Professional Documents
Culture Documents
09 - Chapter 4 PDF
09 - Chapter 4 PDF
Chapter 4
4.1 Introduction
Wt of copolymer - Wt of substrate
Graft yield (%) = x 100 (4.1)
Wt of substrate
The graft copolymerization of acrylamide (AAm) onto Banana stalk (BS) was
carried out at different temperatures ranging from 30 to 70 °c (Figure 6). The graft
yield increases with increase of temperature. This may be attributed to the
following factors: (i) enhancement of swellability and thereby increasing the
surface area (iiJ increase in the mobility of the monomer and the initiator resulting
in the vicinity of the BS particles (iii) higher rate of diffusion of monomer and
initiator from the solution phase to the solid phase (iv) it is most probable that the
accompanied increase in the number of free radicals on raising the temperature
upto 70 °c favours initiation rather than termination of polymerization. The results
also show that graft yield increases at the beginning and subsequently levels off.
combination. Therefore 8.0 x 104 M FeAmS04 concentration has been used for the
study of all other effects.
..
'\40
& : 30 °C
120 • : so 0c
-
�
100
e : 60 °C
-�
.··.:s!� 80
60
"'
. it:
FeAmS04 : 8.0x 10"4M
40 2
H202 :L2 X 10" M
AAm : 25 lefL
20
BS : 5 lefL
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time (min)
Figure 6
Effect of reaction time and temperature on the graft copolymerization
of AAm onto BS
101
Chapter4
160
•••
°
A :30 C
-
:50 °C
: 60 °C
120
:70 °C
�
.i 80
: 1.2 X 10-2 M
C,
40 : 25 g,'L
: 5 g,'L
Time : 4h
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
4
[FeAmS04) x 10 (M)
Figure 7
Effect of concentration of ferrous ammonium sulphate
on the graft coplymerization of AAm onto BS
Figure 8 shows that graft yield increases with increase of H202 up to 1.2 x 10-2 M
concentration and remains constant thereafter. This may be due to the enhanced
rate of termination, which balances the rate of propagation (Pradhan et al., 1982).
The effect of monomer was studied by varying the concentration from 5.0 to 40.0
g/L (Figure 9). The graft yield increased with increase of the monomer
concentration. The enhancement of grafting with the increase of monomer
concentration could be attributed to the following: First, the complexation of BS
102
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
••
120
:30 °C
- ••
100 :50 °C
: 60 °c
:70 °C
'$. 80
.� 60
: 8.0x 10"4M
c., 40 AAm :25 gL
BS : 5 gL
20 Time :4 h
Figure 8
Effect of concentration of H202 on the graft
copolymerization of AAm onto BS
103
Chapter4
...
160
•••
:30 °C
140 :50 °C
:60 °C
120 : 10 °c
100
-� 80
60
C,
FeAmS04 : 8.0x 10"4M
40
H202 : l.2x 10·2M
20 BS : 5 g'L
Time : 4h
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
[AAm] (g/L)
Figure 9
Effect of monomer concentration (AAm) on the
graft copolymerization of AAm onto BS
composition of lignocellulose and the structure of lignin are rather complicated, the
sensitive component for polymerization might be the phenolic hydroxyl groups of
lignin. A mechanism of graft polymerization of AAm onto lignocellulose in BS,
initiated by Fe2+/H202 redox system, is proposed as follows: the ferrous ions first
react with H202 to produce ferric ions and hydroxyl radicals. The hydroxyl radicals
might attack lignocellulose to produce macroradicals. The newly produced ferric
ions then react with the phenolic hydroxyl group of the lignin to produce phenolic
radicals and ferrous ions. Then grafting of AAm takes place resulting in the
formation of PGBS.
I I I
_f_?_? OH
i. R1,R2 = H
ii. R1 = H, R2 = OCH3
iii. R1, R2 = OCH3
Figure 10
Structure of the lignin backbones for (i) p-hydroxyphenylpropane
(ii) guaiacyl and (iii) syringyl group
Initiation
2+ 3+
2 2 +Fe � Fe +OH- +OH•
HO (4.2)
Fe 2 + +
105
Chapter4
•
-BS +AAm -BS-AAm
• (4.4)
where -BS- is the phenolate ion of the lignin, -Bs• is the phenolate radical,
andAAm is the monomer.
Propagation
-BS-(AAm)n• (4.6)
- BS-(AAmJn -1• + AAm
Termination
Figure 11 shows the FTIR spectra of BS and PGBS-COOH. The broad absorption
band at about 3400 cm- 1 for BS is attributable to the sum of the contribution from
hydrogen bonded 0-H stretching vibration from cellulose structure and hydroxyl
group from polyphenols originally present in BS. The Band observed at 2945 cm-1
was attributed to C-H stretching from CH2 groups. The characteristic bands at
676 cm- 1 for BS and 653 cm- 1 for PGBS-COOH arise from 13-glucosidic linkage.
The broad absorption band at 3300 cm- 1 observed in the IR spectrum of
106
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
PGBS-COOH representing the overlap of 0-H, C-H, N-H and C-0 stretching
vibrations (Nakamoto, 1988). The peaks at 1626 cm- 1 (amide carbonyl) and 1568
cm- 1 for PGBS-COOH were due to the presence of aliphatic amide group and the
weak band at 1180 cm- 1 was due to the N-H stretching vibration. The participation
of 0-H groups in the grafting of AAm on BS was suggested by the variation
observed in broad absorption band due to 0-H stretching from 3400 cm- 1 in BS to
3300 cm-1 in PGBS-COOH. The new peaks at 1696 cm- 1 (vc=o) and 1455 cm- 1 (vc-o)
indicate the existence of -COOH groups in PGBS-COOH. These observations
clearly indicate the formation of polymeric chain (back bone) in the PGBS-COOH.
Figure 11
FTIR spectra of BS and PGBS-COOH
107
Chapter4
100 0.2
-:BS
80 - : PGBS-COOH 0
0.1
l
-
-
60 [>-
l!
.21)
0 --=�
(')
40
�
20
-0.1 l
0
0 -0.2
0 200 400 600
Temperature (C)
Figure 12
TG and OTA curves of BS and PGBS-COOH
X-ray diffraction patterns of the BS and PGBS-COOH are shown in Figure 13. It is
obvious that there is no new phase formation due to the grafting of polyacrylamide
on BS. However, results suggest that BS and its grafted products have their
corresponding crystalline structure. Native BS shows scattering angles at 2 B = 13°,
27° and 34°. XRD of BS indicated that BS has a crystalline domain of cellulose
substrate. In the crystalline regions, cellulose molecules (major component of BS)
are arranged in ordered lattices, in which hydroxyl groups are bonded by strong
secondary forces. Diffraction maxima at 20° and 34° have been attributed to the
crystalline region of cellulose. XRD studies showed that on graft polymerization, a
significant decrease in crystallinity took place. The broad peak centered at 21 °
109
Chapter4
100
-:BS
80 - : PGBS-COOH
= 60
·=- 40
20
0
10 20 30 40 50
6
2-Theta-Scale ( )
Figure 13
X-ray diffraction patterns of BS and PGBS-COOH
Figure 14
Scanning electron micrographs of BS and PGBS-COOH
113
Chapter4
--- •
25 1.25
...
• --;---+ : O.OIM NaCl
: O.OOIM NaCl
"'a 15 - : PGBS-COOH 0.75 =Q
j
=
CJ
I0 5
:BS
0.25 �
0 i
-5 -0.25 a
tb -15
CJ
fl
-0.75 a...
