Case study analysis
Poor
Analysis of findings
Utilization of prior
learnings as well as review
of related literatures
Fair
1 pts
Poor
Analysis of findings as
described within the case
study scenario lacks depth
and/or connection. Student
makes few connections or
inappropriate connections
among findings, course
concepts and data gathered
in the given topic.
Poor
Unable to show
understanding of concepts
and failed to highlight
important points related to
the case scenario. Provides
Excellent
2 pts
Fair
Provides a thoughtful analysis
of findings in the case
scenario. Student connects
findings to clinical concepts;
however, specific quotes,
principles, or theories may be
lacking or examples may be
used inappropriately.
Connection of data presented
were minimally recognized or
organized by student
Fair
Shows understanding of the
case with more than
adequate output in the
discussion with the use of
pre-requisite readings and
3 pts
Excellent
Provides an in-depth, critical
analysis of Case Scenario.
Able to connect and
organized findings completely
with the used of appropriate
literature review. Students
insightfully and appropriately
connects findings to specific
clinical concepts, using
carefully selected quotes,
principles, and/or theories
cited from course readings.
Excellent
Illuminates knowledge and
insights to be gained from
case analysis. Able to provide
a complete discussion of the
finding with the used of pre-
 minimal output related to
pre-requisite readings and
prior learnings from anatomy
and physiology and other
related literature.
Poor
May present ideas in a
Overall Organization and
simplistic and/or repetitive
Presentation
fashion. Ideas may be
marginally developed or
poorly organized. Language
has an accumulation of errors
Equivalent Scoring
in mechanics, usage, and
Total Scores
sentence structure.
9-------- 10
8 -------- 9
6-7------ 8
4-5------ 7
3-------- 6
prior learnings from anatomy
and physiology and other
related literature.
Fair
Presents ideas in a way that
shows some depth and
complexity. Organization may
be somewhat inconsistent.
Ideas and language flow well
overall, but errors in
mechanics, usage, and
sentence structure distract
from the content.
requisite readings and prior
learnings from anatomy and
physiology. May even
highlight and put emphasis
on important points in the
case Recommends an
adequate outline of specific
and concrete action or steps
for application related to
history taking and physical
examination.
Excellent
Presents ideas thoughtfully
and in-depth. Ideas are
coherently and logically
organized. Has an effective,
fluent style, marked by
language that is generally
free from errors in
mechanics, usage, and
sentence structure.
NAME:
SECTION: