Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Elaine M. Sloand1, MD
J. Joseph Melenhorst1, PhD
Zachary C. G. Tucker1
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
Loretta Pfannes1
Jason M. Brenchley2, PhD
Agnes Yong1, MD PhD
Emma Gostick3
Daniel C. Douek4, MD PhD
David A. Price3, 4, MD PhD
A. John Barrett1, MD
Neal S. Young1, MD
1
Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of
Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892; 2Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892; 3Cardiff University
School of Medicine, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK; 4Vaccine Research Center, National Institute
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Abstract
Clinical observations and laboratory evidence link bone marrow failure in myelodysplastic
treatment (IST) in some patients. We previously reported that trisomy 8 MDS was more likely to
respond to IST and was associated with skewed T cell receptor VE profiles with clonally
expanded CD8+ T cells capable of suppressing the growth of aneuploid progenitor cells in vitro.
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
Furthermore, microarray analyses showed that Wilms tumor protein (WT1) was over-expressed
by trisomy 8 hematopoietic progenitor (CD34+) cells as compared to CD34+ cells from healthy
donors. Here we show that WT1 mRNA expression is upregulated by as much as 1,000-fold in
the bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNC) of MDS patients with trisomy 8 (p = 0.001);
WT1 protein levels were also significantly elevated. In addition, using a combination of physical
and functional assays to detect the presence and biological reactivity of specific T cells
respectively, we demonstrate that IST-responsive MDS patients exhibit significant CD4+ and
CD8+ T cell responses directed against WT1. Finally WT1-specific CD8+ T cells are present
within expanded VE subfamilies and can inhibit hematopoiesis when added to autologous patient
bone marrow cells in culture. Thus, our results strongly implicate WT1 as one of the antigens
2
Introduction
Clinical and laboratory evidence suggests that bone marrow failure in myelodysplastic
(TCR) E-chain variable (VE) domain usage and spectratyping of VE families have revealed
cells in patients with this form of MDS1;2. Furthermore, patients with trisomy 8 are more likely
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
other forms of MDS2. Following IST, the number of the expanded VE subfamilies declined and
the proportion of trisomy 8 cells in the bone marrow increased. Moreover, in vitro depletion of T
cells from the bone marrow increases the proportion of cultured trisomy 8 cells2.
trisomy 8 cells, and possibly by cells in other forms of MDS, might elicit an MDS-specific
cytotoxic CD8+ T cell response. Immune-mediated suppression of the MDS clone and bystander
damage to normal hematopoietic cells could then induce bone marrow failure3;4. A number of
mRNAs, particularly cyclin D1 and Wilms tumor 1 (WT1), are over-expressed in microarray
analyses of CD34+ cells from trisomy 8 bone marrow as compared to CD34+ cells from healthy
donor bone marrow5. In addition, WT1 appears to be up-regulated in MDS but not in healthy
CD34+ stem cells6, and expression levels increase with disease progression7;8.
The WT1 protein can be immunogenic. For example, CD8+ T cell responses directed
been generated from donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells and can specifically lyse
leukemic but not normal hematopoietic progenitor cells9. Indeed, WT1 peptide vaccines are
3
malignancies10-13. Here, we explore the potential role of self-directed T cell responses specific
for WT1 in the myelosuppression that accompanies trisomy 8 MDS. Our data indicate that WT1-
specific T cell responses contribute to an immune-mediated process that underlies the bone
marrow failure observed in trisomy 8 MDS and other forms of MDS that are characterized by
WT1 over-expression.
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
4
Results
Study population
We studied 61 MDS patients with refractory anemia, 24 of whom had trisomy 8 and 35
healthy donors. All samples were collected prior to IST. Patient characteristics, cytogenetics,
Trisomy 8 bone marrow mononuclear cells show increased WT1 expression compared
expression of WT1 mRNA in bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNC) from 24 MDS patients
prior to treatment with IST (including 9 that did not receive IST) and of 22 healthy controls.
Levels of WT1 mRNA were increased in MDS patients with trisomy 8 compared to 22 healthy
controls (p<0.0001) and non-trisomy 8 patients (p=0.003), (Fig 1A) and were greatest in those
individuals who responded to IST (p=0.06). For patients with trisomy 8 MDS, mRNA expression
levels correlated with the percentage of trisomy 8 cells in bone marrow samples (R2=0.71;
we examined protein extracts from the bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNC) of 12 patients
with trisomy 8 MDS and 8 patients with non-trisomy 8 MDS by immunoblot and compared them
to 8 healthy controls (Fig1C). Actin and WT1 bands were quantified by immunoblot
densitometry and the ratio was calculated to control for differential protein loading. All patients
with trisomy 8 had increased WT1:actin ratios by immunoblot compared to healthy controls; 3/8
5
non-trisomy 8 MDS patients also demonstrated elevated ratios consistent with increased levels of
cancers14 and can be identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), we examined the
WT1 gene in 6 patients using a probe for FISH analysis (a kind gift from John Crolla)15.
