DELA CRUZ, Louielyn CAN SOMETHING WRONG BE JUSTIFIABLE? The term “justifiable” is defined as something that is “able to be shown to be right or reasonable.” Therefore, to answer the question, we believe that a wrong act can indeed be justified. Going back to our definition, a justifiable act is only “shown to be right”. From this, we can say that when a wrong act is justifiable, it does not necessarily mean that it becomes right. However, not all wrong acts can be justifiable. Wrong acts are only justifiable if their outcome is good. A mother hitting her child in order for her child to be disciplined is one example. Hitting your child is wrong, however if your goal is to discipline your child, then it is acceptable or justifiable. You can also play with a wrong act and make it look like something that has a good outcome in order to make it justifiable. This is common with those laws written by lawmakers in order to advance their interests. One example is the cybercrime law. The enactment of cybercrime law is wrong in a sense that it deprives people of their right to freedom of speech. However, it is justified by saying that this law will protect other human rights by prohibiting cybersex, child pornography, identity theft, illegal access to data and libel. This act can be a way of silencing those people who will say anything against the government. Therefore, regardless of the intention, whether good or bad, if wrong act results to a good outcome or is based on just reason, then it can be justified. In addition to that, we also believe that there are some instances in which the best outcomes are only achieved through wrong means. An example of this is the execution of capital punishment in South Korea. If the government of South Korea was more lenient in their punishment, then the people of South Korea would not be as disciplined as they are now. Therefore, we believe that a wrong act, such as the execution of capital punishment, is justifiable since it came from sound judgement.