You are on page 1of 2

Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com

Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 19 (2012) 198-199


www.elsevier.com/locate/cabp

Book Review dominates human behavior, is a pragmatic theory. As


such, it is strictly devoted to an understanding that would
Törneke, N. (2010) lead to a better prediction and influence of behavior. This
Learning RFT: An Introduction to Relational Frame is consistent with the objectives of all clinicians and
Theory and Its Clinical Application clinical scientists, regardless of the approach they adhere
to.
Oakland: New Harbinger Perhaps somewhat ironically, the first book on RFT
that does not seem as if it is written in a strange and
Reviewed by Iftah Yovel, foreign language is actually translated from Swedish. Here
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem is another paradox: This excellent primer presents a
complex learning theory and occasionally reviews basic
up-to-date experimental work, yet it has been written by
someone who is not an experimentalist himself, “primar-
M OST people who have heard about relational frame
theory (RFT) probably associate it with its most
comprehensive and well-known clinical application:
ily for others in the same situation” (p. 5), says Törneke.
Learning RFT is not the first published account of this
acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT; Hayes, theory and its implications. Comprehensive, innovative,
Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999). In the past several decades a and highly stimulating writings on RFT have been
staggering number of different types of cognitive and available for at least a decade (e.g., Hayes, Barnes-
behavioral therapies have been developed, designed to Holmes, & Roche, 2001). Unfortunately, however, these
provide treatment for an ever-growing range of relatively texts are heavily jargoned, and they require a great deal of
specific types of difficulties. ACT is different in this sophistication with many experimental and behavioral
regard. The uniqueness of ACT stems not from any concepts, something that most people who could poten-
specific type of intervention, but rather from the broad tially benefit from RFT may not posses. Practically
theoretical framework on which it is based. Niklas speaking, for many the basics of RFT have not really
Törneke's (2010)Learning RFT, which presents the build- been available, and at best could have only been vaguely
ing blocks of this theoretical foundation, is therefore an inferred from the writings on RFT's clinical applications.
essential reading for researchers and clinicians who are Thus, Törneke's (2010) central objective was to create a
interested in what ACT and other contextual clinical “user-friendly” account of this complex theory. Learning
approaches have to offer. RFT does just that, providing clinicians and researchers
Importantly, however, Learning RFT is not a book about with an excellent opportunity to familiarize themselves
ACT. Basic elements of ACT take a central role in the last with a comprehensive and thought-provoking theory that
section of the book that focuses on clinical applications of is highly relevant to their work.
RFT, but its scope goes beyond any specific clinical The book is divided into three sections. Part I provides
approach. Törneke (2010) sought to “describe clinical a general background that is necessary for understanding
behavior analysis as one integrated therapy model, based the following sections. Chapter 1 explains the basic
on the principles of behavioral psychology and with a principles of learning theory from the perspective of
particular focus on the contribution offered by RFT. This radical behaviorism. The reader is first introduced to the
is not done from a position of arguing with any of the concept of functional contextualism. This term emphasizes
individual models or with the more common ways of the two basic premises of RFT: It is only possible to
describing them” (p. 169). RFT, which uses basic learning understand behavior in relation to the context or setting
principles to describe the processes by which language in which it occurs, and in order to thoroughly understand
and influence any type of behavior, we must first clarify its
function or goal. In Chapter 2 Törneke (2010) first tackles
language and thinking, the phenomena that has tradi-
Keywords: relational frame theory; acceptance and commitment tionally been the thorniest issue for radical behaviorism.
therapy; book review
He describes how Skinnerian behavioral analysis has
1077-7229/11/198-199$1.00/0 attempted to study human verbal behavior, as well as the
© 2011 Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies. shortcomings and inadequacies of these attempts. In-
Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. deed, many believe that radical behaviorism was
199

