Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Colombia History Reading
Colombia History Reading
A. Read the following text about Colombia history and complete the activity
below.
a. What do you know about Colombian History?
The National Front marked the end of the bipartisan violence that afflicted
Colombia for more than a century and generated the demobilization of some
liberal guerrillas. In 1964 the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)
were born. On January 7, 1965, the National Liberation Army (ELN)
Linda
traveled to
I wrote a letter
París
last week
Reading Text 1
Colombia – History
1
Elite members of the Liberal Party and the Conservative Party alternately
competed and cooperated with each other throughout the nineteenth and twentieth
centuries. Often the nature of relations between the two parties depended on
whether moderates or extremists dominated the ruling party. During the periods
when moderate factions of both parties were in power, the parties were able to
work together in coalitions; when extremist factions prevailed, however, conflict
often resulted. During the competitive periods, one party usually sought to limit or
eliminate the rival party's participation in the political process, attempts that often
resulted in political violence. The most notorious of these periods were the War of
a Thousand Days (1899-1902) and the violence (1948-66). At the end of these civil
wars, the elite inaugurated the cooperative governments of the Period of
Reconciliation (1903- 30) and the National Front (1958-74), respectively, the
former catalyzed by the Rafael Reyes presidency (1904-09) and the latter by the
Gustavo Rojas Pinilla dictatorship (1953-57). The replacement of the discredited
extremist factions by the more conciliatory moderate factions in each case made it
possible for the two parties to share power and to achieve a consensus on what
policies were appropriate for Colombian society at the time.
1
Imagen tomada de la página www.google.com.co/colombia+history
Colombia's economic life has been based consistently on exports of primary
goods, especially coffee. In the sixteenth century, the conquistadors and early
colonialists, who often exploited Indian and slave labor, mined precious metals and
gems for export to Spain under a mercantile system that inhibited the development
of domestic industries. Throughout the pre-independence and post-independence
periods, agriculture on large landholdings, known as latifundios, became the
predominant mode of production for export crops such as sugar and tobacco. By
the 1860s, coffee had emerged as the key export crop. At the turn of the century,
tariffs on coffee exports were the main source of government revenues, and profits
from the coffee trade were the major source of investment in the newly emerging
industrial sector that was beginning to produce basic consumer goods. Although
the industrial sector grew sufficiently to induce urbanization and economic
modernization in the first half of the twentieth century, industrial exports remained
relatively minor compared with coffee, which in the late 1980s still accounted for
almost 60 percent of all export earnings.
Colombia History
Economic
Political Elite
Export
members
3. coffee
2. Gustavo industry
1. Rafael Reyes
(1904-09) Rojas Pinilla
(1953-57)
Important facts
4. 6. 7.
5.
Reading Comprehension
B. I. Read the following text about Colombian political division and complete the
map.
Reading Text 2
The ideological split dividing the political elite began in 1810 and became solidified
by 1850 after the official establishment of the Liberal Party (Partido Liberal--PL)
and the Conservative Party (Partido Conservador--PC), the two parties that
continued to dominate Colombian politics in the 1980s. The Liberals were
anticolonial and wanted to transform New Granada into a modern nation. Those
joining the PL primarily came from the more recently created and ascending
classes and included merchants advocating free trade, manufacturers and artisans
anxious to increase demand for their products, some small landowners and
agriculturists endorsing a liberalization of state monopolies on crops such as
tobacco, and slaves seeking their freedom. The Liberals also sought lessened
executive power; separation of church and state; freedom of press, education,
religion, and business; and elimination of the death penalty.
2
Imagen tomada de www.google.com.co/frente+nacional.
3
Although divided, the PL soon achieved electoral victories. In the election of 1853,
General José María Obando, who had led the revolutionary forces in the 1840 civil
war and who was supported by the draconianos and the army, was elected and
inaugurated as president. Congress remained in the hands of the golgotas. In May
of the same year, Congress adopted the constitution of 1853, which had been
written under López. A liberal document, it had significant provisions defining the
separation of church and state and freedom of worship and establishing male
suffrage. The new constitution also mandated the direct election of the president,
members of Congress, magistrates, and governors, and it granted extensive
autonomy to the departments.
