Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOCTRINE: The purpose of the awarding of nominal damages is not to indemnify the plaintiff, but rather to
vindicate or recognize the violation or invasion of his right.
FACTS:
Marquez entrusted the custody of her 3 month old child, Justine, to Merano as the latter has already gained
her trust.
However, Merano failed to return Justine to Marquez. Marquez contacted Merano and tried to find her
several times. She was able to get in contact with Merano however the latter always failed to show up.
Merano later informed Marquez that her baby was with the Sps. Castillos and that she should get her from
them.
Sps. Castillos refused to give back Justine nd even went through the process of legally adopting her. During
this process, Justine was turned over to the DSWD.
Marquez charged Merano with Kidnapping under Art. 270 of the RPC.
Both the RTC and the CA found Merano guilty of the crime charged.
However, the CA also awarded Marquez nominal damages in addition to the moral and exemplary
damages awarded by the RTC.
RULING: Since it was proven that the right of the Marquez as apparent was violated, the award of nominal damages to
vindicate her of her rights is just and valid.