Professional Documents
Culture Documents
J . W. Lo~vwAXD A. S. I<. A r ~ o o
DeQai.title?~tof' Cheiizistry, Univeisily of' Alberta, Edt7zot110~1,
illberta
Received June 17, 1'366
Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 114.5.218.53 on 04/19/20. For personal use only.
Recently, a novel method llas been introduced by Millar and Wilson (12, 13) and Stille
and Foster (14), namely, the dehydration of the appropriate tertiary diols in high-boiling
solve~ltssuch as diethyl phthalate. In this way, quinodinlethanes derived froin the anthra-
cene and phenantllrene series have been generated and trapped by dienophiles, such as
maleic anhydride, benzoq~~inone, and dimethyl acetylene dicarboxylate.
An interest in the homogeneous dehydrogenation of hydroaroinatic coinpounds with
high-potential quinones (15) led us to investigate the dehydrogenation of aromatic hydro-
carboils as a method of generating quinodimethanes.
'The driving force for the hydrogen transfer reaction, represented schematically below,
2507
2505 C.-\NADIAN JOURNAL O F CHEMISTRY. VOL. 4-1, 1906
is provided by the gain in resonance energy of both reactants (15). ;\Iolecular orbital
calculations predict that the resonance energy of P-xylylenes is conlparable I\ ith that of
the beiizenoid precursor (16) (e.g. 9-xylylene itself has a resonance energy of 3S kcal/mole
compared \\it11 ca. 36 kcal/mole for ;h-xylene). Therefore, the dehydrogenation of a
dimethyl aronlatic hydrocarbon to a quinodimethane is energetically feasible. The
generating reactant also acts as a dienopllile, and therefore \\.ill trap the quinodimetl~ane.
Since the reaction is homogeneous, unlike the various methods described above, order-of-
magnitude estimates may be made of the rate of the reaction bet~veenthe quinodimethane
Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 114.5.218.53 on 04/19/20. For personal use only.
and the dienophile, as sllown beloxv. By using different quinones, illlorination is obtained
on the steric requirements of the subsequent reactions.
9,10-A~ztl~raq~~i~zodimetlzane
Previous attempts to prepare anthraquinodimetliane by tlie pyrolysis of 9,lO-dimethq-l-
anthracene were unsuccessful (2). Dehydration of 9,10-dimethyl-9,10-dihq-drox~~-9,10-
dihydroanthracene in boiling diethyl phthalate in the presence of a dienophile gave
1 : l or 1:2 adducts (13, 17). We have observed that cis-9,10-dirnethyl-9,10-dihq-dro-
anthracene (18) reacts readily with 3 moles of tetracl~loro-1,2-be1~zoq~1iiione and that the
reaction is not confined to a simple dehydrogenation to 9,10-di111et11yla11t11race11e, The
product mixture Ivas complex, hut by repeated chroiiiatographg~in benzene on aluiiiina a
Can. J. Chem. 1966.44:2507-2515.
The structure \\-as confirmed by ozonolysis, \\-hich gave formaldehyde (isolated as the
dimedone derivative) and a yellow solid V, C21I-IloC1403, the n.m.r. spectruni of \vllicl~
rcscmbles that of IV except for the absence of the olefinic band. The infrared spectruiil of
17 shows a strong carboiiyl absorption, as expected.
9,lO-Dimethylantliracene similarly reacts \\-it11 2 llloles of tetrachloro-l,2-benzoquinone
to give IV as tlie main isolable product. The deep-red color of the quinone allo~vsmeasure-
n~eiitof the reaction rates by a simple spectrokinetic procedure, the details of ~vhiclihave
LOWN A N D AIDOO: QUISODIIVIETI-IANE CHEMISTRY 2509
been presented else\\-here (21). I t was thus sllo\vi~that cis- and trans-9,lO-dimethyl-9,lO-
dihydroanthracene undergo rapid, triply consecutive, second-order reactions with 3 moles
of the quinone, with a relatively slow initial step. T h e reaction of 9,1O-diinetl~g~lanthracei1e
and tetracl1loro-1,2-benzoquinoi~e, n-hich n.as bimolecular, consecutive second order n it11
a fast second step (i.e. Diels-Alder reaction of the quinodimethane \\-it11 tlie quinone),
was 30-GO times faster than the reaction of the dihydrodiilietl~ylanthracenes.
On the basis of the evidence of the isolated product and the rate d a t a , the follon ing two
series of reactions can be postulated.
Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 114.5.218.53 on 04/19/20. For personal use only.
Scheme 1 Scheme 2
folloxved by decoriiposition of the ozonide with steain gave a yello~vsolid, the i1.ni.r.
spectruili of \vhicli showed the absence of vinyl protons; the infrared spectrum shoxb-ed a
ne\v carboiipl. Mass spectronietry showed a inolecular ion pealc measuring 499.0543,
compared with 499.9540 calculated for C251-11203C14. A strong peak in the spectrum at
m/e 256 n-as expected and is due to the following fragiiientatioii.
Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 114.5.218.53 on 04/19/20. For personal use only.
This iiiterpretation is based on the very recent analogy provided by the mass spectrulii
of an adduct of tetrachloro-1,2-bciizoqi1inone and abietic acid (22).
is based, by analogy, on the studies of Ansell (23), in which the powerfully electron-
attracting nitrile groups so enhance the dienophilic character of the double bond to u-hich
they are attached that addition taltes place exclusively a t this bond. Attempts to prove
this point by the base-catalyzed elimination of hydrocyailic acid were unsuccessful owing
to thc general lability of the substance towards the action of strong bases.
CI
Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 114.5.218.53 on 04/19/20. For personal use only.
CN CN
IX
The material is assigned structure IX by analogy with a similar ether obtained by the
reaction of 2,2-dirnethylindane with the same quinone (20), and the structure was proved
by clcavage of the ether linltage with hydriodic acid and reduction of the resulting
9-iodon~ethyleneanthracenewit11 lithiunl aluillinium hydride to 9-methylanthracene.
Thc scope of the above method of generating 9- and o-quinodiinethanes in other systems,
particularly the phenanthrene and acepleiadylene series, is being investigated.
EXPERIMENTAL
Melting points were talcell on a Fisher-Johns apparatus and are uncorrected. Infrared spectra were
recorded on a Perkin-Elmer model 421 spectrophotometer. Only the principal, sharply defined peaks are
reported. Nuclear lnagnetic resonance spectra were recorded OII a Varian )\-GO analytical spectrometer
operating a t a hxed radiofrequency of GO Mc.p.s. The spectra were measured on a n approximately 15%
(w/v) solution in a n appropriate solvent, with tetramethylsilane a s a standard. Line positions are reported
in parts per million from the reference. Absorption spectra were recorded in 'spectrol-grade solvents on a
Beclanan DB recording spectrophotorneter. Mass spectra were obtained on an i\EI-MS-9 high-resolution
mass spectrometer. Microanalyses were carried out by Dr. C. DaesslC, Organic Microanalyses Ltd., Montreal,
Quebec, and by Miss D. Roberts, Microanalytical Laboratory, Chemistry Department, University of Alberta,
Edmonton, Alberta.
Renctio?~of 9,10-Di111ethylnntltracemzvitJz Tetraclzloro-1,d-brnoqziinone
:\ mixture of 4.506 g (0.022 mole) of 9,1O-dimethylanthrace11eand 10.822 g (0.044 mole) of tetrachloro-
1,2-benzoquinone in 100 ml of sodium-dried benzene was refluxed under nitrogen for 2 days, cooled, diluted
~ v i t h150 1111 of IZ-hexane, and filtered to remove hydroquinone. The filtrate was concentrated i n uaczlo t o
ca. 40 ml and passed down a colurnr~of grade I alumina to remove hydroquinone and unreacted quinone.
Elution with 1:l benzene-n-hesane and evaporation of the solvents gave a pale-yellow crystalline solid
(2.3 g) as the first fraction. Careful chromatography of this fraction on alu~ninain 1:2 benzene-n-hexane
gave, as the main component, a colorless crystalline solid (1.75 g, 18% yield), which was purified by recrystal-
lization frorn ethyl acetate, m.p. 240" fdecomp.).
;\rial. Calcd. for C??I.I13ClJO2(450.12): C, 58.6; 1-1, 2.9; C1, 31.50. 1;ound: C , 58.4; 1-1, 3.2; Cl, 31.9; ~nol.wt.
(ebullioscopic in benzene) 444.4.
