michelangelo.

cn

HISTORY OF HUNS AND ALANS (2nd C. BC - 5TH C. AD)

(Numbers of pages refer to the book “The 10,000 year long Hungarian continuitas”)

Hou Hanshu, 'Western Regions', 125 AD: “Liyi (= 栗弋 = Suyi = Sogdiana), and both the "old" Yancai (which had changed their name to
Alanliao and seem to have expanded their territory to the Caspian Sea), and Yan, a country to Yancai's north, as well as the strategic city of
"Northern Wuyi" 北烏伊 (Alexandria Euschate, or modern Khujand, Fergana), were all dependent on K’angchü” [the Chu, Talas, and Jaxartes
valleys’ territories].
Hou Hanshu, 88: “Alania was dependent on K’ang-chü and
was situated between the Caspian Sea and the Aral Sea.”
“The Alans occupy the country and the towns.” “Their way
of life and dress are the same as those of the K’angchü”.
“Yentsay was the name of the alliance of K’ang-chü and
Alania”. “A military and political alliance between the
Sarmatian and Alan tribes living between the lower reaches
of the Volga and the Aral Sea was formed under the name
of Yen-ts’ai–Alania. Their forces were 100,000 strong”.
L. R. Kyzlasov1): “The inhabitants of K’angchü were
said to lead a settled life, have towns, cultivate the
land and breed livestock and were reported to be
farmers and craftsmen”. The Hungarians were never
nomads!
The above reports are confirmed by genetics: the
Hungarians who lived in K’angchü have left in that
region the highest rates of R1a1a (right, map, see page
67) and the highest concentration of Hungarian
archaeology. The linguistic speculations of the Indo-Russist
Kyzlasov and Abayev (that region was Indo-Iranian!) are
demolished by Genetics, Anthropology, Archaeology, and
History.
In other words: K’angchü extended from the Talas Valley to Fergana (west Arsia, west of the Tien Shan mountains. South of
them their allied, the Kushans; north of them the Hsiung Nu) and along the Jaxartes Valley as far as the Aral Sea, and, later
on, to Alania (North Ossetia, Caucasus) and lower Volga. K’angchü was the place from where the Hungarian Sarmatians (Sarmato-
Alans for the Hermitage and Alans for Asimov) controlled the Central Northern Silk Route, from the West Tien Shan mountains to Tanaïs.
K’angchü was the place from where the Central Asian Hungarians started migrating back to Carpathia.
Dionysius and Ptolemy: “the Huns are on the Caspian coast among the ‘Scythians and Caspians’ [Scythians and Sarmatians are the same
for them!] during the middle and second half of the 2nd c.” (Archaeology confirms it!).
L. R. Kyzlasov1): “According to 6th century Chinese sources, the Alanian Yen-ts’ai was renamed Su-te and the Hsiung-nu of Central
Asia took possession of it (apparently in the 2nd century)”.
UNESCO: “The works of Armenian historians contain hints of a struggle between the peoples of the Caucasus [the Alanians!] and the Later
Huns in the third and fourth centuries.”
Ammianus Marcellinus: “this restless and untume [untamed?] people, burning with uncontrolled passion to seize the property of others,
as they advanced, robbing and slaughtering neighbouring peoples, came to the Alans’. The Alans were routed, and most of them fled [a
Hungarian marker] from the Aral Sea region and the lower reaches of the Volga to the northern Caucasus [to the Kingdom of Alania, North
Ossetia]. There also, however, they were subject to the Huns and Alanian detachments were incorporated into the Hun
forces”. (Note: these Alanians were the Hungarians who arrived in the Carpathian Basin with Attila!). The “blond Alans of Iraq” could be
part of this diaspora: see H on the above map).
In other words: the Huns enslaved Hungarians in the Jaxartes valley and in Caucasus: this is why the “Hunnish horde” came
to Europe with Hungarian Sacred Symbols and artefacts; this is why the Hunnish and Ostrogothic archaeology is 90%
Alanian!
UNESCO: “In the 370s a mass of nomadic tribes, united by the Huns in a powerful alliance, burst into Europe and, in 375, they attacked
the Ostrogoths.”
Jordanes, 38: “The Huns included contingents from the innumerable tribes that had been brought under Attila’s sway".
A. Marcellinus: “They made their violent way amid the rapine and slaughter of the neighbouring peoples”.
Jordanes: “They made their foes flee in horror because their dark skinned aspect was fearful, and they had, if I may call it so,
a sort of hideous lump, not a head, with pinholes rather than eyes. For they cut the cheeks of the [baby] males with a sword,
so that before they receive the nourishment of milk they must learn to endure wounds. Hence they grow old beardless”.
“They are short in stature, quick in bodily movement, alert horsemen, broad shouldered, ready in the use of bow and arrow. Though
they live in the form of men, they have the cruelty of wild beasts”. (“The origins and deeds of the Goths”2). The Romans and the
Chinese described the Hsiungnu/Huns and the Tongwancheng Huns in the same way and René Grousset (“L’Empire des steppe”) added
that also the 13th century Mongols were alike.
A. Marcellinus: “Nearly all the Alans are of great stature and beauty, their hair is somewhat yellow, their eyes are terribly
fierce”, “Roman History”3). The Greeks, the Chinese, the Romans, and the Byzantines always described the Hungarians as “just” people,
whichever was their denomination at the time (Thracian, Tagar, Ohrsi, Arsi, Parthian, Avar, Hun, Turk, Magyar...). The Romans were not
“anti-Hungarians”: the Romans were “anti-Huns”!
In other words: the Huns (i.e. the Mongols) were a small bloody warring élite that, as most warring élites, left little genetic
and cultural traces of their existence, and entered history only thanks to their violence and to their devastations. The
Hunnish “empire” in Carpathia lasted as long as the third Reich in Germany: the time needed to get rid of the tyrants, who
both surrogated the states of the two empires. The ancestors of the Hungarians are not the Huns but the Alans.

References: “History of Civilizations of Central Asia”, Volume II, M. S. Asimov, UNESCO Publishing is the source of all the
quotations on this page.
See michelangelo.cn > “The fairy tale of the Huns”. 1) “Northern Nomads”. 2) “De origine actibusque Getarum", XXIV, 127-8, 551 AD,
after Cassiodorus, 526-533. 3) Book XXXI.

As I consider the UNESCO a source more reliable than Obrusánszky Borbála and Kiszely István, I have come to the conclusion
that the books of Borbála are fairy tales (supported only by her vivid imagination!) that she has written for her children… but
she ought to warn her adult readers about it!