Professional Documents
Culture Documents
26(2002),521{528.
¨
cTUB_
ITAK
HPLC
Method
for
the
Analysis
of
Paracetamol,
Caeine
and
Dipyrone
M.
Levent
ALTUN
Department
of
Pharmacognosy,
Faculty
of
Pharmacy,
Ankara
University,
06100
Ankara-TURKEY
Received27.06.2001
Anaccurate,simple,reproducibleandsensitivemethodforthedeterminationofparacetamol
anddipyronewasdevelopedandvalidated.Paracetamol,caeineanddipyronewereseparatedu
-BondapackC8
columnbyisocraticelutionwithaflowrateof1.0ml/min.Themobilephasecompo
sitionwas0.01MKH2PO4--methanol-acetonitrile-isopropylalcohol(420:20:30:30)(v/v/v/
spectrophotometricdetectionwascarriedoutat215nm.Thelinearrangeofdeterminationf
caeineanddipyronewere0.409-400g/ml,0.151-200g/mland0.233-600g/ml,respectively.
Themethodwasshowntobelinear,reproducible,speci
c,sensitiveandrugged.
KeyWords:Paracetamol,Acetaminophen,Caeine,Dipyrone,Highperformanceliquidchromatogr
Validation.
Introduction
Paracetamol(acetaminophen)isoneofthemostpopularover-the-counteranalgesicandantip
Paracetamolisavailableindierentdosageforms:tablet,capsules,drops,elixirs,suspens
tories.
Dosageformsofparacetamolanditscombinationswithotherdrugshavebeenlistedinvari
pharmacopoeias1;2
.
Thecombinationofparacetamolwithdipyroneisusedasanantipyretic,analgesicandantii
drug.
Numerousmethodshavebeenreportedfortheanalysisofparacetamolanditscombinationsin
orinbiologicalfluids.Paracetamolhasbeendeterminedincombinationwithotherdrugsu
titrimetry3;4,voltammetry5,fluorimetry6,colorimetry6,UV-spectrophotometry7-9,quantita
tivethin-layer
chromatography(TLC)10,high-performanceliquidchromatography(HPLC)11-16
andgaschromatography
(GC)17
inpharmaceuticalpreparations.
Dipyroneisananalgesic,antipyretic,andantiinflammatorydrug.Afteroraladministration
ed
to4-methylaminoantipyrineandfurthermetabolizedto4-aminoantipyrine,4-formylaminoantip
ne,
and4-acetylaminoantipyrine18
.
Dipyrone(noramidopyrinemethanesulfonatesodium,metamizole)isawater-solublepyrazolone
tive
drugavailableinoralandparenteralforms.Formorethan60yearsithasbeenusedasan
521
HPLCMethodfortheAnalysisofParacetamol,CaeineandDipyrone,M.
L.
ALTUN
antipyretic,antispasmodic,andantiinflammatorydrug.Althoughthedrugiswidelyusedin
inothersithasbeenrestrictedorbannedbecauseoftheallegedrisksofadversereactio
agranulocytosis18
.
Dipyronehasbeendeterminedbytitrimetric19,UV-spectrophotometric8;9;20,colorimetric21,
rographic22,
TLC,HPTLC20,gasliquidchromatography(GLC)23andHPLC24
methods.
Thesimultaneousdeterminationofparacetamolanddipyroneintabletsbyderivativespectro
wasreportedintheliterature25
.
AlthoughthereareUV9andPLS(PartialLeast-squaresSpectrophotometric)26
methodsforthedetermination
ofparacetamol,dipyroneandcaeineintheirternarymixture.AsuitableHPLCmethodto
determinetheternarymixtureofparacetamol,dipyroneandcaeinewasnotlocatedintheli
Theobjectiveofthisstudywastodevelopandvalidateaspeci
c,accurate,preciseandreproducible
qualitycontrolmethodforparacetamol,caeineanddipyroneintheirternarycombination.