-25 -1.25
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
Figure 15
Effect of pH on the surface charge density of BS and
PGBS-COOH at different ionic strengths
114
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
reaching the binding sites of the adsorbent, caused by repulsive forces. In the
present study maximum adsorption for all the four metal ions occurred at pH
values higher than that of pHpzc ·
The removal of Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II) and Cd(II) ions by PGBS-COOH may be
represented as
+ +
2 PGBS-COOH + M2 (PGBS-C00)2 M + 2 H (4.9)
120
(b)
100
Pbz+ Pb(OH)z
.-. 80
-
~
0
r Il
~
'0
60
8-
iZl 40
20
0
(a)
Sorbent dose: 2 gIL
100
Temperature: 300e
PGB8-eOOH
.- Time: 3h
';!. 80
'-"
'a
~ 60
<>+ 100 mgIL
Q
Sl
1:i.A , ... _ #
20
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
pH
Figure 16
Effect of pH (a) on the removal of Pb(II) on BS and
PGBS-COOH. [(--) Adsorption, (- - - -) Precipitation]
and (b) on the distribution of Pb(II) species
118
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
140
(b)
120
2+
Co
_ 100
80
....
�
� 60
40
20
0
(a)
Sorbent dose: 2 g/L
120
Temperature: 30 °c
-. 100 Time: 3 h
� GBS-COOH
-;
80 <>• 50 mg/L
� l::,,.Ji,. 100 mg/L
a 60
I
�' 100 mg/L
� I --
40
20
"
I 1 50 mg/L
BS
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
pH
Figure 17
Effect of pH (a) on the removal of Co(II) on BS
and PGBS-COOH. [(--) Adsorption, (- - - - ) Precipitation]
and (b) on the distribution of Co(II) species
119
Chapter4
120
-
Hg
2+ (b)
100
H g(OH)2
� 80
._
.... 60
00 40
20
0
Sorbent dose : 2 gL (a)
- too Temperature : 30 °c
Time: 3 h
�
._ 80
60
40
20 50mgL
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
pH
Figure 18
Effect of pH (a) on the removal of Hg(II) on BS and
PGBS-COOH. [(--) Adsorption, (- - - - ) Precipitation] and
(b) on the distribution of Hg(II) species
120
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
120
(b)
-
100
'I. 80
·-
fl.I
�
y
60 2
Cd(OH)2
i
Cd
40
t
Cd(OH
20
0
(a)
--
Sorbent dose : 2 g,'L
100 Temperature : 30°C
Time: 3h
'I. 80 D • 25 mg,'L
-a... <>+ 50 mg,'L
60
50 mg,'L
� 40
I I
I I
20 I I
., '., 15 m
0
0 2 4 6 8 10
pH
Figure 19
Effect of pH (a) on the removal of Cd(II) on BS and
PGBS-COOH. [(--) Adsorption, (- - - - ) Precipitation]
and (b) on the distribution of Cd(II) species
121
Chapter4
The heavy metal sorption from real wastewaters is usually carried out in the
presence of various other ions. Ionic strength is one of the functions for expressing
the total amount of coexistent ions. The acid-base and electron-donor properties of
the adsorbent, the flexibility of the polymer chains and the degree of swelling of
the polymer in water solution depend on the ionic strength of the solution. The
effect of ionic strength on the adsorption Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II) and Cd(II) on
PGBS-COOH was studied at pH 6.5 with different ionic strengths varying from
0.01 to 1.0 M NaCl and at a fixed initial metal concentration of 50 mg/L
(Figure 20). It was found that adsorption of metal ions from the solution decreased
with increase in the concentration of NaCl. The adsorption of metal ions per unit
weight of adsorbent was found to decrease from 24.0 to 17.2 mg/g for Pb(II), 23.7
to 16.7 mg/g for Co(II), 22.9 to 17.2 mg/g for Hg(II) and 19.9 to 14.3 mg/g for
Cd(II) for a change in ionic strength from 0.001 to 1.0 M (Figure 20). Since
considerable change in adsorption is not observed between the ionic strengths
0.001 and 0.01 M, 0.1 M was taken to be the optimum concentration of NaCl for
further studies.
The effect of change in adsorption with increase in NaCl concentration may be
imparted to changes in the properties of electrical double layer or in the metal ion's
activity. Adsorption is sensitive to the change in ionic strength if electrostatic
attraction is a significant mechanism. Thus, here it seems that electrostatic
attraciion plays an important role in the removal of metal ions by PGBS-COOH.
According to the surface chemistry theory developed by Guoy Chapman (Osipow,
1972), when solid adsorbent is in contact with sorbate species in solution, they are
bound to be surrounded by an electrical diffused double layer, the thickness of
which is significantly expanded by the presence of electrolyte. Such expansion
inhibits the adsorbent particles and metal species from approaching each other
122
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
more closely and, through the decreased electrostatic attraction, leads to the
decreased uptake of metal ions. Lee and Yang (1997) explain the reduction of
metal adsorption by the presence of competing Na+ ions for metal binding
nevertheless, the reduction can also be explained on the basis of different ionic
species present at different chloride concentrations. Perusal of metal speciation
diagram (Knocke and Hemphill, 1981) showed that an increase in chloride
concentration reduces M2+and M(OHt species due to the formation of
chlorocomplexes. The results obtained are in good agreement with the calculated
values for the Langmuir constant 'b' related to binding energy between the cations
and the functional groups of the adsorbent. The results show that, the higher the
stability of the complex formed between the metal ion and the functional groups of
the adsorbent, the weaker the negative influence of the increased ionic strength.
30
Sorbent dose : 2 gL
�
cb 25 Temperature: 30°C
e Time: 3h
20 pH:6.5
Q
15
10 ••
I :Pb
:Co
e •
Q
:Hg
5 :Cd
0
0 -2 -4 -6 -8
In [NaCl]
Figure 20
Effect of ionic strength on the adsorption of Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II)
and Cd(II) onto PGBS-COOH
123
Chapter4
120
Pb(Il) Co(Il)
100
80
60
• : 25mg'L Sorbent dose : 2 g'L • : 25mg'L
Sorbent dose : 2 lefL
40 + : 50mg'L
° + : 50mg'L Temperature: 30 C
°
,,.... Temperature: 30 C
A : 100mg'L
'1. A : 100mg'L pH: 6.5
� 20 pH: 6.5
• : 150mg'L • : 150mg'L
Agitation: 200rpm Agitation: 200 rpm
0
'120
0
Cd(Il) Hg(Il)
; 100
80
60
• : 25mg'L • : 25mg'L
40 + : 50mg'L + : 50mg'L
A : 100mg'L A : 100 mg'L
20 • : 150mg'L • : 150 mg'L
Agitation: 200 rpm Agitation: 200 rpm
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time (min)
Figure 21
Effect of contact time and initial concentration on the
adsorption of Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II) and Cd(II) onto PGBS-COOH
Batch rate analysis can be used to evaluate kinetic and other parameters for the
design of batch mode treatment systems given the desired treatment goals. The
effect of concentration and temperature on reaction rates is well known and
important in understanding reaction mechanism. Several, kinetic models are
available to examine the controlling mechanism of adsorption process and to test
126
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
the experimental data. The rate constants of adsorption metals from solution were
determined by making use of the pseudo-first-order equation of Lagergren (1898)
and the pseudo-second-order equation by Ho and McKay (2000).
The Lagergren pseudo-first-order equation is represented as
(4.11)
where the superscripts 'exp' and 'cal' are the experimental and calculated values
and 'n' is the number of measurements. Kinetic parameters of these models for
different concentrations are calculated from the slope and the intercept of the linear
plots of log(qe-qJ versus t and t!q, versus t and are given in Table 5. The values of
dq(%) and correlation coefficients (r2) are also listed in Table 5. Based on r2 and
dq values it is established that the adsorption of metal ions onto PGBS-COOH can
be best described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The earlier
application of the pseudo-second-order equation to the kinetic studies of
competitive heavy metal adsorption by sphagnum moss peat was undertaken by Ho
et al. (1996). The pseudo-second-order rate expression has also been applied to the
sorption of dyes and organic substances from aqueous solutions (Ho et al., 2001).