destroyed partly by its inability to help much with complex theory and actual clinical difficulties, obstacles,
understanding language, and Chomsky's famous attack and dilemmas. The section commences with a behavioral
along those lines was one of the major victories of the analytic perspective on psychotherapy in general and on
“cognitive revolution” (Richelle, 1993). Before turning to other broad therapeutic approaches (e.g., psychodynam-
the main section of the book, Törneke explains in ic therapy). However, it primarily focuses on clinical
Chapter 3 why it is clinically important to functionally behavioral analysis, with particular emphasis on thera-
examine the power of thinking, and how a better peutic strategies relatively specific to clinical applications
understanding of the fundamentals of verbal behavior of RFT. Readers who are already familiar with such
may enable the development of improved therapeutic therapies will be able to deepen their understanding of
models. The clear examples and powerful arguments central therapeutic strategies such as the acceptance of
Törneke uses help convince the reader that “… to unwanted internal experiences or cognitive defusion.
understand, predict and influence human behavior, we Even treatment elements that seem relatively self-explan-
need a theory of human language based on experimental atory—for example, the motivational role of focusing on
research. RFT is such a theory” (p. 56). This last assertion valued living in ACT—gain a whole new perspective when
creates much anticipation for what's to come, and in the their elaborated connections to basic verbal processes are
following chapters Törneke works hard to deliver. elucidated. It is unfortunate, however, that this section is
In Part II, the core section of the book, RFT is presented. too brief. For example, while the clinical vignettes that are
Chapter 4 lays down the foundations and basic terminology used to demonstrate some of the interventions are very
of the theory, and describes how it addresses key questions useful, illustrating the clinical applications of such a
regarding the nature of human verbal behavior—the same comprehensive theory requires a broader range of clinical
questions that Skinnerian behavioral analysis failed to examples.
answer. Here is where this book's primary goal, to offer a Undoubtedly, Törneke (2010) has met his primary goal
clear and palatable presentation of RFT, is most clearly to create an RFT primer “for the rest of us,” who are not
evident, as Törneke (2010) demonstrates how fundamental closely familiar with the works of experimental behavioral
verbal processes (e.g., the acquisition of language) can be analysis. His book, which is written in plain language and
understood using relatively simple relations among differ- with minimal use of jargon, makes RFT accessible to a much
ent types of stimuli, combined with basic learning wider audience. This achievement owes much to Törneke's
principles. Chapter 5 goes on to explain how RFT explains lively and engaging style of writing, which conveys even the
more complex verbal phenomena such as analogies and most complex technical concepts in a highly accessible way
metaphors. This is also where RFT tools are used to describe and makes this book a pleasure to read. I believe that many
the various conceptualizations of the self, an analysis which clinicians and clinical scientists will benefit greatly from the
is highly relevant to the clinical implications of the theory stimulating and rewarding experience of reading Learning
discussed in the last section of the book. Chapter 6 focuses RFT. I know I did.
on the central functional analytic concept of rule-governed References
behavior, describing how RFT addresses the ways in which
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational
language affects all types of human activity. Part II
frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and
concludes with a chapter titled “The Dark Side of Human cognition New York: Plenum Press.
Languaging” that leads to the final part of the book, which is Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and
commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New
dedicated to clinical issues. Building on the fundamentals
York: Guilford Press.
of the theory discussed in the preceding chapters, Törneke Richelle, M. (1993). B. F. Skinner: A reappraisal. Hillsdale: Lawrence
describes the “side effects” of human language that lead to Erlbaum Associates.
Törneke, N. (2010). Learning RFT: An introduction to relational frame
much pain and suffering, emphasizing the central role that
theory and its clinical application. Oakland: New Harbinger.
experiential avoidance takes in many different types of human
difficulties. Address correspondence to Iftah Yovel, Ph.D., Department of
In Part III of Learning RFT, which focuses on the Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus,
Jerusalem 91905 Israel; e-mail: yoveli@mscc.huji.ac.il.
clinical implications of the theory, readers will learn how
their newly acquired understanding of human verbal
behavior and its problems can be used in therapy. This is Received: March 27 2011
where Törneke (2010) skillfully delineates the direct Accepted: May 31 2011
connections between the intricacies of a broad and Available online 19 August 2011

You might also like