Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Number
Type of the
Individual ☒ Collaborative ☒ of 4
activity:
weeks
Moment of Unit
Initial ☐ ☒ Final ☐
evaluation Intermediate:
Delivery Environment of the
Evaluative score of the activity: Collaborative Learning and
activity: 90 Monitoring and Evaluation
Environment
Starting date of the activity: Deadline of the activity:
15/02/2019 14/03/2019
Competence to develop:
The student analyzes the importance of intellectual property rights
protection, as a differentiating factor to stand out in the competitive
markets.
Topics to develop:
Activities to develop
Individual:
IP Comparative Chart
Student name: Date
IP form IP Descriptio Exampl
(Traditional/nontraditional Typ n e
) e
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Also, it is mandatory that the person who solve the survey and
the student, sign a confidentiality agreement attached in the
Collaborative Learning Environment as Annex 2 - Confidentiality
agreement (Consentimiento Informado)
Environment
Collaborative Learning, Monitoring and Evaluation
for the
Environment
development
Products to Individual:
deliver by
Each student submits to the Monitoring and Evaluation
student
Environment a .zip file named VNT_Step 1_Student
Name including:
Collaborative:
● Cover
● Introduction
● Objectives
● Table of contents
● Problem tree diagram of each student (Activity
6)
● Problem definition (200 words paragraph)
(Activity 8)
● References (Use APA)
Roles to ● Compiler
perform by ● Reviewer
the student ● Evaluator
in the ● Deliveries
collaborative ● Alerts
group
3. Evaluation rubric
Evaluation rubric
Collabora
Activity
Individual Activity ☒ tive ☒
type:
Activity
Moment of Unit
the Initial ☐ Intermed ☒ Final ☐
evaluation iate:
Performance levels of the individual
Assessed activity Scor
Aspects Low e
High score Media score
score
The student
submit to the
The student
Monitoring and The
submit to the
Evaluation student
Monitoring and
Environment does not
Evaluation
a .zip file submit any
Understandi including the Environment
file to the
ng of a .zip file
comparative Monitoring
intellectual chart and three describing
and
property traditional and 30
creative Evaluation
(IP) assets infographics nontraditional
Environme
and its legal defining properly IP, but it is not nt,
protection following the
the IP types and describing
given
describing the IP
guidelines
legal protection
for traditional IP
(up to 30 (up to 15 (up to 0
points) points) points)
Identify The student The student The 30
technologic submit to submit to student
intangible Google form the Google form does not
assets development the submit any
investment and the audio of development survey to
towards one Survey to and the audio Google
digital identify and of one Survey forms or it
transformati characterize to identify and is not
on to stand medium-sized characterize according
out in enterprises for medium-sized to a
competitive digital enterprises for mediun-
markets transformation digital sized
identifying
transformation
intangible assets
answering only
as a
some of the
differentiating enterprise
questions
factor to stand
proposed for
out in competitiv
the diagnosis
e markets
(up to 30 (up to 15 (up to 0
points) points) points)
Performance levels of the collaborative
Assessed activity Scor
Aspect Low e
High score Media score
score
The student
posts in the The student
The
Collaborative posts in the
student
Learning forum Collaborative
does not
a creative Learning forum
post any
problem tree a diagram
Describe problem
diagram, identifying the
problems in tree or
identifying research
a real diagram in 15
clearly the problem, but
business relation to
research there is not a
context the
problem, clear deduction
proposed
deducing causes of causes and
research
and consequences
consequences
(Up to 15 (Up to 10 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Strength The student The student The 15
written com submits the PDF submits the student
munication s document to the PDF document does not
kills Collaborative to the submit the
Learning Collaborative PDF
Environment Learning document
forum, including Environment to the
a group research forum, but it Collaborati
problem does not ve
description, present a clear Learning
description of Environme
evidencing
the research nt,
proper spelling
problem or it is describing
and grammar,
missing some the
following all
of the given research
given guidelines
guidelines problem
(Up to 15 (Up to 10 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Final score 90