The values of qe were found to increase with increase in the initial metal
concentration from 50 to 150 mg/L. The perusal of the data for an equilibrium time
indicates that the metal ion adsorbed qe is higher for Pb(II) followed by Co(II),
Hg(II), and Cd(II) at all concentrations. This is obvious because more efficient
utilization of the adsorptive capacities of the adsorbent is expected due to a greater
driving force by higher concentration gradient pressure. For a decrease in the initial
concentration of metal ions from 150 to 25 mg/L, the values of second-order rate
constant, k were found to increase from 8.97 x 10-3 to 1.35 x 10-3 g/mg min for
2
Pb(II), and from 2.24 x 10-2 to 1.68 x 10-3 g/mg min for Co(II), from 5.73 x 10-3 to
1.23 X I 0-3 g/mg min for Hg(II) and 1.10 X I 0-2 to 2.48 X I 0-3 g/mg min for Cd(II)
respectively. The product kq/ is actually the initial sorption rate represented as
h = kq/. The data clearly show that the initial sorption rate, h is increased with an
increase in initial metal concentration.
128
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
80 .--�����������--�����������----.
Pb(U) Co(U)
70
60
50
40 -................ .. .......................----
� 30
S 20
� 10 ...... ...
'i �·.::
.. ... ... .. ....
..
80
e : 25mr/L Cd(U) Hg (U)
Sorbent dose:2 rfL
d= 70
Temperature:30°C • : 50 mrfL
e 60 pH:6.5 .i : IOOmr/L
< I : 150mrfL
•
Agitation : 200rpm
50
40
30 .. . .. . .. . . . . .. . .. . . ..................
20
. . .. ... .. .......... , ......
......................
10 ----------------·······
....
O II"-�"'-�.......�.......�_...�_._�......,:::: -
"----'�---'---�"--�-'-����
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 50 100 150 200 250 JOO
Time (min)
Figure 22
Effect of contact time on the adsorption of Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II)
and Cd(II) onto PGBS-COOH and comparison of two kinetic models
with the observed data- (Legends): experimental;{-):
pseudo-second-order; {- - - -): pseudo-first-order
Table 5
Kinetic parameters for the adsorption of Pb(Il), Co(ll), Hg(Il) and Cd(ll) onto
PGBS-COOH at different initial concentrations
Pseudo-first-order Pseudo-second order
25 12.43 2.66 7.47 67.3 0.942 8.97 1.48 12.83 8.07 0.999
50 23.96 2.26 15.23 64.8 0.957 4.19 2.60 24.89 7.24 0.998
Pb(II)
100 42.62 2.29 30.29 57.4 0.967 2.09 4.18 44.74 10.18 0.999
150 59.52 2.49 40.74 61.5 0.962 1.35 5.29 62.60 12.88 0.997
25 12.35 1.77 3.54 90.5 0.931 22.39 3.49 12.48 5.87 0.998
50 23.50 2.44 11.73 75.2 0.942 6.93 3.92 23.97 7.37 0.999
Co(II)
100 40.56 1.80 23.54 71.9 0.954 2.38 4.17 41.83 5.38 0.999
150 56.47 2.48 37.69 61.4 0.945 1.68 5.75 58.47 5.75 0.999
25 12.32 1.76 8.02 68.7 0.964 5.73 0.93 12.75 14.24 0.998
50 22.88 1.73 16.16 64.4 0.966 2.42 1.42 24.27 14.14 0.999
Hg(II)
100 39.18 1.99 27.42 62.9 0.975 1.60 2.74 41.41 13.18 0.997
150 51.89 1.88 35.36 65.4 0.954 1.23 3.63 54.34 14.45 0.997
25 11.21 2.14 5.69 76.7 0.975 11.01 1.48 11.53 11.67 0.998
50 20.32 2.59 11.19 71.4 0.972 6.13 2.68 20.89 9.62 0.999
Cd(II) n
100 32.67 2.12 16.91 75.9 0.964 3.45 3.92 33.71 12.21 0.999
150 43.64 2.54 26.43 67.8 0.958 2.48 5.08 45.30 8.95 0.999 .... .....
al� N
CD
130
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
An identical trend in the h and k2 values with the initial concentration has been
reported also by earlier workers who studied the adsorption characteristics of
Cu(II) on chitosan (Wu et al., 2001) and Hg(II) adsorption on sulphurised activated
carbons (Anoopkrishnan et al., 2003). The decrease in the k2 values with increase
in concentration may be due to the progressive decrease in covalent interactions,
relative to electrostatic interactions of the sites with lower affinity for M(II) with an
initial M(II) concentration.
The linearised k2 and Ca values on log-log plots (Figure 23) show high
correlation coefficient greater than 0.971 and the following relationships
were obtained for Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II) and Cd(II) respectively. The decrease in
rate constant with concentration is sharp in the case of Co(II) as indicated by the
large negative value of the slope. The above relationships can be utilized for
predicting the rate constant of adsorption process at any initial concentrations
under similar experimental conditions.
131
Chapter4
-2
Sorbent dose : 2 g'L
-3 Temperature: 30°C
-4 Time: 3h
=
pH :6.5
�
••
-5
:Pb
..
-6 :Co
-7 :Hg
:Cd
-8
2 3 4 5 6
In C0
Figure 23
Log-log plots of initial concentration and pseudo-second-order
rate constants of the adsorption of Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II)
and Cd(II) on PGBS-COOH
such performance of the sorbent, i.e., decrease in unit adsorption with increase in
the dose of adsorbent, may be due to the fact that some adsorption sites remain
unsaturated during the adsorption process, whereas the number of available
adsorption sites increase by increasing the adsorbent dose and that results on the
increase of removal efficiency. Another reason for decrease in unit adsorption may
be the particle interaction such as aggregation, resulting from high adsorbent dose.
Such aggregates would lead to decrease in total surface area of the adsorbent and
increase in diffusional path length.
160 Temperature : 30 C
140 pH :6.5
Agitation time : 3 h
.- 120
'-' 100
t 80
o 60
� 40
20
0
0 200 400 600 800
Co (mg/L)
Figure 24
Effect of adsorbent dose on the adsorption of Co(II) from
aqueous solutions on PGBS-COOH
The kinetic data obtained from the above experiments were modeled to determine
the percentage removal at any time 't' for the given value of initial concentration
(Co) of Co(II) and adsorbent dose (W,). The experimental kinetic data were fitted
with the relationship of the type
133
Chapter4
t
= a+ ht (4.18)
R
where R is the percentage removal at time t, and a and b are coefficients. From the
slopes and intercepts of the straight line plots of t/R against t for each C0 and Ws, the
corresponding values of a and b were determined (Figure not shown). For each Co
and Ws by fitting equation (4.18) to the experimental data using regression analysis,
it was found that the values of 'a' decreased with the increase of Ws for all values
of Co (Table 6). The average of 'a' values for different initial concentrations with
respect to each adsorbent dose was calculated. The variation of the average values
of 'a' with Ws could be quantitatively represented as
a=---
c+ dWs (4.19)
where 'c' and 'd' are coefficients. The values of 'c' and 'd' were found to be-9.93
and 9.14 respectively. From Table 6 it is also observed that the constant b showed
an increasing trend with Co values for all values of Ws. A linear regression based on
the data of this study yields a relationship between band Co
b= Co (4.20)
e+ /Co
where e andfare coefficients. The values of e andfwere determined and are given
in Table 7 along with the coefficient of correlation (r2). The data clearly showed a
decreasing trend for 'e' with the increasing Ws values, whereas an increasing trend
for 'f. This shows that values of e and f correlate well with Ws through the
relationship
(4.21)
134
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
= Ws
f (4.22)
i+ jWS
where g, h, i and} are coefficients. Their values were computed as -4.09 x I0-4,
3.82 x 10-4, 5.50 x 10-2 and 5.74 x 10-3 respectively. Substitution of Equations
(4.19}-{4.22) in Equation (4.18) yields relationship of the type
t I C t
-= +----c----------0 ---------,--
R 9.14ffs -9.93 (4.23)
_ _ _ _
s _
_ _ s
(
-4 W.