Infrared spectrum: vmoX (CHC13) 1 422 cm-I (s) (characteristic (20) of a six-membered tetrachlorobenzo-
dioxan structure) ; no absorption in the region expected for 013 or C=O. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum
(CDCI3):5.80 (2H, singlet, vinyl protons), 3.94 (213, singlet, -CI-12-0), 7.44 (81-1, complex aromatic absorp-
tion). Absorption spectrunl (cyclohexane): A, 302 mp (log e 3.48), 253 mp (sh) (log e 4.20), 230 mp (sh)
(log c 4.69).
Subseque~ltfractions of the chromatogram consisted of mixtures of minor, higher molecular weight, colored
products which could not be separated.
2312 C.\NADI:\?: JOURS.\I, OF CI-IISMISTRY. VOL. '14. 1966
dioxin structure ("O)), 1 672 cm-I (CEO stretching). Nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum (CDCI,): 4.06
(21-1, singlet, -C1-120-), 7.45 (81-1, complex aromatic absorption) ; no vinyl absorption was present. Absorp-
tion spectrum (CI-13CS):A,,,.,3.05 mp (sh) (log t 3.4i?),264 m p (log eI.GS), 230 nip (sh) (log s 4.35).
Reacbion of 9,10-Di?r~ethylanthrace71e
zuitl~2,S-Dicltloro-5,6-dicya~zobenzoqr~ino~~e
A solution of 2.027 g (0.0099 mole) of 9,10-dimethylanthracene in 75 ml of warm benzene was added to a
solutio~lof 6.79 g (0.03 mole) of 2,3-dichloro-S,G-dicyanobe1~zoq~1i1~0t1e in 225 ml of warm benzene, with
shaking. There was a n immediate darkening of the solution caused by charge transfer complexing; then a
copious yelloxv precipitate separated. T h e mixture was refluxed for 7 h and cooled, and the solid was collected.
Extraction of the solid with hot acetone left the insoluble brown hydroquinone, and evaporation of the extract
gave adduct VIII a s a bright-yellow crystalline solid (1.86 g, 28.2% yield), m.p. 21'7" (decomp.).
X ~ C I ~C, 5S.38; I-I, 1.85; S,S.51; Cl, 21.54. Found: C, 58.44; 1-1, 2.30;
Anal. Calcd. for C ~ ~ H I ? O ~ (65S.35):
K,5.36; Cl, 21.74; mol. nrt. (by mass spectrometry) 656 ( T I ) .
L O W S A N D XIDOO: Q U I K O D I M E T H A 9 E CIIEMISTRY 2313
Infrared spectrum: v,,,,, (Sujol mull) 1 726 cm-I (br) (enedione C=O), 2 245 cm-1 (m) ( C e X ) . Zuclear
magnetic resonance spectrum ((CD3)2SO): 4.82 (21-1, singlet, 'angular' protons), 6.32 (21-1, singlet, vinyl
protons), 7.50-8.:30 (41-1, .-Mi2aromatic protons), -&\I3 quartet, J = 16 c.p.s., centers of gravity a i 4.17 and
4.37 (CI-I? proions). (See 1:ig. 1.) .-\bsorptio11 spectrum (CI-13CX):A,,, 375 mp (log e 3.19), 275 nip (log E
4.31), 260 mp (sh) (log e4.25), 234 m p (log e4.75).
Reactioir c$I/-il~ctlryluiillric~ce~~e
with 2,3-Diclrloro-ci,fi-dicy~~nobei~eoqrrit~o~~e
11 solution of 2.4 g (0.0106 mole) of ~,3-dichloro-;i,6-dicyar1ober1zoc~uino1ie in 45 ml of d r y benzene was
added to a solution of 1 g (0.0032 mole) of 0-~nethylanthracenein 5 ml of dry benzene. The solution clarl;ened,
;ind alter it \\,;IS refluxed for 10 min :I light-yellow precipitate separated. 'I'he mixture was relluxed for 2 h
Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 114.5.218.53 on 04/19/20. For personal use only.
and cooled, and tlie solid was collected by liltration. ?'he major product was insoluble in chloroform, methanol,
acetollitrile, dimethyl sulfoxide, and benzene, and was purified by Sohslet extractio~ifrom it of impurities
with methanol, leaving a bright-yello\\r solicl (1.1 g, 34.6% yield), 111.p.215" (decomp.).
Anal. Calcd. for C3sl-I!~C12N202(609.487): C, 74.87; 14, 3.61; CI, 11.66; S , 4.61. 1;ound: C, 74.74; 1-1,
3.85; CI, 11.98; X, 4.42; mol. \vt. (by mass spectrometry) 608 (32CI).
