You are on page 1of 45

Response to Intervention

Academic Interventions for


Elementary & Secondary
Students
Jim Wright
Ji W i ht
www.interventioncentral.org

www.interventioncentral.org
Response to Intervention

RTI: Academic Interventions:


Workshop Agenda
RTI & Academic Interventions: Overview

Documenting Classroom Interventions


Setting
S tti UUp PProgress-Monitoring
M it i ffor Cl
Classroom
Interventions

Academic Interventions: Lab

www.interventioncentral.org
Response to Intervention

Resources from this workshop


series available at:
http://www.jimwrightonline.com/
solvay.php
Other free assessment &
i t
intervention
ti resources available
il bl at:t
http://www interventioncentral org
http://www.interventioncentral.org

www.interventioncentral.org 3
Response to Intervention

School Instructional Time: The Irreplaceable Resource


“In the averageg school system,
y , there are 330
minutes in the instructional day, 1,650 minutes in
thee instructional
s uc o a week,
ee , aandd 56,
56,700
00 minutes
u es in thee
instructional year. Except in unusual circumstances,
these are the only minutes we have to provide
effective services for students. The number of years
we have to apply these minutes is fixed. Therefore,
each minute counts and schools cannot afford to
support inefficient models of service delivery.
delivery ”
p. 177
Source: Batsche, G. M., Castillo, J. M., Dixon, D. N., & Forde, S. (2008). Best practices in problem analysis. In A. Thomas & J.
Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 177-193).
www.interventioncentral.org 4
Response to Intervention

‘Big Ideas’ in Student Academic


Interventions

www.interventioncentral.org
Response to Intervention
Big Ideas: Behavior is a Continuous ‘Stream’
(Schoenfeld & Farmer, 1970)

• Individuals are always performing SOME type


of behavior: watching the instructor, sleeping,
talkingg to a neighbor,
g completing
p g a worksheet
(‘behavior stream’).
• When students are fullyy engaged
g g in
academic behaviors, they are less likely to get
off-task and display problem behaviors.
• Academic tasks that are clearly understood, elicit student
interest, provide a high rate of student success, and include
t h encouragementt andd feedback
teacher f db k are mostt liklikely
l tto
effectively ‘capture’ the student’s ‘behavior stream’.
Source: Schoenfeld, W. N., & Farmer, J. (1970). Reinforcement schedules and the ‘‘behavior stream.’’ In W. N. Schoenfeld
(Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules (pp. 215–245). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
www.interventioncentral.org 6
Response to Intervention
Big Ideas: Academic Delays Can Be
a Potent Cause of Behavior
Problems
(Witt, Daly, & Noell, 2000)

Student
St d t academic
d i problems
bl cause many
school behavior problems.

“Whether [a student’s] problem is a behavior problem or an


academic
d i one, we recommendd starting
t ti with
ith a ffunctional
ti l
academic assessment, since often behavior problems occur
when students cannot or will not do required academic work.
work ”

Source: Witt, J. C., Daly, E. M., & Noell, G. (2000). Functional assessments: A step-by-step guide to solving academic and
behavior problems. Longmont, CO: Sopris West, p. 13
www.interventioncentral.org 7
Response to Intervention
The Key RTI Role of Classroom Teachers as
Tier 1 ‘Interventionists’: 6 Steps
1 The teacher defines the student academic or behavioral
1.
problem clearly.
2 The teacher decides on the best explanation for why the
2.
problem is occurring.
3 The
3. Th tteacher
h selects
l t one or more ‘evidence-based’
‘ id b d’ interventions
i t ti
to address the problem.
4. The teacher documents the student’s Tier 1 intervention plan.
5. The teacher monitors the student’s response
p (p
(progress)
g ) to the
intervention plan.
6. The teacher seeks additional help as needed if the student fails
to make adequate progress with Tier 1 interventions alone.
www.interventioncentral.org 8
Response to Intervention