However, we were unable to detect duplication of the WT1 gene in trisomy 8 and diploid
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
WT1-specific T cells are present in patients with trisomy 8 and in patients with MDS who
respond to immunosuppression
stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) with a comprehensive WT1 peptide
library. Thirty-eight patients with MDS were studied; 14 of these had trisomy 8 as the sole
cytogenetic abnormality, 19 were responsive to IST, 13 were non-responders and 6 patients were
not treated with IST. Specific T cell responses to WT1 were based on the detection of at least
one intracellular cytokine above background levels after stimulation with the peptide library
(gating strategy shown in Figs 2A). WT1-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were
greatest in the patients who responded to IST. For CD8+ T cells, the mean frequencies in
responders and non-responders were 1.8% and 0.4% for TNFD (p=.0039) respectively, 1.5% and
0.66% for IL-2 (p=0.0777), and 0.25% and 0.021% for IFN (p=0.0671) respectively. For CD4+
T cells, the mean frequencies in responders and non-responders were 4.4% and 0.26% for TNFD
(p<0.0001), 1.2% and 0.010% or IL-2 (p<0.0001), and 0.19% and 0.023% for IFN (p=0.002)
6
respectively (Fig 2B). In trisomy 8 patients, the percentage of trisomy 8 in the sample of bone
marrow correlated with the TNFD response to the peptide library (R2=0.40; p<0.0001) (Fig 2C).
A*0201-binding WT1126-134 peptide by intracellular cytokine staining. This peptide was selected
due to reports of successful vaccination in patients with leukemia’s and solid tumors16;17. Twelve
MDS patients were analyzed, 4 of whom had trisomy 8 as the sole chromosomal abnormality.
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
Responses were considerably less than those generated by the entire WT1 peptide library,
suggesting that this epitope was not a main target of autologous T cells in some patients. The
mean frequency of CD8+ T cells that produced TNFD was only 0.05% in IST responders and
0.007% in healthy controls; whereas the mean frequency of TNFD producing CD4+ T cells was
0.08% in IST responders and 0.02% in healthy controls. Because of the wide variation in
patient response, these means were not significantly different (Fig 2D).
Identification of cognate CD8+ T cells specific for the immunodominant WT1126-134 peptide
restricted by HLA-A*201by tetramer analysis
Unstimulated PBMC samples from 25 HLA-A*0201+ patients with MDS, 9 of whom had
trisomy 8 as the sole cytogenetic abnormality, and 25 HLA-A*0201+ healthy donors were
analyzed for circulating WT1-specific memory CD8+ T cells by flow cytometry using the
tetramers were used as a negative and positive controls, respectively (example seen in Fig 3A).
Cognate tetramer binding was significantly greater in the responders when compared to non-
7
Proliferative responses of WT1-specific T cells
In order to further support the hypothesis that IST-responsive MDS patients show
MDS patients showed evidence of proliferation primarily within the CD4+ T cell compartment;
WT1-specific CD8+ T cells are contained within expanded V subfamilies and suppress
Expanded VE subfamilies within the total CD8+ T cell populations were identified
previously for a subgroup of patients in the present cohort2. We therefore examined these VE
expansions for the presence of WT1-specific CD8+ T cells in a patient with trisomy 8 (patient 4;
Supplementary Table 1; VE distribution profile for patient 4 seen in Fig 5A, upper panel).
Memory CD8+ T cells within the expanded VE subfamilies were identified by flow cytometry
and observed to specifically produce cytokine in response to stimulation with the WT1 peptide
library; whereas no analogous response was observed in the un-stimulated controls (Fig 5A,
middle panel). These V-3 subfamilies were previously sorted and found to be oligoclonal; two
detected2.
