You are on page 1of 3

Computers & Geosciences 26 (2000) A1±A3

Geoscience after IT
Part A. De®ning information technology, its signi®cance in
geoscience, and the aims of this publication
p

T.V. Loudon
British Geological Survey, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LA, UK

Abstract

Information technology deals with tools for handling information, notably computers and networks. It brings
bene®ts such as more ecient and rigorous formation and expression of ideas, and wider sharing and integration of
knowledge. This review should help practicing geoscientists and students to gain a broader understanding of these
changes and form a view on future trends. 7 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Information technology; Metainformation

1. De®ning information technology computer software and hardware, including memory


and disk storage; printers; the telephone, cable, broad-
Geoscience after IT, published as a book (Loudon, casting and computer networks; oce copiers; facsi-
2000) and a special issue of Computers & Geosciences, mile (fax) machines; DVDs; video cameras; image
o€ers a broad overview of the impact of information scanners; televisions and monitors; data loggers and
technology on the work of geoscientists, seen against automated instruments in the ®eld and laboratory; sen-
the background of evolving global communication on sors on satellite cameras or downhole logging tools;
the Internet. digital surveying equipment.
Information technology (IT) refers to methods of IT applications seldom respect disciplinary bound-
handling information by automatic means, including aries. The focus here is geoscience, centered on geology
computing, telecommunications and oce systems. It but inevitably overlapping into such subjects as geo-
deals with a wide range of mostly electronic devices for physics, geochemistry, economic geology, engineering
collecting, storing, manipulating, communicating and geology, and soil science. I occasionally stray into re-
displaying information. Examples of IT devices are: lated aspects of environmental science, surveying and
geomorphology, but try to steer clear of such topics as
hydrology, meteorology or oceanography, which may
p
The views expressed by the author are not necessarily
be parts of the Earth Sciences in the wide sense, but
those of the British Geological Survey or any other organiz-
ation. I thank those providing examples, but should point out
are well covered in their own specialized publications.
that the mention of proprietary products does not imply a A primary task of geoscientists is to add to the base
recommendation or endorsement of the product. of recorded knowledge. Philosophers have made vali-
E-mail address: v.loudon@bgs.ac.uk (T.V. Loudon). ant attempts to say what knowledge is (see, for

0098-3004/00/$ - see front matter 7 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 9 8 - 3 0 0 4 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 0 3 6 - 4
A2 T.V. Loudon / Computers & Geosciences 26 (2000) A1±A3

