Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Financial Crisis
Financial Crisis
Stella Jiang
Mr. Zielinski
Colloquy Eta
The 2008 Financial Crisis in the USA caused catastrophic damages to the global
economy. When speaking of its causes, many parties may get involved in the discussion. This
essay will argue that the media and economists are the most responsible party for the crisis as
a demagogue. To start off, they confused people with complicated interpretations of the
economy and did not explain facts well, even misleading them. Secondly, mainstream
economists proposed abolition of government regulation on the economy, which led to the
collapse of the whole financial system. Last but not least, even though some people believe
that they may cause panic when telling the truth, they could still lessen the eventual damage
To begin with, the media and economists in 2008 focused not on their duty of explaining
how the economy works and how to help the economy to flourish but on how to confuse the
people with complex information. In 2008, the Neoclassical Economics, the school of
economics that was the most prevalent in America, focuses on building obscure mathematical
models of the economy and fascinate the audience. A survey done on the students of some top
graduate programs in economics indicated that the students generally tend to value
and Colander 18). It can be derived that the trend in economics wasn’t appreciating the
truthful knowledge but the ability to show off talent and expertise in front of the audience.
Also, during the period before the crisis, economists found that even some excellent passages
with solid theoretical foundations were difficult to be published in some “top journals”
(Harvey). The media also discouraged the publication of authentic knowledge, preventing the
public from correctly understanding how the economy works. In conclusion, the media and
economists conspired to confuse the public with intrinsic messages and prevented them from
understanding the economy. They hid the existence of the financial bubble from the
Moreover, before the crisis happened, economists had suggested the government not to
implement much regulation on the economy. The neoclassical economists stood for a free
market. A free market, a classical concept of capitalism, is a market with little government
regulations. Most economists at the time believed that in a free market competitions would
make the market self-efficient and that government regulation would intervene with the
competitions (Kenton). However, many economic commentators now agree that the free
market led to the final crash of the market since it allowed the mortgage-backed securities to
circulate freely (Harman). What the economists suggested could ruin the economy. However,
this concept of free-market still had many supporters back in 2008, including people with
important positions in the market and the government such as Alan Greenspan, head of US
Federal Reserve, Milton Friedman, famous economists, and Larry Summers, US Secretary of
the Treasury (Harvey). It can be inferred that the neoclassical economic concept even
penetrated through important parts of the government and that the government certainly
Jiang 3
reduced their regulation on the economy. According to their flamboyant theory, they gave the
them.
Lastly, some may also argue that the reason why media and economists told the public
false information about the US economy because they would cause panic in the society if
they tell the truth. The panic would even bring a sooner crisis and break the bubble earlier.
However, the fact was that the bubble was growing while the public has no idea about the
true situation: the economy was making more and more trades with the mortgage-backed
securities, and these securities would penetrate the entire economy and their roles would
become more and more significant, just like how a snowball sliding down a snowy hill would
increase its size over time. In the end, the media and economists didn’t tell the truth, and the
eventual damage cause was far bigger than a panic. If the economists and media would tell
the truth sooner, the damage to the economy after the crisis would be less. A scene in the
movie The Big Short demonstrated how the mortgage-based securities were circulating
throughout the economy as how more and more people bet on Selena Gomez to win in the
casino. The later game ended, the bigger the number of people losing money would be
(McKay). If the media and economists would do their job to remind the American people of
the truth, the severity of the crisis would alleviate in significant levels. In conclusion, it would
be more appropriate for the media and economists to tell the public truth although may cause
a panic because telling the truth would lessen the fatal consequences of the broken bubble.
To sum up, the media and economists are the most responsible group for the American
financial crisis in 2008. In the first place, they misled the public by offering obscure
Jiang 4
knowledge and didn’t explain the situation of the US economy correctly. In the second place,
economists succeeded in suggested the government to allow a free market. Finally, while
some may argue that the media and economists would cause panic when they tell the truth,
they would still have reduced the damage caused by the crisis if they told the truth sooner.
Works Cited
Jiang 5
Harman, Chris. “Economic Crisis: Capitalism Exposed.” Socialist Review, Feb. 2008,
socialistreview.org.uk/322/economic-crisis-capitalism-exposed.
Harvey, John T. “How Economists Contributed to the Financial Crisis.” Forbes, Forbes
crisis/#830b0173b303.
www.investopedia.com/terms/n/neoclassical.asp.
Klamer, Arjo, and David C. Colander. The Making of an Economist. Westview Press, 1990.
McKay, Adam, director. The Big Short. The Big Short, Paramount, 2015,
www.amazon.com/Big-Short-Christian-Bale/dp/B019969US8.