The document discusses grounds for divorce under Indian law and jurisdiction for divorce cases in English law. Under Indian law, the Hindu Marriage Act recognizes several fault-based grounds for divorce, including adultery, cruelty, imprisonment, insanity, leprosy, and presumption of death. English law determines jurisdiction based on either the domicile or habitual residence of either spouse at the time divorce proceedings begin, with habitual residence left undefined and based on factual elements rather than a set definition.
The document discusses grounds for divorce under Indian law and jurisdiction for divorce cases in English law. Under Indian law, the Hindu Marriage Act recognizes several fault-based grounds for divorce, including adultery, cruelty, imprisonment, insanity, leprosy, and presumption of death. English law determines jurisdiction based on either the domicile or habitual residence of either spouse at the time divorce proceedings begin, with habitual residence left undefined and based on factual elements rather than a set definition.
The document discusses grounds for divorce under Indian law and jurisdiction for divorce cases in English law. Under Indian law, the Hindu Marriage Act recognizes several fault-based grounds for divorce, including adultery, cruelty, imprisonment, insanity, leprosy, and presumption of death. English law determines jurisdiction based on either the domicile or habitual residence of either spouse at the time divorce proceedings begin, with habitual residence left undefined and based on factual elements rather than a set definition.
The former recognizes few grounds such as adultery and
conversion by the husband. It is the latter statute, however, which calls for our attention: it re-enacts each of the three theories of divorce in Sections 27 and 28. Many fault grounds are recognized, including lengthy imprisonment, incurable insanity, leprosy, presumption of death, over and above traditional fault grounds such as adultery and cruelty. This broad outlook is reiterated by the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. JURISDICTION IN ENGLISH LAW Several fundamental changes have been effected by the Domicile and Matrimonial Proceedings Act, 1973, following which the jurisdiction of English courts has been limited to two grounds- domicile and habitual residence. According to the statute, the first of these grounds is satisfied if either party is domiciled in the country on the date of initiation of proceedings. Moreover, a subsequent change in domicile would not alter the jurisdiction already enjoyed by the English courts. The second ground of habitual residence has been recognized in light of the Hague Conventions regarding the same. At the same time, the term has not been defined, but left to be determined by factual elements instead. This idea has been underlined by the Council of Europe on Fundamental Legal Concepts thus: “in determining whether a residence is habitual, account Is to be taken of the
Estate of Herman Borax, Deceased, Hermine H. Borax, Louis Borax and Benjamin Borax, Executors, and Hermine Borax v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 349 F.2d 666, 2d Cir. (1965)