+
-2 W.
co
-4.09x10 +3.82xl0 J¥s 5.50x10 +5.74xl0 J¥s . J
-4 -3
which helps to determine the percentage of Co(II) removal at any time for the
given value of Co and Ws .
The above model is used to simulate several variable conditions of Co(II)
adsorption, namely C0, Ws, and pH. (Figure 25). In each case the model is able to
simulate batch data reasonably well for various operational conditions. Further
study is required to more fully understand the above relationship with respect to
real industrial wastewater and other operational conditions. The model can be used
to predict the adsorbent dose required to get the required Co(II) removal at any
given time and initial solute concentration. The required removal efficiency can
also be achieved by controlling the variable such as contact time . and dose of
adsorbent in batch reactor.
135
Chapter4
Table 6
Values of coefficients 'a' and 'b' with respect to coefficient of
correlations (l) for different values of 'Ws' and 'Co'
Initial Co(II) Adsorbent dose, W, (g/L)
conen.,
C0 (mg/L) 1 2 4 8 10
a 0.0560 0.0256 0.0070 0.0043 0.0011
150 b 0.0227 0.0131 0.0107 0.0105 0.0100
r2 0.9990 0.9980 0.9990 0.9990 0.9960
a 0.0885 0.0881 0.0318 0.0147 0.0032
300 b 0.0351 0.0179 0.0115 0.0108 0.0104
r2 0.9960 0.9970 0.9990 0.9950 0.9960
a 0.2090 0.1656 0.0645 0.0178 0.0084
450 b 0.0419 0.0204 0.0130 0.0117 0.0109
r2 0.9960 0.9950 0.9990 0.9990 0.9990
a 0.3328 0.2008 0.0817 0.0369 0.0216
600 b 0.0515 0.0238 0.0133 0.0120 0.0113
r2 0.9950 0.9980 0.9990 0.9980 0.9970
Table 7
Values of coefficients of 'e' and'/' with respect to
coefficient of correlations for different values of 'Ws'
Adsorbent dose, W, (g/L) e f r2
5003.65 13.34 0.998
2 4617.11 30.96 0.987
4 4424.25 68.23 0.996
8 3203.48 78.64 0.997
10 2775.73 84.59 0.999
136
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
120
+ : Experimental
•• • • •
100 -- : Calculated
80 + : Experimental
-- : Calculated
60
-
Adsorbent dose : 10 g,'L Adsorbent dose : 8 g,'L
40 pH : 6.5 pH :7.5
= 20
Initial concn : 300 mg,'L Initial concn
Temperature
: 600 mg,'L
: 30°C
Temperature : 30°C
120
Adsorbent dose : 2 g,'L
� • : Experimental
� 100 pH : 6.5
-- : Calculated
Initial concn : 530 mg,'L
80 Temperature : 30°C
60
40 • •
Adsorbent dose : 7.5 g,'L
pH :7.0
: 450 mg,'L
Initial concn
+ : Experimental
20 Temperature : 30°C
-- : Calculated
0
0 50 100 150 200 50 100 150 200
Time (min)
Figure 25
Comparison of the experimental and calculated values of Co(II)
removal by PGBS-COOH at different experimental conditions
137
Chapter4
activating the adsorption sites. The increase in temperature also increases the
chemical forces responsible for adsorption.
6
Pb(II) Sorbent dose : 2 tef1, Co(II)
5 Concentration: 100 mtefl,
pH: 6.5
Agitation: 200 rpm
3
: 30 °C
2 : 40 °C
•
�
.@� 1 I : so 0c
-
:60 °C
• ; ·o Cd(II) Hg (II)
i5
4
2
1
0
0 50 100 150 200 50 100 150 200
Time (min)
Figure 26
Pseudo-second-order kinetic plots for the adsorption of
Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II) and Cd(II) on PGBS-COOH
at different temperatures
139
Chapter4
60
30 °C 40 C
°
so
40
....................
,-.., 30 ................
..............
._, 20
10
60
so
°
60 C so 0c
40
30
_____ ..... ............. ........
20
. _ ............... ..... ............
. .,
10 :
0
0 50 100 150 200 50 100 150 200
Time (min)
Figure 27
Effect of contact time on the adsorption of Pb(II) onto PGBS-COOH at
various temperatures and comparison of two kinetic models with the
observed
. data, (Legends): experimental;(--): pseudo-second-
order; (- - - -): pseudo-first-order
140
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
Figure 28
Effect of contact time on the adsorption of Co(II) onto PGBS-COOH at
various temperatures and comparison of two kinetic models with the
observed data, (Legends): experimental; (--): pseudo-second-.
order; (- - - -): pseudo-first-order
141
Chapter4
60
30 °C 40 °C
50
40
30 .. , . .. . . . . . . . . . . .
..............
20
a
"Cl 10
,e= 60
,,
"Cl
....
� 60 °C 50 °c
50
=a 40
<
30 . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . .
20 - - - - - - - - - · ·· · · · · · · · · · · ·
, ..
10 ,.
:
0
0 50 100 150 200 50 100 150 200
Time (min)
Figure 29
Effect of contact time on the adsorption of Hg(II) onto PGBS-COOH at
various temperatures and comparison of two kinetic models with the
observed data, (Legends): experimental;(--): pseudo-second
order;(- - - -): pseudo-first-order
142
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ......•....
60 ° °
J0 C 40 C
50
40
30
20
---······· -- • . . . - - - - · · ·
. . . . . .. . .. . - - · "' . .. .. . .. .
..
,,
"Cl 10 ,
a.I.
,
-=
Q
60
so 0c
"Cl °
60 C
50
Q
40
<
30
20 · - ... . . . . .. .
- · · · . .. .. . .. .. -- - - · · · · · · ·
_
10 , ,
0
0 50 100 150 200 50 100 150 200
Time (min)
Figure 30
Effect of contact time on the adsorption of Cd(II) onto PGBS-COOH at
various temperatures and comparison of two kinetic models with the
observed data, (Legends): experimental; (--): pseudo-second
order; (- - - -): pseudo-first-order
Table8
Kinetic parameters for the adsorption of Pb(ll), Co(II), Hg(ll) and Cd(II) onto
PGBS-COOH at different temperatures
Pseudo-first-order Pseudo-second-order
h
Metal Temp qe,exp k1xl02 q., cal llq k2XI03 qe, cal llq
(mg/g) 1 r2 (mg/g r2
(OC) (m in" ) (mg/g) (%) (g/mg (mg/g) (%)
min)
min)
30 42.62 3.46 33.29 57.4 0.990 2.01 4.08 45.09 10.3 0.997
40 43.97 3.34 28.73 60.3 0.986 2.61 5.48 45.79 9.2 0.998
Pb(II)
50 45.93 3.44 22.37 73.7 0.999 4.28 9.49 47.19 6.6 0.999
60 49.13 5.75 19.96 60.5 0.919 9.16 22.57 49.63 3.7 0.999
30 39.45 2.44 23.96 67.8 0.991 2.33 3.99 41.43 13.2 0.995
40 41.66 2.32 22.79 73.2 0.986 2.68 5.00 43.19 12.5 0.996
Co(II)
50 44.79 3.78 22.06 69.1 0.984 4.90 10.13 45.92 5.2 0.999
60 46.38 5.47 18.86 75.9 0.974 9.13 20.24 47.08 2.7 0.993
30 39.31 2.26 27.41 62.0 0.968 1.81 3.07 41.21 10.2 0.999
40 43.18 3.33 30.20 56.4 0.899 2.43 4.85 44.70 6.3 0.999
Hg(II)
50 44.56 4.65 28.45 58.4 0.979 3.94 8.34 46.03 5.4 0.998
60 48.90 4.18 17.44 81.8 0.872 7.48 18.34 49.54 2.9 0.997
30 32.67 1.99 16.48 77.5 0.995 3.58 4.01 33.50 6.2 0.998
40 34.56 2.05 16.07 79.8 0.986 3.90 4.83 35.35 6.6 0.997 (')
Cd(II)
50 36.87 1.16 25.54 78.9 0.953 4.06 5.81 37.85 9.6 0.998
60 38.23 2.37 16.56 80.7 0.968 4.43 6.76 39.07 9.4 0.999 .... .....
