Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(1) Between the hospital and the doctor The elements of Medical Malpractice are: birth had a female body, male hormones, two
practicing within its premises; 1.) The physician has a duty to the patient; sex organs, and no monthly period.
(2) Between the hospital and the patient 2.) The physician failed to perform such duty
being treated or examined within its to his patient; A. SILVERIO vs. REPUBLIC | 126297 | 2007
premises; and 3.) As a consequence of the failure, injury -Read at your own risk. Read the full text first--
(3) Between the patient and the doctor. The was sustained by the patient; A change of name does not alter one’s legal
exact nature of each relationship 4.) The failure of the physician is the capacity or civil status. RA 9048 does not
determines the basis and extent of the proximate cause of the injury sustained sanction a change of first name on the ground
liability of the hospital for the negligence by the patient. of sex reassignment.
of the doctor.
IV. SILVERIO CASE vs. CAGANDAHAN CASE A change of name is a privilege and not a right.
Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur – It is the rule -Read at your own risk. Read the full text first-- It may be allowed in cases where the name is
that the fact of the occurrence of an injury, Silverio had a sex change or reassignment ridiculous, tainted with dishonor, or difficult to
taken with the surrounding circumstances, may operation. On the other hand, Cagandahan has pronounce or write; a nickname is habitually
permit an inference or raise a presumption of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia which is a used; or if the change will avoid confusion. The
negligence, or make out a plaintiff’s prima facie condition where a person possesses both male petitioner’s basis of the change of his name is
case, and present a question of fact for and female characteristics. As the Supreme that he intends his first name compatible with
defendant to meet with an explanation. Court stated: the sex he thought he transformed himself into
thru surgery. The Court held that his true name
The requisites for the applicability of the Cagandahan simply let nature take its course does not prejudice him at all, and no law allows
doctrine of res ipsa loquitur are: and has not taken unnatural steps to arrest or the change of entry in the birth certificate as to
1.) The occurrence of an injury; interfere with what he was born with. And sex on the ground of sex reassignment. The
2.) The thing which caused the injury was accordingly, he has already ordered his life to Court denied the petition.
under the control and management of the that of a male. Respondent could have
defendant; undergone treatment and taken steps, like B. REPUBLIC vs CAGANDAHAN | 166676 | 2008
3.) The occurrence was such that in the taking lifelong medication, to force his body -Read at your own risk. Read the full text first--
ordinary course of things, would not have into the categorical mold of a female but he Where the person is biologically or naturally
happened if those who had control or did not. He chose not to do so. Nature has intersex the determining factor in his gender
management used proper care; and instead taken its due course in respondent's classification would be what the individual,
4.) The absence of explanation by the development to reveal more fully his male having reached the age of majority, with good
defendant. characteristics. reason thinks of his/her sex – Sexual
development in cases of intersex persons makes
Medical malpractice – Failure of a physician to Silverio deliberately took the sex reassignment the gender classification at birth inconclusive —
properly perform the duty which devolves upon operations to change his body to that of a it is at maturity that the gender of such persons,
him in his professional relation to his patient woman. Cagandahan, on the other hand, from like respondent, is fixed.
which results to injury.
V. ADMINISTERING INJURIOUS SUBSTANCE A. SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES was habitually engaged for more than
How the crime of serious physical injuries is How the crime of serious physical injuries is 90 days, in consequence of the
committed: S.K.A.N committed: physical injuries inflicted
1.) That the offender inflicted upon another 1.) By wounding;
any serious physical injury 2.) By beating; 4.) When the injured person becomes ill or
2.) That it was done by knowingly 3.) By assaulting; or incapacitated for labor for more than 30
administering to him any injurious 4.) By administering injurious substance. days (but must not be more than 90
substance or beverages or by taking days), as a result of the physical injuries
advantage of his weakness of mind or Instances considered as the crime of serious inflicted.
credulity; and physical injuries: ISD30
3.) That he had no intent to kill. 1.) Insane 2.) Speech Requisites of deformity
3.) Deformed 4.) 30 Days 1.) Physical ugliness;
VI. MUTILATION vs SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES 2.) Permanent and definite abnormality; and
In Serious Physical Injuries, the intent is simply Explained as follows: 3.) Conspicuous and visible.
to inflict physical injuries. In mutilation, the
offender must have the intention to deprive the 1.) When the injured person becomes Once physical injuries resulted to deformity, it
offended party of a part of his body. insane, imbecile, impotent or blind as a is classified as serious physical injuries.
