Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kingdom, labor exploitation is a very common practice that delivers very little positives to
factory workers. A study by the University of Leicester found that a majority of factory workers
in the United Kingdom were illegally paid below the minimum wage, do not have employment
contracts, and are subjected to intense and arbitrary work practices (Hammer et al., 2015). This
means that workers in these factories were also subjected to issues such as long and intense
working hours, night shift subcontracting, and poor health and safety conditions (Hammer et al.,
2015).
One of the most shocking issues that factory workers have to deal with, in the United
Kingdom, is the lack of a liveable wage and enforcement of a minimum wage. In 2019, the
minimum wage for workers in the United Kingdom was eight pounds and twenty-one cents but
an investigation on clothing factories found that the average salary for factory workers is
between three fifty and four pounds an hour with the highest earners earning five pounds an hour
What is even worse is that the governmental organization that’s tasked with enforcing the
minimum wage, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC), knows what is taking place but
has chosen not to enforce the minimum wage and ignore the situation. A report published by the
HMRC indicated that 232,000 people were paid below the minimum wage yet only eighty-three
of those people were indicated as textile workers (House of Commons Environmental Audit
Committee, 2019). Per the investigation, which comes from a source who has no ties to both the
companies and workers involved, we can undoubtedly say that the percent of factory workers
making less than minimum wage is more than 0.0003% and the 83 person figure provided may
only reflect those who make a wage above the minimum wage.
Another aspect of overconsumption within the textile industry is water consumption
which has become a crucial element to the industry because the raw material used for production
requires a lot of water to be produced correctly for clothing. In the United Kingdom alone, it was
estimated that the water footprint of the clothing industry was 8 billion cubic meters and,
globally, the fashion industry is estimated to utilize 79 billion cubic meters of water annually.
Not only does the growing and production of textiles themselves use a great deal of water, the
dyeing, finishing, and washing of clothes throughout the production process also consumers a lot
of water.
The discarding and recycling of material within the textile industry is another sector of
the industry that has proved to be problematic for the environment (Brewer, 2019). Due to
overconsumption, people in countries such as the United Kingdom are buying more clothes in
the current day than they ever have in previous times which presents more and more textile-
based waste that must be disposed of somehow. In the United Kingdom, statistics show that their
citizens not only buy more clothes per person than any other country in the European Union but
they are also buying five times the amount of clothes than they ever have in history. Data has
also shown that citizens of the United Kingdom discard approximately one million tonnes per
year of textiles and three hundred thousand tonnes come from household bins with twenty
percent being disposed of through landfills and eighty percent of it through incineration.
Overconsumption and waste within the textile industry first starts during the design
process and the production process before the clothing can even reach customers and the global
market. During clothing production and design, clothes are cut out as patterns which leaves as
much as fifteen percent of the fabric on the cutting room floor which does not get used. The
current waste of the entire supply chain for clothing in the United Kingdom was estimated to be
at around 800,000 tonnes in 2016 which is an increase of over 100,000 tonnes from the 700,000
tonnes figure the statistic was at in 2012. When the fibers are prepared to make yarn and clothing
gets produced in the factory, around 440,000 tonnes of the supply chain waste occurs.
Another issue concerning overconsumption is the fact that some corporations in the
higher-end segment of the fashion world are now participating in stock burning for stock that
goes unsold. In 2018, Burberry admitted to burning unsold goods that were valued in total at
around twenty-nine million dollars with ten million dollars worth of destroyed goods being
beauty products such as perfumes. This was one of the few instances in which a company in the
fashion and clothing industry openly admitted to burning unsold products but this is an issue that
The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) reported that the total value of unsold goods
burned by Burberry in the last five years was more than ninety million dollars. The trend of stock
burning within the fashion industry because of overconsumption is extremely troubling because
it releases harmful gases and pollutants while also increasing emissions that harm the
environment and worsen the climate change situation. The burning of beauty products such as
perfume that Burberry reported specifically is extremely concerning because those types of
products tend to use harmful chemicals that, when put into the environment, do nothing but raise
the global temperature and release greenhouse gases. The burning of clothes, especially those
that were made with synthetic fibers, releases microfibers into the air which is harmful to both
humans and various marine ecosystems. The effects of overconsumption have oftentimes been
thought of to only effect periphery countries such as Bangladesh and China because the elites in
western countries have a tendency to exploit periphery countries for materials but through the
research done in this paper we see that this is not the case. In reality, capitalism not only affects
periphery countries but corporations are even willing to go as far as exploiting the lower class