Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Academic and Research Vice-Rector

Activity guide and evaluation rubric
Pre-task - Summary of course contents

1. General description of the course

Faculty or School of education

Academic Unit
Academic Level Professional

Academic Field Formación disciplinar

Course Name Technology in Teaching English as a Foreign

Language
Course Code 551006
Course Type Methodological Retak ye ☐ N ☒
e s o
exam
Number of 3
Credits

2. Description of the activity

Type of Individua Collaborativ Number

☒ ☐ 2
activity: l e of weeks
Evaluatio
Intermediat
n Initial ☒ ☐ Final ☐
e
moment:
Environment to submit the
Total score of the
activity: Monitoring and evaluation
activity: 25
environment.
Starting date of the
activity: February the 1st, Deadline of the activity: February
2020 the 14th, 2020

Competences to develop:
Argumentative, propositional and digital

Topics to develop: Unit 1 Using technology in Foreign Language

teaching.
Step, phase or stage of the learning strategy to develop

Pre-task. Summary of the content of the course. To create a

summary based on the contents of Unit 1.
Activities to develop

Individual activity

Read the structure of the complete course (topics, name of the

units, due dates) and create a summary answering to the
following questions:

1. What are the objectives of the course?

2. What does the course pretend to teach me?
3. What are the due dates and how am I going to fulfill the
objectives and tasks?
4. How many tasks do I have to develop?

Please answer the questions asked in the collaborative forum and

give feedback to your partners answers at least one colleague
before starting to create the summary of the course and /or
deliver it in the evaluation environment.

Upload a Word file in the evaluation environment with the

following name: nameofthestudent-groupnumber and the
following contents:

1. Personal details, including name, your ID number, group

number, title, course name, name of the university, name
of the program, city and date.
2. The summary
3. References

Environme
This activity will be developed individually, the final
nts for the
document must be submitted in the monitoring and
developme
evaluation environment.
nt of the
activity
Products
to be A word file that contains a summary of the
 reference read and personal details, (name, your ID
submitted number, group number, title, course name, name of
by the university, name of the program, city and date)
students and references.

3. General guidelines for the collaborative work

Compiler:
Puts together the final product and includes the
work done only by those who participated on time.
Informs the student in charge of alerts about
people who did not participate and will not be
included in the final product.

Reviser / editor:
Makes sure the written work follows all the criteria
established in the activity guide.

Roles to be Evaluator:
performed
Evaluates the final document to ensure it follows
by the
the evaluation criteria of the rubric and informs the
student in
the student in charge of alerts about any changes that
collaborati need to be made before delivering the product.
ve group
Submitter:
Student in charge of informing about the dates set
for presenting each task and delivering the final
product according to the course agenda. Also
informs other students that the final product has
been sent.

Alerts:
Informs group participants about any news in the
work being done and reports the delivery of the
final product to the course tutor. 
Roles and All the roles presented above are in charge of
duties for creating, revising, editing, submitting the final
the
submissio
n of
group’s product.
products
by
students
All references considered for this activity have to be
References
cited using APA Style
Plagiarism Students must be aware of the risks and penalties
policy in case of plagiarism.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions

that infringe the academic order, among others, are
the following: paragraph e) "Plagiarism is to
present as your own work all or part of a written
report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations
or lack of references, or it includes citations where
there is no match between these and the reference"
and paragraph f) " To reproduce, or copy for profit,
educational resources or results of research
products, which have rights reserved for the
University ". (Acuerdo 029 - 13 De Diciembre de
2013, Artículo 99)

The academic penalties that the student will face

are:

a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the

academic work or evaluation, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures
being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of
any nature, the score obtained will be zero (0.0),
without any disciplinary measures being derived.

To learn how to properly cite all your tasks, see the

following:
BibMe. (n.d.). APA Citation Guide. Retrieved from
http://www.bibme.org/citation-guide/apa/
 4. Evaluation rubric

Evaluation rubric
Activity Individual Collaborative
☒ ☐
type: Activity Activity
Evaluatio
n Initial ☒ Intermediate ☐ Final ☐
moment
Performance levels of the individual
Evaluate activity Scor
d items Average e
High score Low score
score
The student The student
answers to less does not
The student
than 4 answer to the
answers to the
questions in questions
4questions
the asked or
Answers asked in the
provided collaborative collaborative participates
forum. The later than 5 5
in the forum no poin
collabora longer than 3 answers are days in the
provided 3 collaborative ts
tive
days after it
forum days after the forum.
opens.
collaborative
forum opens.
(up to 5 (up to 3 (up to 0
points) points) points)
Feedback The student The student The student 15
gives feedback does not give does not give poin
to more than feedback to any feedback ts
one colleague any colleague in the
in the in the collaborative
collaborative collaborative environment.
forum or
forum 3 days
participates
before the
when the
activity closes. collaborative
forum is about
to close.
 (up to 15 (up to 7 (up to 0
points) points) points)
The summary The summary
The summary does not is not
contains the contain the developed.
answers to the answers to the
questions questions
asked and asked or it 5
Summary reflects a deep does not poin
understanding reflect a deep ts
of the course understanding
structure. of the course
structure.
(Up to 5 (Up to 3 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
25
Final score
Poin
ts