consequence of the physical injuries
Q: Suppose there is no intent to deprive the inflicted; B. MUTILATION
victim of the particular part of the body, what is FIRST MODE
the crime committed? 2.) When the injured person: Intentionally mutilating another by depriving
A: The crime is only serious physical injury. a) Loses the use of speech or the power him, either totally or partially, of some essential
to hear, or to smell, or loses, an eye, a organ for reproduction. Its Elements are what
In mutilation, the body parts should have been hand, a foot, an arm, or a leg; follows:
purposely and deliberately lopped or clipped b) Loses the use of any such member; or 1.) There be a castration, that is, mutilation
off. This intention is not present in serious c) Becomes incapacitated for the work of organs necessary for generation, such
physical injuries. in which he was therefore habitually as the penis or ovarium;
engage, in consequence of the 2.) The mutilation is caused purposely and
PHYSICAL INJURIES MUTILATION physical injuries inflicted deliberately
No intention to clip There is intention to
off some part of the clip off some part of 3.) When the person injured: SECOND MODE
body so as to deprive the body so as to a) Becomes deformed Intentionally making other mutilation, that is,
the offended party of deprive him of such b) Loses any other member of his body; by lopping or clipping off any part of the body of
such part. part. c) Loses the use thereof the offended party, other than the essential
d) Becomes ill or incapacitated for the organ for reproduction, to deprive him of that
performance of the work in which he part of his body.
VII. QUALIFIED SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES gave twin slaps on Carina’s beautiful face. What was a permanent deformity on the victim’s
The qualifying circumstances of Serious is the crime committed by Cindy? face.
Physical Injuries are: PEOPLE vs. YORAC | 29270 | 1971
1.) If it is committed by any of the persons A -Read at your own risk. Read the full text first--
referred to in the crime of parricide; or 1. Slander by deed – If the slapping was done to For double jeopardy not to exist, there is then
2.) If any of the circumstances qualifying cast dishonor to the person slapped. the indispensable requirement of the existence
murder attended its commission. 2. Slight physical injuries by ill-treatment – If of a new fact which supervenes for which the
the slapping was done without the intention of defendant is responsible changing the character
NOTE: The qualified penalties are not applicable casting dishonor, or to humiliate or embarrass of the crime imputed to him and together with
to parents who inflict serious physical injuries the offended party out of a quarrel or anger. the facts existing previously constituting a new
upon their children by excessive chastisement. and distinct offense.
NOTES:
CHASTISEMENT – Punishment by reason of Slander by deed resulting to Slight PEOPLE vs. BULING | 13315 | 1960
discipline Physical Injuries – The former absorbs the -Read at your own risk. Read the full text first--
latter. FACTS: Accused was charged with the crime of
VIII. QUALIFIED LSPI Slander by deed resulting to Less Serious less serious physical injuries for inflicting
The qualifying circumstances of Less Serious Physical Injuries – The former is absorbed wounds on a person which, according to the
Physical Injuries are: by the latter. complaint, would require medical attendance
1.) A fine not exceeding P 500.00, in Slander by deed resulted to blindness – for a period from 10 to 15 days. Having pleaded
addition to arresto mayor, when – The crime committed is that of Serious guilty, he served his sentence fully. Later, the
a) There is a manifest intent to insult or Physical Injuries. Provincial Fiscal filed an information against the
offend the injured person; or accused charging him with serious physical
b) There are circumstances adding VIII. SEMINAL CASES ON BASIC DOCTRINES IN injuries, the information alleging that the same
ignominy to the offense. PHYSICAL INJURIES wounds inflicted by the accused would require
medical attendance for a period from 1½
2.) A higher penalty is imposed when the PEOPLE vs. ADIL | 41863 | 1977 months to 2½ months.
victim is either – -Read at your own risk. Read the full text first--
a) The offender’s parents, ascendants, No double jeopardy exists where an It appears that a different physician examined
guardians, curators or teachers; or information for serious physical injuries was the offended party anew, taking an X-ray
b) Persons of rank or person in filed after the filing of an information for slight picture of the arm of the offended party which
authority, provided the crime is not physical injuries against the same accused had been wounded, which method of
direct assault. arising out of the same incident where the examination was not adopted by the first
information for serious physical injuries was physician. The second physician's certification
Q filed after the wounds inflicted on the offended was the basis of the second complaint.
A disagreement ensued between Cindy and victim had healed and it was found that there
Carina which led to a slapping incident. Cindy
NOTES:
First Scenario
A fracture happened, followed by arraignment,
and a conviction for the same. A 2 nd Charge for
SPI was subsequently made. Did double
jeopardy attach? – Yes. The same carried the
same set of facts.
Second Scenario
Manifestation of a scar after the 1 st Conviction.
Will double jeopardy attach for a subsequent
charge of SPI? – No, for there is no way to know
when such scar will develop.