Experimental
Chemicals
Paracetamol(acetaminophen)wasusedfromUSPreferencestandard(103-90-2),caeinewasobt
MerckChemicals(Merck-2584)anddipyronewasreceivedfromUnitedPharmaceuticalWorks.Ch
ic
gradedouble-distilledwater,analyticalgradeKH2PO4
(Merck-104871),HPLC-gradeacetonitrile
(Merck-100030),methanol(Riedel-deHaen-34860)andisopropylalcohol(CarloErbareagenti-
ere
used.
Apparatus
ThemethoddevelopmentwasperformedwithaLCsystemconsistingofaWatersmodel515solv
system,aWatersmodel996Photodiode-arraydetector(MILFORD,MA,USA)andaWaters717pl
autosamplerusinga20-lsampleloop.Thesystemwascontrolledanddataanalyseswereperf
theMillennium2010software.TheassayswereperformedwithanotherLCsystemconsistingo
modelPU-980pumpandJASCOUV-975UV/VISdetector.Sampleswereinjectedwitha7725Rheod
injectorsystemwitha20lsampleloop.Thedetectorwassetat215nm(0.02a.u.f.s)and
integratedautomaticallybycomputerusingtheBorwinsoftwareprogram.
Separationwascarriedoutatambienttemperatureusinga-BondapakC8
column(5m,250mmx
4.6mmI.D.;Waters,Milford,MA,USA).Aguardcolumn(10mBondapakC18
indisposableplastic
insertsandWatersGuard-Pakholder)wasusedtosafeguardtheanalyticalcolumn.Allthec
concerningthequantitativeanalysiswereperformedwithexternalstandardizationbytheme
peakareas.
Stock
and
Standard
Solutions
Paracetamol(20.00mg),caeine(10.00mg)anddipyrone(15.00mg)wereaccuratelyweighedi
volumetricflaskanddissolvedinthemobilephaseand
lleduptovolumewiththemobilephase.
HPLCMethodfortheAnalysisofParacetamol,CaeineandDipyrone,M.
L.
ALTUN
Standard
Working
Solution
Standardworkingsolutionswerepreparedindividuallyinmobilephaseforparacetamol,caei
Aliquotsfromeachworkingsolutionwerecombinedanddilutedwithmobilephasetoyielda
with
nalconcentrationsof100g/ml,50g/mland150g/ml.Studiesonthestabilityoftheanaly
instandardworkingsolutionshowedthattherewerenodecompositionproductsinthechroma
dierenceinareasduringanalyticalprocedure,evenafterstorageforfourdaysat+4C.
Procedure
Chromatographic
Conditions
HPLCanalysiswasperformedbyisocraticelutionwithaflowrateof1.0ml/min.Themobile
compositionwas0.01MKH2PO4-methanol-acetonitrile-isopropylalcohol(420:20:30:30)(v/
solventswere
lteredthrougha0.45mmillipore
lterbeforeuseanddegassedinanultrasonicbath.
Volumesof10lpreparedsolutionsandsampleswereinjectedintothecolumn.Quanti
cationwaseected
bymeasuringat215nmasestablishedfromthethree-dimensionalchromatogram.Thechromato
runtimewas10minandthecolumnvoidvolumewas1.735min.
Throughoutthestudy,thesuitabilityofthechromatographicsystemwasmonitoredbycalcul
thecapacityfactor(k0),theresolution(R),theselectivity()andpeakasymmetry(T).
Calibration
Mixedstandardsolutionscontainingparacetamol(25-400g/ml),caeine(12.5-200g/ml),and
(37.5-600g/ml)werepreparedinthemobilephase.
Triplicate10linjectionsweremadeforeachstandardsolutiontoseethereproducibility
responseateachconcentrationlevel.Thepeakareaofeachdrugwasplottedagainstthec
toobtainthecalibrationgraph.The
veconcentrationsofeachcompoundweresubjectedtoregression
analysistocalculatethecalibrationequationandcorrelationcoecients.
Results
and
Discussion
Method
Development
Themobilephasewaschosenafterseveraltrialswithmethanol,isopropylalcohol,acetonit
andbuersolutionsinvariousproportionsandatdierentpHvalues.Amobilephaseconsisti
0.01MKH2PO4-methanol-acetonitrile-isopropylalcohol(420:20:30:30)(v/v/v/v)wasselec
e
maximumseparationandsensitivity.