Infrared spectrum: v,,,:,, ( I W r disk) 1 425 c~n-' (s) (C-0-C linkage GO)),2 216 cm-1 ( C s X ) .
r\dduct I S (0.227 g, 0.00U86 mole) was relluxed \\.it11 a m i x t ~ ~ ofr e 5 1111 of 57'3, hydriodic acid a11c13 ml of
water for S 11. \Vhite crystals of $1-iodomethyleneanthmce~~c (45 mg), m.p. 65-66', \\yhich had sublimed into
the condenser were removed and dried i i ~ afrczln. 'The substance, n,ithout further p~~rilication, was clissolvcd
ill I() ml of dry ether, treated with a solution of 85 mg of lithi~irna l u m i n i u r ~hydride,
~ and stirred for 4 h.
'rlie mixture was cooled, unreacted hydride decon~posedwith water, and the orgaltic layer r e ~ l ~ o v eEvapora- d.
tion of the ethcr gave yellow crystals of $1-methylantliracene, m.p. 74-75", mixed 1n.p. \\rith authentic
9-1nethylantl~racene 54-75'. The n.1n.r. spectrum in CDCI3 \x7asidentical with that of a n authentic sample of
the hydrocarbon.
Can. J. Chem. 1966.44:2507-2515.
~ ~ ) ~ ~Reactioi~
l i . ~ l of 9,10-~i~1~etb~l-9,10-dik~dro-0,10-elhoi~oo~~thiace~c-11,12-dicr~rbor~lic ilnlrydiidc witl~
Tetir~clrloro-l ,2-betr~o(plii~oi~c
A of 1.1s g (0.00:3!) mole) of !),lO-dimethyl-!),l0-diliydro-!J,l0-etl1anoanthmcene-ll,l%-dicarboxylic
anhydride and 1.65 g (0.0068 mole) of the quinone i l l 4.5 rnl of dry 1,2-dichlorobenze11e was heated in a
collstant-te~npcraturebath a t 101' for 44 h. The mixture was concentrated to a srnall volume and cooled,
and the white crystalline solid was collected arld ivnshed with benzene, yieldi~igthe unchanged a d d ~ r c t
(1 .()!) g, I)2(;b recovery), i i i . ~330°,
. mixed m.p. with a n a ~ ~ t h e ~sample
~ t i c 330' (lit. (25) rn.p. :i33-335°).
dJ(rtcrinls
I'lu-e I,?-cliclilorol~enzenewas distilled from sodium n ~ had
~ d b.p. 177-178" a t $50 Innl, t~$? 1.5518 ('74).
Co~l~mercial sarnples of tetrachloro-1,2-be11zoquinone and 2,:3-dichloro-5,6-dicyil11obe11zoqui101e\\!ere puri-
fied by sl~blimationand by recrystallizntior~froul benzene-iz-hesane, respectively, the benzene of crystalliza-
tion being removed in a vacuum desiccator.
Iieactioi~IZules
'I'he rates were dcterrni~~ed
by followi~~gspecirophoto~netricallythe disappearance of the colorcd q ~ ~ i ~ ~ o i i e .
'rhc E a values \\-ere determined by graphical extrapolatioi~.?'he experimental niethod used a r ~ ddetailed
trcattnent of the rate data have been describcd previously (21).
IGnetic Eqltutions E+rr.ployed
e ; b mole I-' = the initial conccntmtioll of hydro-
Let a mole 1-1 = the illitin1 c o n c e ~ ~ t m t i oofn c l u i ~ ~ o nlet
carbon; lei :r mole 1-1 = the amount of cluinone consumed a t time 1; let the initial extinction of the quinonc
;lt 5 600 A be E o ;let the esti~ictionof the cluinone a t 5 GOO A a t time t be E. T h e meaning of the symbols
RI-I, RI-I?,and I< used below is explained in tlie Discussion.
Uiv~olrcula~, IZeactioi~with Fast S C L U
C o i r ~ c ~ ~ ~Seco?~d-Order
tme, TL~
Step
T r i k l y Co)rsec~ltivc,
Seco~zdOrder Reactiorz with Slow Initial Step
Can. J. Chem. 1966.44:2507-2515.
S ~ ~ i i i ~ i ?ofa Rate
r y Co?csta?tts
T h e units for the following rates are liters per mole per second. The initial concentration of hydrocarboll
a n d quinone in 1,2-dichlorobenzene was 0.0100 A t .