8
To assess the ability of memory CD8+ T cells from the expanded VE subfamilies to
suppress the growth of trisomy 8 colonies, VE-expanded CD8+ T cells were isolated by flow
cytometric sorting, incubated with BMMNC for 4 hr, and then cultured for 14 days. Erythroid
and myeloid trisomy 8 cells were suppressed significantly by the VE-expanded CD8+ T cell
populations; in contrast, little or no inhibition was observed with the control population of non-
VE-expanded CD8+ T cells despite their 3-fold greater numbers compared with the specific VE-
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
To confirm that cytotoxic lymphocytes from expanded V subfamilies are specific for
the WT1 cognate antigen, we analyzed one of the expanded VE populations in an IST-responsive
trisomy 8 MDS patient. Representative data is shown here. PBMCs were stained with
WT1/HLA-A*0201 tetramer, and anti-human CD3, CD8, CD27, CD45RO and VE fluorescence
A*0201 tetramer-binding, memory CD8+ T cells within the expanded VE3 subfamily (Fig 5B).
Tetramer-sorted CD8+ T cells were not studied in these experiments due to the
9
Discussion
patients and showed that these cells suppress the growth of trisomy 8 colonies2. Clinically, in
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
addition, this patient population is more likely to respond to IST20. Here, we examined the WT1
gene expression and show that it is higher in MDS, particularly in patients with trisomy 8. While
WT1 acts as a tumor suppressor in the kidney, its over-expression in hematopoietic cells is
associated with leukemia21. The mechanism for over-expression of WT1 in MDS is not well
understood; however, the association between WT1 expression and activation of the anti-
apoptotic genes, specifically A1/BFL122, could favorably affect the survival of cells that over-
express WT1. In this study, we demonstrated that WT1 is over-expressed in MDS and, in
particular, in the trisomy 8 form; indeed, the degree of WT1 over-expression correlated with the
percentage of trisomy 8 cells in the sample. Furthermore, WT1-specific CD8+ T cells, identified
by tetramer analysis and intracellular cytokine assays, suppressed trisomy 8 colony formation
and the presence of these cells correlated with a response to IST. It is likely that the immune
response of patients with MDS is directed against WT1 antigens other than WT1126-134 peptide
since the response of CD8 cells to the peptide library was ten-fold in excess of what it was for
WT1126-134 peptide. At least four native peptide nonamers from human WT1 have been shown to
generate a WT1-specific cytotoxic response capable of killing leukemic cell lines 23-25.
10
The WT1126-134 epitope, restricted by HLA-A*0201, is the most extensively studied
immunogenic peptide derived from the WT1 protein. CD8+ T cells specific for this peptide are
seen in patients with myeloid malignancies and following allogeneic stem cell transplant26;27.
Antibodies specific for WT1 are also detectable in human leukemia and MDS patients28;29. We
patients with leukemia and thus represent autoreactive T cells that have presumably escaped
clonal deletion10. In MDS, over-expression of WT1 may induce the expansion of such antigen-
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
specific CD8+ T cells, thereby leading to an autoimmune suppression of the MDS clone as well
as the residual normal marrow cells; the latter might be mediated by epitope spreading or via a
bystander effect from cytokines released during CD8+ T cell engagement of cognate targets.
Successful IST reduces the WT1-specific CD8+ T cell-induced marrow suppression (Fig 2
supplement) and hence allows hematopoietic recovery. The cytokine elaborated after
lymphocytes were exposed to the peptide library was primarily TNF- in all patients except one
patient who developed MDS after aplastic anemia; this patient’s lymphocyte secreted interferon
. Others have noted that lymphocytes from patients with AA over-express IFN- while those
from patients with MDS secrete TNF30. These findings suggest that despite their similarities,
the immunological processes in MDS and AA are different. Our findings do not exclude other
antigens from playing a role in the MDS-associated immune response. Indeed, in patients with
significant apoptosis, it is likely that apoptotic bodies31 and caspase-cleaved proteins32 might
The fact that the magnitude of CD4 and CD8 cytokine expression after incubation with
the WT1 peptide library was so much in excess of that directed against the WT1126-134 peptide
suggests that other peptides play a more prominent role immune response in these patients.
11
This is consistent with the data of other investigators who found WT1 peptide 235–243
immunogenic enough to vaccinate patients with acute leukemia13. At least four native peptide
nonamers from human WT1 have been shown to generate a WT1-specific cytotoxic response
capable of killing leukemic cell lines 23-25. The finding that both CD4 and CD8 cells responded
to WT1 is consistent with data of other investigators who found a pronounced contraction of
naive and central memory cells and accumulation of effector and terminal effector–memory cells
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
within the CD4+ T-cell compartment in younger MDS patients responsive to IST.
