14/04/2020 Why this pardon for Britain’s gay men is so inadequate | Owen Jones | Opinion | The Guardian

Why this pardon for Britain’s gay men is so

inadequate
Owen Jones
Lives were destroyed by unjust laws enforced by the state. The effects of this injustice are still felt
today
Wed 1 Feb 2017 19.38 GMT

A
pardon for Britain’s persecuted gay men represents an important nod to justice, but
it somehow sticks in the craw. How can it not? Pardons imply an act of forgiveness
for wrongdoing, not absolving the innocent of unjust guilt. Crimes and wrongdoing
were committed not by men damned for who they were attracted to and who they
loved, but by the state. If forgiveness is to be considered, it is the persecutors – not
the persecuted – who should be begging for it.

I can hear the criticisms of this argument before they are even uttered. This was a different
time, a different age, and it is wrong to apply today’s values to the past. There should now be
gratitude at the government’s generosity, not least given the granting of legal equality, not
just to gay and bisexual men, but to other LGBT people, too.

It is difficult to empathise with these arguments. In 1945, 800 men were prosecuted for
homosexuality; a decade later, the number had surged to 2,500, with four out of every 10 of
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/01/pardon-britain-gay-men-unjust-laws-state 1/4
14/04/2020 Why this pardon for Britain’s gay men is so inadequate | Owen Jones | Opinion | The Guardian

them jailed. People at the time knew it was wrong: including, to their credit, politicians and
intellectuals such as Clement Attlee, Isaiah Berlin, Bertrand Russell and Barbara Wootton, all
of whom formed the Homosexual Law Reform Society in the late 1950s.

The misery inflicted by this persecution is still poorly understood and appreciated. Alan
Turing, rightly, has become the cause celebre. A genius whose contribution to the war effort
against Nazism may well have saved hundreds of thousands of lives, and yet he was
persecuted, chemically castrated and driven to suicide. If they did that to war heroes, what
hope for anybody else.

Lives were wrecked; people were humiliated; they lost their jobs; they were ostracised by
their families; many lived lives of fear, misery and shame; they felt the anguish of rejection by
their own country; their relationships were destroyed. With the horrors of such persecution,
Turing was far from the only victim to take his own life. It has taken so many decades to
pardon those whose lives were destroyed – some who still live today.

That’s because the struggle for LGBT equality has not been one of the powerful suddenly, of
their own accord, becoming more enlightened. As the African American statesman Frederick
Douglass pointed out in the 19th century: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It
never did, and it never will.” The struggle for LGBT rights was a case study of how courage
and determination from below – rather than generosity and charity from above – drives social
change. Indeed, it was a difficult, courageous, often miserable struggle met with powerful,
often vicious resistance. As the campaigner Peter Tatchell points out, even though
homosexuality was partly decriminalised in England and Wales in 1967 – though not for
another 13 years in Scotland – convictions for same-sex behaviour surged fourfold in the years
that followed.

Those who campaigned for equality were poofs, perverts, deviants. When straight allies in the
Labour party stood alongside them in the 1980s, they were castigated by an
uncompromisingly bigoted press as the “loony left”. The Conservative party positioned itself
as a political firewall against LGBT emancipation, even introducing the first new piece of
homophobic legislation for centuries in the form of section 28 in 1988. The legal
emancipation that came under Labour was the product of a long, difficult struggle by LGBT
activists – some of whom are noted by history, most forgotten.

It is fashionable now, particularly among those who resent LGBT equality, to claim that the
struggle is over. We gave you equal legal rights, did we not? We’ve even pardoned those
prosecuted for their homosexuality. Where is the gratitude? The legacy of persecution by
police, politicians and media alike still looms over us: the damage inflicted on the lives of
hundreds of thousands of people. Despite the transformation of attitudes because of the work
of LGBT activists, LGBT people are still exposed to homophobia and transphobia from the
earliest of ages. A society that still fails to accept LGBT people as genuine equals causes much
higher levels of mental distress among LGBT people, along with its grimmer symptoms:
alcohol and drug abuse, even suicide. The government slashes funding to LGBT services and
charities, and it deports LGBT people to countries where they are not safe.

Neither triumphalism nor gratitude are the right responses to the pardons. They may
undoubtedly be a source of justified vindication to those still alive who were persecuted, who
endured lonely years of hatred and rejection, and finally have some official recognition of the
injustice they suffered. But the homophobia that underpinned those persecutions has not
gone away. Even now, young teens coming to terms with who they are internalise shame

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/01/pardon-britain-gay-men-unjust-laws-state 2/4
14/04/2020 Why this pardon for Britain’s gay men is so inadequate | Owen Jones | Opinion | The Guardian

because of the failure of society to accept them properly. The damage will continue for many
decades.

The correct response to these pardons is to pay tribute to those who struggled, and to learn
from their courage to finish what they started. No gratitude, no triumphalism. Only optimism
that injustice can be overcome, and determination to defeat it.

Since you’re here...

… we’re asking readers like you to make a contribution in support of our open, independent
journalism. In these frightening and uncertain times, the expertise, scientific knowledge and
careful judgment in our reporting has never been so vital. No matter how unpredictable the
future feels, we will remain with you, delivering high quality news so we can all make critical
decisions about our lives, health and security. Together we can find a way through this.

We believe every one of us deserves equal access to accurate news and calm explanation. So,
unlike many others, we made a different choice: to keep Guardian journalism open for all,
regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay. This would not be possible
without the generosity of readers, who now support our work from 180 countries around the
world.

We have upheld our editorial independence in the face of the disintegration of traditional
media – with social platforms giving rise to misinformation, the seemingly unstoppable rise of
big tech and independent voices being squashed by commercial ownership. The Guardian’s
independence means we can set our own agenda and voice our own opinions. Our journalism
is free from commercial and political bias – never influenced by billionaire owners or
shareholders. This makes us different. It means we can challenge the powerful without fear
and give a voice to those less heard.

Your financial support has meant we can keep investigating, disentangling and interrogating.
It has protected our independence, which has never been so critical. We are so grateful.

We need your support so we can keep delivering quality journalism that’s open and
independent. And that is here for the long term. Every reader contribution, however big or
small, is so valuable. Support the Guardian from as little as $1 – and it only takes a minute.
Thank you.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/01/pardon-britain-gay-men-unjust-laws-state 3/4