You are on page 1of 7

International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR) ISSN: 2319-4421 73

Volume 3, No. 1, January 2014

The Impact of Consumer Experience on Brand Loyalty: The


Mediating Role of Brand Attitude
Sivarajah Rajumesh, PhD Scholar, Huazhoung Uiversity of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

ABSTRACT techniques available in the marketing literature used by all


most all marketers to gain competitive advantages, so it is
The objective of this study is to explore the direct and currently difficult to differentiate the particular product or
indirect influence of brand experience on brand loyalty service from the competitors’ one. Marketing studies
and brand attitude. The study involves in selecting fast indicate that having loyal customers is one of the best
moving consumer goods category as the sample product. ways to compete with less cost and effort. Creating loyal
The study used convenient sampling techniques to collect customers is depending on different marketing techniques
the data. A total of 280 questionnaires distributed to the such as pricing, promotion, product differentiation,
randomly selected participants, who are residing Jaffna branding, etc. Many researchers contribute to the
District in Sri Lanka, and a sum of 232 usable branding concept such as brand trust, brand attachment,
questionnaires received. Multiple regression analyses brand love, brand attitude, brand experience and brand
were conducted to assess each component of the proposed personality (Aaker, 1991; Brakus, Schmitt, &
mediation model. First, it was found that brand experience Zarantonello, 2009, p. 53; Carroll & Ahuvia, 2006;
was positively associated brand loyalty (B = .50 t = 13.52, Delgado-Ballester & Munuera-Aleman, 2001;
p = .001). It was also found that brand experience was McAlexander, Schouten, & Koenig, 2002; Thomson,
positively related to brand attitude (B = .55, t = 20.85, p = MacInnis, & Park, 2005) , which are very powerful and
.001). Lastly, results indicated that the mediator, brand useful aspects for the smart marketers to differentiate their
attitude, was positively associated with brand loyalty (B = products and to keep existing customers and to attract new
.74, t = 12.74, p = .001). Results of the mediation analysis customers.
confirmed the mediating role of brand attitude in the
relation between brand experience and brand loyalty (B = Recent researchers focus on brand experience even though
.41; CI = .32 to .49). In addition, results indicated that the concept of brand experience is not a new
the direct effect of brand experience on brand loyalty aspect(Brakus, et al., 2009). Holbrook & Hirschman
became significant (B = .09, t = 2.17, p = .03) when (1982), introduced the branding concept, which influences
controlling for brand attitude, thus suggesting partial in multiple disciplines in business management such as
mediation. This result can assists to the managers to take consumer behaviour, economics, and marketing filed
decision regarding the investment in relations to brand (Brakus, et al., 2009; Caru` & Cova, 2003; LaSalle &
experience and brand attitude related aspects to create Britton, 2003 ; Schmitt, 1999).
loyal customers, which in turn will lead to competitive
advantage. This model limited to brand experience, and In recent years, marketing practitioners and academicians
brand trust as antecedent to brand loyalty and the considered the importance of brand experience in the
consequence of brand experience is limited to trust and marketing related concepts such as sale promotion, brand
brand loyalty, future researchers can incorporate the differentiation, loyalty and customer satisfaction (Brakus
brand attachment and brand involvement as antecedent et al., 2009; Morrison and Crane, 2007; Zarantonello and
and customer satisfaction and commitment as possible Schmitt, 2010). More than three decades ago, the brand
consequences to achieve more clear idea about the related literature discussed the linkage between attitude
importance of these factors. and loyalty (Dick & Basu, 1994) . This strongly indicates
that brand attitude reflecting in cognitive, affective, and
conative situation influence on repeat patronage. Most of
Keywords: the recent studies, related to brand loyalty, did not
Brand, Brand experience, Brand Attitude, Brand Loyalty consider the importance of brand experience and brand
attitude in determining brand loyalty. Thus, there is a gap
1. INTRODUCTION in the branding literature about the relationship of brand
attitude and brand experience on brand loyalty.
The growing competition provides pros and cons to
marketers in gaining competitive advantages, marketers The objective of this study is to explore the direct and
continuously search for ways to compete and attract indirect influence of brand experience on brand loyalty
customer’s attention in the market place. Many traditional and brand attitude in a holistic model. Sri Lankan soft

