. I also looked for how the space was affecting how the dancers and
choreographers were communicating with each other and whether it was positively or negatively
impacting the practice. For the second case study I looked for the same aspects in the PAC room
and wrote down my observations. After the observations I interviewed the artistic director and
asked her specific questions primarily focusing on the different rooms and how she thinks those
rooms can impact a rehearsal and also which room she thinks is most beneficial for KDDC and
Results
Case Study #1
Observation: Appendix A
My observation at UPAC shows that the small room with over 40 dancers made it very
difficult to dance to the fullest. It also made the dancer a lot more distracted and frustrated as
some people were talking and not focusing. This led to the choreographer to be frustrated and
lecture the dancers on talking. This took time away from rehearsal and negatively impacted the
productivity.
Interview: Appendix C
During the interview the artistic director made it very clear that the practices at UPAC
cause problems in rehearsal. She notes that although there is a mirror and marley floor the
physical size of the room makes it difficult for the dancers to focus and dance to the best of their
ability. She also mentions that it is easier for her get frustrated with the team because the small
Case Study 2:
Observation: Appendix B
The observations made during this practice at the PAC location is that there is a much
larger space for the dancers to move. I also noted that the dancers were able to have more
mobility. Because of the larger space the dancers were not as close to each other which helped
the dancers to stay focused and not talk as much. This helped the choreographer to teach more
7
choreography. The overall practice at this space ran much smoother and was exponentially more
productive.
Interview: Appendix C
During the interview the artistic director explained that the PAC building has much more
space for the dancers to execute their dance moves. This helps her to be able to see her creative
vision better. Also, she explains that the larger space helps to not distract dancers and improves
For the discourse community of dance, there are many aspects that creates this
community. My research question focuses on how spatial rhetoric can affect a dancer’s
productivity and their ability to move full out. This is relevant to the discourse community
because it will showcase just how important spatial rhetoric is to both dancers and
choreographers in the community. Furthermore, by finding which space works best for the
people in the community it will explain whether the space where dancers execute their moves is
important and safe to not only them but also the choreographers involved.
Coding Chart
Discussion
After analyzing the two Case studies, my primary research, through the coding chart I
realize that there are many similar themes with my observations and the Directors answers to my
questions. My findings show that the space for a dancer is very significant and can affect their
ability to move and the overall productivity of a practice. This is significant because it shows
9
that a lack of space for a dancer can inhibit their ability to dance up to par and can affect the
by explaining that spatial rhetoric applies to the discourse community of dance because there are
certain elements such as, smooth floors, mirrors and a stereo that create a typical dance room.
Furthermore, spatial rhetoric plays a crucial part in the community because the size of the dance
room can also affect the productivity of the dancers. My primary research findings support the
claims of the secondary sources. Many of the secondary sources claim that a space can affect the
dancer’s ability and the way in which choreographers collaborate which is like my primary
research findings. Both data/findings with the primary research and secondary sources suggest
that spatial rhetoric plays an important part in the discourse community. Without the specific
elements that make a dance room it is difficult for people in the discourse community to create or
Conclusion
Overall, with the collection of the secondary resources and my primary research, it is
evident that spatial rhetoric plays an enormous part on the discourse community of dance
because it affects the communication and the productivity of a practice. My primary research is
only focused on one dance group at the University of Central Florida. Although this was
necessary for my research due to the time constraint; the small sample size is a limitation to my
research. Another limitation is that I only observed one practice from each dance space which
only creates a small amount of research. For the future, this research could be expanded in many
ways, such as finding how sound can affect a practice. Also, still relating to space, an expansion
of my research would be to observe many different studios or dance groups and compare how
References
Communication.” Dance Research: The Journal of the Society for Dance Research,
Duffy, A. B., & Beaty, A. (2019). Flexibility of Artistic Roles and Shared Ownership between
doi:10.2307/3331982
Gehm, S., & Von Wilcke, K. (2011). Communicating, Distilling, Catalyzing.: On the Creation of
www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1wxt9q.19
Conflict and Diversity. Writing About Writing. Boston, MA: Bedford, St. Martins. 319-
342.
Mumford, P. (1985). Lighting Dance. Dance Research: The Journal of the Society for Dance
Vincs, K., & McCormick, J. (2010). Touching Space: Using Motion Capture and Stereo
www.jstor.org/stable/40864130
12