You are on page 1of 3

AGR 103L – Field and Lab practical assessment

Course: AGR 103L Soil Stewardship Laboratory


Community 1, Group 2, Section A

Soil chemical properties (soil moisture ang organic matter/carbon content) determination

Activity Procedures/ protocol Comment/observation


Soil chemical properties: soil As the purpose of this exercise  Comments
moisture content determination was to learn proper laboratory Throughout this activity, we had
techniques to prepare a soil to make sure that every sample
sample for laboratory analysis was labelled and, we were
and measure gravimetric water obliged to respect time for
content. checking on samples placed in
The procedures involved include oven, which made our work
the following more tiresome because we were
instructed to go back in the
 Soil sample laboratory late at night.
preparation
We measured the collected
 We collected soil samples and recorded the data.
samples from our
permanent first-year The collected samples in oven
farm fields. had helped us to analyse the
 The collected samples change in mass. The changes in
were put in 4 aluminium mass signifies that water has
moisture boxes with been removed.
covers for better
analysis and  Observation
interpretation of results.
 We measured and Relevant data on moisture
recorded the weight of content were as follows:
each soil sample.
 Thereafter, we marked Soil Moisture (%) in plot of
our sample with prior to Carrot A was 3.37%
easy identification of Soil Moisture (%) in plot of
our samples. Carrot B was 3.27%
Soil Moisture (%) in plot of
 Soil sample processing Cucumber A was5.69%
Soil Moisture (%) in plot of
 We put measured Cucumber B was 3.91%
weight of soil sample in
the aluminium moisture
box and placed them in  Conclusion
the oven after removing
the lid of the box. From the data above our soils
 We kept the sample at were found to be having a lot of
107 °C for 4 hours and moisture content because it was
again at 300°C until it in rainy season and it had rained
attains a constant the night before, which
weight, this took 10 increased the moisture
hours. percentages of our soil samples.
 We cooled the sample,
first in the switched-off
oven and then in a
desiccator.
 We weighted the cooled
sample. The loss in
weight is equal to the
moisture contained in
that soil sample. The
percentage of moisture
was calculated as:

Moisture percent = (loss in


weight/ Oven - dry wt. of soil
in weight) *100

Soil chemical properties: Referring on the purpose of this During this activity, we used
organic matter/carbon content exercise which was to learn various methods for estimating
proper laboratory techniques to organic matter in soil. Whereby
measure organic matter content the loss of weight on ignition
and aggregate stability and can be used as a direct measure
become familiar with how they of the organic matter contained
are related. in the soil.

The procedures used were as We putted our sample at two


follow: distinct temperatures and
For sample preparation: obtained an observable change
 We used the soil in mass. The change in mass
samples we have dried, meant that some organic matter
grounded, and sieved (Carbon content) have been
before. removed.
 We cleaned and dried
crucibles following  Observation
cleaning methods
outlined in sample The relevant data collected
preparation exercise. were as follow:
 We labelled crucibles  Organic matter
and weighted on % organic matter in pasture was
balance, recorded 4.17%
crucible weight (C1). % organic matter in permanent
 We placed soil samples farm was: 5.30%
in clean, labelled % organic matter in bush was
crucibles and weighted 6.25%
on same balance, record % organic matter in temporary
crucible + sample farm was: 2.48%
weight (C2).
For sample processing, we  Carbon content
used the following procedures: % carbon content in pasture was
 We weighted 5.0–10.0 g 2.41%
of sieved (2 mm) soil % carbon content in permanent
into an ashing vessel. farm was: 3.074%
 We placed the ashing % carbon content in bush was
vessel with soil in a 3.625%
drying oven set at 107 % carbon content in temporary
°C and dry for 4 hours. farm was: 1.438%
 We removed the ashing
vessel from the drying  Conclusion
oven and placed them in
a dry atmosphere. From our findings, we found
 When cooled, we that our soil had relatively high
weighted to the nearest organic matter content binds
0.01 g. W1 mineral particles, giving our
 We placed the ashing soils a granular structure,
vessel with soil into a keeping the soil loose and
muffle furnace and aerated.
bring the temperature to Organic matter in our soil also
300 °C. Ash in the increases the water holding
furnace for 10 hours. capacity of soils and water
 We removed the ashing availability to plants.
vessel from the muffle
furnace, cooled in a dry We are expecting to have fertile
atmosphere, and soil in near future because, as
weighted to the nearest the organic matter in our soils
0.01 g. W2 decay, it will release essential
 The percentage of OM nutrients to the soil that is taken
is given by: up by plants. Also, organic
Percent organic matter: matter is the primary source of
(OM)=((W1-W2)/W1) *100 carbon and energy for soil
organisms.

You might also like