i-Explore International Research Journal Consortium www.irjcjournals.org


International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR) ISSN: 2319-4421 74
Volume 3, No. 1, January 2014

drink “ Elephant House Necto” brand, which is famous for Marketing researchers point out that experiences related to
its taste and flavour among Sri Lankans, selected to the consumption take place in three situations such as while
study. searching products, shopping and receiving it, and
consuming it (Arnould, Price, & Zinkhan, 2002; Brakus, et
This research started with reviewing relevant literature al., 2009; Holbrook, 2000). First, product related
about brand attitude, brand experience and brand loyalty. experiences happen when consumers search and assess the
Then, based on the relevant reviewed literature the relevant information through physical contact or virtually
conceptual model and hypothesis are developed. Further, such as media advertisements (Hoch & Ha, 1986; Kempf,
the study includes research methods, results and 1998). Second, Shopping and service experiences happen
discussion, Managerial implication and limitation and when consumers directly involve with the store’s
future research directions respectively. atmosphere, its employees, and its policies and practices
(Hui & Bateson, 1991; Kerin, Jain, & Howard, 1992).
2. LITERATURE REVIEW Third, consumption experiences involves with the hedonic
aspects such as feelings/impressions, fantasies, and fun
2.1 Brand attitude (Holbrook & Hirschman, 1982) . In summary, experiences
Psychology literature argues, optimistic attitude play happen directly when shop, receive, buy, and consume it
crucial role to trust and believe someone (Baier, 1986). and indirectly when interacting with media including print
Brand attitude considered as an attitude that a consumer and electronic media.
reveals toward a particular brand they encountered with
(De Chernatony & Riley, 1998). Marketing researchers Brand experience is explained as “subjective, internal
considered brand attitude as a key point because it is (sensations, feelings, and cognitions) and behavioral
strongly considered that brand attitude influence on responses evoked by brand related stimuli that are part of a
customer behaviour (Chaudhuri & Holbrook, 2001; Keller, brand’s design and identity, packaging, communications,
2003; Suh & Yi, 2006). Marketing researchers have taken and environments” (Brakus, et al., 2009, p. 53). Thus,
attitude and trust into consideration to study company- brand experience scales developed in four dimensions
customer relationships (eg.Delgado-Ballester & Munuera- such as sensory, affective, behavioural, and intellectual.
Aleman, 2001; Ha & Perks, 2005). A positive attitude of a Marketing practitioners considered brand experience as
brand, which induces consumer’s decision to purchase the one of the important tools among brand image, brand
particular brand, helps to create trust in the brand, attitude, and brand awareness which help to form strong
(Chaudhuri & Holbrook, 2001; Morgan & Hunt, 1994). marketing strategies to gain competitive advantages
The attitude of existing brand helps to a customer to make (Brakus, et al., 2009; Chang & Chieng, 2006).
a purchase decision towards a new product (HÃubl, 1996). Combined symbolic meaning of thoughts, feelings, and
In the uncertain situation about a brand, consumers rely on behavior associated with the consumption of
the particular company products for which they have product/service provide consumer experience (Padgett &
already developed positive attitude (Hess & Story, 2005). Allen, 1997). Alba and Hutchinson (1987) argue
In addition to repeat purchase, customers must have consumers’ brand experience reflect their knowledge of
relatively strong favourable attitude towards a brand to be and familiarity with a particular brand or brand category.
truly loyal to that brand (Day, 1969). A person’s internal Brand experience has more influence than products
evaluation of an object such as a branded product create attributes and benefits on brand selection. It can create a
attitude about that product, which are often stable and stronger meaning and memories, which can produce
durable tendency to behaviour (Mitchell & Olson, 1981). greater customer trust in the brand decision making.
According to Existing literature, attitude is one of the
antecedents of consumer behavioural intensions (Bearden Resent research indicates that functional benefits do not
& Teel, 1983; Hellier, Geursen, & Rickard, 2003; Oliver, create interest to consumption, in turn; consumers
1981). Attitude is the customers’ positive, negative, or increasingly rely on making choices on the basis of
neutral learned feature toward a brand, which plays crucial experiential aspects of the products or services (Pine &
role in consumer behavioural pattern (Hellier, et al., 2003; Gilmore, 1998; Schmitt, 1999 ). Marketing practitioners
Suh & Yi, 2006). and academicians paid attention with great interest in the
concept of brand experience and recognized its important
2.2 Brand Experience role in developing marketing strategies to gain customer
Retailers concentrate on their effort providing source of attention.
memories rather than goods and source of experience
rather than service (Pine & Gilmore, 1998). There are four dimension of brand experience identified
by the researchers such as sensory, affective, intellectual,
Brands experience means the degree of familiarity of a and behavioural dimensions. Sensory dimension includes
person with some form of exposure of the brand visual, auditory, tactile, and gustative stimulations of a
(Braunsberger & Munch, 1998; Ha & Perks, 2005). brand. Affective dimension refers to feelings related to