� �
ii:. w
144
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
lnk2 = lnA0 Ea
-- (4.24)
RT
where Ao is the temperature independent factor called frequency factor and Ea is the
activation energy. There is a linear relationship between In k2 and the reciprocal of
absolute temperature 1/T. The values of En calculated from the slope of the plots
and were found to be 42.09, 39.03, 39.56 and 5.71 kJ/mol for Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II)
and Cd(II) respectively. Energies of activation below 42 kJ/mol generally indicate
diffusion-controlled processes and higher values represent chemical reaction or
surface controlled reaction (Spark, 1995). The relatively low Ea values also suggest
that the sorption has a low potential energy barrier.
observed that for the same equilibrium time, the adsorption is higher for greater
values of initial metal ion concentration. The curvature of the isothe1m decreased
as the Ce values increased considerably for a small increase in qe , The L-type
nature of the curve obtained in the present investigation is favourable for
adsorption and indicates a strong tendency in the process of monolayer formation
(Giles et al., 1960). The normal shape of the isotherm for all metals represent the
formation of a monolayer on the PGBS-COOH surface, meaning that the adsorbent
is favourable at low concentration range as indicated by the sharp line (Faust and
Aly, 1987). To determine the adsorption capacity of the PGBS-COOH, a study of
adsorption isotherm was attempted by analyzing the equilibrium data by a
computer simulation technique to fit the different isotherm models.
The Langmuir, Freundlich and Scatchard isotherm models were used to
interpret equilibrium isotherm data. The Langmuir isotherm is based upon an
assumption of monolayer adsorption onto a surface containing a finite number of
adsorption sites of uniform energies of adsorption with no transmigration of
adsorbate in the plane of the surface. The adsorbed layer is thus one molecule in
thickness and all sites are equal, resulting in equal energies and enthalpies of
adsorption. The strength of the intermolecular attractive forces is believed to fall
off rapidly with distance. The Langmuir isotherm is given by
(4.25)
The sorption data were analyzed according to the linear form of the Langmuir
isotherm
(4.26)
146
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
A linear form of this equation is commonly used by taking logarithms on both sides
and is represented as
1
log qe = log KF +-log c. (4.28)
where KF and 1/n are Freundlich isotherm constants related to adsorption capacity
and intensity of adsorption respectively. This isotherm is another form of the
Langmuir approach for adsorption on an "amorphous" surface. The amount
adsorbed is the summation of adsorption on all sites, each having a bond energy.
The · Freundlich isotherm is derived by assuming an exponential decay energy
distribution function . inserted in the Langmuir equation. It describes reversible
adsorption and is not restricted to the formation of the mono layer. The Scatchard
isotherm represents intermediate situations, close to the Langmuir model. The
Scatchard isotherm equation for a linear plot is represented by the following
equation
147
Chapter4
(4.29)
�e = Ks(Q/ -qe)
e
where Qs° and Ks are Scatchard constants related to the maximum monolayer
adsorption capacity and equilibrium adsorption constant respectively.
Linear regression was frequently used to determine the most fitted model
throughout the years and the method of least squares has been frequently used for
finding the parameters of the models. However Ho (2004c) indicated that
transformations of non-linear isotherm equations to linear forms implicitly alter
their error structure and violate error variance and normality assumptions of least
squares. The isotherm constants of all the previous equations are very useful
parameters for predicting adsorption capacities and also for incorporating into mass
transfer relationships to foresee the design of batch reactors. The values of all the
isotherm constants were calculated from the slope and intercept of the plots using
regression analysis and are shown in Table 9. In this manner, the experimental and
theoretical values of q are shown in Figure 31. It can be seen that, the experimental
data presented a good fitting in relation to the Langmuir adsorption model for all
the metals. The validity of the isotherm models is tested by comparing the
experimental and calculated data using the normalized standard deviation liq (%)
represented by the Equation (4.13). The values of liq(%) calculated are included in
Table 9.
The plots of the experimental qe and Ce values as specific sorption (C/qe)
against the equilibrium concentration (Ce) for the metal-PGBS-COOH systems are
shown in Figure 32. The plots of C/qe versus Ce are linear over the whole
concentration range studied showing the applicability of Langmuir isotherm. This
is further confirmed by the fact that the correlation coefficients (r2) for almost all
the experimental systems are all greater than 0.98 as shown in Table 9. The values
of(! and b for the removal of metals by PGBS-COOH were determined from the
148
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
slopes and intercepts of the plots using regression analysis. The values of Q0 and b
were found to be 185.34 mg/g and 0.0167 L/mg for Pb(II), 166.93 mg/g and 0.0093
L/mg for Co(II); 137.89 mg/g and 0.0092 L/mg for Hg(II), 65.89 mg/g
0.0341 L/mg for Cd(II) respectively at 30 °c. The adsorption capacity with respect
to all the metal ions increased with increase in temperature. On the other hand, the
equilibrium adsorption, qeq was smaller than Q0• This showed that the adsorption of
metal ions on PGBS-COOH is a monolayer type in which the surface of the
adsorbent is not fully covered (Ozer et al., 1999).
The experimental results showed that the adsorption capacity of the sorbent for
the various metal ions decreased in the order Pb> Hg> Cd at 30°C. The observed
order of uptake for metal ions was the same as that of their increasing ionic radii,
i.e., their decreasing hydrated ionic radii. The hydrated radii of the metal ions
+
studied are: 0.401 for Pb2\ 0.413 for Hg2+ and 0.426 for Cd2 . The smaller the
hydrated ionic radius, the greater its affinity to penetrate into smaller pores and,
thus, have greater access to active groups of the adsorbent. This suggests that the
energy required for the dehydration of the metal ion, so that they could occupy a
site in the adsorbent, plays an important role in determining the selectivity for the
metal ion. But Co(II) with a larger hydrated ionic radii was found to have been
removed more efficiently than either Hg(II) or Cd(II) indicating the fact that Co(II)
might have been coordinated to the various coordinating sites other than the
-COOH groups of the adsorbent. The presence of lateral interactions in the case of
Co(II) adsorption is evidenced by the low l}.q % values with respect to the
Freundlich isotherm. Since the results show that adsorption capacity is not equal
for all studied cations, it seems that PGBS-COOH does not behave unique
alongside of various cations. This proposes that all active groups in PGBS-COOH
are not available to all cations or specific interactions other than electrostatic
interactions occur in adsorption process between the PGBS-COOH and cations in
149
Chapter4
250 200
Pb(II) , Co(II)
,,. .... ,-
200 , .... .... --
-:-.;� 150
150
100
100
-
: Langmuir Sorbent dose : 2 giL
50 Time : 3h
50 : Scatchard
pH: 6.5
: Freundlich
0 0
� 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 100 200 300 400 500 600
100 250
Cd(II) Hg(ll)
200
75
150
50
100
:40 °C
25
• : 50 °C 50
• : 60 °C
0 0
0 100 200 300 400 0 200 400 600.
Ce (mg/L)
Figure 31
Comparison of the model fit of various isotherms to the observed
isotherm data for the adsorption of Pb(II}, Co(II}, Hg(II) and Cd(II) onto
PGBS-COOH at different temperatures. (Legends): experimental; (-):
Langmuir; (- - - -): Scatchard; (- - -): Freundlich
151
Chapter4
Figure 32
Langmuir isotherm plots for the adsorption of Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II) and
Cd(II) onto PGBS-COOH
Table 9 ....~ ~
C1I
Langmuir, Freundlich and Scatchard isotherm constantsfor the adsorption of Ph(/I), Cor/I), =
tD
::r.