Flowratesbetween0.5and1.5/minwerestudied.Aflowrateof1.0ml/mingaveanoptimal
tonoiseratiowithareasonableseparationtime.Usingareversed-phaseC8
column,theretentiontimesfor
paracetamol,caeineanddipyronewereobservedtobe4.880min,5.845minand8.093minres
Totaltimeofanalysiswaslessthan9min.
Themaximumabsorptionofparacetamol,caeineanddipyronetogetherasdetectedat215nma
thiswavelengthwaschosenfortheanalysis.
Thechromatogramat215nmshowedacompleteresolutionofallpeaks(Figure).
HPLCMethodfortheAnalysisofParacetamol,CaeineandDipyrone,M.
L.
ALTUN
AU
0.500
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
(I) (II)
(III)
4.818
5.7527.885
2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00
minutes
FigureChromatogramofthemixtureofparacetamol(I),caeine(II)anddipyrone(III)develo
method
Linearity
Table1presentstheequationoftheregressionline,correlationcoecient(r2),relatives
(RSD)valuesoftheslopeandinterceptforeachcompound.Excellentlinearitywasobtained
betweenthepeakareasandconcentrationsof25-400g/mlwithr2
=0.9987,12.5-200g/mlwith
r2
=0.9999and37.5-600g/mlwithr2
=0.9993forparacetamol,caeineanddipyrone,respectively.
Table1.LinearityResults,LimitofDetection(LOD)andLimitofQuanti
cation(LOQ)
Compound.
Equationr
2
Slope
(RSD%)
Intercept
(RSD%)
LOQ
g/mL
LOD
g/mL
Paracetamol
215Y=
20491.74X+
150586.10.99870.1922.0311.2260.409
Caeine
215Y=
53717.01X+
197602.20.99990.1501.8680.5020.151
Dipyrone
215Y=
19043.82X+
111528.50.99930.0582.9140.7760.233
X=Concentration(g/mL);Y=Area
Limits
of
Detection
and
Quanti
cation
Limitsofdetection(LOD)wereestablishedatasignal-to-noiseratio(S/N)of3.Limitsof
cation
(LOQ)wereestablishedatasignal-to-noiseratio(S/N)of9.LODandLOQwereexperimental
ed
bysixinjectionsofparacetamol,caeineanddipyroneattheLODandLOQconcentrations.Th
calculatedtobe0.409,0.151and0.233g/mlandtheLOQwascalculatedtobe1.226,0.502
g/mlforparacetamol,caeineanddipyrone,respectively(Table1).
Suitability
of
the
Method
Thechromatographicparameterssuchasresolution,selectivityandpeakasymmetryweresati
thesecompounds(Table2).Thecalculatedresolutionvaluesbetweeneachpeak-pairwereno
andtheselectivitywasnotlessthan1.30.
k.
valueswerefoundtobe1.81,2.37and3.66forparacetamol,caeineanddipyrone,respectiv
HPLCMethodfortheAnalysisofParacetamol,CaeineandDipyrone,M.
L.
ALTUN
Table2.SystemPerformanceParametersofParacetamol,CaeineandDipyrone
Compoundtr
(n=9,mean)
Area
(n=9,mean)
k.
R.
T
Paracetamol4.880
(0.33)*
2308090.67
(0.56)*
1.813.628
(0.64)*
1.307
(0.24)*
1.179
Cafeine5.8452853026.332.371.154
(0.47)*(0.47)*6.4331.547
Dipyrone8.093
(0.47)*
3062225.89
(0.46)*
3.66(0.77)*(0.16)*1.505
*RSD%valuesaregiveninparentheses
RSD%=(StandardDeviation/Mean)x100
Precision
Theprecisionofthemethod(within-dayvariationsofreplicatedeterminations)waschecked
paracetamol,caeine,dipyrone9timesattheLOQlevel.Theprecisionofthemethod,expres
RSD%attheLOQlevel,was2.02,2.51and5.54%forparacetamol,caeineanddipyrone,resp
(Table3).