i-Explore International Research Journal Consortium www.irjcjournals.org


International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR) ISSN: 2319-4421 75
Volume 3, No. 1, January 2014

brand and its emotional tie with the consumer. An The strength of the consumer attitude towards the brand
intellectual dimension reflects of the consumers varies, consumer who has the stronger positive brand
convergent and divergent thinking related to the brand. A attitude exhibits greater resistance to information that try
behavioural dimension exposes bodily experiences, to divert their attention from particular brand (e.g.Petty,
lifestyles and interaction with a brand (Brakus, et al., 1995). Conceptual theory related to cognitive loyalty
2009; Schmitt, 1999). Thus, the intensity of the brand argues belief of an object influence on attitude towards
experience is determined by one or more of the above that object (Oliver, 1999). Researchers accepted the
dimensions. formation of attitude based on belief-based models.
Perceived benefits related to cognitive belief plays
Brand managers consider brand experience as an important role in the formation of attitude in consumer
encounter of the consumer from holistic offer of a brand mind. Relevant literature supports that customer’s
(Klaus & Maklan, 2007), which is important to brand satisfaction, attitude, and commitment towards
building process (Prahalad & Ramaswamy, 2004). repurchasing behavior are the key elements to build brand
loyalty (Gomez, Arranez, & Gillan, 2006). Affective
2.3 Brand Loyalty attitudes which consists feelings, moods, and emotions
Aaker (1991) discussed the vital role of the brand loyalty deeply impact on loyalty (Barsky & Nash, 2002).
in the brand equity process which produces some H1: Brand attitude positively influence on brand loyalty
marketing advantages such as less marketing costs, more
new customer base, and greater trade leverage. The 2.5 Brand loyalty and brand experience
organizations’ success depends on its ability to attract and Available literature suggests a direct link between brand
make loyal customer. This is to create organization to have experience and brand loyalty (Brakus, et al., 2009).
the ability to keep its current customers and make them Deming (2007) , states branding is a process involving
loyal to its brand for long run. The customers may have creating authentic (genuine), unique (distinctive),
different degree of loyalty to brand (Kandampully & emotional experiences that produce believes. Nonetheless,
Suhartanto, 2000). Loyalty means customers purchase a experiences are complex aspect, which includes four
product or service repeatedly. Brand loyalty is the dimensions; sensory, affective, intellectual and
commitment and positive attitude to purchase the same behavioural (Brakus, et al., 2009). Thus, brand managers
brand in a durable manner in their future purchase consider not only traditional brand building techniques but
situation (Y. Liu, 2007). also brand experiences to manage the brand (Frow &
Payne 2007). Consumers who have positive brand
Jacoby and Chestnut (1978) conceptually defined brand experience towards the particular brand behave as loyal
loyalty as a biased behavioural response expressed over customer to the brand (Brakus, et al., 2009). Customer’s
time by some decision-making unit with respect to one or past accumulation of favorable experiences constitutes to
more brands out of a set of such brands, and is a function affective loyalty, which drive to attitudinal loyalty (Oliver,
of psychological (decision-making evaluate) processes. 1999).
Brand loyalty can be estimated in three forms such as
behavioural, attitudinal or composite approach (Jacoby &
Chestnut, 1978). Behavioural loyalty has been H2: Brand experience positively influence on brand loyalty
operationalized as repeat purchases frequency (eg.Brown,
1953) or proportion of purchase of the same brand over H3: Brand experience positively influence on brand
time (eg.Cunningham, 1956), while attitudinal brand attitude
loyalty considered as stated preferences, commitment or
purchase intentions of the customers towards the products H4: Brand attitude mediate the relationship of brand
or services. experience and brand loyalty