MDS clones are not eradicated by the WT1-specific CD8 T cells. Other studies from our
laboratory suggest an explanation: trisomy 8, although susceptible to T cell attack, can avoid
apoptotic death by upregulating survivin and BCL-2, thereby blocking the caspase-dependent
pathway to apoptosis 33. Thus, although partially suppressed, trisomy 8 cells may avoid complete
elimination by CD8+ T cells. Such a mechanism would be in keeping with the hematological
Our findings raise questions about the long-term outcome after IST in MDS. Reduction
in T cell auto-reactivity and subsequent unchecked proliferation of the MDS clone could
potentially increase the likelihood of disease progression. Nonetheless, in our experience of over
leukemia1;2.
against synthetic WT1 peptides lyse both autologous WT1-loaded cells and WT1-expressing
leukemia cell lines. In these studies, lysis of freshly isolated acute leukemia cells was shown to
be HLA-restricted and specific for WT1-expressing cells35, while normal hematopoiesis was not
12
suppressed34;35. Indeed, WT1 peptide vaccines are currently under investigation by our group and
findings suggest that a WT1-based vaccine could have paradoxical effects in MDS with over-
expression of WT1: thus, vaccine-boosted T cells might suppress the MDS clone but accentuate
marrow failure. Of note, it has been reported that 2 patients with hypoplastic MDS developed
severe pancytopenia after vaccination with WT1, necessitating the use of high-dose steroids to
abrogate the WT1-specific immune response38. On the other hand, vaccination might remove the
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
inciting cause of the immune response and eventually restore normal hematopoiesis. Overall,
then, WT1 vaccination in MDS patients should be performed with caution, especially in cases
13
Methods
Patients
system were enrolled to receive treatment with horse ATG (Pharmacia, Kalamazoo, IN), ATG
plus cyclosporine (CsA) or CsA alone in sequential protocols 00-H-0169, 04-H-0026 and 95-H-
0189 approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Heart, Lung and Blood
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
Monoclonal antibodies
(mAbs) were used: (i) DCD3-Alexa 700, DCD3-PECy7, DCD3-FITC, DTCR-FITC, DCD8-
PECy7, DIL-2 allophycocyanin (APC) and DMIP1E-PE (BD Pharmingen); (ii) DCD28-FITC,
Texas Red-PE (Beckman Coulter); (iii) DTCRVE-FITC and DTCRVE-PE (Immunotech); (iv)
APCAlexa 750, DCD14-Pacific Blue and DCD19-Pacific Blue (Invitrogen); and, (vii) DCD4-
PerCPCy5.5 (BioLegend).
Peptide synthesis
(Lewisville, TX) to a minimum purity of 95%. The identity of each peptide was confirmed by
mass spectral analysis. The following peptides, all restricted by HLA-A*0201, were tested:
14
WT1126-134 (RMFPNAPYL)34, cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65495-503 (NLVPMVATV)40, and HIV-
1 p17 Gag77-85 (SLYNTVATL)41. The WT1 peptide library consisted of 127 sequential 15-mer
peptides, each overlapping by 11 amino acid residues (New England Peptide LLC).
Cell separation
Density gradient centrifugation with lymphocyte separation media (Organon) was used to
Cells were treated with hypotonic buffer comprising KCl, HEPES (N-2-
NaOH to expose the nucleus at interphase, then fixed onto slides using methanol/acetic acid
(3:1). FISH was performed with probes for chromosomes 5q, 7, 11 and 8 (Vysis Inc.) as
described previously2. Percentage positive staining was based on a 400 cell score. Three different
observers, blinded with respect to sample identity, examined three different sets of slides and the
mean score was recorded. A healthy negative control and a trisomy 8 positive control were
Flow cytometry was used to analyze TCRV expression patterns within the circulating T
cell populations of MDS patients as described previously2. Fresh PBMC were stained with
DCD4, DCD8, DCD28 and one of 22 TCRV mAbs for 15 min at room temperature. The
distribution of VE subfamilies was determined within the total CD4+ and CD8+ T cell
15
populations and also within the corresponding subpopulations that expressed low levels of
CD28. In addition, DTCRDE-FITC was used to determine the contribution of each VE subfamily
to the total DETCR repertoire. Values obtained for individual VE families were expressed as a
based on the observation of a percentage greater than two standard deviations above the mean
previously Inclusion bodies were released by repeated freeze/thaw cycles and purified by
washing with 0.5% Triton X-100 buffer (Sigma). Soluble biotinylated peptide-MHC class I
Fluorochrome-labeled tetramers (1-2 μg per test with respect to the pMHCI component) were
added for 15-30 min at 37°C. Cells were washed once in PBS/1% FCS, and subsequently stained
with pre-titrated DCD3, DCD8, DCD14 and DCD19 mAbs for 20 min at room temperature. After
a further wash in PBS containing 0·5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA, the cells were re-suspended in
cytometer. A minimum of 0.5 x 106 cells was acquired in each case. The HIV/HLA-A*0201
16
tetramer, refolded around the p17 Gag77-85 (SLYNTVATL) peptide, was used as a negative
To assess T cell immunoreactivity to WT1, 106 cells were suspended in RPMI 1640
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
CA), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen) (R10)
together with the co-stimulatory mAbs DCD28 and DCD49d (1 Pg/mL each; BD Pharmingen).