N
n
Hg(!/) and Cd(/I) onto PGBS-COOH ~
40 169.77 0.0129 0.981 7.3 13.54 0.400 0.996 4.0 170.46 11.88 0.895 36.9
Co(II)
50 172.66 0.0184 0.990 7.3 17.92 0.368 0.995 3.5 169.75 18.03 0.901 36.8
60 181.46 0.0250 0.993 7.8 22.10 0.353 0.988 5.2 175.28 26.85 0.905 30.4
30 137.89 0.0092 0.998 4.9 5.28 0.520 0.924 14.7 150.49 7.53 0.909 5.6
Hg(II) 40 161.74 0.0120 0.991 4.4 7.60 0.501 0.918 15.5 171.53 10.54 0.955 5.2
50 191.03 0.0170 0.992 6.2 11.92 0.471 0.947 13.2 210.74 12.63 0.932 10.4
60 210.50 0.0294 0.997 6.4 20.72 0.412 0.957 11.2 213.56 26.80 0.917 13.3
30 65.89 0.0341 0.998 4.2 6.64 0.424 0.941 14.3 64.45 35.97 0.975 5.2
40 68.77 0.0382 0.999 3.1 7.42 0.416 0.945 14.1 67.70 38.83 0.985 6.6
ed(II)
50 76.65 0.0401 0.998 5.7 8.52 0.413 0.959 12.5 74.14 43.13 0.961 11.8
60 84.22 0.0440 0.997 6.2 9.49 0.417 0.968 12.6 83.24 42.94 0.952 22.9
153
Chapter4
�e =Ks(Q/-qeJ (4.30)
e
where Qs° and Ks are Scatchard constants related to the maximum monolayer
adsorption capacity and equilibrium adsorption constant respectively. The Qs°
values obtained in all cases are very much close to the corresponding Langmuir
monolayer capacities.
Temperature has a direct influence on the amount of the sorbed substance. In
the present investigation, the adsorption experiments were performed in the
temperaturt;; range of 30-60 °c. It was found that, according to the adsorption
isotherm, the amount of metal adsorbed on PGBS-COOH increase with the
solution temperature. It is observed that the values of Q0 increase with increase of
temperature. The Q0 values increased from 185.34 to 204.97 mg/g for Pb(II) and
from 166.93 to 181.46 mg/g for Co(II) and from 17.89 to 210.50 mg/g for Hg(II)
and from 65.89 to 84.22 mg/g for Cd(II) with a rise in temperature from 30 to
60 °c indicative of the endothermic nature of adsorption. In general, the formation
of adsorption complexes between transition metal cations and carboxylated ligands
is endothermic, whereas amine ligands complex formation is exothem1ic (Volesky,
1990). Since the temperature of most real wastewater was higher rhan room
temperature, PGBS-COOH had an advantage over those adsorbents whose uptake
capacity decreases with increase in temperature.
The results also show that b is an increasing function of the solution
temperature in all cases. The increase of b with temperature indicates that the
affinity for metal ions is favoured by high temperature, and therefore, this
154
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
However, when the uptake was expressed on a molar basis the following order
was obtained.
easily hydrolysed metals, it might be suggested that adsorption and hydrolysis are
correlated in same way. No other specific reason can at present be attributed to the
observed fact regarding the higher adsorption capacity of Co(II).
l'lS o - l'lH o
In b, = (4.32)
R RT
nature of sorption. Further, the value of �G0 becomes more negative with rise in
temperature showing increase in feasibility of adsorption at higher temperatures.
The values of �s1 were found to be 163.84, 144.16, 167.91 and 92.20 J/mol/K
respectively for Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II) and Cd(II). The positive values of� show
the increase in randomness at the solid-solution interface during adsorption. The
relatively small positive value in the system under investigation indicates that as a
result of adsorption no significant structural change occurs in the adsorbent
material.
10.0
9.0
-:c 8.0
�
7.0 �
•:P
+ :Co
6.0 • :Hg
e :Cd
5.0
0.0029 0.003 0.0031 0.0032 0.0033 0.0034
1/f (K-1)
Figure 33
Plots of In b 1 for the adsorption of Pb(II), Co(II}, Hg(II) and Cd(II)
as a function of 1/T
The effect of isotherm shape can be used to predict whether a sorption system
is favourable or unfavourable in batch process. According to Hall et al. (1966) the
essential features of the Langmuir isotherm can be expressed in terms of separation
factor or equilibrium parameter RL which can be calculated from the relationship.
R - I (4.33)
L - 1 +bC0
157
Chapter4
Table 10
Equilibrium and thermodynamic parameters/or the adsorption of
Pb(Il), Co(Il), Hg(Il) and Cd(ll) onto PGBS-COOH
Cl) RL
Ele,,...., values
t,.G
O
t,,Jf l:!.S1
Cl) Cl)u
c..o
� sCl) '-' 150
mg/L
200
mg/L
300
mg/L
400
mg/L
(kJ/mol) (kJ/mol) (J/mol/K)
E-<
-
30 0.4212 0.3531 0.2668 0.2144 -18.93
,,...., 40 0.3577 0.2946 0.2178 0.1728 -20.26
'-'
32.13 167.91
50 0.2816 0.2272 0.1639 0.1282 -21.85
60 0.1848 0.1453 0.1018 0.0784 -24.04
30 0.1641 0.1291 0.0931 0.0691 -20.77
40 0.1503 0.1172 0.0812 0.0621 -21.74
7.15 92.20
,,...., 50 O.l431 0.1114 0.0771 0.0592 -22.58
'-'
L1Hx (4.34)
= --- 2
RT
The equilibrium concentration Ce, at constant amount of metal adsorbed, obtained
from the adsorption isotherm data at different temperatures are used for the plots of
In Ce versus 1/Tfor different amounts of metal adsorption (Figure 34). The plots of
In Ce versus 1/T were found to be linear with good correlation and the values of
t:Jlx,
•••
7.0 Surface loading (mg/g) Pb(Il) Surface loading (mg/g) Co(II)
6.0
155
150 • 140
5.0 • 145
140
0 135
•
A 130
• 115
120
4.0
tJ. 130 0 110
D 125 /J. 105
0 115 D 100
3.0
-= 7.0
•••
Cd(II) Surface loading (mg/g) Hg(II)
•••
Surface loading (mg/g)
6.0 58 108.0
56 101.5
5.0
0
• 54
52
50
• 97.5
90.0
0 85.0
4.0
tJ. 48 /J. 80.5
D 46 D 63.5
3.0 0 44
100
Pb(II) Co(II)
80
- .......
60
40
20
...... ... -+
=..
100 120 140 160 18075 100 125 150
100
Cd(II) Hg(II)
80
60
��
40
20
0
40 50 60 70 50 75 100 125 150
Surface loading (mg/g)
Figure 35
Variation of AHx with respect to surface loading
were calculated from the slopes of plots. The average values of !)J!x were found to
be 49.89, 32.39, 28.40 and 27.98 kJ/mol respectively for Hg(II), Pb(II), Co(II) and
Cd(II) and are independent of surface loading (Figure 35). This points out that the
surface of the adsorbent is energetically homogeneous and lateral interaction
between adsorbed metal ions is nearly absent (Wu et al., 200 l ).
161
Chapter4
::r.
tD
n
&
-
t':r1
..c
e.....
a"
::l.
§
Table 11
�
Langmuir, Freundlich and Scatchard isotherm constants for the adsorption of Pb(II), Co(Il), ,:i..
I!..
Hg(ll) and Cd(ll) onto Ceralite IRC-50 at 3ffC a,
200 00
Pb(II) Hg(II)
150
_ .... _ ....
