Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Drive Test Softwares Quality of drive test tools should be asessed as wel
Results
Jan-20 Jan-20 Comments Feb-20 Feb-20 Comments
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Criteria
Scale 1 - 5
Excellent 5
Good 4
Average 3
Poor 2
Unacceptable 1
Not Evaluated 0
Tools Assessment Jan-20
The assesment should be based on
required number of mobile devices
Mobile Devices
available with the subco. Quality of of
mobile should be used as well
Quality of drive test tools should be
Drive Test Softwares
asessed as well
Quality of post processing output and
Post Processing Softwares
Report
Rigger Tools Quality of Tools used by Riggers
Results
Jan-20 Comments Feb-20 Feb-20 Comments Scale 1 - 5
#DIV/0!
Criteria
Excellent 5
Good 4
Average 3
NA Poor 2
Unacceptable 1
Not Evaluated 0
NA
NA
Tools Assessment Jan-20
The assesment should be based on
required number of mobile devices
Mobile Devices
available with the subco. Quality of of
mobile should be used as well
Quality of drive test tools should be
Drive Test Softwares
asessed as wel
Quality of post processing output and
Post Processing Softwares
Report
Rigger Tools Quality of Tools used by Riggers
Results
Jan-20 Comments Feb-20 Feb-20 Comments Scale 1 - 5
Criteria
Scale 1 - 5
Excellent 5
Good 4
Average 3
Poor 2
Unacceptable 1
Not Evaluated 0
Tools Assessment
Drive Test Softwares Quality of drive test tools should be asessed as wel
Results
Jan-20 Jan-20 Comments Feb-20
Excellent 5
Good 4
Average 3
They have tools for the job but some of
them are not equiped with major tool like Poor 2
inclinometer
Unacceptable 1
Not Evaluated 0
Drive Test Softwares Quality of drive test tools should be asessed as wel
Results
Jan-20 Jan-20 Comments Feb-20
4 4
4 4
4 4
3 3
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
3.88 3.88
Feb-20 Comments Scale 1 - 5
Criteria
Excellent 5
Good 4
Average 3
Poor 2
Unacceptable 1
Not Evaluated 0