Stimulation was performed with pooled peptides constituting the WT1 peptide library (1 Pg/mL
final concentration for each individual peptide) or staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB, 1Pg/mL;
Sigma-Aldrich) as the positive control; medium alone was used as the negative control.
Following incubation for 1 hr at 37qC/5% CO2, brefeldin A (10 Pg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich) was
added and the cells were incubated for a further 5 hr. In some experiments, the cells were
stimulated with antigen from the start in the presence of brefeldin A and monensin (GolgiPlug
and GolgiStop, respectively; both from BD Pharmingen). Following stimulation, cells were first
stained with the live-dead cell discrimination dye Aqua-blue or violet (ViViD) amine-reactive
fluorescent dye (both from Invitrogen) to eliminate the dead cells and then with mAbs specific
for surface markers. In other experiments, the cells were stained with DTCRVE mAbs following
antigen stimulation, then stained with mAbs specific for CD3, CD4, CD8, CD27 and CD45RO.
Next, the cells were fixed and permeabilized with cytofix/cytoperm solution (BD Pharmingen)
and stained intracellularly for cytokines. Lastly, the cells were washed, fixed, and analyzed using
17
a custom-built LSRII or FACSAria flow cytometer (BD). At least 200,000 events were acquired
per tube.
Data analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc). The gating strategy
is depicted in Figure 2. First, live T cells were discriminated from dead cells, monocytes and B
cells by a CD3 versus ViViD/CD14/CD19 gate. In some experiments Aqua Blue was used
instead of ViViD, and CD14 and CD19 were not included in the analysis. Next, single cells were
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
identified in a forward scatter-area (FSC-A) versus FSC-height plot, followed by a FSC-A versus
side scatter-area plot to identify the lymphocyte population. Next, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were
gated in a CD4 versus CD8 bivariate plot. Cytokines were identified directly in these T cell
subsets, or after the identification of central and effector memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
Immunoblotting
Protein extracts were prepared from BMMNC as described previously43 and quantified
using the Micro BCA Protein Assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Electrophoresis at 125V was used
to resolve proteins (10g/lane) in 12% Tris-glycine SDS gels (Invitrogen). Resolved proteins
from the gel were then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA). The membrane was blocked for 2 hr with 5% BSA in PBS and 0.05% Tween-20,
then incubated with the primary mAb. Subsequently, membranes were incubated with the HRP-
conjugated secondary mAb and the bands of interest were detected using the ECL Plus system
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Membranes were stripped after the first blotting in
ImmunoPure IgG elution buffer (Pierce), then re-blocked and re-blotted with another mAb. To
evaluate equal loading of the lanes, membranes were re-blotted with anti-actin polyclonal Ab.
18
Densitometry analysis of the bands of interest was performed using ImageQuant analysis
software (Amersham Biosciences). Anti-WT1 mAb was purchased from Calbiochem; the anti-
actin polyclonal Ab and the HRP-conjugated mAbs were purchased from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology.