150
100
-�.-:;,:- ....... 100 ...-:'-; - --- -.-
so so
"""r
,-..,
� 0 0
0 200 400 600 0 200 400 600
� 70 70
Cd(II) Sorbent dose : 2 glL Co(D)
60 60
.. .. . . . .. .. - ·
-- _
Time : 3h
-- --
so pH :6.5 50
--- -- .... --
....
. .. . .. . -
40 40
30 + : Experimental 30
20 : Langmuir 20
: Scatchard
10 : Freundlich 10
0 0
0 100 200 300 400 0 200 400 600 800
Ce (mg/L)
Figure 36
Comparison of the model fit of various isotherms to the observed
isotherm data for the adsorption of Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II) and Cd(II) onto
Ceralite IRC-50 at 30°C
164
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
Table 12
Come_arison ol adsore_tion cae_acities (fl) with other adsorbents
Metal Adsorbent (! References
(m��)
Pb(II) Tea leaves 150.3 Singh et al, (1993)
Flax shive carbon 147.1 El-Shafey et al. (2002)
Condensed tannin 114.9 Zhan and Zhao (2003)
Marine algae 85.7 Jalali et al. (2002)
Sawdust 22.2 Taty-Costodes et al, (2003)
PGBS-COOH 185.3 Present work
Co(II) Soil 1.5 Rawat et al. (1996)
Styrene-g-polyethylene
25.0 Choi and Nho (1999)
membrane
Zeolite 85.0 Ebner et (ll. (2001)
Magnetite-silicate
9.4 Ebner et al. (2001)
composite
Cation exchange resin
86.2 Rengaraj and Moon (2002)
IRN 77
PGBS-COOH 166.7 Present work
Namasivayam and Periasamy
Hg(II) Pea nut hull carbon 109.9
(1993)
Sago waste activated
55.6 Kadirvelu et al. (2004)
carbon
Gebremedhin-Haile et al.
Modified zeolite 10.21
(2003)
PGBS-COOH 137.9 Present work
Cd(II) Flax shive carbon 39.1 El-Shafey et al. (2002)
Sawdust 19.1 Taty-Costodes et al. (2003)
Straw activated carbon 11.1 Larsen and Schierup (1981)
Bagasse fly ash 1.2 Gupta et al. (2003)
PGBS-COOH 65.9 Present work
165
Chapter4
Table 13
Composition of ch/or-alkali industry wastewater
Composition (mg/L)
Hg: 50; Pb: 2.7; Cd: 0.5; Mg: 25.6; Ca: 41.2; Na:
Sample I 280.8; P04 : 10.9; N03 : 16.5; NH4 : 20.7; Cl: 398.39;
BOD: 58.4; COD: 138.6; SS: 358.7.
Hg: 23.8; Pb: 3.1; Cd: 0.4; Mg: 34.8; Ca: 49.2; Na:
Sample 2 291.4; P04 : 11.7; N03 : 16.4; NH4 : 28.7; Cl: 342.34;
BOD: 78.8; COD: 231.4; SS: 352.6.
These types of equations can be used to predict the Hg(II) removal for any
PGBS-COOH dose within the particular experimental conditions. To test the
robustness of the relationship presented in Equation (4.36) and (4.37) the values of
R (% Hg(II) removal) for different ms values were calculated from the above
equations. The comparison of the observed and predicted values of R for different
values of ms is shown in Figure 37. In each case the experimental and predicted
values are in excellent agreement.
168
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
120
-
100
� 80 Equilibrium time : 4 h
0
Temperature: 30 °c
60 pH :6.5
Figure 37
Effect of adsorbent dose for the removal of Hg(II) from
chlor-alkali industry wastewater by PGBS-COOH
The effectiveness of the adsorbent material has been confirmed by treating it with
synthetic wastewaters containing Pb(II) and Cd(II) ions in the presence of other
cations and anions. Composition of synthetic wastewater for Pb(II) and Cd(II) is
given in Table 14. The effect of adsorbent dose on Pb(II) and Cd(II) removal by
PGBS-COOH is given in Figure 38. The percentage removal of metals was found
to increase with increase in mass of adsorbent. This may be due to the increase in
adsorbent surface area with increase in mass of adsorbent. Almost complete
removal of Pb(II) from 50 mL wastewater containing 10.0 mg/L was possible with
100 mg (2.0 g/L) of the adsorbent. But for Cd(II) the complete removal from 50
mL wastewater containing 10.0 mg/L was possible with 160 mg (3.2 g/L) of
169
Chapter4
Table 14
Composition of synthetic wastewaters
containing Pb(II) and Cd(ll)
Metal Composition
ions (mg/L)
Pb(Il) Pb2+: 10; Ca2+: 60; Mg2+: 14.0; Na+: 20.0; K+: 3.0; so/-: 170.0; Cl 1-:
30.0; N03 1-: 3.0; Si02 : 8.0; (pH: 6.5)
+ +
PGBS-COOH. Considering the presence of other ions like, Ca2+, Mg2 , Na and
K+, the amounts of PGBS-COOH needed for the complete removal of Pb(II) and
Cd(II) f.,.om the wastewater, are in good agreement with that obtained from the
batch experiments discussed above. Examination ofFigure 38 also reveals that at a
fixed metal concentration, the percentage removal increases with increasing
adsorbent dose. However, unit adsorption or adsorption per unit mass ofadsorbent
decreases and the effect is more pronounced at higher adsorbent dose. Adsorption
of Pb(II) per unit weight of adsorbent decreases from 7.48 mg/g (59.8 %) at 0.40
g/L of adsorbent to 2.08 mg/g (100 %) at 2.40 g/L and for Cd(II), adsorption
decreases from 3.61 mg/g (28.9 %) at 0.40 g/L ofadsorbent to 1.56 mg/g (100 %)
at 3.20 g/L for the synthetic wastewater under consideration. This is because, as
the dose of adsorbent (g/L) is increased, there is less commensurate increase in
adsorption resulting from the lower utilization of the adsorption capacity of the
adsorbent. The results of the experiment were utilized to develop a mathematical
relationship between percentage removal (R) and adsorbent dose (ms) [using
boundary conditions] with r2 values greater than 0.99 and is represented as
170
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
R = ms
3 (4.37)
(3.47 x 10- )+(8. 75 x 10- 3) ms
(4.38)
The above equations corresponding to Pb(II) (4.37) and Cd(II) (4.38) can be used
to predict the Pb(II) and Cd(II) removal R (%) for any PGBS-COOH dose (ms)
within the particular experimental conditions. To test the validity of the
relationship presented in the above equations, the values of R (%) for different ms
values were calculated from the above equations. The comparison of the observed
and predicted values of R for different values of ms is shown in Figure 38. The
experimental and predicted values are in excellent agreement and suggest the
effectiveness of the equations.
120
100
'$. 80
•
,.· Pb Cd
] 60 Theoretical: -
Experimental: <)
Initial concentration: 10 mglL
•
� 40 ,•
,-· Equilibrium time: 3 h
20 Temperature: 30 °c
pH:6.5
0
0.0 1� 2� 3� 4� 5�
Adsorbent dose (g/L)
Figure 38
Effect of adsorbent dose for the removal of Pb(II) and Cd(II)
from simulated wastewater by PGBS-COOH
171
Chapter4
Table 15
Composition of Co(Il) containing synthetic nuclear
power plant coolant water
Concentration of element
Compound
Element
chosen (mg/L)
Sample I Sample 2
Sb(V) Sb20s 5 5
Co(Il) Co(N03)2.6H20 10
Fe(III) Fe(N03)3 .9H20 30 30
Ni(II) Ni(N03)2.6H20 15 15
Ag(l) AgN03 5 5
B(III) H3B03 20 20
Cr(III) Cr(N03 )3 .9H20 4 4
Li(I) LiOH.H20 0.5 0.5
Cs(I) CsN03 0.5 0.5
172
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
Removal of Cr(III) and Ni(II) from nuclear power plant coolant water by
adsorption on PGBS-COOH was also studied. About 98.8 % Cr(III) and 99. l %
Ni(II) from Sample 1 and 96.3 % Cr(III) and 97.1 % Ni(II) from sample 2 were
observed at pH 6.5 and an adsorbent dose of 100 mg in 50 mL. The results clearly
indicate that PGBS-COOH can also be used to remove Cr(III) and Ni(II) from
aqueous solutions. Further work is now under way to establish the effectiveness of
PGBS-COOH in removing other toxic heavy metals from wastewaters.