example Audi, 1998). Workers in computer expert sys- 3. This publication


tems and knowledge bases take a more pragmatic
approach. Addis (1985) de®nes knowledge as ``justi®ed 3.1. Target readers
true belief'', seen not as referring to a state of the
brain, but as a shared human response to a complex . Practicing geoscientists with a general interest in
environment. Information can be de®ned as something how modern information technology (IT) will a€ect
that adds to one's knowledge and understanding, and their work and in¯uence future directions in their
includes data (known facts) and their interpretation. science.
The pre®x meta- is sometimes used to refer to a higher . Geoscientists, familiar with computer or IT appli-
logical type. Thus metalanguage deals with the nature, cations in their own specialist ®eld, who need a
structure or behavior of language. Similarly, metadata broader perspective on future trends.
is the name sometimes given to data about data, . Students or educators specializing in IT applications
describing the data so that they can be understood in geoscience who require a top-down view of their
beyond their originating project. The broader term subject.
metainformation refers to information about infor-
mation. De®nitions of knowledge, information and
data seem to lead more rapidly than most to circular-
ity. However, as the underlying concepts are familiar, 3.2. Objectives
these should serve our present purpose.
To provide an overview and rapid reference to assist
readers to:
. understand the ways in which geoscientists can col-
lect, record, analyze, explain, assemble and commu-
nicate information in the evolving geoscience
2. The signi®cance of IT to geoscience information system;
. understand how IT a€ects methodology and enables
Modern IT o€ers opportunities for more e€ective hidden constraints imposed by traditional methods
handling of geoscience information in three main to be overcome;
areas. The ®rst is the obvious ability of computers to . understand the theory underlying IT applications
calculate, thus opening up possibilities of more rigor- and know how to ®nd examples and guidance for
ous analysis with quantitative and statistical methods, their implementation;
and more vivid graphical presentation with visualiza- . form a view on future trends and thence develop a
tion techniques. A second area is the manipulation and framework to in¯uence new developments and oper-
management of information. This starts with the abil- ate e€ectively within them.
ity to move words around in a word processor or to
move elements of a picture in a graphics system. It
leads to the ability to capture data, store vast quan-
tities of information in a database or document man- 3.3. Structure and overview
agement system, and retrieve speci®c items on demand.
A third area is hypertext linkage with rapid dissemina- One e€ect of IT can be to separate content from
tion and display of multimedia information through container. The same material can be held (as here) in
worldwide telecommunications and the Internet. an electronic archive and presented as a book, a
IT in¯uences the way in which scientists investigate special issue of a journal or a set of articles for brows-
the real world, how they are organized, how they com- ing on screen or printing locally. I have tried to har-
municate, what they know and how they think. They monize the results with established bibliographic
depend less of intermediaries like typists, cartogra- conventions and terminology, and apologize for any
phers, librarians and publishers for acquiring infor- remaining confusion.
mation and disseminating their ®ndings. They can Although I wrote this account for reading in
collaborate more widely, thanks to better control and sequence, there is probably enough repetition and
¯ow of information. Individual workers and groups cross-reference for you to refer to sections out of con-
can enjoy greater autonomy within a de®ned, shared text. I hope you will have little diculty in dipping
framework. into sections of interest from the table of contents,
Taken together, the bene®ts from IT (see part B) abstracts and keywords. Internal cross-references
include better science, cost savings, and speed and should help you to follow threads leading to similar
¯exibility in data collection, storage, retrieval, com- topics.
munication and presentation. The parts deal with the following topics.
T.V. Loudon / Computers & Geosciences 26 (2000) A1±A3 A3

Parts A and B: de®nitions and motivation. dards for the global network of cross-referenced
Information technology deals with tools for knowledge, and the particular value of well-orga-
handling information, notably computers and net- nized structures of geoscience knowledge. They help
works. Geoscience can bene®t from IT through us to understand the emerging geoscience infor-
more ecient and rigorous formulation and ex- mation system, to de®ne our requirements and to
pression of ideas, and wider sharing and integration build on current initiatives and opportunities, which
of knowledge, Progress requires a broad systems are outlined here.
view. This account should help geoscientists to
understand the overall changes and form a view on
future trends.
Parts C±H: familiarization with IT methods and the
Acknowledgements
underlying theory.
Not all geoscientists are familiar with available
I remember with gratitude the help of too many col-
methods of IT, although these in¯uence all phases
leagues to list here. In particular, Dan Merriam and
of a project and every time of information. This
Graeme Bonham-Carter have made this publication
review looks for underlying principles, moving from
possible, and Peter Henn and Lee Hodge of Elsevier
individual to project to global requirements. It
have o€ered patient guidance. I am indebted to the
tracks the process of familiarization, from ubiqui-
British Geological Survey for access to their facilities
tous tasks like word processing through statistical
and for moral and intellectual support. I am grateful
analysis and computer visualization to the manage-
to Dr Peter Allen for his encouragement over many
ment of databases and repositories.
years, and to John McInnes and Bob McIntosh for
Parts I±M: the emerging system.
their constructive advice.
Earlier parts dwell on the bene®ts of IT and the
nature of IT tools. For a clearer view of how geo-
science and IT will interact, we need to reconsider
References
our own methods of investigation: how we observe,
remember and record, how we build knowledge Addis, T.R., 1985. Designing Knowledge-Based Systems.
from information, cope with changing ideas, and Kogan Page Ltd, London 322 pp.
create a shared record in the geoscience information Audi, R., 1998. Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction
system. Our methods relate to the potential of IT: to the Theory of Knowledge. Routledge, London 340 pp.
the ¯exibility of hypermedia, the developing stan- Loudon, T.V., 2000. Geoscience after IT. Elsevier, Oxford.

You might also like