reaction (qRT-PCR)
RNA was treated with DNase I (Invitrogen) to eliminate genomic DNA, and random
hexamer primed cDNA was synthesized using the Advantage RT-for-PCR kit (Clontech). ABL
expression was used as the endogenous cDNA quantity control for all samples44; conditions for
the measurement of ABL expression were reported previously45. Expression of WT1 was
measured using 500 nM primers and 200 nM probe as described previously46. All qRT-PCR
reactions were performed in triplicate on 10 PL samples. The ABI PRISM 7900 sequence
detection system (Applied Biosystems) was used with standard conditions and 40 cycles of
amplification; primer and probe sequences for qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
PBMC from MDS patients and controls (1 x 106 viable cells) were pulse-labeled at a
Invitrogen/Molecular probes) at 37q C, 5% CO2 for 6 min, followed by rapid quenching with
sterile R10. After repeated washes in R10, cells were re-suspended at a final concentration of 1 x
19
106 cells/mL in R10 and placed in 48-deep well plates with 5 U of recombinant human IL-2
(PeproTech) and the co-stimulatory mAbs DCD28 and DCD49d (1.0 Pg/mL each). Cells were
stimulated with SEB (1Pg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich), the WT1 peptide library (1Pg/mL) or the
optimal WT1 126-134 peptide; R10 alone was used as the negative control in each case. Cells were
then incubated for 6 days in a light-protected environment at 37qC 5% CO2. After incubation,
cells were stained with Aqua-blue amine-reactive fluorescent dye and surface marker-specific
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
mAbs, fixed and acquired on a LSRII flow cytometer (BD). At least 200,000 events were
performed short-term (14 day) colony culture after incubation of BMMNC for 4 hr with
autologous CD8+ T cells from the expanded V subfamily purified by flow cytometry as
described previously2. The ratio of BMMNC to CD8+ T cells during the incubation phase was
1:6 for the V-expanded CD8+ T cells and 1:18 for the non-V-expanded CD8+ T cells.
Statistics
Summary statistics were used to describe patient characteristics, baseline variables, and
distributions of overall disease free survival and cumulative probability of response. Statistical
tests based on T-tests, likelihood ratio tests and Chi-squared tests were used to compare the
response rates, overall survival and leukemia evaluation between subgroups. Data analysis was
20
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
21
Figure Legends
Figure 1. Increased WT1 mRNA and protein expression in trisomy 8 MDS. (A) qRT-PCR for
WT1 mRNA expression was performed on BMMNC from patients with trisomy 8 (N =11),
MDS patients with other cytogenetic abnormalities (N=13) and healthy donors (n=22) as
described in the Methods. Patients with trisomy 8 had significantly increased WT1 mRNA
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
expression levels compared to non-trisomy 8 MDS patients (p=0.003) and healthy donors
(p<0.0001). (B) The extent of WT1 over-expression was proportional to the percentage of
trisomy 8 cells in the BMMNC sample (p<0.0001) (R2 =0.71). (C) Immunoblots were performed
on samples of nuclear and cytoplasmic protein extracted from the BMMNC of 12 trisomy 8
patients, 8 patients with non-trisomy 8 MDS and 8 healthy controls; representative examples are
shown with densitometry readings expressed as ratio of WT1 protein:actin protein. All patients
Figure 2. Functional WT1-specific T cells are present in IST-responsive MDS patients. (A)
PBMC from 38 patients with MDS were stimulated with a comprehensive WT1 peptide library
as described in the Methods. Cells cultured in R10 alone were used as negative controls. Gating
strategy: Live T cells were discriminated from dead cells, B cells and monocytes in a dump vs
CD3 bivariate plot. Next, single cells were selected in a forward scatter-area (FSC-A) versus
FSC-height (FSC-H) plot, and small lymphocytes in a FSC-A versus side scatter-area plot.
Fluorochrome aggregates were then excluded (not shown) prior to selection of the CD4+ and
CD8+ T cells. (B) Cytokine production after stimulation for 6 hours with the WT1 peptide
library or positive control (SEB); un-stimulated cells were used as a negative control. The
22
percentage of cytokine producing CD4+ (bottom) and CD8+ (top) T cells for a representative
IST responder is indicated in these plots. (C) A composite figure for cytokine expression in
response to stimulation with the comprehensive WT1 peptide library in IST responders and non-
responders. (D) CD4 TNF production correlated with the percentage of trisomy 8 in BMMNCs
(p<0.0001) (R2 =0.40). (E) Functional CD8+ T cell responses to the immunodominant WT1126-
134 peptide were measured by intracellular cytokine staining. Responses were considerably less
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
greater in IST responders than non-responders. (A) Gating strategy and an example of tetramer
binding is seen for patient 4. This demonstrates binding of the CMV tetramer to CD8 cells in this
CMV-seropositive patient and shows no binding to the HIV gag tetramer. The WT1126-134
tetramer binding is seen in memory CD8+ T cells (upper right), and is absent in both naïve and
memory-CD8 negative populations (bottom). (B) The mean frequency of memory CD8+ T cells
binding the WT1126-134 tetramer in IST responders was significantly higher than was observed in
peptide. Representative plots showing proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in response to
stimulation with the WT1126-134 peptide. Proliferation was assessed in a flow cytometric assay
based upon staining and carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) titrations
described in the Methods. The percentage of divided cells is indicated in the top left corner in
each case. Gates were drawn with reference to the un-stimulated controls in each case.
