You are on page 1of 14

Unrestricted M.

Naveed Alam 1
Why Allocate Joint Costs?
 To compute inventory cost and cost of goods sold
 To determine cost reimbursement under contracts
 For insurance settlement computations
 For rate regulation
 For litigation purposes

M. Naveed Alam 2
Terms
 Joint process - single process in which one product cannot be manufactured without
producing others.

 Joint products - primary outputs of a joint process; substantial revenue-generating


ability.

 Split-off point - when joint products are first identifiable as individual products. At split-
off joint costs are allocated to joint products

 By-products – incidental output of a joint process with a higher sales value than scrap
but less than joint products.

 Scrap –incidental output of a joint process with a low sales value.

 Waste - residual output with no sales value.

M. Naveed Alam 3
Approaches to Allocating Joint Costs
Two basic ways to allocate joint costs to products are:

 Approach 1: Physical Measure.

 Approach 2: Market Based.


 Sales value at split-off method.
 Estimated net realizable value (NRV) method.
 Constant gross-margin percentage NRV method.

M. Naveed Alam 4
Method Selection
 If selling price at splitoff is available, use the Sales Value at
Splitoff Method
 If selling price at splitoff is not available, use the NRV Method
 If simplicity is the primary consideration, Physical-Measures
Method or the Constant Gross-Margin Method could be used
 Despite this, some firms choose not to allocate joint costs at all

M. Naveed Alam 5
Example;

Final
Joint Product #1 Product
#1
Further Processing Dept 1

Single Production
Process Final
Joint Product #2 Product
#2
Further Processing Dept 2

M. Naveed Alam 6
M. Naveed Alam 7
Example -2

Final
Joint Product #1 Product
#1
Further Processing Dept 1

Single Production
Process Final
Joint Product #2 Product
#2
Further Processing Dept 2

M. Naveed Alam 8
M. Naveed Alam 9
By-Products
 These are secondary products with relatively little
value that are derived from the manufacturing
process.
 The most common practice is to make no allocation
of the processing costs up to the split-off point.

M. Naveed Alam 10
Sell-or-Process Further Decisions
 In Sell-or-Process Further decisions, joint costs are
irrelevant. Joint products have been produced, and a
prospective decision must be made: to sell
immediately or process further and sell later
 Joint Costs are sunk
 Separable Costs need to be evaluated for relevance
individually

M. Naveed Alam 11
Management Decisions
To Process or Not to Process?
1. Will revenues exceed total costs?
2. What is the opportunity cost?
3. How to classify outputs?
4. Sell at split-off or process further?

Final
Joint Product #1 Product
#1
Further Processing Dept 1

Single Production
Process Final
Joint Product #2 Product
#2
Further Processing Dept 2

M. Naveed Alam 12
Byproducts
 Two methods for accounting for byproducts
 Production Method – recognizes byproduct inventory
as it is created, and sales and costs at the time of sale
 Sales Method – recognizes no byproduct inventory,
and recognizes only sales at the time of sales:
byproduct costs are not tracked separately

M. Naveed Alam 13
Assignment
Practice Questions of joint product cost

(Submission
Problem # 1 Date is 10-05-2020 – 8pm
Joint Product Cost is $ 940,000
Further Unit Sales Unit Sales
Product Kg Processing Price (at split Price After
Cost of time) Process
X 320,000 $ 250,000 $ 8 $ 12
Y 200,000 $ 250,000 $ 30 $ 31
Z 380,000 $ 450,000 $ 15 $ 21
Required;
1. Allocate the Joint cost on the following basis;
 Physical measure basis.
 Sale Value basis.
 NRV basis.
2. Should we process further process or not?

M. Naveed Alam 14

You might also like