Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Congress is considering replacing Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill. The idea first gained traction with a petition signed by 100,000 Americans.
However, another petition has been sent to Congress in favor of keeping Jackson on the bill. Congress has asked a select number of historians (you!)
to weigh in on the matter. In particular, they have asked you to make a recommendation as to whether Jackson is worthy of the honor of being on the
bill based on the historical evidence related to his presidency. Congress also requests that you discuss the major decisions of Jackson’s entire
presidency, and not only Indian Removal.
Drawing on at least five sources (three primary), draft a letter to Congress with your final recommendation. Please draw on each of the following
areas to support your recommendation: Indian Removal, the Nullification Crisis, and the Bank Veto. Please also include at least one analysis of the
constitutionality of one or more of Jackson’s actions. Finally, please address at least two counter-arguments to your recommendation.
You may choose from the below sources, or find other sources:
--McCulloch v. Maryland
Topic: Review background Topic: Emergence of the Topic: Climax and resolution Topic: SAC - South Carolina Topic: McCulloch v.
knowledge / Election of 1828 nullification crisis. of the nullification crisis. vs. Federal Government in Maryland and Biddle’s case
the nullification crisis for the recharter of the Bank.
Objective: Establish Objective: Introduce an early Objective: Examine
Jackson’s reputation, values challenge faced by Jackson Jackson’s role in Objective: Assess students’ Objective: Introduce another
and priorities going into his and the way in which it (temporarily) preserving the understanding of the big challenge faced by
presidency. challenged his “common union. nullification crisis and have Jackson and the ways in
man”, states’ rights values. them consider both sides of which his “common man”,
the issue which will be useful states’ rights values informed
in addressing counter- his response.
arguments in their summative
assessment.
Topic: Jackson’s Topic: Aftermath of the Bank Topic: Topic: Assess the Topic: Survey American-
unprecedented use of the veto Veto: inflation and economic --Quiz: nullification crisis constitutionality of Jackson’s Native American relations
power, including the bank depression. and the bank veto. actions during the since the War of 1812.
veto. --Introduce activity assessing nullification crisis and the
Objective: Identify the the constitutionality of bank recharter debate. Objective: Contextualize the
Objective: Examine the ways consequences of one of Jackson’s actions during the Indian Removal Act.
in which Jackson expanded Jackson’s main actions as nullification crisis and the Objective: Prepare students
the power of the presidency. president, as well as bank recharter debate. for constitutional analysis in
alternative explanations (“It summative assessment.
was Van Buren’s fault.”) Objective: Assess
understanding.
Topic: Indian Removal Act: Topic: Research Native Topic: Research Native Topic: Small group Topic: Writing conferences to
difference between the letter American tribes’ experiences American tribes’ experiences presentations on Native perfect recommendation
of the law and its under Jackson’s Indian under Jackson’s Indian American tribes’ experiences letters.
implementation. Removal policies (in small Removal policies (in small under Jackson’s Indian
groups). groups). Removal policies. Objective: Peer feedback and
Objective: Understand iteration.
Jackson’s motivation behind Objective: Examine the Objective: Examine the Objective: Examine the
this policy. human toll of Jackson’s human toll of Jackson’s human toll of Jackson’s
Indian Removal policies. Indian Removal policies. Indian Removal policies.