23
Figure 5. CD8+ T cells within expanded V subfamilies respond functionally to WT1 peptides
and suppress trisomy 8 colony growth. Functional and tetrameric analyses of CD8+ T cells
within expanded V subfamilies were performed in patient 4. (A) Expanded CD8+ T cell
subfamilies were identified by flow cytometry using directly conjugated V-specific mAbs
(upper panel). PBMC from patient 4 were stimulated with a comprehensive WT1 peptide library
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
and stained as described in the Methods. CD8+ T cells within the expanded V subfamilies
showed substantial intracellular IFN and TNF production compared to un-stimulated controls
(middle panel). Expanded CD8+ T cell subfamilies were sorted by flow cytometry using directly
conjugated V-specific mAbs, incubated with autologous marrow for 4 hours, and placed in
semisolid media for short-term culture (14 days). Suppression of trisomy 8 colony growth was
observed, relative to both controls in the absence of CD8+ T cells and in the presence of 3x the
number of CD8+ T cells from V subfamilies that were not expanded (lower panel). (B) Cognate
WT1126-134/HLA-A*0201 tetramer-binding memory CD8+ T cells are within the expanded V3+
subfamily.
24
Supplementary Data
Supplementary Figure 1. FISH with probes directed at the WT1 gene and chromosome 8
show normal numbers of the WT1 allele. Samples of blood from trisomy 8 patients were
hybridized with probe to WT1 (orange) and chromosome 8 (green). WT1 gene duplication was
not detected with this technique.
Supplementaty Fig 2 Samples obtained from patients pre and post treatment show increasing
numbers of trisomy 8 cells and decreasing numbers of cytotoxic T cells directed at WT1.
Samples obtained from patients following a successful response to IST demonstrate that tetramer
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
binding cells decrease with treatment while the number of target trisomy 8 cells increases.
25
Reference List
1. Maciejewski JP, Risitano A, Sloand EM, Nunez O, Young NS. Distinct clinical outcomes
3. Sato T, Selleri C, Anderson S, Young NS, Maciejewski JP. Expression and modulation of
cellular receptors for interferon-gamma, tumour necrosis factor, and Fas on human bone
human marrow cells is induced by interferon gamma and tumor necrosis factor alpha and
3190.
5. Chen G, Zeng W, Miyazato A et al. Distinctive gene expression profiles of CD34 cells
6. Tsuboi A, Oka Y, Ogawa H et al. Constitutive expression of the Wilms' tumor gene WT1
inhibits the differentiation of myeloid progenitor cells but promotes their proliferation in
26
7. Cilloni D, Gottardi E, Messa F et al. Significant correlation between the degree of WT1
expression and the International Prognostic Scoring System Score in patients with
8. Inoue K, Tamaki H, Ogawa H et al. Wilms' tumor gene (WT1) competes with
2976.
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
specific memory CD8+ T cells exist in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic
myelogenous leukemia before and after stem cell transplantation. Blood 2003;102:2892-
2900.
11. Rezvani K, Brenchley JM, Price DA et al. T-Cell Responses Directed against Multiple
12. Oka Y, Tsuboi A, Elisseeva OA, Udaka K, Sugiyama H. WT1 as a novel target antigen
27
13. Oka Y, Tsuboi A, Taguchi T et al. Induction of WT1 (Wilms' tumor gene)-specific
cytotoxic T lymphocytes by WT1 peptide vaccine and the resultant cancer regression.
PNAS 2004;101:13885-13890.
16. Keilholz U, Letsch A, Busse A et al. A clinical and immunologic phase 2 trial of Wilms
tumor gene product 1 (WT1) peptide vaccination in patients with AML and MDS. Blood
2009;113:6541-6548.
responses following combined PR1 and WT1 peptide vaccination in patients with
18. Wooldridge L, Lissina A, Cole DK et al. Tricks with tetramers: how to get the most from
19. Kordasti SY, Ingram W, Hayden J et al. CD4+CD25high Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in
20. Sloand EM, Rezvani K. The Role of the Immune System in Myelodysplasia: Implications
28
21. Wagner KD, Wagner N, Schedl A. The complex life of WT1. J Cell Sci 2003;116:1653-
1658.