Table3.PrecisionoftheDevelopedMethodattheLOQlevel(n=9)
Compound.
PeakArea
(mean)
RSD%
Paracetamol21524179.442.02
Caeine21525541.222.51
Dipyrone21518617.505.54
Accuracy
Astandardworkingsolutioncontainingparacetamol,caeineanddipyrone,yielding
nalconcentrationsof
100g/ml,50g/ml,and150g/mlrespectivelywasprepared.Thepreparedmixtureofstandard
injected9timesasatestsample.Fromtherespectiveareacounts,theconcentrationsoft
caeineanddipyronewerecalculatedusingthedetectorresponses.Theaccuracy,de
nedintermsof%
deviationofthecalculatedconcentrationsfromtheactualconcentrations,islistedinTab
Table4.AccuracyoftheDevelopedMethod(n=9)
Compound
Spiked
Concentration
g/mL
Measured
Concentration
g/mL
Mean±
SD
RSD
%
Deviation
%
Paracetamol100105.28±
0.6300.6005.28
Caeine5049.43±
0.2490.5041.14
Dipyrone150154.94±
0.7420.4793.29
(SpikedConcentration-MeanMeasuredConcentration)
%Deviation=×
100
SpikedConcentration
HPLCMethodfortheAnalysisofParacetamol,CaeineandDipyrone,M.
L.
ALTUN
Ruggedness
TheruggednessoftheHPLCmethodwasevaluatedbycarryingouttheanalysisusingastanda
solution,thesamechromatographicsystemandthesamecolumnondierentdays.Theprepared
standardswasinjected9timesasatestsample.Smalldierencesinareasandgoodconstanc
timeswereobservedafter96hours.AnRSDoflessthan0.560%forareasand0.472%forret
wereobtained(Tables5and6).Thecomparabledetectorresponsesobtainedondierentdays
themethodiscapableofproducingresultswithhighprecisionondierentdays.
Similarly,theruggednessofthemethodwastestedbyinjectingthestandardworkingsoluti
dierentHPLCunit.Thehighdegreesofreproducibilityofdetectorresponsesandretention
thatthemethodisfairlyrugged.
Table5.DaytoDayVariabilityAccordingtoAreaa
June16,2000June20,2000
ParacetamolCaeineDipyroneParacetamolCaeineDipyrone
Area
S.D.
2308090.67
12921.17
2853026.33
13356.87
3062225.89
14124.23
2381848
11432.76
2949559.88
9166.10
3020215.89
7476.78
RSD%0.5600.4680.4610.4800.3110.248
aMeanvaluesofninedeterminations
Table6.DaytoDayVariabilityAccordingtoRetentionTimea
June16,2000June20,2000
ParacetamolCaeineDipyroneParacetamolCaeineDipyrone
Rt
S.D.
4.880
0.016
5.845
0.027
8.093
0.038
5.122
0.007
6.456
0.011
8.934
0.020
RSD%0.3290.4680.4720.1390.1710.221
aMeanvaluesofninedeterminations
Analysis
of
Synthetic
Mixtures
Recoverystudiesinthismethodwereperformedonthesyntheticmixturespreparedbyadding
weighedamountsofthedrugs(Table7).MeanrecoveriesandRSDwerefoundtobe101.62and
paracetamol,100.11and3.38%forcaeine100.86and2.88%fordipyrone,respectively.
Table7.RecoveryResultsforParacetamol,CaeineandDipyroneinSyntheticMixturesbyHPL
ParacetamolCaeineDipyrone
MixtureAddedFoundRecoveryAddedFoundRecoveryAddedFoundRecovery
Nogg%gg%gg%
1400400.97100.24200194.2097.10600600.02100.00
2300302.77100.92150155.87103.91450455.34101.19
3200190.8495.42100103.55103.55300289.0796.36
4100105.29105.295049.4398.87150154.94103.29
55053.12106.252524.2897.127577.60103.46
X=101.62X=100.11X=100.86
RSD%=4.28RSD%=3.38RSD%2.88
X=Mean
HPLCMethodfortheAnalysisofParacetamol,CaeineandDipyrone,M.