RTI & Intervention: Key Concepts

www.interventioncentral.org
Response to Intervention
Core Instruction, Interventions, Accommodations
& Modifications: Sorting Them Out
• Core Instruction.
Instruction Those instructional strategies
that are used routinely with all students in a
general-education setting are considered ‘core
instruction’. High-quality
g q y instruction is essential
and forms the foundation of RTI academic
support NOTE: While it is important to verify that
support.
good core instructional practices are in place for
a struggling student
student, those routine practices do
not ‘count’ as individual student interventions.

www.interventioncentral.org 10
Response to Intervention
Core Instruction, Interventions, Accommodations
& Modifications: Sorting Them Out
• Intervention
Intervention. An academic intervention is a
strategy used to teach a new skill, build fluency
in a skill, or encourage a child to apply an
existingg skill to new situations or settings.
g An
intervention can be thought of as “a set of
actions that
that, when taken
taken, have demonstrated
ability to change a fixed educational trajectory”
(Methe & Riley-Tillman,
Riley Tillman 2008; pp. 37)
37).

www.interventioncentral.org 11
Response to Intervention
Core Instruction, Interventions, Accommodations
& Modifications: Sorting Them Out
• Accommodation. An accommodation is intended to help
the student to fully access and participate in the general-
education curriculum without changing the instructional
content
t t andd without
ith t reducing
d i th the student’s
t d t’ rate t off llearning
i
(Skinner, Pappas & Davis, 2005). An accommodation is
intended to remove barriers to learning while still expecting
that students will master the same instructional content as
their typical peers.
– Accommodation example 1: Students are allowed to supplement
silent reading of a novel by listening to the book on tape.
– Accommodation example 2: For unmotivated studentsstudents, the
instructor breaks larger assignments into smaller ‘chunks’ and
providing students with performance feedback and praise for each
completed ‘chunk’
chunk of assigned work (Skinner,
(Skinner Pappas & Davis,
Davis
2005).
www.interventioncentral.org 12
Response to Intervention

“Teaching
Teaching is giving; it
“ isn’tt taking away.
isn away ” ”
(Howell Hosp & Kurns
(Howell, Kurns, 2008; pp. 356)
356).

Source: Howell,
Howell KK. W.,
W Hosp,
Hosp J.
J L.,
L & Kurns
Kurns, S
S. (2008)
(2008). Best practices in curriculum-based
curriculum based evaluation.
evaluation In A.
A Thomas & JJ.
Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp.349-362). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School
Psychologists..
www.interventioncentral.org 13
Response to Intervention
Core Instruction, Interventions, Accommodations &
Modifications: Sorting Them Out
• Modification
Modification. A modification changes the expectations of
what a student is expected to know or do—typically by
lowering the academic standards against which the student
is to be evaluated.

Examples of modifications:
– Giving a student five math computation problems for practice
instead of the 20 problems assigned to the rest of the class
– Letting the student consult course notes during a test when peers
are not permitted to do so
– Allowing a student to select a much easier book for a book report
than would be allowed to his or her classmates.
www.interventioncentral.org 14
Response to Intervention

RTI: Documenting & Monitoring


Classroom Interventions

www.interventioncentral.org
Response to Intervention

www.interventioncentral.org 16
Response to Intervention
Documenting Tier 1 (Classroom) Interventions: A
Sample Form
• Definition of up to two student
academic or behavioral
problems. The most significant
step in selecting an effective
classroom intervention is to
correctly identify the target
student concern(s) in clear,
specific,
f measureable terms
(Bergan,1995). The teacher
selects
l no more than
h two
student concerns to address on
the
h intervention
i i plan.
l
www.interventioncentral.org 17
Response to Intervention
Documenting Tier 1 (Classroom) Interventions: A
Sample Form
• Intervention description. The
teacher describes the
evidence-based
intervention(s) that will be
used to address the identified
student concern(s).

