Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Carrier To Interference (C /I Ratio) Calculations
Carrier To Interference (C /I Ratio) Calculations
Interference
(C /I ratio)
Calculations
1
Outlines the C/I calculation methodology for interference assessment
under No.11.32A w.r.t. coordination of networks under No. 9.7 (i.e. GSO
vs GSO satellite networks)
how the different type of carriers are categorized according to the class
of emission (itemC.7 a Annex 2 in Appendix 4)
9.65 If, at the date of receipt of a notice under No. 9.64 above, the Bureau
has been informed of a continuing disagreement, the Bureau shall examine
the notice under Nos. 11.32A or 11.33 and shall act in accordance with No.
11.38.
More complex than delta T/T and more detailed
C/I generation
Margin
B (↑ Emiss) G Rx ES Max
G Tx ES Max T ES
Beam Level
Group Level
B (↑ Emiss) G Rx ES Max
G Tx ES Max T ES
B (↑ Emiss) G Rx ES Max
G Tx ES Max T ES
FSL = 10log10(4πdf/c)2
k, Boltzmann constant = -228.6 dBW/K/Hz
Finding C/I Required
B (↑ Emiss) G Rx ES Max
G Tx ES Max T ES
Uplink C/N
C/N ↑ = PES Max+ GTx ES Max+ G(θ)Rx Sat- FSL(↑ Freq)- (k + TSat + B(↑ Emiss)) (dB)
Downlink C/N
C/N ↓ = PSat Max+ G(θ)Tx Sat+ GRx ES Max- FSL(↓ Freq)- (k + TES + B(↓ Emiss)) (dB)
Free Space Loss (Annex II of AP8)
FSL = 20 (log f + log d ) + 32.45 dB
where :
f : frequency (mHz)
d : distance (km)
where:
d = 42644(1-0.2954.cos ψ)0.5
where:
cos ψ= cos ζ x cos β
where :
Select C/N
Calculated Submitted
To summarize:
C/I = C/Ib - Ia
FSL’ (↑ Freq)
FSL (↑ Freq)
P ES Max P’ ES Max
G Tx ES Max G’(φ) Tx ES
C/I ↑ = C ↑ - I ↑ (dB)
2d1.d2
Where
d1 and d2 are the distances (km),
from earth station to the two
satellites separately
θg is the geocentric angular
separation in degrees between
the two satellites, taking the
longitudinal station-keeping
tolerances into account
1
Antenna reference patterns
Annex 3 of Appendix 7 of the Radio regulations
ITU-R S.580-6
ITU-R S.465-6
ITU-R BO.1900
ITU-R M.694-1
ITU-R BO.1213-1
ITU-R Bo.1295
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
An
gl
e
2
4.
5
7
9.
5
12
14
.5
17
Pattern1
REC-465
19
.5
22
24
.5
27
29
.5
32
34
.5
37
39
.5
Pattern2
REC-580
42
44
.5
47
49
.5
52
54
.5
57
59
7265
.5
62
Freq (MHz)
64
.5
67
69
.5
72
74
.5
60
77
79
Gmax (dBi) .5
82
84
.5
87
89
.5
92
94
.5
97
REC-580
REC-465
Finding C/I
G(θ’) Rx ES G Rx ES Max
C/I ↓ = C ↓ - I ↓ (dB)
C/I = C/Ib - Ia
Digital
METHOD 1: Wanted Bandwidth (BW) to Interfering BW
Overlapping Ratio Adjustment
METHOD 1: Co-freq.
TV/FM
METHOD 2: METHOD 3: Non co-freq.
Wanted BW to (Relative Protection Ratio)
Interfering Equivalent BW
Analogue
Overlapping Ratio
(Other than
Adjustment METHOD 2
TV/FM)
Other
Source: Table 1 in Section B3 of Rules of Procedures, ITU-R S.741-2
Finding C/I
BW: Necessary
Wanted Signal Bandwidth (Hz)
Interfering Signal
BWi
BW: Necessary
Wanted Signal Bandwidth (Hz)
Interfering Signal
BWi
Ia = 10log10 (BWoverlap / BWi)
BW: Necessary
Wanted Signal Bandwidth (Hz)
BW: Necessary
Wanted Signal Bandwidth (Hz)
Interfering Signal
(Analogue with
Gaussian
distribution)
BWeq
Wanted Signal
(TV/FM)
Frequency Offset
Interfering Signal
(TV/FM)
To summarize:
Wanted Signal
Interfering Signal
• Negative Margin:
Potential for harmful interference
Results
3
EXAMPLE 1
Wanted
Interfering
Interfering
`THAICOM-AK2
INTERSPUTNIK-75E-Q