A lot of research related to the outcome and antecedents of


consumer attitudes about brand. However, consumer Conceptual model
attitudes as an outcome of brand experience has got little
attention in the literature (Biedenbach & Marell, 2009; Brand attitude
O’Cass & Grace, 2004). Thus, this study try to find out the
relationship of brand experience and brand attitude
towards brand loyalty.
Brand experience Brand Loyalty
2.4 Brand loyalty and brand attitude
Consumers attach themselves to various brands and form
relationship with them (Fournier, 1998), which, Figure 1: Conceptual frame work
consequently, contribute to brand equity (e.gKeller, 2003).

i-Explore International Research Journal Consortium www.irjcjournals.org


International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR) ISSN: 2319-4421 76
Volume 3, No. 1, January 2014

3. METHODOLOGY was found that brand experience was positively associated


brand loyalty (B = .50 t = 13.52, p = .001). It was also
3.1 Sample and Data collection found that brand experience was positively related to
Empirical analysis, which includes primary data collected brand attitude (B = .55, t = 20.85, p = .001). Lastly, results
through well self administrated questionnaire, is the basic indicated that the mediator, brand attitude, was positively
nature of this paper. The questionnaire consists two parts; associated with brand loyalty (B = .74, t = 12.74, p =
part one consists pre coded questions regarding the .001). Because both the a-path and b-path were significant,
demographic data of the respondents, and part two mediation analyses were tested using the bootstrapping
contains likert scale (ranging from (1) strongly disagree to method with bias-corrected confidence estimates
(5) strongly agree) questions regarding brand experience, (MacKinnon, Lockwood, & Williams, 2004; Preacher &
brand attitude and brand loyalty. The study involves in Hayes, 2008). In the present study, the 95% confidence
selecting fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) category interval of the indirect effects was obtained with 5000
as the sample product. Specially, Sri Lankan brand bootstrap resample (Preacher & Hayes, 2008). Results of
“Elephant House Necto”, which is famous for its taste and the mediation analysis confirmed the mediating role of
uniqueness among the soft drink consumers in Sri Lanka, brand attitude in the relation between brand experience
selected as sample. The study used convenient sampling and brand loyalty (B = .41; CI = .32 to .49). In addition,
techniques to collect the data. A total of 280 results indicated that the direct effect of brand experience
questionnaires distributed to the randomly selected on brand loyalty became significant (B = .09, t = 2.17, p =
participants, who are residing Jaffna District in Sri Lanka, .03) when controlling for brand attitude, thus suggesting
and a sum of 232 usable questionnaires received. partial mediation. Thus, the hypotheses H1 to H4 supported
by the results.
Analysis of the demographic characteristics of this study
indicate that the sample frame consist 56.9% of male and Experiences evolve in several ways, some take place in
43.1% of female respondents. Based on the age, below direct manner, such as consumers action towards search
24years old, 25-34 years old, 35-44 years old, and 45 years for purchase and consume products, while others occur
old and above is 19.4%, 38.8%, 23.7% and 18.1% indirectly when consumer expose to intangible aspects of
respectively. Respondent’s education levels are as follows marketing communications (Brakus, et al., 2009).
6.9% primary education, Secondary education 50%, and Experience is seen as a distinctive offering comparable to
university education 43.1%. Income level of the the product or services. This specific marketing feature is
respondents reflects as follows 23.7%- below Rs. 20,000, directed towards consumer decision process with an
65.9%- Rs. 20,000-Rs.30,000, 6.9% -Rs.30,000-Rs.40,000 objective to provide them a way to mentally, emotionally,
and 3.4% -over Rs.40,000. spiritually, socially and physically engage in the
consumption process of product/ service (Caru` & Cova,
The study used inferential and statistical analysis to test 2003).
the hypotheses, to which there researcher used statistical
package for social science (SPSS-version 19) software. Recent researchers concentrate on measuring the
consequences of brand experience on some of the unique
3.2 Measurement but related concepts such as sale promotion, brand
Self administered questionnaire, which has two parts; first differentiation, brand loyalty and customer satisfaction
part related to respondents democratic characteristics, and (Brakus et al., 2009; Morrison and Crane, 2007;
second part related to respondents perceptions brand Zarantonello and Schmitt, 2010). Therefore, it is logical to
attitude, brand experience and brand loyalty, used to argue that researchers are motivated with the potential of
collect the data. The items to measure the brand attitude these experiences to transform into consumers preferential
are adopted from (Liu, et al., 2012) , the brand experience treatment towards that brand.
are adopted from (Brakus, et al., 2009) and the brand
loyalty are adopted from (Chaudhuri & Holbrook, 2001). Such transformation process is based on the brand related
Cronbach’s alpha for the reliability of the variables for experiences have the tendency to become the part of
brand experience, brand attitude, and brand loyalty, person’s long-term memory in association with brand, and
α=0.704, α=0.813, and α=0.814 respectively. They are all thus there is a chance that some of these associations can
above the recommended cut off of 0.60. These measures play a crucial role in building brand attitude, brand
are compositely reliable and internally consistent as preference, and brand loyalty (Brakus et al., 2009). So,
recommended by (Nunnally, 1978). smart marketers can consider these associations in
building brand management process. Brand experience can
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION severely impact consumers’ long-term memories related to
the brands, which can provide strategic advantage in the
market place to compete with their competitors to
Multiple regression analyses were conducted to assess
differentiate their product or services.
each component of the proposed mediation model. First, it