L.
ALTUN
Conclusion
Thedevelopedmethodissuitablefortheidenti
cationandquanti
cationoftheternarycombinationof
paracetamol,caeineanddipyrone.
Ahighpercentageofrecoveryshowsthatthemethodcanbesuccessfullyusedonaroutineb
Theproposedmethodissimple,sensitive,rapid,speci
candcouldbeappliedforqualityandstability
monitoringofparacetamol,caeineanddipyronecombinations.
References
1.
J.E.F.Reynolds,\MartindaleTheExtraPharmacopoeia",31st
ed.,pp.27-28,PharmaceuticalPress,
London,1996.
2.
TheUnitedStatesPharmacopoeia,24th
revision,pp.17-39,U.S.PharmacopeialConvention,Rockville,
MD,2000.
3.
BritishPharmacopoeiaCD1998,version2,TheStationeryOceLtd.,Norwich,1998.
4.
EuropeanPharmacopoeia1997,thirdedition,pp.748-749,ConventionontheElaborationofa
Parmacopoeia(EuropeanTreatySeriesNo.50),Strasbourg,1996.
5.
O.V.Lau,S.F.LukandY.M.Cheung,Analyst,114,1047-1051(1989).
6.
H.A.El-ObeidandA.AAl-Badr,\AnalyticalPro
lesofDrugSubstances",Vol.14,pp.551-596,American
PharmaceuticalAssociation,1985.
7.
H-K.ChanandD.J.W.Grant,IntJ.Pharm.,57,117-124(1989).
8.
N.ErkandF.Onur,Anal.Lett.,30(6),1201-1210(1997).
9.
H.N.Dogan,Pharmazie,51(10),773-774(1996).
10.
P.Kahela,E.LaineandM.Anttila,DrugDev.Ind.Pharm.,13(2),213-224(1987).
¨
Univ.,27(2),93-100(1998).
11.
S.S¨uzen,C.Akay,S.Tartlms,R.S.Erd¨ol,A.OnalandS.Cevheroglu,J.FacultyofPharm
12.
W.R.Sisco,C.T.Rittenhuse,L.A.EverhartandA.M.McLaughlin,J.Chromatogr.,354,355-36
13.
M.HossainandJ.W.Ayres,Int.J.Pharm.,133,223-235(1996).
14.
H.M.Ali,M.M.A.Homeida,J.Ford,C.A.Truman,C.J.C.RobertsandA.A.Badwan,Int.J.Ph
155-159(1988).
15.
K.H.Yuen,K.K.Peh,Y.L.QuahandK.L.Chan,DrugDev.Ind.Pharm.,23(2),225-228(1997).
16.
D.D.Orsi,L.Gagliardi,A.BolascoandD.Tonelli,Chromatographia,43(9/10),496-500(199
17.
J.J.BerghandA.P.L¨otter,DrugDev.Ind.Pharm.,10(1),127-136(1984).
18.
E.Z.Katz,Y.Caraco,L.GranitandM.Levy,Clin.Pharmacol.Ther.,58(2),198-209(1995)
19.
M.K.Srivastava,S.Ahmad,D.SinghandI.C.Shukla,Analyst,110,735-737(1985).
20.
T.Aburjai,B.I.Amro,K.Aiedeh,M.AbuirjeieandS.Al-Khalil,Pharmazie,55,751-754(20
21.
A.M.HapetteandS.A.Poulet,J.Liq.Chromatogr.,13(2),357-370(1990)
HPLCMethodfortheAnalysisofParacetamol,CaeineandDipyrone,M.
L.
ALTUN
22.F.Belal,Electroanalysis,4,589(1992).
23.A.Siou
andD.Colussi,J.Chromatogr.,146,503-507(1978).
24.
G.Geisslinger,R.B¨ockerandM.Levy,PharmaceuticalResearch,13(8),1272-1275(1996).
¨¨
25.M.Ust¨unOzg¨urandS.Sungur,ChimicaActaTurcica,23,119-123(1995).
26.A.Bozdogan,A.M.Acar,G.KuntandH.Caglar,Pharmazie,49,457-458(1994).