Despite the victory that the constitution represented for the Liberals, tensions grew
between golgota and draconiano forces. When the draconianos found Obando to
be compromising with the golgotas, General José María Melo led a coup in April
1854, declared himself dictator, and dissolved Congress. Melo's rule, the only
military dictatorship in the nineteenth century, lasted only eight months because he
proved unable to consolidate the interests of the draconianos; he was deposed by
an alliance of golgotas and Conservatives.
In 1857 PC candidate Mariano Ospina Rodríguez was elected president. The next
year, his administration adopted a new constitution, which renamed the country the
Grenadine Confederation, replaced the vice president with three designates
elected by Congress, and set the presidential term at four years. With
the draconiano faction disappearing as a political force, the golgotas took over the
PL in opposition to the Conservative Ospina. General Mosquera, the former
president and the governor of the department of Cauca, emerged as the most
important Liberal figure. A strong advocate of federalism, Mosquera threatened the
secession of Cauca in the face of the centralization undertaken by the
Conservatives. Mosquera, the golgotas, and their supporters declared a civil war in
1860, resulting in an almost complete obstruction of government.
3
Imagen tomada de www.google.com.co/los federalista
In February 1863, a Liberal-only government convention met in Rionegro and
enacted the constitution of 1863, which was to last until 1886. The Rionegro
constitution renamed the nation the United States of Colombia. All powers not
given to the central government were reserved for the states, including the right to
engage in the commerce of arms and ammunition. The constitution contained fully
defined individual liberties and guarantees as nearly absolute as possible, leaving
the federal authority with little room to regulate society. The constitution also
guaranteed Colombians the right to profess any religion.
The Rionegro constitution brought little peace to the country. After its enactment
and before the next constitutional change, Liberals and Conservatives engaged in
some forty local conflicts and several major military struggles. Contention
persisted, moreover, between the moderate Liberals in the executive branch and
the radical Liberals in the legislature; the latter went so far as to enact a measure
prohibiting the central authority from suppressing a revolt against the government
of any state or in any way interfering in state affairs. In 1867 the radical Liberals
also executed a coup against Mosquera, leading to his imprisonment, trial before
the Senate, and exile from the country.
With the fall of Mosquera and the entrenchment of radical Liberals in power,
Conservatives found it increasingly difficult to accept the Rionegro constitution.
Eventually Conservatives in Tolima and Antioquia took up arms, initiating another
civil conflict in 1876. The Liberal national government put down the rebellion, but
only with difficulty.
The National Front agreement to share power between Liberals and Conservatives
was a constructive effort to assuage the interparty strife and distrust that had
contributed to both the violence and the collapse of the democratic system. Its
inauguration marked the beginning of a gradual decline in the level of
4
Imagen tomada de www.google.com.co/frente+nacional
confrontation. Nevertheless, the necessity of securing bipartisan support for any
policy or action produced several difficulties--most notably, stalemate and inaction
in the governmental process, voter apathy, and the exacerbation of factionalism
within the two parties--that were to plague National Front administrations.
Conservative Federalists
1. partycharacteristics characteristics 6.
5.
2.
3.
.
4.
Reading Understanding
II. Answer true (T) or false (F) according to the above text
1. The political elite began in 1810 and became solidified by 1850 _________
2. The Liberals were anticolonial and wanted to transform New Granada into a
modern nation______.
4. General José María Obando led the revolutionary forces in the 1840 _____.
1. Complete the following sentences with the past of the verb in brackets.
Example: The Rionegro constitution brought (bring) little peace to the country.
g. The new constitution also __________ (establish) the direct election of the
president, members of Congress.
Examples
Did the conservative and the liberal parties form the National Front?
PRACTICE II
a. The two political parties formed the National Front in 1958 to 1974
____________________________________________________________.
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________.
____________________________________________________________.
Examples:
Did the liberal party separate the Church and the State? Yes, they did.
Did Conservative party participate in the Rionegro convention? No, they did not.