i-Explore International Research Journal Consortium www.irjcjournals.org


International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR) ISSN: 2319-4421 77
Volume 3, No. 1, January 2014

5. MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS [2] Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions


of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer
The importance of understanding brand experience as a Research.411-54.
competitive marketing offer is undoubtedly accepted that [3] Arnould, E. J., Price, L., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2002).
it has placed a position of strategic movement in Consumers: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
contemporary brand management process. However, [4] Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, Vol.
creating positive consumer experience that can give 96(2).231-60.
sensible encounter and inducement towards the brand [5] Barsky, J., & Nash, L. (2002). Evoking emotion:
require resources. In this context, marketing practitioners affective keys to hotel loyalty. Cornell Hotel &
and researchers need to find empirical evidence to support Restaurant Administration Quarterly, Vol. 43(1).39-
the importance of brand experience influencing into 46.
consumers long term memory and it turn into consumers [6] Bearden, W. O., & Teel, J. E. (1983). Selected
favourable brand related attitude towards the brand and determinants of consumer satisfaction and complaint
subsequently leads to brand loyalty. One of the primary reports. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 20.21-8.
objectives of this research was to empirically establish the [7] Biedenbach, G., & Marell, A. (2009). The impact of
presence of such influences. customer experience on brand equity in a business-to-
business services setting. Journal of Brand
Furthermore, it is highly valuable for marketing decision Management, Vol. 17(6).446-58.
makers to understand that how brand experiences as a [8] Brakus, J. J. s., Schmitt, B. H., & Zarantonello, L.
weapon, directly or indirectly influence on consumers (2009). Brand experience: what is it? How is it
preference towards that particular brand. Thus, the second measured? Does it affect loyalty? Journal of
objective of this study was to investigate the pattern and Marketing, Vol. 73(3).52-68.
magnitude of paths leading from brand experience to [9] Braunsberger, K., & Munch, J. M. (1998). Source
brand loyalty. Based on the results, the size of expertise versus experience effects in hospital
standardized coefficients suggests that brand experience advertising. Journal of Services Marketing, Vol.
plays the most critical role in brand loyalty. Furthermore, 12(1).23-38.
results of this study suggest that brand attitude is also [10] Brown, G. H. (1953). Brand loyalty-fact or fiction.
direct antecedent of brand loyalty. In addition to the Trademark Rep., Vol. 43.251.
above, the result of the study also indicates brand [11] Carroll, B., & Ahuvia, A. (2006). Some antecedents
experience is generating the highest coefficients when and outcomes of brand love. Marketing Letters, Vol.
brand attitude mediates its relationship with brand loyalty. 17(2).79-89.
This results support to the past research results that weaker [12] Caru` , A., & Cova, B. (2003). Revisiting
direct link between brand experiences with some of its consumption experience: a more humble but complete
consequences and a stronger effect through a mediating view of the concept. Marketing Theory, Vol. 3.267.
variable (Brakus et al., 2009; Iglesias et al., 2011) [13] Chang, P. L., & Chieng, M. H. (2006). Building
consumer - brand relationship: A cross-cultural
6. LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE experiential view. Psychology & Marketing, Vol.
23(11).927-59.
RESEARCH [14] Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain
of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand
This research focused in investigating the proposed performance: the role of brand loyalty. The Journal of
conceptual model for single product category. Future Marketing, Vol. 6.81-93.
researchers can test the model for other product and [15] Cunningham, R. M. (1956). Brand loyalty – What,
service categories to generalize the idea. This model where, how much? Journal of Marketing Research,
limited to brand experience, and brand trust as antecedent Vol. 34(1).116-28.
to brand loyalty and the consequence of brand experience [16] Day, G. S. (1969). A two-dimensional concept of
is limited to trust and brand loyalty, future researchers can brand loyalty Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.
incorporate the brand attachment and brand involvement 9(3).29- 35.
as antecedent and customer satisfaction and commitment [17] De Chernatony, L., & Riley, F. D. (1998). Defining a
as possible consequences to achieve more clear idea about ‘brand’: beyond the literature with experts’
the importance of these factors. interpretations. Journal of Marketing Management,,
Vol. 14(5). 417-43.
REFERENCES [18] Delgado-Ballester, E., & Munuera-Aleman, J. L.
(2001). Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty.
[1] Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: European Journal of marketing, Vol. 35(11/12).1238-
Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. . New 58.
York: The Free Press.

i-Explore International Research Journal Consortium www.irjcjournals.org


International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR) ISSN: 2319-4421 78
Volume 3, No. 1, January 2014