22. Simpson LA, Burwell EA, Thompson KA et al. The antiapoptotic gene A1/BFL1 is a
23. Asemissen AM, Keilholz U, Tenzer S et al. Identification of a highly immunogenic HLA-
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
24. Gao L, Xue SA, Hasserjian R et al. Human cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for Wilms'
1436.
25. May RJ, Dao T, Pinilla-Ibarz J et al. Peptide epitopes from the Wilms' tumor 1
oncoprotein stimulate CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that recognize and kill human malignant
26. Rezvani K, Yong AS, Savani BN et al. Graft-versus-leukemia effects associated with
27. Melenhorst JJ, Scheinberg P, Chattopadhyay PK et al. High avidity myeloid leukemia-
associated antigen-specific CD8+ T cells preferentially reside in the bone marrow. Blood
2009;113:2238-2244.
29
28. Elisseeva OA, Oka Y, Tsuboi A et al. Humoral immune responses against Wilms tumor
3279.
29. Gaiger A, Carter L, Greinix H et al. WT1-specific serum antibodies in patients with
30. Maciejewski JP, Risitano AM, Sloand EM et al. A pilot study of the recombinant soluble
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
human tumour necrosis factor receptor (p75)-Fc fusion protein in patients with
31. Cocca BA, Cline AM, Radic MZ. Blebs and Apoptotic Bodies Are B Cell Autoantigens.
J Immunol 2002;169:159-166.
33. Sloand EM, Pfannes L, Chen G et al. CD34 cells from patients with trisomy 8
2405.
2203.
30
35. Ohminami H, Yasukawa M, Fujita S. HLA class I-restricted lysis of leukemia cells by a
CD8(+) cytotoxic T-lymphocyte clone specific for WT1 peptide. Blood 2000;95:286-
293.
36. Oka Y, Elisseeva OA, Tsuboi A et al. Human cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses specific
for peptides of the wild-type Wilms' tumor gene (WT1 ) product. Immunogenetics
2000;51:99-107.
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
recurrent acute myeloid leukemia induced by vaccination with WT1 peptide in the
38. Oka Y, Tsuboi A, Murakami M et al. Wilms tumor gene peptide-based immunotherapy
for patients with overt leukemia from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or MDS with
39. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT et al. Proposals for the classification of the
40. Diamond DJ, York J, Sun JY, Wright CL, Forman SJ. Development of a candidate HLA
Blood 1997;90:1751-1767.
31
42. Sloand EM, Fuhrer M, Keyvanfar K et al. Cytogenetic abnormalities in paroxysmal
2003;123:173-176.
43. Solomou EE, Keyvanfar K, Young NS. T-bet, a Th1 transcription factor, is up-regulated
44. Beillard E, Pallisgaard N, van dV, V et al. Evaluation of candidate control genes for
diagnosis and residual disease detection in leukemic patients using 'real-time' quantitative
45. Yong AS, Szydlo RM, Goldman JM, Apperley JF, Melo JV. Molecular profiling of
CD34+ cells identifies low expression of CD7, along with high expression of proteinase
212.
46. Ogawa H, Tamaki H, Ikegame K et al. The usefulness of monitoring WT1 gene
transcripts for the prediction and management of relapse following allogeneic stem cell
32
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
Fig 1A
LogWT1:Ablx100
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
Fig 1B
%trisomy8
p<0.0001
Fig 1C
Nuclear WT1
60kDa
actin
WT1:actin ratio 0.58 0.49 0.81 2.06 2.08 1.26 1.01 0.86
Cytoplasmic WT1
60kDa
actin
WT1:actin ratio 0.1 0.08 0.82 0.95 1.35 1.17 0.48 0.42
A
Fig 2
B
Fig 2C
% trisomy 8
p<0.0001
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
Fig 2E
Fig 3A
(Patient 4)
Normalized%
(Patient 4) 10 Patient4
8 Healthy controls
6
4
2
Nature Precedings : hdl:10101/npre.2010.4154.1 : Posted 12 Jan 2010
0
14 2 17 7 3 1 5.1 22 8 21.3 6.7 20 9 23 16 13.1 12 13.6 5.3 5.2 11 18
WT1inducedCytokineexpressioninexpandedVsubfamilies
6 14
5 12 +WT1PeptideLibrary
10 Unstimulated
%TNF
%IFN
4
8
3
6
2
4
1 2
0 0
VE3 VE5.3 VE22 VE5.4 VE22
Suppressionoftri8coloniesbythesecombinedV subfamilies
60
Numbertri8Colonies
Control
45 NonSelected
Selected
30
15
0
Fig 5B
(Patient 4)