Ideally, teachers are given a


research-based ‘intervention
menu’’ with
i h classroom-friendly
l f i dl
strategies that they can try.

www.interventioncentral.org 18
Response to Intervention
Documenting Tier 1 (Classroom) Interventions: A
Sample Form
• Intervention delivery. The
teacher has the option to write
details necessary for
implementing the intervention
in the classroom (e.g., where
and when the intervention is to
be used; adult-to-student ratio;
f
frequency off the intervention;
the length of time each
session
i off the
h iintervention
i will
ill
last; materials needed for the
i
intervention,
i etc.). )
www.interventioncentral.org 19
Response to Intervention
Documenting Tier 1 (Classroom) Interventions: A
Sample Form
• Checkup date. The teacher
notes the date at which the
intervention will be reviewed to
determine whether it has been
sufficiently effective. NOTE:
For academic interventions, it
is advisable to allow at least 4
instructional weeks before
f
deciding whether the
i
intervention
i hhas bbeen
effective.

www.interventioncentral.org 20
Response to Intervention
Documenting Tier 1 (Classroom) Interventions: A
Sample Form
• Assessment data. For each
intervention, the teacher
selects the type(s) of
classroom data that will be
collected formatively
throughout the intervention
period to judge its
effectiveness.
ff For each data
source, in turn, the teacher
collects
ll bbaseline
li ddata on
student performance—and
calculates
l l an outcome goal.l
www.interventioncentral.org 21
Response to Intervention

Setting Up Classroom Data


Collection

www.interventioncentral.org
Response to Intervention

Interventions: Potential ‘Fatal


Fatal Flaws
Flaws’
Any intervention must include 4 essential elements. The absence of any one of the
elements would be considered a ‘fatal
fatal flaw
flaw’ (Witt,
(Witt VanDerHeyden & Gilbertson
Gilbertson, 2004) that
blocks the school from drawing meaningful conclusions from the student’s response to the
intervention:
1. Clearlyy defined pproblem. The student’s target
g concern is stated in specific,
p , observable,,
measureable terms. This ‘problem identification statement’ is the most important step of
the problem-solving model (Bergan, 1995), as a clearly defined problem allows the teacher
or RTI Team to select a well-matched intervention to address it.
2
2. B li ddata.
Baseline t The
Th teacher
t h or RTI TeamT measures theth student’s
t d t’ academic
d i skills
kill iin th
the
target concern (e.g., reading fluency, math computation) prior to beginning the intervention.
Baseline data becomes the point of comparison throughout the intervention to help the
school to determine whether that intervention is effective.
effective
3. Performance goal. The teacher or RTI Team sets a specific, data-based goal for student
improvement during the intervention and a checkpoint date by which the goal should be
attained.
4. Progress-monitoring plan. The teacher or RTI Team collects student data regularly to
determine whether the student is on-track to reach the performance goal.
Source: Witt, J. C., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Gilbertson, D. (2004). Troubleshooting behavioral interventions. A systematic
process for finding and eliminating problems. School Psychology Review, 33, 363-383.

www.interventioncentral.org 23
Response to Intervention

www.interventioncentral.org
Response to Intervention

www.interventioncentral.org
Response to Intervention

www.interventioncentral.org
Response to Intervention

www.interventioncentral.org
Response to Intervention

www.interventioncentral.org
Response to Intervention

www.interventioncentral.org
Response to Intervention

www.interventioncentral.org
Response to Intervention

‘Academic Enabler’ Observational Checklists:


Measuring Students’
Students Ability to Manage Their
Own Learning

www.interventioncentral.org 31
Response to Intervention
‘Academic Enabler’ Skills: Why Are They Important?
Student academic success requires more than content
knowledge or mastery of a collection of cognitive
strategies. Academic accomplishment depends also on
a set of ancillary skills and attributes called ‘academic
academic
enablers’ (DiPerna, 2006). Examples of academic
enablers include:
– Study skills
– Homework completion
– Cooperative learning skills
– Organization
– Independent seatwork

Source: DiPerna, J. C. (2006). Academic enablers and student achievement: Implications for assessment and intervention
services in the schools. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 7-17.
www.interventioncentral.org 32
Response to Intervention

‘Academic Enabler’ Skills: Why Are They Important? (Cont.)