[19] Deming , S. (2007). The Brand Who Cried Wolf. [35] Kempf, D. S., & Smith, R. E. (1998). (1998).
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Consumer processing of product trial and the
[20] Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994). Customer loyalty: influence of prior advertising: A structural modeling
toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal approach. Journal of Marketing Research.325-38.
of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 22(2).99- [36] Kerin, R. A., Jain, A., & Howard, D. J. (1992). Store
113. shopping experience and consumer price-quality-
[21] Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: value perceptions. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 68.376-
deviations from the Dirichlet model for repeat 76.
purchasing. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. [37] Klaus, P., & Maklan, S. (2007). The role of brands in
30.478-93. a service-dominated world. Journal of Brand
[22] Frow , P., & Payne , A. (2007). Towards the perfect Management, Vol. 15(2).115-22.
customer experience Journal of Brand Management, [38] LaSalle, D., & Britton, T. A. (2003). Priceless:
Vol. 15(2).89-101. Turning Ordinary Products into Extraordinary
[23] Gomez, B. G., Arranez, A. G., & Gillan, J. G. (2006). Experiences. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School
The role of loyalty program in behavioral and Press.
affective loyalty. Journal of Consumer Marketing, [39] Liu, M. T., Chu, R., Wong, I. A., Zúñiga, M. A.,
Vol. 23(7).387-96. Meng, Y., & Pang, C. (2012). Exploring the
[24] Ha, H., & Perks, H. (2005). Effects of consumer relationship among affective loyalty, perceived
perceptions of brand experience on the web: brand benefits, attitude, and intention to use co-branded
familiarity, satisfaction and brand trust. Journal of products. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and
Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 4(6).438-52. Logistics, Vol. 24(4).561-82.
[25] HÃubl, G. (1996). A cross-national investigation of [40] Liu, Y. (2007). The long-term impact of loyalty
the effects of country of origin and brand name on the programs on consumer purchase behavior and loyalty.
evaluation of a new car. International Marketing Journal of Marketing, Vol. 71(4).19-35.
Review, Vol. 13(5).76-97. [41] MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J.
[26] Hellier, P. K., Geursen, G. M., & Rickard, J. A. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect:
(2003). Customer repurchase intention: a general Distribution of the product and resampling methods.
structural equation model. European Journal of Multivariate behavioral research, Vol. 39(1).99-128.
Marketing, Vol. 37(11/12).1762-800. [42] McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F.
[27] Hess, J., & Story, J. (2005). Trust-based commitment: (2002). Building Brand Community. Journal of
multidimensional consumer-brand relationships. Marketing, Vol. 66(January).38-54.
Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 22(6).313-32. [43] Mitchell, A., & Olson, J. (1981). Are product attribute
[28] Hoch, S. J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1986). Consumer learning: beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on
advertising and the ambiguity of product experience. brand attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.
Journal of Consumer Research.221-33. 18.318-32.
[29] Holbrook, M. B. (2000). The millennial consumer in [44] Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The
the texts of our times: Experience and entertainment. commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing.
Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 20(2).178-92. The Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58.20-38.
[30] Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The [45] Morrison, S., & Crane, F. G. (2007). Building the
experiential aspects of consumption: consumer service brand by creating and managing an emotional
fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer brand experience. Journal of Brand Management, Vol.
Research.132-40. 14(5).410-21.
[31] Hui, M. K., & Bateson, J. E. (1991). Perceived control [46] Nunnally, C. J. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New
and the effects of crowding and consumer choice on York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
the service experience. Journal of Consumer [47] O’Cass, A., & Grace, D. (2004). Exploring consumer
Research.174-84. experiences with a service brand. Journal of Product
[32] Jacoby, J., & Chestnut, R. W. (1978). Brand Loyalty: & Brand Management, Vol. 13(4).257-68.
Measurement and Management New York: John [48] Oliver, R. L. (1981). Measurement and evaluation of
Wiley & Sons. satisfaction processes in retail settings. Journal of
[33] Kandampully, J., & Suhartanto, D. (2000). Customer Retailing, Vol. 57(3).25-48.
loyalty in the hotel industry: the role of customer [49] Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty?
satisfaction and image. International journal of Journal of Marketing, Vol. 63(4).33-44.
contemporary hospitality management, Vol. [50] Padgett, D., & Allen, D. (1997). Communicating
12(6).346-51. experiences: a narrative approach to creating service
[34] Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand management: brand image. Journal of advertising, Vol. 26(4).49-62.
building, measuring , and managing brand equity (2nd
ed.). Upper Saddle River, NY: Prentice Hall.

i-Explore International Research Journal Consortium www.irjcjournals.org


International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR) ISSN: 2319-4421 79
Volume 3, No. 1, January 2014

[51] Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (1995). (1995).


Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.93-130.
[52] Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the
experience economy. Harvard business review, Vol.
76.97-105.
[53] Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-
creation experiences: The next practice in value
creation. Journal of interactive marketing, Vol.
18(3).5-14.
[54] Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic
and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing
indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior
research methods, Vol. 40(3).879-91.
[55] Schmitt, B. H. (1999). Experiential Marketing: How
to Get Customers to Sense, Feel, Think, Act, and
Relate to Your Company and Brands. New York,
NY.: The Free Press.
[56] Suh, J. C., & Yi, Y. J. (2006). When brand attitudes
affect the customer satisfaction-loyalty relation: the
moderating role of product involvement. Journal of
Consumer Psychology, Vol. 16(2).145-55.
[57] Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Park, C. W. (2005).
The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of
Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands.
Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 15(1).77-91.
[58] Zarantonello, L., & Schmitt, B. H. (2010). Using the
brand experience scale to profile consumers and
predict consumer behaviour. Journal of Brand
Management, Vol. 17(7).532-40.

i-Explore International Research Journal Consortium www.irjcjournals.org

You might also like