Arrhe?~izcsRate Paraw~eters
'l'he Arrlie~liusparameters were computed by the method of least squares and their precision (standard
LOWX AND AIDOO: QUINODI~LIETHANECI-IEMISTRY 2515
deviation) by the equations set out in in a previous paper (21). The vallies of hob,. a t SO0 mere obtained by
least-squares interpolation.
Hy+ocarbon ks00 (1 mole-' s-I) E (kcal/mole) loglo B
cis-9,lO-Dlhydro-9,lO-
dimethylan thracene 9.9SfO.lSXlO-" 14.654~0.53 7.03
trans-9,lO-Dihydro-
9,lO-dimethylanthracene 5.27&0. 16X10-3 15.00f0.40 6.97
9,lO-Dimethylnnthracene 4.22&0.10 X lo-? 12.96&0.16 6.65
ACI<NOWLEDGMEX'TS
Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 114.5.218.53 on 04/19/20. For personal use only.
REFERENCES
1. M. SZWAIIC. Discussio~~sFaraday Soc. 2,46 (1947).
2. M. SZWARC.J. Polymer Sci. 6, 319 (1951).
3. M. SZWARC. J. Chem. Phis. 16, 128 (1948).
4. E B. F. LANDRUM.J. ilm. Chenl. Soc. 79,4952 (1957).
L. E R ~ E Dand
5. ROPER. U.S. Patent S o . 2,798,052 (1957).
6. F. G. MANNand F. I-I. C. STEWART. J. Chem. Soc. 2826 (1934).
7. H. E. WIXBERG, L , C. 1V. TIIEOBALD. 1. .lm. Chem. Soc. 82, 1428
F. S. I;AWCETT,117. E. ~ I O C H Eand
Can. J. Chem. 1966.44:2507-2515.
(1960).
8. P. D. GARDNER and 1-1. SA~RAFI~ADEI-1. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 82,4287 (1060).
9. D. J. CRAMand G. I<. I<NOX. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 83,2204 (1961).
10. L,. A. ERREDE. J . .4m. Chem. Soc. 83, 049 (1961).
11. L. A. ERREDE and l3. I?. LASDIIUM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79,4952 (1957).
12. I. 1'.MILLARand I<. V. WILSON. Proc. Chem. Soc. 217 (1963).
13. I. T. M I L L A R I<. WILSOX. J . Chem. Soc. 2121 (1964).
~ ~\7.I ~
14. T. I<. STILLEand R. T. FOSTER.J. Org. Chem. 28,2708 (1063).
15. L. RII. JACTCAIAN. I n Advances in organic chemistry. Vol. 11. Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York.
1960. p. 320, and references therein.
16. C. A. COUI~SOX, D. P. CRAIG, 11. A~IACCOLL, and A. PULLMAN.Discussions Faraday Soc. 2, 36 (1947).
17. I. 'r. MILLARand I<. E. I<ICHARDS.Chem. Commun. 15, 369 (1065).
18. L. M. JACICXAS and J. W. LOWN. J . Chem. Soc. 3776 (1962).
19. L. M. JACIC~IAN. ilpplications of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in organic chemistry.
Pergalnon Press, New York. 1950.
20. E. A. BIIAUDE,L. bI. JACIZIIAN, I<. P. LINSTEAD, alld G. LOWE. J. Chen~.Soc. 3123 (1060).
21. E. A. B I L ~ U DL.E ,h,I. JACICIIAX, I<. P. LINSTEAD, and J. S. SHANNON.J. Chem. Soc. 3116 (1960).
22. T. R. I<ASTURI. E. RAGEIAVAX. S. DEV.and D. I<. BANEIITEE.Tetrahedron. 22. 745 (19661.
23. M. F. .\P*SELL,'G. C. CLLLIXG, B. 111. NASII,and J . W. L ~ W N . Proc. Chem. SO;. 405'(1960).
24. '1'. CAIISWLLL. Ind. Eng. Chem. 20, 728 (1028).
23. s I<LOET%EL.J. ;\III. Chem. Soc. 60,451 (1935).
\V. E. ~ a c ~ ~ a~ ur l ~d11.s C.
This article has been cited by:
6. W. Friedrichsen. 1969. Reaktionen von o-chinonen mit dienen. Tetrahedron Letters 10:51, 4425-4428. [Crossref]
Can. J. Chem. 1966.44:2507-2515.