Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fuzzy Based Pid For Calciner Temperature Control PDF
Fuzzy Based Pid For Calciner Temperature Control PDF
14563
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
B. ESTIMATING MODEL PARAMETERS subspace methods based on N4SID, CVA, and MOESP
Parametric models, such as transfer functions or state- algorithms. A model of the noise affecting the observed
space models use a small number of parameters to capture system can also be estimated. Figure 2.2 depicts the process
system dynamics. System Identification Toolbox estimates of obtaining the transfer function model.
model parameters and their uncertainties from time-response
and frequency-response data. These models can be analyzed
using time-response and frequency-response plots, such as
step, impulse, bode plots, and pole-zero maps.
C. VALIDATING RESULTS
System Identification Toolbox helps to validate the
accuracy of identified models using independent sets of
measured data from a real system. For a given set of input
data, the toolbox computes the output of the identified model
and lets to compare that output with the measured output
from a real system. One can also view the prediction error
and produce time-response and frequency-response plots
with confidence bounds to visualize the effect of parameter
uncertainties on model responses.
14564
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
14565
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
The error and the derivative of its error are sent to the fuzzy
controller. The PID parameter Kp, Ki and Kd is calculated
according to the rules in the fuzzy controller, at the same
time, Kp was also refined by P controller which was the
immune PID controller, so the Kp, Ki and Kd can be
continuous updated according to error e(t) and its derivative
de/dt.
Figure 4.5: Rule viewer of mamdani FIS VI. SIMULATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
14566
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
fuzzy PID were shown in figures 6.3 and 6.4 respectively. B. SERVO WITH REGULATORY RESPONSE OF PID
From the response, it was observed that the calciner AND FUZZY PID CONTROLLER
temperature follow the given set points and the servo
response of the PID and fuzzy PID were compared in the
table 8.1.
14567
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
dynamics and interactions, high stress factors in real time From the table 7.1 it has been observed that Integral Square
operation conditions, and lack of adequate experience in Error (ISE) value of fuzzy PID controller is reduced as
utilizing the existing control system are typical reasons for compared to PID controller.
incorrect operator actions. The consequences of this may
result in low production quality, production interrupts, and VIII. CONCLUSION
equipment damage, in worst case risk on human safety. The
increasing demand on production sustainability in the recent The main aim of the project was to control the
years has resulted in requirements of which the degree of calciner temperature and to obtain a good quality clinker.
fulfillment is effected by the level of skills of plant operators The transfer function model of calciner for the process has
and engineers. been derived using system identification tool. The simulink
model of calciner has been developed in MATLAB using
A. REAL TIME RESPONSE OF THE PID real time steady state values of Turkey power plant. The
CONTROLLER open loop response of the process where observed and the
interaction effect has been studied. The parameters for PID
were obtained using Ziegler - Nichols tuning. The fuzzy
rules were written using FAM table and the rules are inserted
in the FIS using mamdani method which is used to tune the
PID. Thus Fuzzy PID controller was implemented and then
optimized values were obtained. It is observed that the
performance criteria namely the ISE, IAE, ITAE, and
settling time in Fuzzy PID controller is better than the PID
controller. Also from the responses, it has been observed that
the proposed method has better tracking and faster settling
time.
IX. APPENDIX
Figure 7.1: Response of PID controller in real time DATA FROM REAL TIME CALCINER UNIT
B. REAL TIME RESPONSE OF FUZZY PID
CONTROLLER
CALCINER CALCINE KILN
S.N TEMPERATU R COAL TOTAL
O RE FEED FEED
1 894.7916 9.6501 588.4775
2 894.7916 9.6401 589.4781
3 896.5278 9.6359 585.4742
4 898.9583 9.6276 588.4867
5 901.3889 9.6184 594.3333
6 904.1666 9.6096 590.6599
7 902.7778 9.6029 588.5881
Figure 7.2: Response of Fuzzy PID controller in real time 8 900.6944 9.6033 590.9871
9 899.3055 9.6079 591.7212
Comparison of performance indices of PID and FUZZY PID 10 901.3889 9.6074 589.3926
controller for the real time response is shown in Fig. 7.1 and
7.2. 11 903.1249 9.6 585.8295
12 901.7361 9.5952 584.7019
Table 7.1:
CALCINER TEMPERATURE CONTROL ISE 13 900.6944 9.5972 586.1656
USING
14 901.0416 9.5997 590.9084
PID CONTROLLER 18.4
FUZZY CONTROLLER 16.4 15 903.1249 9.5979 590.3184
16 906.2499 9.5892 591.2415
14568
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
REFERENCES
[1] Ashwani Kharola “A PID BASED ANFIS AND FUZZY
CONTROL OF INVERTED PENDULUM ON INCLINED
PLANE”, International journal on smart sensing and
intelligent systems.
[2] Ahmed M.Salch and Sohair F.Rezeta “FUZZY LOGIC
CONTROL OF AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM IN
RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS”.
[3] Elvira Lakovic and Damir Lotinac “AIRCRAFT LANDING
CONTROL USING FUZZY LOGIC AND NEURAL
NETWORKS”
[4] Gaddam Mallesham and Akula rajani “AUTOMATIC
TUNING OF PID CONTROLLER USING FUZZY
LOGIC”, VIIIth international conference on development
and application system.
[5] Jan Jantzen “TUNING OF FUZZY PID CONTROLLER”
,IEEE journal 2009
[6] P.T.Rajeena Mol , B.Chinthamani, K.P.Kamini and
K.R.Sugashini “INTELLIGENT HOME HEATING
SYSTEM” ,International Journal of Research in
Engineering and Technology
[7] Salim Jyothi ohri “FUZZY BASED PID CONTROLLER
FOR SPEED CONTROL OF DC MOTOR” ,National
institute of Technology.
[8] Sankata B. Prusty, Umesh C. Pati and Kamalakanta
Mahapatra “IMPLEMENTATION OF FUZZY-PID
CONTROLLER TO LIQUID LEVEL SYSTEM USING
LABVIEW”.
[9] Somayeh Abdolzadeh and Seyed Mohammad Ali
Mohammadi "IMPLEMENTATION OF ADAPTIVE
FUZZYCONTROLLER ON THE VARIABLE SPEED
WIND TURBINES IN COMPARISON WITH
CONVENTIONAL METHODS”
[10] S.Subramanian , N. Raghothaman and B. Chellappa
“FUZZY LOGIC CONTROL IN HIGH TEMPERATURE
FURNACE” ,Recent Research in Science and Technology
,2010.
[11] Sudha Hatagar and S.V.Halse “THREE INPUT-ONE
OUTPUT FUZZY LOGIC CONTROL OF WASHING
MACHINE”, International journal of scientific research
and Technology
[12] Tushar Upalanchiwar and A.V.Sakhare “DESIGN AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF FUZZY-PID CONTROLLER
USING MATLAB”,International journal of research in
computer and communication technologies.
[13] ZHANG Shengyi “STUDY OF FUZZY PID
CONTROLLER IN MATLAB FOR TWO PHASE
HYBRID STEPPING”, IInd international conference on
system engineering and modeling.
[14] Zulfatman and M. F. Rahmat “APPLICATION OF SELF-
TUNING FUZZY PID CONTROLLER ON INDUSTRIAL
HYDRAULIC ACTUATOR USING SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION APPROACH” ,International journal on
smart sensing and intelligent systems, vol. 2, no. 2, june
2009.
[15] Zuo Yusheng and Xu Qun “COMPARED WITH PID,
FUZZY AND FUZZY PID CONTROLLER”,IEEE journal.
14569
14570