120
100
80
Equilibrium time : 4 h
pH :6.5
60
studied using a batch reactor system. The regeneration of the adsorbent may make
the treatment process economical.
The PGBS-COOH loaded with the maximum amount of M(II) ions was placed
in the desorption medium and the amount of metal ions desorbed in 4 h was
measured. Solutions having different concentrations of NaN03, Na2C03 , Na2S04,
NaCl, NaCl-HCl and HCl were evaluated for the extraction of adsorbed M(II) from
spent adsorbent. In this study, the ability of HCl to desorb the metal uptake by
PGBS-COOH was found to be maximum. From further experiments, 0.2 M HCl
was found to be a good reagent for the desorption of metal from the adsorbent.
Desorption efficiency is defined as the percentage extraction of metal initially
loaded onto the PGBS-COOH. Figure 40 clearly shows that the PGBS-COOH can
be used repeatedly without significantly losing its adsorption capacity. As shown in
this figure with four adsorption/desorption cycles, the adsorption (%) decreased
from 99.7, 99.3, 99.8 and 90.5 % to 91.7, 91.1, 90.2 and 79.21 % for Pb(II), Co(II),
Hg(Il) and Cd(II) respectively from Cycles 1 to 4. On the other hand, recovery of
M(II) ions in 0.2 M HCl decreased from 97.8, 94.8, 94.3 and 79.2 % in the first
cycle to 89.8, 86.5, 88.7 and 71.2 % in the fourth cycle respectively for Pb(II),
Co(II), Hg(II) and Cd(II). The reduction in metal uptake in four cycles of
adsorption-desorption indicates that the binding sites on the surface of the
adsorbent were destroyed or morphologically altered on repeated exposure to a
strong acid environment. The initial mass of adsorbent, 0.1 g used at the first cycle
was reduced to <0.085 g over four cycles of adsorption-desorption, resulting in an
adsorbent loss of more than 15 %. The loss of adsorbent might have contributed to
the reduction in metal uptake though it is not known whether HCI has the ability to
rupture the structure of the adsorbent. Great care had been taken to minimize the
loss of adsorbent and require further investigation.
174
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ... ........
90
=
?f!. 80
e,
.5!
70
Q
� 60
i
Q
100 Cd(II) � : Adsorption
D: Desorption
Hg(II) � : Adsorption
D: Desorption
Q
< 90
80
70
60 ....___.___.__..__..__..._....._...._........._._....._................__.___.__.�..__..._..._...._.........__.___.__._
1 2 3 4 2 3 4
Cycle number
Figure 40
Four cycles of adsorption/desorption of
Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II) and Cd(II) onto/from PGBS-COOH
175
Chapter4
The equilibrium relationship between the adsorbed metal amount per unit mass of
the adsorbent (qe) and the residual metal ion concentration {Ce) in solution may be
represented by isotherm models like Langmuir or Freundlich as discussed earlier.
In the present adsorption studies of lead(II), cobalt(II), mercury(II) and
cadmium(II) onto PGBS-COOH, the adsorption equilibrium was established in 3 h
and then the adsorbed amount did not change with time (Figure 21 ). The efficiency
of metal ion removal can be improved if the solution is treated with separate small
batches of adsorbent rather than in a single-stage batch process. Mutli-stage batch
process is important to maximize economical operation but filtration and handling
costs increase rapidly. Consequently two-stage batch adsorption process is
practically sound. Adsorption in batch stirred reactors in series can be considered
as a multistage equilibrium operation depending on any of the equation
corresponding to an isotherm model.
As seen in Figure 41, if the same volume of solution (Vo) is treated at each
stage by the same amount of adsorbent (m) to reduce the solute (metal ion)
concentration of the solution from Co to C/, the material balances for the metal ion
are for Stage l is
{4.39)
(4.40)
where C/ and C/, are the equilibrium concentration after the l st and 2nd stages
respectively and q/ and q/ are the amount of metal ions adsorbed per unit mass of
the adsorbent at the l st and 2nd stage respectively.
176
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...... .....
(4.42)
The amount (q0) of metal adsorbed per unit mass of the adsorbent at the beginning
in each reactor is equal to 0.0. Equations (4.41) and (4.42) will provide the
operation lines passing through (q0, C0) and (qe 1, Ce 1 ) for the first stage and
(q0, Ce 1 ) and (q/, Ce2) for the second stage, respectively. Each slope is y = - m/V0,
i.e., the negative of the ratio of adsorbent quantity to wastewater volume. Since the
amounts of the adsorbent used in each stage are equal, the operation lines are
parallel.
m
Qo
Vo Vo Vo
I
Co
m
q/ q/
Figure 41
Schematic representation of a two-stage batch reactor
177
Chapter4
The equilibrium metal concentration of each stage can be found by using the
experimental equilibrium curve and operation line (Figure 42). To determine the
equilibrium metal ion concentration (Ce 1 ) in solution leaving the first reactor, the
initial metal ion concentration (Co) is located at the proper point on ordinate [q0=0,
C0 =300 mg/L each for Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II) and C0 = 150 mg/L for Cd(II)]; then
the operation line passing through (qo, C0) with a slope of -m/V0 is drawn
(Figure 42). In the present case since 0.1 g of the adsorbent is added to 50 mL of
the solution the slope is -2.0. According to Equation (4.41), the intersection
coordinates of the operation line with the equilibrium curve give qe 1, c/ The
second stage is constructed by locating Ce I on the ordinate and drawing a straight
line (the second operation line) from (qo, Ce 1) with the same slope. The ordinate of
the intersection point of this line with the equilibrium curve gives the metal ion
concentration C/ at equilibrium in the effluent from the second reactor. A similar
construction for the third reactor leads to the desired concentration C/ leaving the
third reactor if the required concentration limit has not been attained. The residual
Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II) and Cd(II) concentration leaving the second stages were
graphically found to be 15.2, 39.4, 58.5 and 15.0 mg/L respectively. The values of
q/ obtained from the operating lines corresponding to the second stage were found
to be 142.4, 130.3, 120.8 and 67.5 mg/g for Pb(II), Co(II), Hg(II) and Cd(II)
respectively at 30 °c. The qeI values of the metals corresponding to the first stage
of the metals were found to be closely agreeing with the qe values obtained from
the experiments and Langmuir equations.
The operational line thus helps in evaluating the theoretical number of stages
for the removal of M(II) ions from the wastewater. In the present study it was
found that M(II) would reduce virtually to 0.5 within three stages at 30 °c.
Additional research is warranted to examine the robustness of the above method
178
Kinetic and Equilibrium Models ...........
500 --����������--.500
Initial Pb(II) concn: 300 mg/L Initial Co(II) concn: 300 mg/L
Temperature: 30°C Temperature: 30°C
400 400
300 300
200 200
100 100
0 0
0 50 100 150 200 0 50 100 150
300 600
u Initial Cd(II) concn: 150 mg/L
Initial Hg(II) concn: 300 mg/L
°
250 Temperature: 30°C 500 Temperature: 30 C
200 400
150 300
100 200
50 100
0 0
0 15 30 45 60 75 0 50 100 150
Qe (mg/g)
Figure 42
Equilibrium curve and operation lines with mN0
slopes = -2.0 for Pb(II}, Co(II}, Hg(II) and Cd(II)
adsorption in two-stage batch reactors