Because academic enablers are often described as
broad skill sets, however, they can be challenging to
define in clear, specific, measureable terms. A useful
method for defining a global academic enabling skill is
to break it down into a checklist of component sub-
skills--aa process known as ‘discrete
skills discrete categorization
categorization’
(Kazdin, 1989). An observer can then use the checklist
to note whether a student successfully displays each of
the sub-skills.

Source: Kazdin, A. E. (1989). Behavior modification in applied settings (4th ed.). Pacific Gove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

www.interventioncentral.org 33
Response to Intervention

‘Academic Enabler’ Skills: Why Are They Important? (Cont.)


Observational checklists that define academic enabling skills
have several uses in Response to Intervention:
– Classroom teachers can use these skills checklists as convenient
tools to assess whether a student ppossesses the minimum ‘starter
set’ of academic enabling skills needed for classroom success.
– Teachers or tutors can share examples of academic-enabler skills
checklists with students, training them in each of the sub-skills and
encouraging them to use the checklists independently to take
greater responsibility
responsibilit for their own
o n learning.
learning
– Teachers or other observers can use the academic enabler
checklists periodically to monitor student progress during
interventions--assessing formatively whether the student is using
more of the sub-skills.
Source: Kazdin, A. E. (1989). Behavior modification in applied settings (4th ed.). Pacific Gove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

www.interventioncentral.org 34
Response to Intervention

‘Academic Enabler’ Skills: Sample Observational Checklists

www.interventioncentral.org 35
Response to Intervention

‘Academic Enabler’ Skills: Sample Observational Checklists

www.interventioncentral.org 36
Response to Intervention

‘Academic Enabler’ Skills: Sample Observational Checklists

www.interventioncentral.org 37
Response to Intervention

‘Academic Enabler’ Skills: Sample Observational Checklists

www.interventioncentral.org 38
Response to Intervention

‘Academic Enabler’ Skills: Sample Observational Checklists

www.interventioncentral.org 39
Response to Intervention

‘Academic Enabler’ Skills: Sample Observational Checklists

www.interventioncentral.org 40
Response to Intervention

‘Academic Enabler’ Skills: Sample Observational Checklists

www.interventioncentral.org 41
Response to Intervention
Classroom Intervention
Scavenger Hunt
• P
Pair
i up.
• Log onto a computer.
• Visit the webpage set up for this conference:
www.jimwrightonline.com/solvay.php
• Browse through the intervention websites featured
on that page.
page
• Try to locate at least one intervention idea that you
wouldld lik
like tto try
t ini your classroom
l or school.
h l

www.interventioncentral.org 42
Response to Intervention

Activity: Selecting Tier I


Intervention Ideas

www.interventioncentral.org
Response to Intervention

Tier I Interventions List: Activity

• S
Select
l t an iintervention
t ti ttopic:
i
Reading, Math, Writing
• Scan the ideas in your handout
that relate to your selected topic.
• Select 1-2 TOP ideas
from y your readingg that yyou
feel should be on every
teacher’s ‘Tier I’ intervention
list at your school
• Be prepared to share your ideas

www.interventioncentral.org 44
Response to Intervention

Intervention Ideas

• 11: Reading Interventions: pp.13-17


13 1
• 2 Math:
2: M th pp. 18
18-22
22
• 3 Writing:
3: W iti pp. 2323-26
26
• 4: Study/Organizational Skills
Intervention: pp.27
pp 27-30
30
• 5: Homework: pp.4
pp.4-12
12
www.interventioncentral.org 45

You might also like